ObjectiveTo evaluate and synthesize the available experiences related to laparoscopic duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (LDPPHR) in the management of benign pancreatic head lesions. MethodsA retrospective review of the clinical data was conducted for 12 patients who underwent LDPPHR at the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (between January 2020 and December 2024). ResultsAll 12 patients successfully underwent LDPPHR. The surgical duration ranged from 138 to 479 min, with a mean of 336 min. Intraoperative blood loss varied between 40 and 700 mL, averaging 270 mL. The hospital stay varied from 11 to 51 d, with a mean duration of 21.5 d. Notably, none of the 12 patients required blood transfusions during the procedure. Of the 12 patients, 6 were diagnosed with a pancreatic fistula postoperatively, including 5 cases classified as grade A pancreatic fistula, and 1 cases of grade B pancreatic leakage. There were 2 cases of bile leakage and 1 case of gastric emptying disorder. No deaths occurred during the perioperative period. Postoperative pathological examination revealed: chronic pancreatitis witch main pancreatic duct stones in 8 cases, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with low-grade epithelial intraepithelial neoplasia in 3 cases, serous cystadenoma in 1 case. Postoperative follow-up was conducted for 10 patients, with follow-up durations ranging from 6 to 24 months. No recurrence was observed during the follow-up period, and no long-term complications such as diabetes, gastric emptying dysfunction, etc. were reported. ConclusionsLDPPHR offers several benefits, including minimal invasiveness, faster recovery, and enhanced postoperative quality of life for patients. It is safe and feasible for the treatment of benign lesions in the head of the pancreas.
ObjectiveTo investigate the role of local pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors.MethodThe clinical data of 45 patients with benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors who underwent local pancreatectomy from January 2014 to June 2019 in Union Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology were analyzed.ResultsForty-five patients underwent the local enucleation or resection with negative margin. The pathological results showed that there were 17 cases of solid pseudopapilloma, 5 cases of mucinous cystadenoma, 4 cases of serous cystadenoma, 10 cases of islet cell tumor, 5 cases of nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumor, 4 cases of congenital cyst. There were 6 cases of head of pancreas, 26 cases of body of pancreas, 8 cases of tail of pancreas, 5 cases of uncinate process. The tumor was 1.2 to 9.0 cm in diameter with an average of 3.2 cm. Among them, the diameter was more than 5.0 cm in 9 cases. The incidence of pancreatic fistula after operation was 57.8%, 65.4% was grade A fistula, 34.6% was grade B fistula, and no grade C fistula occurred. The incidence of abdominal infection was 13.3%, incidence of abdominal hemorrhage was 6.7%. There was no secondary diabetes mellitus and pancreatic endo- and exocrine dysfunction, and no death case.ConclusionsPancreatic enucleation for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors after strict preoperative evaluation can effectively preserve the pancreatic endocrine function of patients. Although the incidence of pancreatic fistula is high, it is mostly biochemical fistula, and the incidence of serious complications is low.
ObjectiveTo summarize the current status and update of the use of medical imaging in risk prediction of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).MethodA systematic review was performed based on recent literatures regarding the radiological risk factors and risk prediction of pancreatic fistula following PD.ResultsThe risk prediction of pancreatic fistula following PD included preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative aspects. Visceral obesity was the independent risk factor for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). Radiographically determined sarcopenia had no significant predictive value on CR-POPF. Smaller pancreatic duct diameter and softer pancreatic texture were associated with higher incidence of pancreatic fistula. Besides the surgeons’ subjective intraoperative perception, quantitative assessment of the pancreatic texture based on medical imaging had been reported as well. In addition, the postoperative laboratory results such as drain amylase and serum lipase level on postoperative day 1 could also be used for the evaluation of the risk of pancreatic fistula.ConclusionsRisk prediction of pancreatic fistula following PD has considerable clinical significance, it leads to early identification and early intervention of the risk factors for pancreatic fistula. Medical imaging plays an important role in this field. Results from relevant studies could be used to optimize individualized perioperative management of patients undergoing PD.
ObjectiveTo investigate the factors that affect the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP).MethodsThe clinical data of 114 patients underwent DP who were performed in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from Jan. 2014 to Jun. 2019, were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsIn this group of 114 patients, 43 cases (37.7%) of POPF occurred after DP, including 19 cases of grade A (biochemical fistula), 21 cases of grade B, and 3 cases of grade C. The univariate analysis results showed that: BMI value, drinking history, preoperative plasma albumin level, postoperative plasma albumin level, postoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), preoperative and postoperative prognostic nutrition index (PNI) levels were significant different between the POPF group and non-POPF group (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis results showed that: preoperative plasma albumin>35 g/L [OR=0.115, 95%CI was (0.038, 0.348)], postoperative plasma albumin>35 g/L [OR=0.126, 95%CI was (0.031, 0.516)], and postoperative NLR value≤6.65 [OR=0.149, 95%CI was (0.048, 0.461)] were the influencing factors of POPF after DP. The area under curve of postoperative NLR was 0.731 [95%CI was (0.639, 0.824)]. ConclusionPreoperative and postoperative plasma albumin>35 g/L, as well as postoperative NLR ≤6.65 are protective factors for POPF after DP, and postoperative NLR can be used as a predictor of POPF.
Objective To summarize risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy and to investigate clinical application of pancreatic fistula risk prediction system. Method The literatures of the risk factors and risk prediction of pancreatic fistula after the pancreaticoduodenectomy were collected to make a review. Results There were many risk factors for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy, including the patient’s own factors (gender, age, underlying diseases, etc.), disease related factors (pancreatic texture, diameter of pancreatic duct, pathological type, etc.), and surgical related factors (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, anastomosis, pancreatic duct drainage, etc.). The fistula risk prediction system after the pancreatoduodenectomy had a better forecast accuracy. Conclusions Occurrence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy is related to softness of pancreas and small diameter of pancreatic duct. Pancreatic fistula risk prediction system is helpful for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
ObjectiveTo investigate value of drainage fluid amylase content and other risk factors in predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).MethodsThe clinical data of 166 patients who underwent LPD in this hospital from January 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The independent risk factors of CR-POPF after LPD were analyzed. And the sensitivity and specificity of drainage fluid amylase content obtained on postoperative day 1 and 3 (Abbreviated as DFA1 and DFA3, respectively) in predicting CR-POPF by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.ResultsA total of 166 patients underwent LPD were collected in this study. The CR-POPF occurred in 16 (9.6%) patients and all of them were grade B. The DFA1 (P=0.037), DFA3 (P<0.001), and positive bacterial culture of drainage fluid after operation (P=0.020) were the independent risk factors of CR-POPF after LPD (P<0.05) by the logistic regression multivariate analysis. The area under the ROC curve of the DFA1 and DFA3 in predicting CR-POPF was 0.880 [95%CI (0.812, 0.949)] and 0.912 [95%CI (0.853, 0.971)] respectively, and the corresponding best critical value was 3 925 and 939 U/L, and the sensitivity was 100% and 100%, specificity was 64.0% and 70.7%, respectively.ConclusionFor patients with DFA1>3 925 U/L, DFA3>939 U/L, and positive bacterial culture of drainage fluid after operation, preventive measures should be made to avoid CR-POPF.
Objective To investigate the effect of the position of pancreatic duct in pancreatic section on postoperative pancreatic fistula. Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy admitted to the pancreatic surgery department of our hospital from September 2018 to August 2020 were retrospectively collected. The consistency between intraoperative pancreatic section data and preoperative CT cross-sectional images of pancreatic duct was compared, and the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression model analysis, to determine whether the position of pancreatic duct on pancreatic section during pancreaticojejunostomy had an impact on the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Results A total of 373 patients were included in this study. In 44 cases, the ratio of the thickness of the short distance from the center of the pancreatic duct to the edge of the pancreas at the pancreatic section was 0.41±0.09, and the imaging measurement value was 0.40±0.10. The interclass correlation coefficient detection value of the two measurement methods was 0.916 (>0.75), P<0.001, this had high consistency. Patients had a high BMI [OR=1.276, 95%CI (1.154, 1.411), P<0.000 1] and soft pancreatic texture [OR=2.771, 95%CI (1.558, 4.927), P=0.001] were independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula, while the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula decreased with the increased proportion of pancreatic duct thickness from center to edge [OR=0.875, 95%CI (0.840, 0.911), P<0.000 1]. Conclusions Patients with high BMI and soft pancreas are independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula, and the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula is reduced when the center of pancreatic duct is far from the edge of pancreas. The ratio of short distance from the center of pancreatic duct to the edge of pancreas to the total thickness of pancreas measured by preoperative imaging can be used to evaluate the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
ObjectiveTo explore effect of preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on clinically related postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) and analyze its influencing factors in order to provide a basis for clinical prediction of CR-POPF. MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of patients who successfully completed DP in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study from January 1, 2017 to January 31, 2021 were collected retrospectively. The preoperative PNI value was calculated and the optimal cut-off value was obtained according to the receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve. The patients were divided into low and high PNI based on the optimal cut-off value. The clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between the patients with low and high PNI and CR-POPF or not. At the same time, multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of CR-POPF. ResultsA total of 143 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study. The CR-POPF occurred in 33 cases (23.08%) after DP, and the average preoperative PNI was 52.26 (39.20–65.10), the optimal cut-off value of PNI was 50.55, with 49 cases in the low PNI group and 94 cases in the high PNI group. In patient with low PNI, the proportions of patients aged ≥65 years and with CR-POPF were higher than those with high PNI (P<0.05). In the patients with CR-POPF, the proportions of patients with soft pancreatic texture and with low preoperative PIN were higher than those without CR-POPF (P<0.05). Further, the multivariate logistic regression showed that the the preoperative low PNI (OR=5.417, P<0.001) and soft pancreatic texture (OR=4.126, P=0.002) increased the risk of CR-POPF. ConclusionLow preoperative PNI and soft pancreatic texture increase risk of CR-POPF after DP, and it is necessary to preoperatively evaluate PNI status of patients.
Objective To compare anastomotic fistula of modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods The clinical data of 147 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2015 to June 2017 in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively analyzed. The modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 101 cases (MTL group) and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 46 cases (IPJ group). The differences of intraoperative and postoperative statuses were compared between the two groups. Results The baseline data of these two groups had no significant differences (P>0.05). Except for the average time of the pancreaticoenterostomy of the MTL group was significantly longer than that of the IPJ group (P<0.05), the intraoperative blood loss, the first postoperative exhaust time, postoperative hospitalization time, reoperation rate, death rate, and rates of complications such as the pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, anastomotic bleeding, gastric emptying disorder, and intraperitoneal infection had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Both modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy are safe and effective. An individualized selection should be adopted according to specific situation of patient.
Objective To explore the influencing factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and to compare the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with internal drainage of main pancreatic duct and external drainage according to the pancreatic fistula risk score (FRS) system, to provide the basis for the best drainage scheme in clinic. Methods The clinical data of 76 patients with PD who treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2016 to December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively, to explore the risk factors of pancreatic fistula. Single factor analysis was based on group chi-square test or Fisher exact probability method, and multivariate analysis was based on unconditioned logistic regression model. According to the results of FRS, the difference of pancreatic fistula in different risk groups was explored. The statistical method was chi-square test. Results The incidence of pancreatic fistula after PD was 31. 5% in 76 patients.Univariate analysis showed that the diameter of the main pancreatic duct and the texture of the pancreas were the related factors affecting the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after PD (P<0.05), and the soft pancreas was the independent risk factor for the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after PD (OR=3.886, P=0.011). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula between the internal drainage group and the external drainage group (P>0.05). There was no pancreatic fistula occurred in the patients with negligible risk. The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with high risk of external drainage group was only 12.5%, comparing with patients in internal drainage group (63.6%), the difference was statistically significant (P=0.026). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula between patients in the external drainage group with moderate risk and low risk compared with the corresponding patients in the internal drainage group (P>0.05). Conclusions Pancreatic texture was an independent risk factor for pancreatic fistula after PD. External drainage maybe more effective than internal drainage in preventing pancreatic fistula after PD in patients with high risk of FRS.