Objective To analyze the difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic leakage and anasto-motic bleeding complications in various methods of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy （PD）. Methods The clinical data of 526 patients underwent pancreaticojejunostomy from January 2008 to September 2012 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. End-to-side “pancreatic duct to jejunum mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis （abbreviation：mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis） was performed in 359 patients， which contained 149 patients with internal drainage， 130 patients with external drainage， and 80 patients with no drainage. End-to-side invaginated anastomosis was performedin 165 patients without drainage. In addition， side-to-side anastomosis was performed in 2 patients without drainage.Results There were 34 cases （6.46%） of pancreatic leakage， 8 cases （1.52%） of anastomotic bleeding in pancreaticoje-junostomy， and 32 cases of death （6.08%）. ① The pancreatic leakage rate of mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis was signi-ficantly lower than that of end-to-side invaginated anastomosis 〔4.18% （15/359） versus 11.52% （19/165）， χ2=10.029， P=0.002〕. There was no significant difference of the anastomotic bleeding incidence between mucosa-to-mucosa anasto-mosis and end-to-side invaginated anastomosis 〔1.67% （6/359） versus 1.21% （2/165）， χ2=0.159， P=0.691〕. ② In the mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis group， the pancreatic leakage rates in the ones with internal drainage and external drainage were lower than those in the ones without drainage， respectively （2.68% （4/149） versus 11.25% （9/80）， χ2=7.132， P=0.008；1.54% （2/130） versus 11.25% （9/80）， χ2=9.410， P=0.002）；which was no significant difference between the ones with internal drainage and external drainage 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕. But there were no significant differences for both the pancreatic leakage 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕and anastomotic bleeding incidence 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕 between the ones with internal drainage and external drainage. Conclusions Mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis has a lower pancreatic leakage incidence as compared with end-to-side invaginated anastomosis. However， there is no significant difference of the anast-omotic bleeding incidence. Internal or external drainage could reduce the incidence of pancreatic leakage， but have no obvious effect to the anastomotic bleeding incidence.
ObjectiveTo prospectively study the effect of preventing postoperative reflux esophagitis with esophagogastrostomy and RouxenY gastrojejunostomy after proximal subtotal gastrectomy.MethodsTwentysix cases of carcinoma of the gastric fundus and cardia were allocated randomly to 2 groups (the control group with 12 cases and the experimental group with 14 cases) according to odd or even number of the admission number.After proximal subtotal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy, the control group underwent pyloroplasty while the experimental group with pyloruspreserving RouxenY gastrojejunostomy.The inflammatory reaction of the tissue obtained at the esophagogastric junction using a fiber gastroscope was observed after half year of postoperative followup in the two groups.An examination of gastric emptying of a radionuclidelabeled test meal were performed.According to the Visick score of followup data,the effects of operation were evaluated.The 5year survival rate was also evaluated.ResultsThe postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms in the experimental group were slighter than those in the control group.The examination of gastric emptying of a radionuclidelabeled test meal showed that the gastric emptying time of a half dose,gastric remains rates of radionuclide after 10 min and 60 min in the experimental group were similar to those in the control healthy people group.But in the control group,the gastric emptying time of a half dose delayed,and the gastric remains rate of radionuclide after 10 min and 60 min were higher than the other groups.The biopsy study of the esophagogastric junction showed that the inflammatory reaction in the experimental group was slighter than that in the control group.There was no significant difference between the two groups in the survival rate.ConclusionFor patients with carcinoma of the gastric fundus and cardia, after proximal subtotal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy,compared with pyloroplasty,pyloruspreserving RouxenY gastrojejunostomy can decrease the reflux esophagitis,and relieve the postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of antecolic duodenojejunostomy (ADJ) and retrocolic duodenojejunostomy (RDJ) after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADJ versus RDJ after PPPD were searched in Cochrane Library, PubMed database, Embase database, Web of Science, Chinese biomedicine database, CNKI database, VIP database, and Wanfang database from inception to April 2014, as well as Google. After quality assessment of RCTs according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version, Meta analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsFour RCTs of 462 patients in total were included in this Meta-analysis. The results of Meta-analysis showed that, there were no significant differences in the operation time (MD=14.02, 95% CI:-41.42-69.46, P=0.62), incidence of postoperative complications (RR=1.09, 95% CI:0.81-1.48, P=0.56), incidence of delayed gastric emptying (RR=0.63, 95% CI:0.31-1.28, P=0.20), incidence of pancreatic fistula (RR=1.13, 95% CI:0.72-1.75, P=0.60), incidence of abdominal abscess (RR=0.92, 95% CI:0.54-1.58, P=0.77), and mortality (RR=0.61, 95% CI:0.24-1.60, P=0.32) between ADJ group and RDJ group. ConclusionsThe effectiveness of ADJ is similar with RDJ after PPPD, so the reconstruction way after PPPD can be routed according to the surgeon's preference.
Objective To compare anastomotic fistula of modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods The clinical data of 147 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2015 to June 2017 in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively analyzed. The modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 101 cases (MTL group) and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 46 cases (IPJ group). The differences of intraoperative and postoperative statuses were compared between the two groups. Results The baseline data of these two groups had no significant differences (P>0.05). Except for the average time of the pancreaticoenterostomy of the MTL group was significantly longer than that of the IPJ group (P<0.05), the intraoperative blood loss, the first postoperative exhaust time, postoperative hospitalization time, reoperation rate, death rate, and rates of complications such as the pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, anastomotic bleeding, gastric emptying disorder, and intraperitoneal infection had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Both modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy are safe and effective. An individualized selection should be adopted according to specific situation of patient.
The secondary anastomotic stenosis is often occured from the repair and reconstructive operation of the injured bile duct. It is difficult to treat and the outcome is serious. In order to prevent this complication, the fibrin glue instead of traditional suturing technique combined with inner support was used. Fifty-four hybrid dogs were divided into 3 groups. Group A received Roux-en-y choledochojejunostomy with fibrin glue; group B received Roux-en-y choledochojejunostomy, with a fibrin glue combined support left permanently in the bile duct and group C received Roux-en-y choledocholejejunostomy with fibrin glue combined a support left temporarily in the bile duct. The amount of collagen in the scar was measured at 3/4, 3, 6, 9, 12 months respectively after operation. The results showed: 1. the mature period of scar was shortened from 12 months to 9 months when fibrin glue instead of suture was used in choledochojejunostomy; 2. the mature period of scar was further shortened from 9 months to 6 months when fibrin glue combined with inner support instead of fibrin glue was used in choledochojejunostomy. The conclusions were as follows: 1. fibrin glue could facilitate the healing of wound by inhibiting the formation of scar and accelerrate the maturation of scar; 2. when the inner support was used with fibrin glue in the operation, the mature period of scar could be further shortened; 3. the mechanism of action of the fibrin glue included minimizing the injury, avoiding foreign-body reaction, modifying organization of hematoma, preventing formation of biliary fistular and enhancing intergration and cross-linkage of collagen.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified triple-layer(MTL) duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and with resection of jejunal serosa, analyse the risk factors of pancreatic fistula, and compare effects with two-layer(TL) duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. MethodsData on 184 consecutive patients who underwent the two methods of pancreaticojejunostomy during standard PD between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2013 were collected retrospectively. The risk factors of pancreatic fistula were investigated by using univariate and multivariate analyses. ResultsA total of 88 patients received TL and 96 underwent MTL. Rate of pancreatic fistula for the entire cohort was 8.2%(15/184). There were 11 fistulas(12.5%) in the TL group and four fistulas(4.2%) in the MTL group(P=0.039). Body mass index, pancreatic texture, pancreatic duct diameter, and methods of pancreaticojejunostomy had significant effects on the formation of pancreatic fistula on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm and TL were the significant risk factors of pancreatic fistula. ConclusionsMTL technique effectively reduced the pancreatic fistula rate after PD in comparison with TL, especially in patients with pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm.
Objective To evaluate the linkage between the proxmal as well as long term outcome and choice of therapeutical modality for benign hilar stricture of bile duct prospectively. Methods 25 patients have been catergorized into 4 groups according to different pathogen and the proxmal as well as long term outcome after pathogen based management have been studied prospectively. Results The hepatic portal cholangio-jejunostomy applied for iatrogenic hilar stricture of bile duct has been proved to be effective and the incidence of refulux cholangitis is only 10%(1/10). Hepatic hilar plasty procedures keep the physiological entitity of bile duct and the vital, sufficient autologous repair materials as well as reliable operation design are needed. Resection of atrophic right liver lobe bearing hepatolithiasis combined hepatic hilar plasty has reached both elimination of liver focus and maintaining the physiological entitity of bile duct. The ballon dilation for mild ring-like hilar stricture of bile duct is valide but not for hilar tubular stricture of secondary sclerosing cholangitis.Conclusion The strategy of individualized management (pathogen based management) for benign hilar stricture of bile duct has proved to be reliable and effective.
Objective To investigate the effect of the position of pancreatic duct in pancreatic section on postoperative pancreatic fistula. Methods The clinical data of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy admitted to the pancreatic surgery department of our hospital from September 2018 to August 2020 were retrospectively collected. The consistency between intraoperative pancreatic section data and preoperative CT cross-sectional images of pancreatic duct was compared, and the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression model analysis, to determine whether the position of pancreatic duct on pancreatic section during pancreaticojejunostomy had an impact on the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Results A total of 373 patients were included in this study. In 44 cases, the ratio of the thickness of the short distance from the center of the pancreatic duct to the edge of the pancreas at the pancreatic section was 0.41±0.09, and the imaging measurement value was 0.40±0.10. The interclass correlation coefficient detection value of the two measurement methods was 0.916 (>0.75), P<0.001, this had high consistency. Patients had a high BMI [OR=1.276, 95%CI (1.154, 1.411), P<0.000 1] and soft pancreatic texture [OR=2.771, 95%CI (1.558, 4.927), P=0.001] were independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula, while the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula decreased with the increased proportion of pancreatic duct thickness from center to edge [OR=0.875, 95%CI (0.840, 0.911), P<0.000 1]. Conclusions Patients with high BMI and soft pancreas are independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula, and the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula is reduced when the center of pancreatic duct is far from the edge of pancreas. The ratio of short distance from the center of pancreatic duct to the edge of pancreas to the total thickness of pancreas measured by preoperative imaging can be used to evaluate the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
ObjectiveTo investigate the application of imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy in pure laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsEighty-five cases of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from May 2014 to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. According with inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, 78 cases were investigated. They were divided into pancreatic duct-to-jejunum mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy group as controlled group (n=42) and imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy (technique of duct-to-mucosa PJ with transpancreatic interlocking mattress sutures) group as modified group (n=36). The rates of pancreatic fistula, abdominal infection/abscess, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal/intraabdominal hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, and incision infection were investigated as well as hospital stays and pancreaticojejunostomy time in two groups were compared. ResultsThe rate of pancreatic fistula especially B to C grade pancreatic fistula in the modified group was obviously lower compared with which in the controlled group (8.3% vs. 31.0%, P < 0.05), pancreaticojejunostomy time ofmodified group was significantly shortened [(35.6±12.4) min vs. (52.8±24.6) min, P < 0.05] and total operative time also shortened [(322.4±23.6) min vs. (384.2±30.2) min, P < 0.05). There were no significant difference of the rates of abdominal infection/abscess, bile leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrointestinal/intraabdominal hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, ?incision infection, and hospital stays (P > 0.05)]. Conciusions The type of pancreaticojejunostomy has a significant impact on the rate of pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy can decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula after operation, and shorten the pancreaticojejunostomy time and total operative time.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of transorally inserted anvil (OrVilTM) for laparoscopic total gastrectomy compared with open total gastrectomy.MethodsRetrospectively summarized the 285 gastric cancer patients from the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between December 2012 and April 2018, of them 156 patients underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy (being reconstructed by OrVilTM) via 129 patients underwent open total gastrectomy. Operation-associated parameters and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe intraoperative blood loss was significantly less, proximal resection margin was significantly longer, and first ambulatory time, time to first flatus, time to fluid diet were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic total gastrectomy group (P<0.05). Whereas the total operative time, esophagojejunostomy time, numbers of dissected lymph nodes, time to remove drainage tube, length of postoperative hospital stay, and morbidity of postoperative complication (including anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, anastomotic bleeding, celiac and pleural effusion or infection) were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionOrVilTM is a technically safe and feasible surgical procedure for esophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy.