ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of treatments for β-coronaviruses.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) of treatments for β-coronaviruses from inception to June 17th, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using Stata 14.0 software.ResultsA total of 109 studies invoving 23 210 patients were included. The results of the systematic review showed that compared with standard of care, corticosteroids could reduce mortality and increase cure rate for COVID-19. However, chloroquine could decrease cure rate. In severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) patients, corticosteroids could decrease the cure rate. In Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) patients, ribavirin/interferon/both drugs showed higher mortality.ConclusionsThe currently limited evidence shows that corticosteroids may be effective to COVID-19 patients while having limited effects on SARS patients. Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine may have negative effects on COVID-19 patients. Ribavirin/interferon may be harmful to MERS patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo investigate the prevention and control measures and procedures for surgical operation safety during the outbreak of new coronavirus pneumonia.MethodsAfter interpreting the diagnosis and treatment plan of new coronavirus pneumonia, the prevention and control plan of new coronavirus pneumonia, and the technical guidelines for prevention and control of new coronavirus pneumonia infection in medical institutions, we formulated and improved the prevention and control measures and procedures for surgical safety in our hospital.ResultsA total of 567 patients were operated in our hospital from January 22, 2020 to February 10, 2020, including 501 were operated in the surgical center and 66 were operated in the interventional center. Among all the cases, there were 303 emergency operation and 264 scheduled or limited operation. In the emergency operation, the top three were 130 cases of caesarean section (42.9%), 63 cases of abdominal digestive system operation (20.8%) and 31 cases of skull operation (10.2%). In the scheduled or limited operation, the top four were 65 cases of benign diseases of the eye (24.6%), 57 cases of tumor (21.6%), 53 cases of orthopedic surgery (20.1%), and 25 cases of coronary angiography (9.4%). All the patients were successfully completed the operation and recovered well after the operation. No serious surgical complications or infection-related complications occurred.ConclusionDuring the outbreak of new coronavirus pneumonia, surgery and epidemic prevention and control can be carried out by adjusting and optimizing measures and procedures.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) describes a physiological state of end-organ hypoperfusion characterized by reduced cardiac output in the presence of adequate intravascular volume. Mortality still remains exceptionally high. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) has become the preferred device for short-term hemodynamic support in patients with CS. ECMO provides the highest cardiac output, complete cardiopulmonary support. In addition, the device has portable characteristics, more familiar to medical personnel. VA ECMO provides cardiopulmonary support for patients in profound CS as a bridge to myocardial recovery. This review provides an overview of VA ECMO in salvage of CS, emphasizing the indications, management and further direction.
This study reports the surgical treatment of a female patient at age of 64 years with novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) latent infection complicated with esophageal foreign body perforation with no significant changes in the lung CT. The patient was confirmed as SARS-CoV-2 infection on the 4th day after surgery and then was transferred into the Department of Infectious Disease in our hospital for treatment. This case has guiding value for the operation of thoracic surgery during the outbreak of novel coronavirus pneumonia.
ObjectiveTo provide recommendations for the management of intensive care unit patients without novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).MethodsWe set up a focus group urgently and identified five key clinical issues through discussion. Total 23 databases or websites including PubMed, National Guideline Clearing-House, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and so on were searched from construction of the library until February 28, 2020. After group discussion and collecting information, we used GRADE system to classify the evidence and give recommendations. Then we apply the recommendations to manage pediatric intensive care unit in the department of critical care medicine in our hospital. ResultsWe searched 13 321 articles and finally identified 21 liteteratures. We discussed twice, and five recommendations were proposed: (1) Patients should wear medical surgical masks; (2) Family members are not allowed to visit the ward and video visitation are used; (3) It doesn’t need to increase the frequency of environmental disinfection; (4) We should provide proper health education about the disease to non-medical staff (workers, cleaners); (5) Medical staff do not need wear protective clothing. We used these recommendations in intensive care unit management for 35 days and there was no novel coronavirus infection in patients, medical staff or non-medical staff. ConclusionThe use of evidence-based medicine for emergency recommendation is helpful for the scientific and efficient management of wards, and is also suitable for the management of general intensive care units in emergent public health events.
ObjectiveTo compare the mortality in lung cancer patients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) versus other cancer patients infected with COVID-19. MethodsA computer search of PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang database, VIP database and CNKI database was conducted to compare the mortality of lung cancer and other cancers patients infected with COVID-19 from the inception to December 2021. Two thoracic surgeons independently screened the literature, extracted data, and then cross-checked the literature. After evaluating the quality of the included literature, a meta-analysis was performed on the literature using Review Manager 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 12 retrospective cohort studies were included, covering 3 065 patients infected with COVID-19, among whom 340 patients suffered from lung cancer and the remaining 2 725 patients suffered from other cancers. Meta-analysis results showed that the lung cancer patients infected with COVID-19 had a higher mortality (OR=1.58, 95%CI 1.24 to 2.02, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis results showed that the mortality of two groups of patients in our country was not statistically different (OR=0.90, 95%CI 0.49 to 1.65, P=0.72). Whereas, patients with lung cancer had a higher mortality than those with other cancers in other countries (Brazil, Spain, USA, France, Italy, UK, Netherlands) (OR=1.78, 95%CI 1.37 to 2.32, P<0.001). ConclusionThere is a negligible difference in mortality between lung cancer and other cancers patients who are infected with COVID-19 in our country; while a higher mortality rate is found in lung cancer patients in other countries. Consequently, appropriate and positive prevention methods should be taken to reduce the risk of infecting COVID-19 in cancer patients and to optimize the management of the infected population.
A novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that broke out at the end of 2019 is a newly discovered highly pathogenic human coronavirus and has some similarities with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the receptor for infected cells by SARS-CoV. SARS-CoV can invade cells by binding to ACE2 through the spike protein and SARS-CoV-2 may also infect cells through ACE2. Meanwhile, ACE2 also plays an important role in the course of pneumonia. Therefore the possible role of ACE2 in SARS and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is worth discussing. This paper briefly summarized the role of ACE2 in SARS, and discussed the possible function of ACE2 in COVID-19 and potential risk of infection with other organs. At last, the function of ACE2 was explored for possible treatment strategies for SARS. It is hoped to provide ideas and theoretical support for clinical treatment of COVID-19.
To systematically and retrospectively analyze Chinese exploration of novel coronavirus pneumonia, including emergency command, medical treatment, health and disease prevention, resource scheduling and other aspects, in order to provide references for the prevention and treatment of global infectious diseases.
When a clustered coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic occurs, how to prevent and control hospital infection is a challenge faced by each medical institution. Under the normalization situation, building an effective prevention and control system is the premise and foundation for medical institutions to effectively prevent and control infection when dealing with clustered epidemics. According to the principles of control theory, medical institutions should quickly switch to an emergency state, and effectively deal with the external and internal infection risks brought by clustered epidemics by strengthening source control measures, engineering control measures, management control measures and personal protection measures. This article summarizes the experience of handling clustered outbreaks in medical institutions in the prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019, and aims to provide a reference for medical institutions to take effective prevention and control measures when dealing with clustered outbreaks.
ObjectiveTo construct a rapid screening tool for the donor of heart dead organ donation (donation after circulatory death, DCD) in the background of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection.MethodsBased on literature analysis and core group discussion, two rounds of expert consultation were carried out by Delphi method to establish dimension and index.ResultsThe screening tool included 3 dimensions, including epidemiological history, hospital exposure history, and clinical manifestations, with 15 entries. The mean of the two rounds of expert authority coefficient was 0.757 and 0.768, and the effective recovery rate of the expert consultation questionnaire was 88% and 100%, respectively. The second round dimension and index coordination coefficients was 0.417 and 0.319, respectively. The content validity of the questionnaire was 0.91.ConclusionsThe DCD liver transplant donor's new rapid screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection is scientific and reliable. During the epidemic period, the DCD liver transplant donor risk screening tool is of great significance to the prevention and control of liver transplantation risk.