ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) for postoperative overall and severe complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in the elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of the elderly (65 years old or more) patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PD were retrospectively collected, who were admitted to the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from January 2017 to October 2021. The incidences of postoperative overall and severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ–Ⅴ was defined as severe complications) were summarized. The univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze whether GNRI was a risk factor for overall and severe complications after PD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the ability of GNRI to distinguish whether overall or severe complications occurred after PD and to confirm the optimal threshold. Then the patients were assigned into a high nutritional risk group (greater than the optimal threshold) and low nutritional risk group (the optimal threshold or less) based on this. Simultaneously, the clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared. ResultsIn this study, 190 elderly patients with pancreatic cancer were enrolled, 95(50.0%) of whom developed complications, including 28(29.5%) cases of serious complications. The results of multivariate logistic regression model analysis showed that the decreased GNRI was a risk factor for the occurrence of overall and severe complications after PD for the elderly patients [OR(95%CI)=0.361(0.154, 0.848), P=0.019; OR(95%CI)=0.906(0.834, 0.983), P=0.018]. The AUC of GNRI for assessing the occurrence of overall and severe complications was 0.765 and 0.715, respectively, with the optimal critical values of 98 and 96, respectively. Compared with the low nutritional risk group, the high nutritional risk group had higher postoperative total hospitalization costs (Z=–2.37, P=0.019), higher occurrences of overall complications (χ2=44.61, P<0.001) and severe complications (χ2=29.39, P＜0.001). ConclusionsIn elderly patients with pancreatic cancer underwent PD, incidence of serious complications is not lower. GNRI has a good discriminative value in terms of postoperative overall and severe complications. When preoperative GNRI is 98 or less and GNRI is 96 or less, patients should be given early preoperative nutritional support treatment in time.
ObjectiveTo compare the short- and long-term efficacy of artery-first approach pancreatico-duodenectomy (AF-PD) and standard approach pancreaticoduodenectomy (S-PD).MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang, and CNKI databases were searched, relevant literatures were included, and relevant data were extracted for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 30 articles were included, including 2 750 cases underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The results of meta-analysis showed that in terms of short-term efficacy when compared with S-PD group, the AF-PD group had less intraoperative blood loss (WMD=–175.87, P<0.001), lower intraoperative blood transfusion rate (OR=0.36, P=0.002), higher R0 resection rate (OR=1.83, P<0.001), lower postoperative pancreatic leakage rate (OR=0.71, P=0.005), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD=–2.69, P=0.007). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the operation time and overall postoperative complication rate between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of long-term efficacy when compared with S-PD group, the AF-PD group had lower tumor local recurrence rate (OR=0.43, P=0.004) and tumor liver metastasis rate (OR=0.60, P=0.010), but had higher 1-year (OR=1.95, P=0.007), 2-year (OR=2.04, P<0.001), 3-year (OR=2.09, P=0.001), and 5-year (OR=2.06, P=0.003) overall survival rates, and there were no significant differences in the rates of lung metastasis and peritoneal metastasis between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsAF-PD is better than S-PD in some short-term and long-term outcome indicators such as R0 resection rate, pancreatic leakage rate, overall survival rate, and so on. However, due to the limited quality of the included literatures, more high-quality studies are still needed to verify in the future.
Objective To investigate the risk factors and preventions of functional delayed gastric emptying (FDGE) after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD). Methods The clinical data of 41 patients after undergoing PPPD between 2003 and 2009 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively.Results In all 41 cases, postoperative complications developed in 13 patients (31.7%), in which 7 patients developed FDGE (17.1%). The complications excluding FDGE (P=0.010) and diabetes (P=0.024) had remarkable relations with the FDGE in the univariate analysis; Compared with the non-FDGE patients, the albumin was declined obviously (P=0.020) while the serum direct bilirubin increased significantly (P=0.036) in the FDGE patients, while the development of FDGE had relation only with the albumin (P=0.039) and the complication of diabete (P=0.047) by the binary logistic regression analysis. Conclusion In the patients undergoing PPPD, preoperative control of the blood glucose, preoperative correction of hypoproteinemia and hyperbilirubinemia, and centralizing PPPD in high-volume have possibly positive significance for the prevention of FDGE.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy between laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in treatment of carcinoma of head of pancreas. MethodsClinical data of 60 patients with locally advanced carcinoma of head of pancreas who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from October 2004 to October 2009 were collected, of which 26 patients were in LPD group and 34 patients were in OPD group. ResultsOperative time and hospitalization expense of patients in LPD group were both longer or more than those of OPD group (P<0.05), but blood loss, time of starting activity, time of aeration, time of pulling out the drainage tube, time of pulling out the stomach tube, time of absolute resting on bed, and hospitalization time in LPD group were all shorter or lower than those of OPD group (P<0.05). There were 25 patients suffered with postoperative complications, including 10 patients in LPD group and 15 patients in OPD group, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in total incidence of postoperative complication (P>0.05). But in the specific postoperative complication, the incidences of pancreatic fistula and biliary fistula of LPD group were higher than those of OPD group (P<0.05), but incidences of incision infection, pulmonary infection, and systemic infection were all lower than those of OPD group (P<0.05). All patients were followed up for 1-60 months with the median time of 21.5 months. During the follow-up period, in LPD group, 24 patients suffered with recurrence, 20 patients suffered with tumor metastasis, and 24 patients died; in LPD group, 31 patients suffered with recurrence, 25 patients suffered with tumor metastasis, and 31 patients died. There were no significant difference between the 2 groups in the recurrence rate, metastasis rate, mortality, and survival situation (P>0.05). ConclusionsFor carcinoma of head of pancreas, postoperative recovery and infection complications of LPD are significantly superior than those of OPD. But compared with the OPD, it has no obvious advantage in reducing the pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, delayed gastric emptying, and other complications, and it also has no obvious advantage in improving the long-term survival situation too.
ObjectiveTo summarize the application status and prospect of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).MethodThe relevant literatures about studies of LPD at home and abroad were reviewed.ResultsLPD was a difficult operation, mainly suitable for pancreatic head and periampullary benign and malignant tumors. With the development of laparoscopic techniques in recent years, LPD combined the superior mesenteric vein and portal vein resection and reconstruction, or combined multi-visceral resection was feasible, but the survival benefit of LPD with arterial resection and reconstruction and extended lymph node dissection remained to be discussed. At present, there was no clear requirement on the way to reconstruct the pancreatic fluid outflow tract, but the pancreaticojejunostomy for digestive tract reconstruction was chose by the most surgeons. The most studies had confirmed that LPD was minimally invasive and had a short-term prognosis that was not inferior to that of open pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, the results of large sample analysis about long-term survival rate and oncology results were lacking, so it was difficult to judge the advantages and disadvantages of long-term prognosis of the two methods.ConclusionsLPD is a safe, feasible, reasonable, and effective surgical method. With improvement of laparoscopic technology, LPD is expected to become a standard operation method for treatment of pancreatic head cancer and periampullary carcinoma, and oncology benefits of LPD will be further confirmed in future by large-sample clinical randomized control trials and studies of long-term prognosis follow-up.
Objective To explore the feasibility of clinical application of hepatic artery （HA） or proper hepatic artery （PHA） anastomosing with superior mesenteric artery （SMA） and internal iliac vein （IIV） anastomosing with superior mesenteric vein （SMV） or portal vein （PV） in the extended pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with vascular resection．Methods The HA，PHA，SMA， SMV， PV， and IIV were dissected on 20 adult corpses， and the length， thickness，and lumen diameter of blood vessels were measured and compared with the results of multislice spiral CT scan，magnetic resonance angiography，or color Doppler in 25 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma．The extended pancreaticoduodenectomy was carried out on 5 patients of pancreatic head carcinoma with vascular invasion according to the mathcing results，and the reconstructions of HA or PHA with SMA and IIV with SMV or PV were performed．Results According to autopsy，HA-PHA was （5.50±1.50） cm in length，（0.20±0.01） mm in thickness，（5.02±1.32） mm in lumen diameter；and SMA was （4.00±1.00） cm in length，（0.21±0.01） mm in thickness，（6.05±1.06） mm in lumen diameter．The lumen diameter of left IIV，right IIV，and PV or SMV was （11.06±0.16） mm，（11.10±0.13） mm，and （11.56±0.20） mm，respectively．The thickness of left IIV，right IIV，and PV or SMV was （0.10±0.01） mm，（0.10±0.02） mm，and （0.10±0.02） mm，respectively．The multislice spiral CT scan，magnetic resonance angiography，color Doppler，and selective arteriography in vivo showed that the thickness and lumen diameter of HA-PHA and SMA were wider （0.1 mm and 0.3 mm） than those of the autopsy results，and there were no statistic significances （P＞0.05），but the length of HA-PHA was longer （1－2 cm） than that of SMA，and there was statistic significance （P＜0.05）. The survival of 5 patients with extended pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with PHA or SMA and IIV-PV/SMV resection and reconstruction was longer than that of palliative surgery patients or giving-up patients at the same period，and no long-term complications occurred．Conclusions The vascular invasion of pancreatic head carcinoma is not an absolute contraindication of radical pancreaticoduodenectomy．The survival of 5 patients with vascular invasion of pancreatic head carcinoma in this group is prolonged by extended pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with vascular resection and reconstruction as compared with palliative surgery group at the same period．HA，PHA，and IIV are the best autologous vascular alternative materials without more complications． Being familiar with regional anatomy will guide the surgeons in extended pancreaticoduodenectomy.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of antecolic duodenojejunostomy (ADJ) and retrocolic duodenojejunostomy (RDJ) after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD). MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) of ADJ versus RDJ after PPPD were searched in Cochrane Library, PubMed database, Embase database, Web of Science, Chinese biomedicine database, CNKI database, VIP database, and Wanfang database from inception to April 2014, as well as Google. After quality assessment of RCTs according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version, Meta analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsFour RCTs of 462 patients in total were included in this Meta-analysis. The results of Meta-analysis showed that, there were no significant differences in the operation time (MD=14.02, 95% CI:-41.42-69.46, P=0.62), incidence of postoperative complications (RR=1.09, 95% CI:0.81-1.48, P=0.56), incidence of delayed gastric emptying (RR=0.63, 95% CI:0.31-1.28, P=0.20), incidence of pancreatic fistula (RR=1.13, 95% CI:0.72-1.75, P=0.60), incidence of abdominal abscess (RR=0.92, 95% CI:0.54-1.58, P=0.77), and mortality (RR=0.61, 95% CI:0.24-1.60, P=0.32) between ADJ group and RDJ group. ConclusionsThe effectiveness of ADJ is similar with RDJ after PPPD, so the reconstruction way after PPPD can be routed according to the surgeon's preference.
ObjectiveTo summarize of clinical application and progress of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR).MethodThe relevant literatures published recently at domestic and abroad about the clinical application and progress of DPPHR were collected and reviewed.ResultsFor the benign lesions, low-grade malignancies and borderline tumors of the head of pancreas, the DPPHR could achieve the same expected therapeutic effect as the classical pancreatoduodenectomy. The DPPHR could reserve the continuity of stomach and duodenum while resecting lesions and improve the symptoms of patients, reduce the reconstruction of digestive tract and the resection of pancreas and surrounding tissues as much as possible, and retain the pancreas-intestinal axis, which was more in line with the physiology of human beings.ConclusionsAt present, DPPHR is worthy of further development and promotion in department of pancreas surgery, but current studies only focus on occurrence of short-term complications after operation. Because patients with benign diseases of pancreatic head have better prognosis and longer survival time after operation, we should pay attention to the long-term complications such as diarrhea, anemia and reflux cholangitis. More clinical studies need in future to be demonstrated superiority of DPPHR in clinical efficacy and to evaluate occurrence of long-term complications and their impact on quality of life of patients with DPPHR by comprehensive analysis of multiple evaluation indicators.
Objective To explore the hepatic artery variations encountered in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) surgery and its significance. Methods The clinical datas of 26 patients who underwent LPD from January 2020 to January 2023 were retrospectively collected. Preoperative evaluation of hepatic artery variability and its types based on relevant clinical and imaging data, as well as targeted measures taken during surgery, and patients’ prognosis were analyzed. Results According to preoperative abdominal enhanced CT, arterial computer tomography angiography imaging and intraoperative skeletonization of the hepatoduodenal ligament, hepatic artery variation was found in 9 of 26 patients undergoing LPD. The left hepatic artery was substituted in 1 case, the right hepatic artery was substituted in 2 cases, 2 cases were the left accessory hepatic artery, and the common hepatic artery originated from the superior mesenteric artery in 3 cases. There was 1 case, right hepatic artery coming from the abdominal aorta, whose arterial variation was not included in the traditional typing. The variant hepatic artery from superior mesenteric artery was separated by posterior approach during operation, and the variant hepatic artery from left gastric artery was separated by anterior approach during operation. Nine patients with hepatic artery variation recovered well after operation, and no serious complications occurred. Conclusions Various hepatic artery variations during LPD need to be carefully evaluated before surgery. During surgery, it should be determined whether to retain the mutated blood vessel based on its diameter and changes in liver blood flow after occlusion, so that reasonable operation can be performed during the operation to avoid hepatic artery damage.
Objective To compare anastomotic fistula of modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods The clinical data of 147 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2015 to June 2017 in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University were retrospectively analyzed. The modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 101 cases (MTL group) and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy were used in 46 cases (IPJ group). The differences of intraoperative and postoperative statuses were compared between the two groups. Results The baseline data of these two groups had no significant differences (P>0.05). Except for the average time of the pancreaticoenterostomy of the MTL group was significantly longer than that of the IPJ group (P<0.05), the intraoperative blood loss, the first postoperative exhaust time, postoperative hospitalization time, reoperation rate, death rate, and rates of complications such as the pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, anastomotic bleeding, gastric emptying disorder, and intraperitoneal infection had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Both modified triple-layer duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and end-to-end invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy are safe and effective. An individualized selection should be adopted according to specific situation of patient.