ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of incision closure device in laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy. MethodsThe clinical data of 130 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from Oct. 2014 to Feb. 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the methods of gallbladder suture, 130 cases were divided into two groups, 72 cases underwent traditional manual suture (MS group), and 58 cases underwent incision closure device (ICD group). The operative time, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time, bleeding volume, postoperative hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, complications, and postoperative 6-12 months follow-up of patients in 2 groups were observed.Results One hundred and thirty cases were performed laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy successfully. The operative time and postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time of ICD group were significantly shorter than those of MS group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The hospitalization expenses of the patients in ICD group were significantly higher than those in the MD group (P < 0.05). There were no significant difference between the two groups in the bleeding volume and postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05). The patients were followed up for 6-12 months, with an average of 8 months, and no complications occurred and stone recurrence. ConclusionIncision closure device can shorten the time of laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy and postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function, but the cost is higher. Next development, still need decrease the expend and strengthen clinical promotion.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LP) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in treating large (>2 cm) renal pelvic calculi.MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LP with PNL for the treatment of large renal pelvic calculi from inception to September 23th, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.2 software.ResultsFive RCTs with 447 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with PNL group, LP group provided a significantly higher stone-free rate (RR=1.07, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.13, P=0.01), lower auxiliary procedure rate (RR=0.36, 95%CI 0.13 to 1.01, P=0.05), less hemoglobin decrease (MD=–0.83, 95%CI –1.05 to –0.61, P<0.000 01) and lower postoperative fever rate (RR=0.36, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.72,P=0.004). However, no significant differences were detected in conversion rate (RR=0.76, 95%CI 0.19 to 3.07, P=0.70), blood transfusion rate (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.14, to 1.12, P=0.08), postoperative leakage rate (RR=1.87, 95%CI 0.67 to 5.21, P=0.23), operative time (MD=10.49, 95%CI –17.14 to 38.13, P=0.46) and hospital stay (MD=0.53, 95%CI –0.22 to 1.28, P=0.17).ConclusionsLP is superior to PNL with regard to stone-free rate, auxiliary procedure rate, hemoglobin decrease and postoperative fever rate. Due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo explore the value of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy on hepatolithiasis patients with previous bile duct surgery contraindicating hepatectomy. MethodsEighty-six hepatolithiasis patients contraindicating hepatectomy accepted laparoscopic choledocholithotomy during March 2009 and March 2013 in the department of general surgery, AVIC 363 hospital. Among them, 26 cases with previous bile duct surgery(PBS group) and 60 cases without (NPBS group), 15 cases with left intrahepatic bile duct stone, 52 cases with right intrahepatic bile duct stone, and 19 cases with bilateral intrahepatic bile duct stone. Perioperative materials were reviewed between two groups retrospectively. ResultsThe operation time of the PBS group and NPBS group was(161.4±31.5) min and(155.7±28.1) min respectively(P > 0.05). And the intraoperative blood loss of them was(69.2±50.7) mL and(44.1±27.4) mL respectively (P < 0.05). Postoperative complication incidence of PBS group was 53.8%, among them, ascites was found obviously much more in PBS group than that in NPBS group(P < 0.05). The general residual stone incidence of two groups was 15.1%, and the general stone clearance rate was 98.8%. The long term postoperative complication occurrence in PBS group was 23.1%, which was higher significantly than that in NPBS group(P<0.05). ConclusionLaparoscopic choledocholithotomy is a safe, effective thus feasible choice for hepatolithiasis patients with previous bile duct surgery, especially for those without hepatic atrophy, bilateral hepatic bile ducts stone with hepatic bile duct stricture and hepatic bile duct stone with coexisting biliary cirrhosis.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy and surgical techniques of laparoscopic choledocholithotomy and primary suture. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 58 patients who underwent laparoscopic choledocholithotomy and primary suture between January 2009 and December 2014. ResultsAll the 58 patients underwent the surgery successfully. Operation time was 45-125 minutes, averaging 75 minutes. Intraoperative blood loss was between 10 and 50 mL with an average of 20 mL. Postoperative hospital stay was 5-14 days with an average of 7 days. Four cases of biliary leakage were cured by conservative treatment. ConclusionWith operation indications strictly grasped and skillful operation techniques, laparoscopic choledocholithotomy and primary suture are safe and reliable with a good curative effect.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the third-generation super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) for the treatment of kidney calculi with diameter of ≤2.5 cm and CT value of ≥700 Hu, and discuss the feasibility of adopting the technology in primary hospitals.MethodsThe clinical data of 64 patients with unilateral kidney calculi (CT value ≥700 Hu, diameter ≤2.5 cm) treated in the People’s Hospital of Leshan Central District between July 2017 and July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. After random assignment, 30 patients were treated with SMP and 34 were with mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL). The pre-, intra-, and post-operative data were compared and analyzed to evaluate the efficacy and safety.ResultsThe unilateral lesion operations of both groups were successfully completed in the first phase. All patients were given double J tubes after operation, and there were no major complications such as post-operative hemorrhage and sepsis. There was no statistically significant difference in the post-operative hemoglobin decrease, post-operative immediate stone removal rate, post-operative stone removal rate after one month, or the rate of procalcitonin >0.1 μg/L between the two groups (P>0.05). The differences in the lithotripsy time [(29.63±6.28) vs. (25.21±5.19) minutes], post-operative hospital stay [(5.33±0.61) vs. (9.44±0.96) days], rate of indwelling renal fistula (3.3% vs. 50.0%), analgesic demand rate (10.0% vs. 58.8%), and postoperative infectious fever rate (6.7% vs. 26.5%) between SMP group and MPCNL group were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionsSMP has the advantages of less trauma, low systemic inflammatory response syndrome incidence, less pain, quick rehabilitation, short hospital stay, tubeless after surgery, etc. It is worthy of extensive promotion in primary hospitals.
摘要:目的:探討后腹腔鏡輸尿管切開取石術治療嵌頓性輸尿管結石的臨床價值和技術要點。 方法:2006年12月至 2009年3月,對58例嵌頓性輸尿管中上段結石采用后腹腔鏡輸尿管切開取石術,術中取石后于鏡下直接置入雙J管,間段縫合輸尿管切口。 結果:58例手術均獲成功,無中轉開放手術,結石清除率100%。術后創腔引流液量少,3～5d拔除引流管,1周出院,術后3周膀胱鏡下拔除雙J管。隨訪1～27個月,B超復查顯示腎積水明顯好轉或消失,無結石復發。 結論:后腹腔鏡輸尿管切開取石術治療嵌頓性輸尿管結石具有創傷小\療效好、術后恢復快等特點,明顯優于開放手術及其它手術,值得推廣應用。Abstract: Objective: To summarize our experience and evaluate the outcome of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy of the upper ureter impacted stone. Methods: Between December 2006 and March 2009, 58 patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy of the upper ureter. After removal of the stones, the double J was put in and interrupted suture was performed for upper ureter. Results: Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy was successful in all patients, there was neither ureteral stricture nor recurrent calculus, the blood loss ranged from 510 mL, without urine leakage occurred.The mean hospital stay was 7 days, after 3 weeks double J was removed by cystoscopy. With 127 months followup, the hydronephrosis relieved and no recurrence of ureter calculus founded. Conclusion:Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy is a safe and effective minimally invasive operation, and worth to generalization.
Objective To evaluate the clinical application value of the tauro ursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) for preventing the relapse of lithiasis after the gallbladder-protected lithotomy. Methods Totally 80 cholecyslithiasis patients in Chengdu General Military Hospital who met the demand of lithotomy in protecting gallbladder were divided into two groups by random permutations, with 40 patients in each. The calculus was removed by using the percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy in order to preserve the well-functioning gallbladder. The patients in the trial group were given TUDCA after surgery for two years, whereas the patients in the control group received the same nursing and diet therapies without medication. The thickness of gallbladder wall and the contraction function of gallbladder were checked two years after surgery, the statistics of the recurrence rate of liary calculus symptoms and cholecyslithiasis were conducted, and the comparison between those two groups was performed. Results All the operations of gallbladder-protected lithotomy were successful. There was significant difference between those two groups two years after surgery in terms of the thickness of gallbladder wall and the contraction function of gallbladder (Plt;0.05). The relapse of lithiasis was remarkably decreased in the trial group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion The application of TUDCA for patients with gallbladder-protected lithotomy can prevent the relapse of cholecyslithiasis.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of transurethral ureteroscopy lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi. MethodsWe electronically searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2013), PubMed (1966 to 2013.8), EMbase (1990 to 2013.8), CNKI (1949 to 2013.9), CBM (1978 to 2013.9), VIP (1989 to 2013.8) and WanFang Data (1990 to 2013.8) for the randomized controlled studies (RCTs) related to retroperitoneoscopy ureterolithotomy versus transurethral ureteroscopy lithotripsy for upper ureteral calculi. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and evaluated methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 1 410 patients (transurethral ureteroscopy lithotripsy:747 cases; etroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy:663 cases) were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, transurethral ureteroscopy lithotripsy was lower than retroperitoneoscopy ureterolithotomy in success rates of surgery (OR=0.26, 95%CI 0.14 to 0.51), 3-day stone clearance rates (OR=0.06, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.11), and 1-month stone clearance rates (OR=0.21, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.53), while it showed superiority in operation time (MD=-22.35, 95%CI-35.29 to-9.41) and postoperative hospital stay (MD=-1.84, 95%CI-3.44 to-0.24). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi, transurethral ureteroscopy lithotripsy causes less operation time and postoperative hospital stay, but it had no advantage in success rates of surgery, 3-day stone clearance rates, and 1-month stone clearance rates.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of flexible ureteroscope lithtripsy (fURL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in treating renal calculus. Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, VIP, and WanFang Data from January, 1990 to August, 2012 were searched to comprehensively collect the clinical trials that compared fURL and PCNL in treating renal calculus. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to exclusion and inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results Eight non-randomized controlled trials involving 536 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, PCNL was better than fURL in stone clearance (OR=0.26, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.46), but fURL was better than PCNL in postoperative pyrexia (OR=0.1, 95%CI 0.42 to 3.35), the incidence of blood transfusion (OR=0.17, 95%CI 0.03 to 1.00), and the duration of hospitalization (P=0.45, I2=0%). Conclusion Current evidence has proved that PCNL is better than fURL in decreasing stone clearance, fURL is better than PCNL in complication, the duration of hospitalization, and medical costs.
ObjectiveTo explore the application value of lithotomy position in the treatment of tibial shaft fracture with closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation.MethodsThe clinical data of 78 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated with closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation between January 2015 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 33 patients were treated with lithotomy position (trial group) and 45 patients were treated with traditional supine position (control group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in general data such as gender, age, the cause of injury, the interval between injury and admission, the interval between injury and operation, and fracture type and site (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, the number of patients with open reduction, postoperative incision infection, and fracture healing were recorded. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Harris score were used to evaluate the effectiveness.ResultsBoth groups of operations were successfully completed. The trial group was superior to the control group in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and the number of patients with open reduction (P<0.05). Incision infection occurred in 1 case (3.03%) of the trial group and 3 cases (6.67%) of the control group after operation. The difference in the incidence of infection was significant (χ2=0.139, P=0.045). The incisions of other patients healed by first intention. X-ray film reexamination showed that the fractures of the two groups healed. The fracture healing time of the trial group was (5.30±1.33) months, while that of the control group was (5.98±1.80) months, with no significant difference (t=?1.815, P=0.073). There was no significant difference in VAS score, Harris scores of knee joint and ankle joint between the two groups before operation and at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation (P>0.05). At 3 days after operation, the VAS score was lower in the trial group than in the control group, and the Harris scores of knee joint and ankle joint were higher in the trial group than in the control group, and the differences were significant (P<0.05).ConclusionApplication of lithotomy position in closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation for tibial shaft fracture is favorable for fracture reduction, with less bleeding, shorter operation time, and fewer fluoroscopy.