Objective To observe the effects of intravitreal injection of conbercept for aggressive posterior retinopathy of prematurity (AP-ROP). Methods It is a retrospective case study. Twenty-one patients (40 eyes) with AP-ROP were enrolled in this study. There were 9 males (18 eyes) and 12 females (22 eyes), with the mean gestational age of (28.30±1.79) weeks and the mean birth weight of (1 021.40±316.70) g. All the lesions of 40 eyes were located in posterior zone, with 24 eyes in zone I and 16 eyes in zone II. All the eyes were treated with intravitreal injection of conbercept 0.025 ml (0.25 mg). During follow-up, nonresponders or patients with deterioration were retreated with intravitreal injection of conbercept or photocoagulation; patients with progressive deterioration to stage 4 had received vitrectomy. At the 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 weeks after treatments, the disappearance or decrease of retinal vessel tortuosity and neovascularization, and the growth of the normal retinal vessels toward the peripheral retina were evaluated. Results Thirty-six eyes were cured for only one injection, the cured rate was 90.00%. However, 2 eyes (5.00%) had progressed to stage 4 with contractive retinal detachment, which underwent vitrectomy. Two eyes (5.00%) had received twice injections, whose remaining avascular zone area treated by photocoagulation. No major systemic or ocular complications after injection appeared. All lens remained transparent and no iatrogenic retinal hole was occurred during the follow-up. Conclusion Intravitreal injection of conbercept is effective in the treatment of AP-ROP.
Objective To investigate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with intravitreal bevacizumab on wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods In this retrospective study, 34 eyes (28 cases) diagnosed with wet AMD received PDT combined intravitreal injection of bevacizumab, including 25 eyes with classic CNV and 9 eyes with minimally classic CNV by fluorescein angiography; On optical coherence tomography (OCT), 23 eyes showed intraretinal fluid (IRF) and 11 eyes presented subretinal fluid (SRF). After signing informed consent, all patients underwent initial standard PDT followed by intravitreal bevacizumab (1.25 mg) within succeeding 3 to 7 days. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and OCT with routine eye examinations were evaluated monthly. Additional bevacizumab (1.25 mg) was injected intravitreally if new or increasing fluid appreciated on OCT, or BCVA lowered more than 5 letters even with stabilized fluid. Injection was discontinued if no fluid was showed on OCT (quot;dry macularquot;), or BCVA was stabilized even with fluid after two consecutive injections. BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT) were analyzed and compared between baseline and 6 month follow-up. The correlation between parameters such as baseline BCVA, greatest linear dimension (GLD), type of CNV, SRF or IRF and posttreatment BCVA will be analyzed. The injection number of bevacizumab and complications were recorded. Results Compared to baseline, BCVA improved (9.4plusmn;10.2) letters and reach 44.9plusmn;21.3 letters (t=5.438，P＜0.01) and CRT decreased (184.6plusmn;214.6) mu;m (t=4.810，P＜0.01) at 6 month visit. The average of injection number was 1.9plusmn;0.9 (including initial injection of combination therapy). With multiple lineal regression analysis, only baseline BCVA correlated to posttreatment BCVA at 6 month visit (r=0.802.P＜0.01). The type of CNV, GLD, SRF or IRF on OCT and CRT at baseline were not associated to post-treatment BCVA (r=0.053, -0.183, 0.139 and 0.053, respectively.P＞0.05). BCVA of eyes with SRF (14.7 letters) increased more than eyes with IRF (6.9 letters) on OCT (t=-2.207，P=0.035). The change of BCVA after treatment (t=-0.076), change of CRT (t=-1.028) and number of injections (Z=-1.505) were not different between classic CNV and minimally classic CNV (P＞0.05). The change of CRT (t=-0.020) and number of injections (Z=-0.237) did not present difference between SRF and IRF (P＞0.05). The change of BCVA (t=1.159) and number of injections (Z=-1.194) were not correlated to whether residual fluid or not at 6 month visit (P＞0.05). No severe complications were noticed during follow-up.Conclusion For wet AMD patients, PDT combined intravitreal bevacizumab could improve visual acuity, reduce retinal thickness and control CNV progress in a short-term.
ObjectiveTo observe the effect of intravitreal injection of conbercept in the treatment of retinopathy of premature (ROP) and to analyze the factors related to the therapy.MethodsA retrospective study. A total of 57 patients (57 eyes) with pre-threshold type 1 (30 patients, 30 eyes), threshold ROP (21 patients, 21 eyes) and acute aggressive posterior ROP (APROP, 6 patients, 6 eyes)) from premature infants by retinal screening in Henan Provincial People’s Hospital during October 2017 and June 2018 were enrolled in this study. All children were received routinely intravitreal injected 10 mg/ml conbercept 0.025 ml (0.25 mg) within 24 hours after diagnosis. Fundus examination was performed 7 days after injection. The interval of examination was 1?3 weeks according to fundus conditions. The mean follow-up was 30.1±4.6 weeks. For patients with relapse or no response to treatment, repeated intravitreal injection of conbercept or laser photocoagulation therapy was given. The retinal blood vessels of the affected eyes were observed. Logistic stepwise regression analysis was used for the correlation test of multiple factors.ResultsAmong 57 eyes, 49 eyes and 8 eyes were treated with 1 or 2 times of intravitreal injection of conbercept. After 24 weeks of treatment, in 57 eyes, 26 eyes were cured (45.6%), 22 eyes improved (38.6%), 8 eyes relapsed (14.0%), and 1 eye aggravated (1.8%). The recurrence time was 12.9±4.5 weeks after the first injection, and the corrected gestational age was 49.0±6.7 weeks. There were significant differences in initial injection time, lesion range among the cure, improved and recurrence eyes (F=5.124, 7.122; P＜0.01, ＜0.01). Parameters of ROP condition, including ROP diagnosis (pre-threshold type 1, threshold and APROP), zone (zone 1 and 2), stage (stage 2 and 3) and plus lesions, were significant different among the cure, improved and recurrence eyes (χ2=11.784, 14.100, 6.896, 9.935; P＜0.01, ＜0.01, ＜0.05, ＜0.01). Logistic stepwise regression analysis showed that the recurrence rate was correlated with ROP zone, more likely recurrence at zone 1 than zone 2 (Wald=9.879, OR=27.333, P=0.002). No injection-related complications such as endophthalmitis, cataract and glaucoma were found during treatment and follow-up period.ConclusionsIntravitreal injection of conbercept is effective in the treatment of ROP without obvious adverse reactions. Lesion zoning is associated with recurrence after treatment.
ObjectiveTo analyze the influencing factors on clinical response to conbercept for diabetic macular edema (DME).MethodsA total of 51 patients (51 eyes) with DME who underwent intravitreal injection of conbercept were included in this retrospective study. The general information (age, sex, body mass index, smoking history, drinking history), blood glucose indicators (duration of diabetes, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c), blood pressure indicators (history of hypertension, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure), lipid indicators [total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), apolipoprotein A (APOA)], biochemical indicators [neutrophil concentration, hemoglobin (HB), serum creatinine (Scr)] were collected. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and macular central macular thickness (CMT) before and after treatment were comparatively analyzed. CMT reduced not less than 20% and BCVA increased by 2 lines as effective standards. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the factors affecting the efficacy of intravitreal injection of conbercept in patients with DME.ResultsUnivariate analysis showed that diastolic blood pressure, HDL, serum neutrophil concentration, baseline CMT and baseline BCVA were associated with edema regression (P＜0.05); HbA1c was associated with vision improvement (P＜0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there was a history of smoking (OR=0.122, 95% CI 0.017 ? 0.887), low diastolic blood pressure (OR=0.850, 95%CI0.748 ? 0.966), low HDL (OR=0.007, 95%CI 0.000 1 ? 0.440), thin baseline CMT (OR=0.986, 95%CI0.977 ? 0.995) were independent risk factors for failure outcome of edema regression (P＜0.05); long duration of diabetes (OR=1.191, 95%CI 1.011 ? 1.404), high APOA (OR=1.007, 95% CI 1.000 ? 1.013) were independent risk factors for failure outcome of vision improvement. Age, fasting blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, TC, HB, Scr and other indicators had no effect on the efficacy of edema regression and vision improvement after treatment (P＞0.05).ConclusionsSmoking history, long duration of diabetes, low diastolic blood pressure, low HDL level, high APOA level and thin baseline CMT are independent risk factors for the treatment of DME with intravitreal injection of conbercept.
The introduction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy represents a landmark in the management of wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, as a new therapy, several problems such as durability of the therapeutic effects, medication side effects, and medication selection have emerged. We should make appoint of improving the therapeutic effect and safety by realizing the limitation of the therapy, monitoring the clinical potential adverse reactions of anti-VEGF agents, and recommending individualized treatment.
The therapeutic effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) was determined by a number of factors. Comprehensive thorough analysis of clinical features, imaging results and treatment response can predict the potential efficacy and possible vision recovery for the patient, and also can optimize the treatment regime to make a personalized therapy plan. Precise medicine with data from genomics, proteomics and metabolomics study will provide more objective and accurate biology basis for individual precise treatment. The future research should focus on comprehensive assessment of factors affecting the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy, to achieve individualized precise diagnosis and treatment, to improve the therapeutic outcome of nAMD.
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of intravitreal injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody ranibizumab in choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathologic myopia (PM). Methods This is a prospective, uncontrolled, open-label study. 34 eyes of 34 patients with CNV secondary to PM were included in the study. All affected eye were treated with intravitreal ranibizumab 0.05 ml (10 mg/ml). Before the injection, bestcorrected visual acuity of early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS), noncontact tonometer, ophthalmoscope, fundus photography, fundus fluorescein angiograph (FFA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination were necessary. The initial average letters of ETDRS acuity were 33.85plusmn;14.67, range from 0 to 69. The initial average central macular thickness (CMT) was（293.41plusmn;79.45） m, range from 210 m to 543 m. The patients were followed up for 3 to 12 months. Best-corrected visual acuity, OCT and ophthalmoscope examination were assessed monthly. If necessary, FFA was used. The letters of ETDRS acuity and CMT were compared before and after treatment. Results All eyes received an average of 1.68 injections, the final vision of follow-up increased （13.50plusmn;9.94） letters than before （t=7.92，P=0.00）, CMT decreased （71.14plusmn;72.26） m (t=4.62，P=0.00). There were no systemic or ocular serious side effects during the follow up. Conclusion Intravitreal ranibizumab for pathologic myopia choroidal neovascularization showed visual acuity improvement, retinal thickness reduction and safety.
Objective To compare the efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab and bevacizumab in the treatment of pathological myopia choroidal neovascularization (PM-CNV). Methods It is a retrospective case study. Seventy-nine patients (79 eyes) with PM-CNV were enrolled in this study. There were 26 males (26 eyes) and 53 females (53 eyes), with the mean age of (30.77±5.53) years. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, slit lamp microscope, fundus color photography, fundus fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed. BCVA was recorded as logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). The central retinal thickness (CMT) was measured by OCT (Cirrus HD-OCT). The eyes were divided into bevacizumab treatment group (38 eyes) and ranibizumab treatment group (41 eyes). There was no difference of the mean logMAR BCVA, intraocular pressure and CMT between two groups (t=?0.467, ?1.983, 1.293;P=0.642, 0.051, 0.200). The eyes in bevacizumab treatment group were treated with bevacizumab 0.05 ml (1.25 mg), and the eyes in ranibizumab treatment group were treated with ranibizumab 0.05 ml (0.5 mg). Times of injection between two groups were compared. The changes of intraocular pressure were observed at 1, 7 days and 1 month after treatment. The changes of logMAR BCVA and CMT at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment and systemic adverse reactions occur were compared. Results At the 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment, the mean logMAR BCVA of the bevacizumab treatment group and the ranibizumab treatment group was significantly improved than that before treatment (F=132.374,P＜0.01). There was no significant difference in the mean logMAR BCVA at different time points between the two groups (F=0.095,P=0.759). The mean CMT of the two groups was lower than that before treatment (F=151.653,P＜0.01). There was no significant difference in the mean CMT between the two groups (F=0.332,P=0.566). No retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, cataract and persistent high intraocular pressure were associated with drug, injection-related eye and systemic adverse events during follow-up. Seven eyes had conjunctiva bleeding after treatment, 11 patients (11 eyes) complained of shadow floaters after treatment. Conclusion Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab or ranibizumab can equally effectively improve the visual acuity and reduce the CMT of PM-CNV patients.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal injections of conbercept in choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathologic myopia (PM). MethodsA retrospective case series of 37 eyes of 37 patients affected with CNV secondary to PM treated by intravitreal injections of Conbercept. All the patients were examined with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart, central macular thickness (CMT) of optical coherence tomography (OCT)at baseline. The initial average letters of ETDRS BCVA was 49.86±8.87, CMT was (306.38±31.01) μm. All eyes were treated with intravitreal Conbercept 0.05 ml (10 mg/ml). Follow-up visits were performed monthly after injection. The mean follow-up time was 16.8 months. Injections were repeated according to the situation of BCVA, CMT, subretinal fluid and CNV leakage in follow-up. All eyes received an average of 4.8 injections. BCVA, CMT and ophthalmoscope examination were assessed monthly. The relationship of BCVA improvement and CMT reduction with the data at baseline and number of treatments were analyzed by Spearman Rho correlation respectively. ResultsDuring the 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, the mean BCVA were all improved with statistically significant difference (t=17.629, P < 0.01).At 12 months, 15 eyes (45.9%) had improvement of 15 letters or more, 32 eyes (86.5%) had improvement of 5 letters or more, and 1 eye (2.7%) had decreased more than 5 letters. During the 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, the mean CMT were all decreased with statistically significant difference (F=43.726, P < 0.01). At 12 months, the retinal fluid of 34 eyes (91.9%) were absorbed completely; 33 eyes (89.2%) had angiographic closure at that time. There was no significant relevance between BCVA improvement and sex, age and course of the disease (P > 0.05), but a significant negative correlation was found between the BCVA improvement and BCVA at baseline, injection times (P < 0.05). There was no significant relevance between CMT reduction and sex, age, course of the disease and injection times (P > 0.05), but a significant positive correlation was found between CMT reduction and CMT at baseline (P < 0.05). There were no systemic or ocular serious side effects during the follow up. ConclusionsIntravitreal injections of Conbercept showed BCVA improvement and CMT reduction. It appeared to be effective and safe for choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia. Intravitreal Conbercept for CNV secondary to PM showed BCVA improvement, CMT reduction and safety.
Objective To study and compare the clinical efficacy between intravitreal conbercept injection and (or) macular grid pattern photocoagulation in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods Ninety eyes of 90 patients diagnosed as macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO were enrolled in this study. Forty-eight patients (48 eyes) were male and 42 patients (42 eyes) were female. The average age was (51.25±12.24) years and the course was 5–17 days. All patients were given best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, slit lamp with preset lens, fluorescence fundus angiography (FFA) and optic coherent tomography (OCT) examination. The patients were divided into conbercept and laser group (group Ⅰ), laser group (group Ⅱ) and conbercept group (group Ⅲ), with 30 eyes in each group. The BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) in the three groups at baseline were statistically no difference (F=0.072, 0.286;P=0.930, 0.752). Patients in group Ⅰ received intravitreal injection of 0.05 ml of 10.00 mg/ml conbercept solution (conbercept 0.5 mg), and macular grid pattern photocoagulation 3 days later. Group Ⅱ patients were given macular grid pattern photocoagulation. Times of injection between group Ⅰ and Ⅲ, laser energy between group Ⅰ and Ⅱ, changes of BCVA and CMT among 3 groups at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after treatment were compared. Results Patients in group Ⅰ and Ⅲ had received conbercept injections (1.20±0.41) and (2.23±1.04) times respectively, and 6 eyes (group Ⅰ) and 22 eyes (group Ⅲ) received 2-4 times re-injections. The difference of injection times between two groups was significant (P＜0.001). Patients in group Ⅱ had received photocoagulation (1.43±0.63) times, 9 eyes had received twice photocoagulation and 2 eyes had received 3 times of photocoagulation. The average laser energy was (96.05±2.34) μV in group Ⅰ and (117.41±6.85) μV in group Ⅱ, the difference was statistical significant (P=0.003). BCVA improved in all three groups at last follow-up. However, the final visual acuity in group Ⅰ and group Ⅲ were better than in group Ⅱ (t=4.607, –4.603;P＜0.001) and there is no statistical significant difference between group Ⅲ and group Ⅰ (t=–0.802,P=0.429). The mean CMT reduced in all three groups after treating for 1 week and 1 month, comparing that before treatment (t=–11.855, –10.620, –10.254;P＜0.001). There was no statistical difference of CMT between group Ⅰand Ⅲ at each follow up (t=0.404, 1.723, –1.819, –1.755;P=0.689, 0.096, 0.079, 0.900). CMT reduction in group Ⅰ was more than that in group Ⅱ at 1 week and 1 month after treatments (t=–4.621, –3.230;P＜0.001, 0.003). The CMT in group Ⅲ at 3 month after treatment had increased slightly comparing that at 1 month, but the difference was not statistically significant (t=1.995,P=0.056). All patients had no treatment-related complications, such as endophthalmitis, rubeosis iridis and retinal detachment. Conclusions Intravitreal conbercept injection combined with macular grid pattern photocoagulation is better than macular grid pattern photocoagulation alone in treating macular edema secondary to non-ischemic BRVO. Combined therapy also reduced injection times comparing to treatment using conbercept injection without laser photocoagulation.