Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is effective in the treatment of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and its applicable population is also gradually expanding, but it carries risk of ischemic and bleeding events, which underscores the importance of optimizing adjuvant antithrombotic regimens. The release of the 2022 version of Chinese expert consensus on antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation has promoted the standardized and safe development of antithrombotic therapy after TAVR in China. Combined with the latest progress of antithrombotic therapy after TAVR, from emphasizing ischemia and bleeding risk assessment, single-agent antiplatelet therapy for patients without anticoagulation indications, the selection of antithrombotic strategies for patients with other antithrombotic indications, antithrombotic strategy changes in postoperative valve thrombosis and bleeding events, this article interprets this consensus.
ObjectiveTo compare and analyze the clinical effects of two kinds of frame design valves after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 124 patients who underwent TAVR and were followed up for 1 year. There were 71 males and 53 females aged 75.57±6.21 years. These patients were treated with Venus-A or Edwards Sapien aortic valves. The hemodynamics and cardiac function of these two kinds of transcatheter aortic valves (THV) were evaluated by echocardiography. The 30-day mortality and 1-year clinical effect of the patients were calculated.ResultsEight-one patients used Venus-A valve and 43 patients used Edwards Sapien valve. The aortic valve transaortic pressure gradient was reduced and the rate of perivalvular leakage was low (both 2.6%) in both groups, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups. The implantation rate of permanent pacemaker was 17.3% and 11.6%, respectively. The 1-month survival (94.0% and 93.0%) and 1-year survival (94.0% and 91.0%) rates were not statistically different.ConclusionThe two groups of THV with different stent structures have good short-term clinical effect and low implantation rate of permanent pacemaker.
We reported a case of a 61-year-old female patient, six years status post her last cardiac surgery, who was admitted with a chief complaint of bilateral lower extremity edema for over a year, which had acutely worsened with associated chest pain for two days. The patient had a complex cardiac surgical history: 12 years prior, she underwent double valve replacement (aortic and mitral) plus tricuspid valvuloplasty for mitral valve prolapse with severe regurgitation and moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation. Nine years ago, she underwent bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement and vegetation removal for prosthetic valve vegetation with severe regurgitation. Six years ago, she underwent a transapical transcatheter mitral valve replacement and mitral balloon valvuloplasty due to prosthetic mitral valve prolapse with severe regurgitation. Following evaluation during this admission, she successfully underwent a valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV-TAVR). The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery. This case report aims to explore the clinical strategy and application of the ViV-TAVR technique for managing bioprosthetic valve failure in patients with a history of complex valvular surgeries.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a common theraputic option for aortic stenosis, but the evidence for precise anatomy for TAVR is accumulating. This paper presents the case of an 71-year-old female patient who had an extremely high risk of coronary obstruction due to both coronary ostia lying too low. The patient underwent TAVR with the help of coronary protection successfully. During the procedure, the patient was protected with wires only for both coronaries. After deployment, angiofluoroscopy suggested that chimney stenting should be applied for left coronary. The whole procedure was unenventful and both coronaries were seen.
It has been 20 years since the first transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was performed internationally in 2002, and the development of TAVR technology in China has also been more than 10 years. The reliability of TAVR has been clinically proven, and it has also brought good benefits to patients with aortic stenosis. With the gradual progress of technology, TAVR has a trend to surpass surgical aortic valve replacement and become the mainstream surgery for patients with aortic stenosis. This article will review the relevant issues in the development of TAVR technology in recent years, based on existing research, and provide certain clinical references for the future development of TAVR technology.
Objective To summarize the clinical experience and mid-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation valve-in-valve (TAVI-ViV) for failed surgical bioprostheses in the aortic position. Methods Patients who underwent TAVI-ViV procedures at Tianjin University Chest Hospital between January 2019 and January 2025 were consecutively enrolled. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and postoperative hemodynamic performance were collected and analyzed. Early postoperative and follow-up valve hemodynamics were evaluated, and surgical experiences were summarized. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoint was severe prosthetic valve stenosis. Results A total of 45 patients were included, with a mean age of (68.38±7.72) years and an average interval between surgeries of (11.00±3.67) years. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 6.80% (4.29%, 8.21%). The procedural success rate was 97.78% (44/45), with one case aborted due to coronary obstruction. The mean implantation depth was (6.87±3.45) mm, the annular expansion rate ranged from 10% to 40%, and the stent crown compression rate varied from 0% to 42%. The median follow-up duration was 21 months, with 27 patients completing the 2-year follow-up. At 2 years postoperatively, the overall follow-up rate was 92.59% (25/27), and the echocardiographic follow-up rate was 66.67% (18/27). The all-cause mortality rate was 7.41% (2/27). The mean peak aortic valve velocity was 2.96±0.69 m/s, the mean transvalvular gradient was (21.83±10.98) mm Hg, and 3 patients exhibited velocities ≥4 m/s (indicating severe stenosis). The regression analysis showed that the implant depth deviation [β=0.41, SE=0.18, OR=1.51, 95%CI (1.06, 2.30), P=0.024］, the compression rate of the corona [β=2.48, OR=11.93, 95%CI (1.21, 122.40), P=0.034], and the enlargement rate of the annulus [β=1.96, OR=7.13, 95%CI (1.28, 35.50), P=0.026] were the independent predictors of high flow velocity after surgery. Conclusion The optimal implantation depth for TAVI-ViV using a self-expanding valve system is 4 to 5 mm. When the annular expansion rate approaches 10%, hemodynamic performance can be significantly improved. The degree of crown compression in the valve stent is strongly correlated with elevated postoperative transvalvular gradients.
Objective To systematically assess postoperative changes in physical activity (PA) and their influence on clinical outcomes among elderly patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), providing an evidence-based framework for risk stratification and the design of personalized cardiac rehabilitation programs. Methods A systematic search was conducted in CNKI, Wanfang, SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant literature published from April 16, 2002 to January 1, 2026. Eligible studies included patients with a mean age of ≥65 years who underwent TAVR, with assessments of PA both pre- and postoperatively, and reported clinical outcomes stratified by the trajectory of PA change. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies and the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool for randomized controlled trials. ResultsFour studies, all assessed as high-quality (three cohort studies with an NOS score of 8 and one randomized controlled trial with "some concerns" for risk of bias) encompassing 1 278 patients were included. The mean age was (82.2±7.3) years, and 52.0% were female. The results demonstrated a strong association between postoperative PA trajectories and clinical outcomes. Patients with persistently low or declining PA exhibited significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality, composite cardiovascular events, and rehospitalization compared to those whose PA improved or remained stable. A notable "protective effect of functional improvement" was observed: patients with low baseline PA who achieved significant postoperative improvement had prognosis comparable to those with normal baseline PA. Multivariable analyses identified advanced age, female sex, comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cognitive impairment as independent predictors of impaired postoperative PA recovery. Conclusion Dynamic postoperative PA trajectories are a key predictor of clinical outcomes in the elderly TAVR population. This allows for risk stratification to identify a "low-benefit" high-risk cohort, for whom targeted, individualized cardiac rehabilitation interventions are crucial to optimize long-term survival and enhance quality of life.
Biological valves can lead to structural valve degeneration (SVD) over time and due to various factors, reducing their durability. SVD patients need to undergo valve replacement surgery again, while traditional open chest surgery can cause significant trauma and patients often give up treatment due to intolerance. Research has shown that as an alternative treatment option for reoperation of thoracic valve replacement surgery, redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement for SVD is safe and effective, but still faces many challenges, including prosthesis-patient mismatch, high cross valve pressure difference, and coronary obstruction. This article aims to review the strategies, clinical research status and progress of redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement in SVD patients.
Quadricuspid aortic valve (QAV) is a rare congenital heart disease, and its long-term lesion type is mainly reflux. The application of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in such patients is extremely rare. This article reports a case of an elderly patient with QAV complicated with severe regurgitation and small subvalvular membrane. Through preoperative evaluation and guidance from the cardiac team discussion, a relatively high oversize rate retrievable valve was selected and the TAVR surgery was successfully completed. At the same time, the valve implantation depth was adjusted to cover the subvalvular membrane. After surgery, the patient’s symptoms such as palpitations were significantly improved. No obvious perivalvular leakage or regurgitation was observed. It provides a reference for TAVR surgical plans for such patients.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a well-established treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis. At present, TAVR has already shown noninferiority and even superiority to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients deemed at high or intermediate risk for SAVR. However, the long-term follow-up results of the randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety between TAVR and SAVR are still lacking in those patients who are at low risk for SAVR. This paper gives an overview and reviews results of the Evolut Low Risk trial and interprets its implications for transcatheter therapy in aortic valve diseases.