The management of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction due to spinal cord injury is one of the most challenging tasks in rehabilitation. Considerable progress has been made in the management of lower urinary tract dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury over the past few decades. However, urinary complications remain one of the most serious complications in patients with spinal cord injury. Lower urinary tract dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury present with a variety of symptoms and signs that require comprehensive evaluation. The management of lower urinary tract dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury require tailored and individualized treatment approaches. Based on the clinical practice of rehabilitation at home and abroad, this paper expounds the progress of the assessment and rehabilitation of lower urinary tract dysfunction after spinal cord injury, and puts forward some suggestions for the reference of clinical staff.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility to use ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) for patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. MethodsClinical data of 32 patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region between April and June 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 17 male and 15 female patients with their age of 46-76 (63.2±7.6) years. USCOM and pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) were used to measure cardiac output (CO) synchronously,and the results were compared between USCOM and PAC. ResultsSixty-four pairs of data were collected from those 32 patients. No adverse event was observed with either USCOM or PAC. Mean CO was 4.27±0.92 L/min with USCOM and 4.49±0.75 L/min with PAC respectively,which were not statistically different (P=0.12) but significantly correlated (r=0.84,P<0.001). ConclusionThere is close correlation between USCOM and PAC for CO measurement. USCOM can not only measure CO accurately,but also has the advantages of being noninvasive,easy to perform and low cost.
ObjectiveTo explore the influence of evidence-based nursing care of catheterization on the incidence of urinary tract injury and urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injury and long-term indwelling catheters.MethodsFrom July 1st, 2017 to November 30th, 2018, 100 patients with spinal cord injury indwelling catheters in Department of Spinal Surgery were prospectively selected as the research objects. According to the admission time, patients admitted between July 2017 and February 2018 were assigned into the control group (n=50), and patients admitted between March 2018 and November 2018 were assigned into the observation group (n=50). Traditional catheter placement was used in the control group, while evidence-based catheter placement was used in the observation group. The incidences of catheter-related urethral injury and urinary tract infection after the catheterization were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in gender, age, diagnosis, or length of hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). Catheter placement was performed 57 times in the control group and 59 times in the observation group during hospitalization. After catheterization, the incidences of urethral hemorrhage and gross hematuria in the control group [22.80% (13/57) and 15.78% (9/57), respectively] were higher than those in the observation group [both were 1.69% (1/59)], with statistical differences between the two groups (P<0.05). The incidence of urinary tract infection in the control group differed from that in the observation group [42.0% (21/50) vs. 18.0% (9/50), P=0.009].ConclusionThe evidence-based urinary catheterization method for patients with spinal cord injury and long-term indwelling catheter can effectively prevent catheter-related urinary tract injury, reduce the incidence of catheter-related urinary tract infection during hospitalization, and improve the quality of clinical care.
ObjectiveTo analyze the causes and potential risk factors of re-catheterization after failure of no urinary catheter in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.MethodsThe clinical data of 1 618 patients without urinary catheter indwelling during the perioperative period of thoracic surgery in our hospital from 2013 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 791 males and 827 females, with a median age of 58 years, ranging from 27 to 85 years. And the risk factors for re-insertion after failure of urinary catheter were investgated.ResultsThe rate of catheter re-insertion was 1.5% (24/1 618). Compared with patients without re-insertion, patients with re-insertion had longer operation time [120.0 (95.0, 130.0) min vs. 120.0 (115.0, 180.0) min, P=0.015] and more intraoperative fluid infusion [800.0 (600.0, 1 100.0) mL vs. 1 150.0 (725.0, 1 350.0) mL, P=0.008]. Further multivariate analysis found that the operation time (OR=1.014, P=0.004, 95%CI 1.005-1.024) and intraoperative fluid infusion (OR=1.001, P=0.022, 95%CI 1.001–1.002) were independent risk factors for re-insertion.ConclusionThe rate of catheter re-insertion in lung cancer patients is relatively low, and conventional no placement of catheter is safe and feasible after lung cancer surgery. Increasing operation time or intraoperative infusion volume may increase the risk of catheter re-insertion after lung cancer surgery.
Objective To study the catheter-related infection (CRI) in cancer patients treated with central venous catheterization. Methods A prospective study with 196 cancer patients was conducted to analyze the types of catheter-related infection and pathogen, as well as the relationship between CRI and the following factors: insert location, gender, age, remained time, or bone marrow suppression. Results Of the total 196 cases, 16 cases were diagnosed as CRI and the CRI rate was 8.2%. The types of CRI were five cases of pathogen colonization, four cases of insert location infection and seven cases of catheter-related bloodstream infection. Of the total 244 specimens, 20 were positive including 7 pathogenic bacteria in either Gram positive or Gram negative types, the dominating pathogens were staphylococcus aureus, staphylococcus epidermidis, acinetobacter baumannii and klebsiella pneumoniae. CRI was related to both insert location and age which were both the independent risk factors. Conclusion The concept of prevention should be set up, and the comprehensive measures should be taken to reduce CRI, such as choosing an appropriate insert location and complying with a strict catheter insert standard.
Objective To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein catheterization and thrombolysis on acute superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. Methods The treatment and therapeutic efficacy of 7 cases of acute superior mesenteric vein thrombosis underwent percutaneous transhepatic portal vein catheterization and thrombolysis under ultrasound guidance from August 2005 to April 2009 were analyzed. Results All the patients succeeded in portal vein catheterization and no bile leakage or abdominal bleeding occurred during the procedure. The clinical symptoms such as abdominal pain, abdominal distension， and passing bloody stool relieved were relieved and liquid diet began at postoperative of day 2-5. Emergency operation was done in one case and there was no intestinal fistula. The angiography after the operation showed that the majority of thrombosis were cleared and the blood of portal vein and superior mesenteric vein flowed smoothly. During the follow-up of 3 months to 3 years, all the patients’ status maintained well and no recurrence occurred. Conclusion Treatment of acute superior mesenteric vein thrombosis by percutaneous transhepatic portal vein thrombolysis is safe and effective.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficiency of double moxibustion combined with intermittent catheterization on urination diary in patients with neurogenic bladder (NB) after spinal cord injury (SCI).MethodsFrom August 2014 to August 2016, hospitalized patients with NB after SCI were reviewed retrospectively and classified into the moxibustion group and the routine group. The urination diary related indicators, International Urinary Incontinence Advisory Committee Urinary Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICI-SQ-SF) score, and routine urine leucocyte count were collected.ResultsA total of 278 patients were enrolled in the study, in whom, the data of 96 were incomplete, and 26 got lost to follow-up. The routine group and the moxibustion group finally contained 70 and 86 respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in sex, age, average course of the disease, SCI segment or grading of injury (P>0.05). After 2 months treatment, the urine routine leucocyte count decreased to (5.72± 0.36)/μL in the routine group and (3.22±0.27)/μL in the moxibustion group, and the ICI-Q-SF score decreased to 8.61±0.45 in the routine group and 5.07±0.38 in the moxibustion group. The urine routine leucocyte count and ICI-Q-SF score were lower than those before treatment, and were lower in the moxibustion group than those in the routine group (P<0.05). In the 7th to 8th week, in the routine group, the average single urine volume was (300±70) mL, the interval between two micturition was (3.5±0.6) hours, the frequency of urinary incontinence was (3.3±0.4) times per week, and the average residual urine volume was (125±42) mL; in the moxibustion group, they were (326±78) mL, (3.8±1.1) hours, (2.3±0.3) times per week, and (103±37) mL, respectively. The indexes were not statistically significant different from those in the 1st to 2nd week (P>0.05), except the average single urine volume in the routine group and all the indexes in the moxibustion group (P<0.05). They were all better in the moxibustion group than those in the routine group (P<0.05).ConclusionThe treatment of moxibustion and intermittent catheterization may improve bladder function, reduce residual urine, reduce urinary incontinence and improve the quality of life for patients with NB after SCI.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of anatomic landmarks positioning method (ALM) and real-time two-dimensional ultrasound (RTUS) guidance in the internal jugular vein cannulation. MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of Knowledge, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the effectiveness and safety of ALM and RTUS in the internal jugular vein catheterization up to May 1st, 2014. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assess methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 1 973 cases were included in the metaanalysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the ALM method, the RTUS method reduced puncture failure rate (OR=0.08, 95%CI 0.05 to 0.15, P<0.000 01). For safety, compared with the ALM method, the RTUS method was significantly lower in arterial injury rate (peto-OR=0.22, 95%CI 0.14 to 0.37, P<0.000 01), and the incidence of pneumothorax (peto-OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.04 to 0.40, P=0.000 3). ConclusionCompared to the ALM method, the RTUS method has characteristics such as causing fewer traumas, and having higher success rate and fewer complications. Due to limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusion still needs to be verified by conducting more studies.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of anatomical landmark method (ALM) versus ultrasound (US)-guided internal jugular vein (IJV) catheterization in pediatric patients. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2016), CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and CNKI were searched from inception to October 2016 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of landmark-guided versus ultrasound-guided IJV catheterization in pediatric patients who underwent elective surgery. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 13 RCTs involving 1 026 pediatric patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the overall success rate (RR=1.21, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.34, P=0.000 5) and arterial puncture rate (RR=0.19, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.50, P=0.000 7) of US-guided IJV catheterization were both significantly superior to the ALM group. Whereas there was no significant difference between two groups as for the incidence of hematoma formation (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.09 to 1.31, P=0.12). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, for IJV catheterization of pediatric patients, both the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided technique are better than the landmark-guided. Since the quantity and quality of included studies are limited, the conclusion of this study needs more high quality studies to verify.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of suprapubic catheterization(SPC) by using central venous catheter (CVC) on the perioperative complications in middle and low rectal cancer surgery. MethodsThe clinical data of 141 patients with middle and low rectal cancer underwent operation in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from April 2012 to January 2015 were collected. There were 65 patients performed SPC by using CVC, 76 patients performed routine transurethral catheterization(TUC). The incidences of bacteriuria and urinary retention, recatheterization rate, duration of catheterization, and catheter-related pain were analyzed and compared between these two groups. Results①Compared with the TUC, the SPC by using CVC could significantly reduce the incidence of bacteriuria(P=0.002), espe-cially in female(P=0.006), ≥60 years old(P=0.001), low rectal cancer(P=0.003), open surgery(P=0.018), Miles(P=0.016), and Dixon(P=0.032).②There was no significant difference in the incidence of urinary retention(P=0.464) between the SPC by using CVC and the TUC.③Compared with the TUC, the SPC by using CVC could significantly reduce the inci-dence of recatheterization rate(P=0.001), especially in the patients with male(P=0.016), ≥60 years old(P=0.008), low rectal cancer(P=0.019), laparoscopic surgery(P=0.013), and Miles(P=0.037).④Compared with the TUC, the point of catheter-related pain was significantly lower in the SPC by using CVC(P=0.001), no matter males(P=0.005) or females(P=0.010), aged 60 years and older(P=0.023) or younger(P=0.034), middle rectal cancer(P=0.017) or low rectal cancer(P=0.046), open surgery(P=0.033) or laparoscopic surgery(P=0.021), Dixon(P=0.019) or Miles(P=0.035).⑤The duration of catheterization was similar between the SPC by using CVC and the TUC(P=0.597). ConclusionSPC by using CVC is a safer, more effective and more acceptable method of bladder drainage in middle and low rectal cancer surgery as compared with routine TUC.