Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early enteral nutrition (EN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, CNKI were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about EN versus TPN after PD published from 2000 to March 2010. The quality of the included trials was assessed according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, and the data were extracted and analyzed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 322 PD patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that the EN (the treatment group) was superior to the TPN (the control group) in the average postoperative hospital stay (MD= –2.34, 95%CI –3.91 to –0.77, Plt;0.05), the total incidence rate of complication (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.99, P=0.04), the recovery time of enterocinesia (MD= –29.87, 95%CI –33.01 to –26.73, Plt;0.05) and the nutrition costs (MD= –30.51, 95%CI –35.78 to –25.24, Plt;0.05); there were no differences in mortality (RR=0.23, 95%CI 0.03 to 2.03, P=0.19), pancreatic leakage (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.45 to 1.35, P=0.38), infectious complications (RR=0.71, 95%CI 0.43 to 1.18, P=0.19), non-infectious complications (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.5 1 to 1.20, P=0.26) and postoperative serum albumin level (MD= –0.79, 95%CI –2.84 to 1.27, P=0.45). Conclusion Compared with total parenteral nutrition, the enteral nutrition used earlier after pancreatoduodenectomy shows significant advantages. But more reasonably-designed and double blind RCTs with large scale are expected to provide high quality proof.
Objective To investigate the main characteristics of intro-abdominal microbial infection and the risk factors for it after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods Clinical data of 200 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from Sep. 2008 to Sep. 2013 were reviewed retrospectively to investigate the main characteristics of abdominal microbial infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk factors for it. Results Of the 200 patients, cultures of drainage fluids were positive in 78 patients, and 42 of them(21.0%) met the diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection criterion. One hundred and eighty-five pathogenic strains were isolated totally, 64 strains of them(34.6%) were Gram positive cocci, 103 strains(55.7%) were Gram negative bacilli, and 18 strains (9.7%) were fungus. The top 5 kinds of bacteria in order were Staphylococcus aureus(31 strains), Pseudomonas aemginosa(28 strains), Escherichia co1i(22 strains), Klebsiella pneumoniae(18 strains), and Enterococcus faecium (14 strains). Most of the pathogens were resistant to broad-spectrum antibiotics. The resistance rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 60.7%(17/28) to imipenem. Extended spectrum beta lactamases(ESBLs)-producing strains accounted for 22.7%(5/22) and 33.3%(6/18) in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae respectively. The detection rate of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) was 45.2%(14/31) in Staphylococcus aureus. Multivariate logistic regression analysis results showed that status of pancreatic fistula and pulmonary infection were the risk factors for intraabdominal infection, patients with high grade of pancreatic fistula(OR=16.252, P=0.003) and with pulmonary infection (OR=2.855, P=0.017) had higher incidence of intra-abdominal infection. Conclusion Gram negative bacilli is the main pathogenic bacteria of abdominal drainage fluids cultivation of microbiology after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Most of them have multi-drug resistance characteristic. Positive prevention and treatment of pancreatic fistula and pulmonary infection can reduce the incidence of intra-abdominal infection.
ObjectiveTo investigate effect of sealing one-layer anastomosis in pancreaticojejunostomy in patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsThe clinical data of 85 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in this hospital from January 2014 to May 2015 were collected. Of all the patients, 28 patients were underwent sealing onelayer anastomosis in pancreaticojejunostomy (sealing one-layer anastomosis group), 27 patients were underwent ductto-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (duct-to-mucosa anastomosis group), and 30 patients were underwent end-to-side invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy (end-to-side invagination group). The anastomosis time, time to pull out drainage tube, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula were compared among these three groups. Results①The anastomosis time (min) of the sealing one-layer anastomosis group was significantly shorter than that of the duct-to-mucosa anastomosis group or end-to-side invagination group (12.51±2.96 versus 25.65±3.35, P < 0.05; 12.51±2.96 versus 23.73±5.27, P < 0.05).②The time to pull out drainage tube of the sealing one-layer anastomosis group was significantly shorter than that of the end-to-side invagination group (7.65±1.30 versus 11.15±3.47, P < 0.05).③The postoperative hospital stay had no statistical significances among these three groups (P > 0.05).④The incidence of pancreatic fistula was 3.57% (1/28), 7.41% (2/27), and 10.00% (3/30) among the sealing one-layer anastomosis group, duct-to-mucosa anastomosis group, and end-to-side invagination group respectively, which had no statistical differences among these three groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionSealing one-layer anastomosis in pancreaticojejunostomy might be a safe anastomosis, and it has advantages of simple operation and short operation time.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of drained versus nondrained pancreaticojejunostomy on prevention of the pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsSeventysix patients underwent the standard pancreaticoduodenectomy including resection of the distal stomach,common bile duct, the head of pancreas and the duodenum.Pancreaticenteric reconstruction was accomplished via either pancreaticojejunostomy by endtoside anastomsis or pancreaticojejunostomy by ducttomucosa anastomsis.The stented external drainage of pancreatic duct was used in 45 of 76 patients. ResultsPancreatic leakage was identified in 1 patient in the drained group consisting of 45 patients,in 7 patients in the nondrained group consisting of 31 patients, the incidence of pancreatic leakage in the drained group (2.2%) was significantly less than in the nondrained group (22.6%,P＜0.05).ConclusionComparing the incidences of pancreatic leakage from both groups,the authors believe that the stented external drainage of pancreatic duct can significantly reduce the incidence of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Objective To analyze the difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic leakage and anasto-motic bleeding complications in various methods of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy （PD）. Methods The clinical data of 526 patients underwent pancreaticojejunostomy from January 2008 to September 2012 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. End-to-side “pancreatic duct to jejunum mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis （abbreviation：mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis） was performed in 359 patients， which contained 149 patients with internal drainage， 130 patients with external drainage， and 80 patients with no drainage. End-to-side invaginated anastomosis was performedin 165 patients without drainage. In addition， side-to-side anastomosis was performed in 2 patients without drainage.Results There were 34 cases （6.46%） of pancreatic leakage， 8 cases （1.52%） of anastomotic bleeding in pancreaticoje-junostomy， and 32 cases of death （6.08%）. ① The pancreatic leakage rate of mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis was signi-ficantly lower than that of end-to-side invaginated anastomosis 〔4.18% （15/359） versus 11.52% （19/165）， χ2=10.029， P=0.002〕. There was no significant difference of the anastomotic bleeding incidence between mucosa-to-mucosa anasto-mosis and end-to-side invaginated anastomosis 〔1.67% （6/359） versus 1.21% （2/165）， χ2=0.159， P=0.691〕. ② In the mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis group， the pancreatic leakage rates in the ones with internal drainage and external drainage were lower than those in the ones without drainage， respectively （2.68% （4/149） versus 11.25% （9/80）， χ2=7.132， P=0.008；1.54% （2/130） versus 11.25% （9/80）， χ2=9.410， P=0.002）；which was no significant difference between the ones with internal drainage and external drainage 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕. But there were no significant differences for both the pancreatic leakage 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕and anastomotic bleeding incidence 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕 between the ones with internal drainage and external drainage. Conclusions Mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis has a lower pancreatic leakage incidence as compared with end-to-side invaginated anastomosis. However， there is no significant difference of the anast-omotic bleeding incidence. Internal or external drainage could reduce the incidence of pancreatic leakage， but have no obvious effect to the anastomotic bleeding incidence.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of gastric paralysis following pancreaticoduodenectomy so as to offer help for prevention and treatment of gastric paralysis. MethodDomestic and international literatures about gastric paralysis following pancreaticoduodenectomy were collected, diagnostic criteria, risk factors, and the latest progress of gastric paralysis were summarized. ResultsGastric paralysis is one of the most common postoperative complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. It might be caused by many risk factors, such as operation method, gastrointestinal anastomosis, abdominal complications, chronic hyperglycemia, and excess infusion, etc. ConclusionsAlthough definition of gastric paralysis by ISGPS is widely adopted, it fails to distinguish gastric paralysis from impaired gastric function related to other postoperative complications and it might result in an overestimation of its true morbidity. The risk factors of occurrence of gastric paralysis are still in controversy and results of research in different centers are not same, more prospective randomized controlled trials are needed.
ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and security of laparoscopic Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD)or laparoscopic pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPPPD)for the patients with periampullary diseases, estimate the ratio of postoperative complications between LPD and LPPPD. MethodsFourty-five patients who underwent the LPD or LPPPD from January 2010 to March 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. These patients were divided into LPD group and LPPPD group basing on the Whipple or polyrus preservation. ResultsAmong these 45 patients, 25 patients were performed the LPD, the other 20 patients were performed the LPPPD. There were 25(55.56%)complications after operation, including 10 cases of pancreatic fistula, 1 case of bile leakage, 6 cases of delayed gastric emptying, 3 cases of infection, 2 cases of stomach intestine stomatorrhagia, 1 case of mesenteric venous thrombosis, 1 case of ascites, 1 case of chylous fistula. The complication rate had no significant difference between two groups. One patient died after operation in the LPPPD group. ConclusionLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and feasible in the treatment of periampullary diseases, the LPPPD could partly prevent the occurrence of reflux of the digestive juice following the resection of pylorus and improve the quality of life.
Objective To explore the situation and prevention of pancreaticoduodenectomy perioperative complications. Methods The clinical data of 111 cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy were retrospectively analyzed， and the possible factor of complications was analyzed. Results There were postoperative complications in 48 patients （43.2%）， which one kind complication occurred in 25 cases， two kinds in 15 cases， and three kinds or more in 8 cases. Four cases （3.6%） died after operation. Conclusions Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a higher risk surgery in abdominal operation. Strengthen perioperative prevention and treatment are important measures to reduce morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness measured using preoperative CT imaging on pancreatic fistula(PF)following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). MethodsOne hundred and fifty-one patients who underwent PD consecutively from January 2013 to April 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Associations between the gender, age and the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness from preoperative CT imaging and PF were analyzed. The diagnostic values of the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness in patients with PF were evaluate by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The reliability analysis was done for the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Spearman rank correlation analysis was done between the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness. Results①PF occurred in 46 cases (30.1%).②The gender and age were not associated with PF (Gender: χ2=1.698, P=0.193; Age: χ2=0.016, P=0.900). The pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness were associated with PF (Pancreatic duct diameter: OR=0.275, 95% CI 0.164-0.461, P=0.000; Pancreatic gland thickness: OR=1.319, 95% CI 1.163-1.496, P=0.000).③There was no correlation between the pancreatic duct diameter and the pancreatic gland thickness (rs=-0.120, P=0.145).④The area under curve of ROC was 0.814 (95% CI 0.745-0.883, P < 0.001) for the pancreatic duct diameter in predicting the PF, the sensitivity and specificity was 68.6% and 78.3% respectively when the best critical value was 3.5 mm. The area under curve of ROC was 0.762 (95% CI 0.674-0.849, P < 0.001) for the pancreatic gland thickness in predicting PF, the sensitivity and specificity was 63.0% and 85.7% respectively when the best critical value was 31 mm.⑤The ICC of the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness was 0.984 and 0.992 respectively by two medical diagnostic measurement. ConclusionPancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness measured using preoperative CT imaging might be useful in predicting PF following PD.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy surgery (ERAS).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane library, CBM, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect clinical controlled trials of comparing ERAS and the traditional rehabilitation management in patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy from inception to March 31st, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 software.ResultsA total of 12 non-randomized historical controlled trials involving 2 588 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that ERAS shortened postoperative hospital stay (MD=–5.44, 95%CI –7.73 to –3.15, P<0.000 01) and the time to the first passage of flatus (MD=–1.40, 95%CI –2.60 to –0.20,P=0.02), reduced the rate of postoperative complication (OR=0.61, 95%CI 0.52 to 0.72, P<0.000 01), pancreatic fistula (OR=0.81, 95%CI 0.66 to 0.99,P=0.04) and delayed gastric emptying (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.63, P<0.000 01). However, there was no significant difference in incidences of biliary fistula, abdominal cavity infection, wound infection and postoperative pulmonary infection between two groups.ConclusionsThe application of ERAS in pancreaticoduodenectomy is effective and does not increase postoperative complication. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.