ObjectiveTo evaluate the predictive value of pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness measured using preoperative CT imaging on pancreatic fistula(PF)following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). MethodsOne hundred and fifty-one patients who underwent PD consecutively from January 2013 to April 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Associations between the gender, age and the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness from preoperative CT imaging and PF were analyzed. The diagnostic values of the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness in patients with PF were evaluate by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The reliability analysis was done for the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Spearman rank correlation analysis was done between the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness. Results①PF occurred in 46 cases (30.1%).②The gender and age were not associated with PF (Gender: χ2=1.698, P=0.193; Age: χ2=0.016, P=0.900). The pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness were associated with PF (Pancreatic duct diameter: OR=0.275, 95% CI 0.164-0.461, P=0.000; Pancreatic gland thickness: OR=1.319, 95% CI 1.163-1.496, P=0.000).③There was no correlation between the pancreatic duct diameter and the pancreatic gland thickness (rs=-0.120, P=0.145).④The area under curve of ROC was 0.814 (95% CI 0.745-0.883, P < 0.001) for the pancreatic duct diameter in predicting the PF, the sensitivity and specificity was 68.6% and 78.3% respectively when the best critical value was 3.5 mm. The area under curve of ROC was 0.762 (95% CI 0.674-0.849, P < 0.001) for the pancreatic gland thickness in predicting PF, the sensitivity and specificity was 63.0% and 85.7% respectively when the best critical value was 31 mm.⑤The ICC of the pancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness was 0.984 and 0.992 respectively by two medical diagnostic measurement. ConclusionPancreatic duct diameter and pancreatic gland thickness measured using preoperative CT imaging might be useful in predicting PF following PD.
Objective To analyze the difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic leakage and anasto-motic bleeding complications in various methods of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy （PD）. Methods The clinical data of 526 patients underwent pancreaticojejunostomy from January 2008 to September 2012 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. End-to-side “pancreatic duct to jejunum mucosa-to-mucosa” anastomosis （abbreviation：mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis） was performed in 359 patients， which contained 149 patients with internal drainage， 130 patients with external drainage， and 80 patients with no drainage. End-to-side invaginated anastomosis was performedin 165 patients without drainage. In addition， side-to-side anastomosis was performed in 2 patients without drainage.Results There were 34 cases （6.46%） of pancreatic leakage， 8 cases （1.52%） of anastomotic bleeding in pancreaticoje-junostomy， and 32 cases of death （6.08%）. ① The pancreatic leakage rate of mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis was signi-ficantly lower than that of end-to-side invaginated anastomosis 〔4.18% （15/359） versus 11.52% （19/165）， χ2=10.029， P=0.002〕. There was no significant difference of the anastomotic bleeding incidence between mucosa-to-mucosa anasto-mosis and end-to-side invaginated anastomosis 〔1.67% （6/359） versus 1.21% （2/165）， χ2=0.159， P=0.691〕. ② In the mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis group， the pancreatic leakage rates in the ones with internal drainage and external drainage were lower than those in the ones without drainage， respectively （2.68% （4/149） versus 11.25% （9/80）， χ2=7.132， P=0.008；1.54% （2/130） versus 11.25% （9/80）， χ2=9.410， P=0.002）；which was no significant difference between the ones with internal drainage and external drainage 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕. But there were no significant differences for both the pancreatic leakage 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕and anastomotic bleeding incidence 〔2.68% （4/149） versus 1.54% （2/130）， χ2=0.433， P=0.510〕 between the ones with internal drainage and external drainage. Conclusions Mucosa-to-mucosa anastomosis has a lower pancreatic leakage incidence as compared with end-to-side invaginated anastomosis. However， there is no significant difference of the anast-omotic bleeding incidence. Internal or external drainage could reduce the incidence of pancreatic leakage， but have no obvious effect to the anastomotic bleeding incidence.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of drained versus nondrained pancreaticojejunostomy on prevention of the pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsSeventysix patients underwent the standard pancreaticoduodenectomy including resection of the distal stomach,common bile duct, the head of pancreas and the duodenum.Pancreaticenteric reconstruction was accomplished via either pancreaticojejunostomy by endtoside anastomsis or pancreaticojejunostomy by ducttomucosa anastomsis.The stented external drainage of pancreatic duct was used in 45 of 76 patients. ResultsPancreatic leakage was identified in 1 patient in the drained group consisting of 45 patients,in 7 patients in the nondrained group consisting of 31 patients, the incidence of pancreatic leakage in the drained group (2.2%) was significantly less than in the nondrained group (22.6%,P＜0.05).ConclusionComparing the incidences of pancreatic leakage from both groups,the authors believe that the stented external drainage of pancreatic duct can significantly reduce the incidence of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodThe clinical data of 150 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in this hospital from January 2011 to January 2014 were reviewed, and the potential factors for pancreatic fistular were evaluated by both univariate and multivariate analysis. ResultsThe incidence of pancreatic fistula was 12.7% (19/150). Univariate analysis results showed that the age, preoperative high bilirubin level, texture of the remnant pancreas, diameter of wirsung, operative time were associated with pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis results revealed that the texture of the remnant pancreas, diameter of wirsung, and operative time were the inde-pendent risk factors (P < 0.05) for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. ConclusionsTexture of the remnant pancreas, diameter of wirsung, operative time are independent risk factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Rich experience and skilled surgical procedures could effectively reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula.
ObjectiveTo investigate effect of sealing one-layer anastomosis in pancreaticojejunostomy in patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsThe clinical data of 85 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in this hospital from January 2014 to May 2015 were collected. Of all the patients, 28 patients were underwent sealing onelayer anastomosis in pancreaticojejunostomy (sealing one-layer anastomosis group), 27 patients were underwent ductto-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (duct-to-mucosa anastomosis group), and 30 patients were underwent end-to-side invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy (end-to-side invagination group). The anastomosis time, time to pull out drainage tube, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula were compared among these three groups. Results①The anastomosis time (min) of the sealing one-layer anastomosis group was significantly shorter than that of the duct-to-mucosa anastomosis group or end-to-side invagination group (12.51±2.96 versus 25.65±3.35, P < 0.05; 12.51±2.96 versus 23.73±5.27, P < 0.05).②The time to pull out drainage tube of the sealing one-layer anastomosis group was significantly shorter than that of the end-to-side invagination group (7.65±1.30 versus 11.15±3.47, P < 0.05).③The postoperative hospital stay had no statistical significances among these three groups (P > 0.05).④The incidence of pancreatic fistula was 3.57% (1/28), 7.41% (2/27), and 10.00% (3/30) among the sealing one-layer anastomosis group, duct-to-mucosa anastomosis group, and end-to-side invagination group respectively, which had no statistical differences among these three groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionSealing one-layer anastomosis in pancreaticojejunostomy might be a safe anastomosis, and it has advantages of simple operation and short operation time.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the various methods in prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsThe literatures over the years related to prevention of pancreatic fistula were reviewed.ResultsManagement of the pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy played the most important role in preventing pancreatic fistula. None of the methods of pancreatic stump had proved to be perfect in preventing pancreatic fistula, though pancreaticojejunostomy was the most widely practiced reconstruct strategy in varieties of option. For pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy, the rate of this complication was 12.3% and 11.1%,respectively. In recent years, a new procedure, bindingup pancreaticoduodenectomy, had shown a promise and excellent results in prevention of pancreatic fistula, the rate of fistula was 0 for consecutive 100 cases after pancreaticoduodenectomy.ConclusionBindingup pancreaticojejunostomy have a definite effect to avoid pancreatic fistula and be worthy of being recommended
ObjectiveTo evaluate the postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy with modified triple-layer(MTL) duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy and with resection of jejunal serosa, analyse the risk factors of pancreatic fistula, and compare effects with two-layer(TL) duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy. MethodsData on 184 consecutive patients who underwent the two methods of pancreaticojejunostomy during standard PD between January 1, 2010 and January 31, 2013 were collected retrospectively. The risk factors of pancreatic fistula were investigated by using univariate and multivariate analyses. ResultsA total of 88 patients received TL and 96 underwent MTL. Rate of pancreatic fistula for the entire cohort was 8.2%(15/184). There were 11 fistulas(12.5%) in the TL group and four fistulas(4.2%) in the MTL group(P=0.039). Body mass index, pancreatic texture, pancreatic duct diameter, and methods of pancreaticojejunostomy had significant effects on the formation of pancreatic fistula on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm and TL were the significant risk factors of pancreatic fistula. ConclusionsMTL technique effectively reduced the pancreatic fistula rate after PD in comparison with TL, especially in patients with pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm.
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the origin, prevention and treatment of postoperative complications and death rate after pancreaticoduodenectomy （PD）. Methods Retrospective study on the clinical materials of complications and death rate was done on 106 cases of PD performed in our hospital during July 1985 to December 2002. Results In this group, 37 cases (34.91%) had postoperative complications, and the incidence rate of severe complications was 19.81% (21/106), the death rate was 10.38% (11/106). Compared between the two groups with preoperative bilirubin gt;342 μmol/L and ≤342 μmol/L, the incidence of total complications increased evidently (P＜0.05), and the bleeding amount，infusion amount and operation time in those with complications or dead ones were evidently higher than those without complications (P＜0.05). Conclusion The safty and resectability of PD has improved evidently in recent years but good skills, careful operation, the experience of the operatior and careful perioperative treatment and nursing are of crucial importance to reduce the complications and death rate.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of gastric paralysis following pancreaticoduodenectomy so as to offer help for prevention and treatment of gastric paralysis. MethodDomestic and international literatures about gastric paralysis following pancreaticoduodenectomy were collected, diagnostic criteria, risk factors, and the latest progress of gastric paralysis were summarized. ResultsGastric paralysis is one of the most common postoperative complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. It might be caused by many risk factors, such as operation method, gastrointestinal anastomosis, abdominal complications, chronic hyperglycemia, and excess infusion, etc. ConclusionsAlthough definition of gastric paralysis by ISGPS is widely adopted, it fails to distinguish gastric paralysis from impaired gastric function related to other postoperative complications and it might result in an overestimation of its true morbidity. The risk factors of occurrence of gastric paralysis are still in controversy and results of research in different centers are not same, more prospective randomized controlled trials are needed.
Objective To explore the situation and prevention of pancreaticoduodenectomy perioperative complications. Methods The clinical data of 111 cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy were retrospectively analyzed， and the possible factor of complications was analyzed. Results There were postoperative complications in 48 patients （43.2%）， which one kind complication occurred in 25 cases， two kinds in 15 cases， and three kinds or more in 8 cases. Four cases （3.6%） died after operation. Conclusions Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a higher risk surgery in abdominal operation. Strengthen perioperative prevention and treatment are important measures to reduce morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy.