Objective To evaluate the operative indication and results of pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods A retrospective study was carried out on the cases of pancreaticoduodenectomy following pancreaticogastrostomy from Aug. 2005 to Feb. 2008 in Shanghai Tongji Hospital. Results During this period, 38 cases had undergone pancreaticogastrostomy with pancreaticoduodenectomy. The median operative time was (352.1±78.3) min. The median intraoperative blood transfusion was (911.3±601.4) ml. The median postoperative length of stay was (26.2±12.1) d. Postoperative morbidity was 21.1% (8/38) with no operative death. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage occurred in 1 patient. Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 2 patients. Incision infection occurred in 2 patients. Abdominal fluid collection occurred in 1 patient and pulmonary infection occurred in 2 patients. All of the complications were treated conservatively. Conclusion Pancreaticogastrostomy is a safer drainage procedure for the pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Objective To investigate the application value of the binding pancreaticogastrostomy in pancreatico-duodenectomy. Methods The clinical data of 13 patients that performed pancreaticoduodenectomy with binding pancr-eaticogastrostomy from Jan. 2010 to Mar. 2013 in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of postoper-ative complications were counted. Results There was 1 patient with pancreatic stump bleeding after operation， and then recovered after conservative treatment. There was no patient with pancreatic fistula， bile fistula， delayed gastric empt-ying， and other complications after operation in whole group. Peritoneal fluid and amylase level in peritoneal fluid were gradually reduced or degraded after operation. The gastrointestinal function was recovered better. All patients were compl-etely cured. Conclusion The binding pancreaticogastrostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy has its own unique advantage.It could be reduce the incidence of pancreatic fistula in postoperative patients by using binding pancreaticogastrostomy reasonably.
ObjectiveTo investigate the age of patients can be the independence factor to affect the feasibility of pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsThe cases in the First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University from Feb. 2011 to Feb. 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, and divided into six groups according to age < 50, 50≤age < 60, 60≤age < 70, 70≤age < 75, 70≤age < 80, and≥80 years old. The complications, hospitalization days, and mortality rates for six groups were analyzed. ResultsThe differences in ASA classification (P < 0.001), hypertension (P < 0.001), coronary heart disease (P=0.001), diabetes mellitus (P < 0.001), heart failure (P=0.001), respiratory failure (P=0.037), postoperative hospitalization days (P=0.014), and delayed gastric emptying grade C (P=0.006) had statistical significance, and pancreatic fistula (P=0.058), postoperative bleeding (P=0.786), and mortality (P=0.125) of the different age groups had no significant difference. ConclusionAge is not the independent risk factor to affect the feasibility of pancreaticoduodenectomy, but the strictly preoperative comorbidities assessment is necessary.
ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors of gastric paralysis following pancreaticoduodenectomy so as to offer help for prevention and treatment of gastric paralysis. MethodDomestic and international literatures about gastric paralysis following pancreaticoduodenectomy were collected, diagnostic criteria, risk factors, and the latest progress of gastric paralysis were summarized. ResultsGastric paralysis is one of the most common postoperative complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. It might be caused by many risk factors, such as operation method, gastrointestinal anastomosis, abdominal complications, chronic hyperglycemia, and excess infusion, etc. ConclusionsAlthough definition of gastric paralysis by ISGPS is widely adopted, it fails to distinguish gastric paralysis from impaired gastric function related to other postoperative complications and it might result in an overestimation of its true morbidity. The risk factors of occurrence of gastric paralysis are still in controversy and results of research in different centers are not same, more prospective randomized controlled trials are needed.
ObjectiveTo investigate effect of sealing one-layer anastomosis in pancreaticojejunostomy in patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. MethodsThe clinical data of 85 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in this hospital from January 2014 to May 2015 were collected. Of all the patients, 28 patients were underwent sealing onelayer anastomosis in pancreaticojejunostomy (sealing one-layer anastomosis group), 27 patients were underwent ductto-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (duct-to-mucosa anastomosis group), and 30 patients were underwent end-to-side invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy (end-to-side invagination group). The anastomosis time, time to pull out drainage tube, postoperative hospital stay, and incidence rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula were compared among these three groups. Results①The anastomosis time (min) of the sealing one-layer anastomosis group was significantly shorter than that of the duct-to-mucosa anastomosis group or end-to-side invagination group (12.51±2.96 versus 25.65±3.35, P < 0.05; 12.51±2.96 versus 23.73±5.27, P < 0.05).②The time to pull out drainage tube of the sealing one-layer anastomosis group was significantly shorter than that of the end-to-side invagination group (7.65±1.30 versus 11.15±3.47, P < 0.05).③The postoperative hospital stay had no statistical significances among these three groups (P > 0.05).④The incidence of pancreatic fistula was 3.57% (1/28), 7.41% (2/27), and 10.00% (3/30) among the sealing one-layer anastomosis group, duct-to-mucosa anastomosis group, and end-to-side invagination group respectively, which had no statistical differences among these three groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionSealing one-layer anastomosis in pancreaticojejunostomy might be a safe anastomosis, and it has advantages of simple operation and short operation time.
Objective To explore how to integrate the various sources of information in designing an evidence-based nursing care plan for preventing gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Method Papers and references about prevention of GIH after PD were searched between September and October 2015, and an evidence-based nursing care plan was drawn up and implemented from November 2015 to January 2016. Results A total of 79 papers were found and of which 17 were aviliable. Thirty-nine patients were cared on the basis of the effective project, of whom one was dignosed with GIH on the 3rd postoperative day and the rate of post-PD hemorrhage was 2.6%. All patients were diacharged on the 6th or 7th postoperative day. Conclusion Exploring evidences under the guidance of scientific method and applying them to clinical nursing can prevent post-PD hemorrhage and improve life quality of patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors of intraabdominal complications (IACs), pancreatic fistula (PF), and operative death after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), and to provide a theoretical basis in reducing the rates of them. MethodsClinical data of 78 patients who underwent standard PD surgery in The Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from Jun. 2003 to Nov. 2011 were collected to analyze the influence factors of IACs, PF, and operative death. ResultsThere were 29 cases suffered IACs (13 cases of PF included), and 6 case died during 1 month after operation. Univariate analysis results showed that IACs and PF occurred more often in patients with soft friable pancreas, diameter of main pancreatic duct less than 3 mm, preoperative biliary drainage, no pancreatic duct stenting, and without employment of somatostatin (P < 0.05), no influence factor was found to be related to operative death. Multivariate analysis results showed that patients with no pancreatic duct stenting (OR=1.867, P=0.000), soft texture of remnant stump (OR=1.356, P=0.046), and diameter of main pancreatic duct less than 3 mm (OR=2.874, P=0.015) suffered more IACs; PF was more frequent in patient with no pancreatic duct stenting (OR=1.672, P=0.030), soft texture of remnant stump (OR=1.946, P=0.042), and diameter of main pancreatic duct less than 3 mm (OR=1.782, P=0.002);no independent factor was found to have relationship with operative death. ConclusionsSoft texture of remnant stump, diameter of main pancreatic duct less than 3 mm, and no pancreatic duct stenting are independent risk factors that should be considered in indications for PD surgery.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early enteral nutrition (EN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, CNKI were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about EN versus TPN after PD published from 2000 to March 2010. The quality of the included trials was assessed according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, and the data were extracted and analyzed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 322 PD patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that the EN (the treatment group) was superior to the TPN (the control group) in the average postoperative hospital stay (MD= –2.34, 95%CI –3.91 to –0.77, Plt;0.05), the total incidence rate of complication (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.99, P=0.04), the recovery time of enterocinesia (MD= –29.87, 95%CI –33.01 to –26.73, Plt;0.05) and the nutrition costs (MD= –30.51, 95%CI –35.78 to –25.24, Plt;0.05); there were no differences in mortality (RR=0.23, 95%CI 0.03 to 2.03, P=0.19), pancreatic leakage (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.45 to 1.35, P=0.38), infectious complications (RR=0.71, 95%CI 0.43 to 1.18, P=0.19), non-infectious complications (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.5 1 to 1.20, P=0.26) and postoperative serum albumin level (MD= –0.79, 95%CI –2.84 to 1.27, P=0.45). Conclusion Compared with total parenteral nutrition, the enteral nutrition used earlier after pancreatoduodenectomy shows significant advantages. But more reasonably-designed and double blind RCTs with large scale are expected to provide high quality proof.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the various methods in prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.MethodsThe literatures over the years related to prevention of pancreatic fistula were reviewed.ResultsManagement of the pancreatic stump following pancreaticoduodenectomy played the most important role in preventing pancreatic fistula. None of the methods of pancreatic stump had proved to be perfect in preventing pancreatic fistula, though pancreaticojejunostomy was the most widely practiced reconstruct strategy in varieties of option. For pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy, the rate of this complication was 12.3% and 11.1%,respectively. In recent years, a new procedure, bindingup pancreaticoduodenectomy, had shown a promise and excellent results in prevention of pancreatic fistula, the rate of fistula was 0 for consecutive 100 cases after pancreaticoduodenectomy.ConclusionBindingup pancreaticojejunostomy have a definite effect to avoid pancreatic fistula and be worthy of being recommended
ObjectiveTo summarize the prevention method for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenec-tomy. MethodLiteratures related to the prevention methods for postoperative pancreatic fistula at home and abroad in recent years were retrieved and summarized. ResultsThe pancreatic fistula was a common complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy. It was mainly caused by preoperative continuous high jaundice, selection of intraoperative anastomosis, and early postoperative pancreatic juice secretion. Trypsinogen was activated by alkaline intestinal juice and then the nearby tissue was digested. Pancreatic juice flowed into abdominal cavity to digest the tissue, then caused serious complications or even death. Through the prevention of drugs, preoperative biliary drainage and intraoperative anastomosis, etc., the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula was slightly decreased. ConclusionThe prevention for postoperative pancreatic fistula is an integrated process, and it needs to be ran through the whole perioperative period.