【作者簡介】〖KG2〗〖HTSS〗蔣青(1963-),女,四川遂寧人,主管護師,碩士,Email:jq0987@yahoo.cn
ObjectiveTo discuss the clinical characteristics, treatment and prevention of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE). MethodsA retrospective analysis of 295 cases of AWE from February 2007 to August 2011 in our hospital was performed. ResultsAll of the patients had abdominal operations before and 99% of them had a history of caesarean section. The mean age of the patients was (31.55±4.52) years old. The average size of the mass was (2.66±1.12) cm, significantly larger than the estimation of ultrasonography before operation which was (1.91±0.83) cm (P<0.001). No relapse was discovered five months to three years after the operation. ConclusionIt is easy to diagnose abdominal wall endometriosis through medical history, clinical characteristics, physical signs and ultrasonic assessment. The prevention of AWE is very important. Operation is still the best treatment for AWE.
ObjectiveTo explore the related factors for the influences and outcomes of mothers and infants, and further provide a basic reference for reducing maternal and prenatal mortality caused by central placenta previa, through the analysis of its clinical characteristics. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 89 patients with central placenta previa treated from January to August 2012. ResultsThere were 89 patients with central placenta previa, and the average age of these patients was (29.6±11.4) years, and the average number of pregnancy among the patients was 3.17. Nine patients had scar uterus; 8 had pernicious placenta previa (9%); 34 had prenatal anemia symptoms; 44 had prenatal vaginal bleeding with the bleeding volume ranged from 2 to 500 mL; 40 were treated before delivery. The average gestational age was 36 weeks ±4.2 days, and 28 of them were readmitted. The intraoperative bleeding in such patients as had placenta located in the anterior wall, placenta adhesion or implantation, history of uterine cavity operation or multipara was more than other patients. The postpartum hemorrhage of patients with the gestational age of 36 weeks or more was more than that of patients with the gestational age shorter than 36 weeks. The incidence of fetal distress in patients with the gestational age of 36 weeks or more is lower and the neonatal 1-minute Apgar score was higher than that in patients with the gestational age shorter than 36 weeks (P<0.05). ConclusionThe treatment of central type of placenta previa should be more active to prolong the gestational week. Patients with placenta adhesion or implantation, caesarean, multipara and placenta in the anterior wall are susceptible to intraoperative bleeding during the termination of pregnancy. Termination of pregnancy in these patients with central placenta previa should be carried out by cesarean section when gestation is more than 36 weeks to reduce postpartum hemorrhage and complications.
Objective To systemically review the clinical application of esketamine for postoperative analgesia in cesarean section. Methods Databases including CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on esketamine in cesarean section from inception to January 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 16 RCTs involving 1 715 cesarean section patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that esketamine decreased the patients’ visual analog scale scores after surgery (MD=?0.67, 95%CI ?0.86 to ?0.49, P<0.000 01) and reduced the need for analgesics for 48 hours after surgery (MD=?2.38, 95%CI ?3.15 to ?1.62, P<0.000 01) compared with the control drugs (such as opioids, ropivacaine, and normal saline), without increasing adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting (RR=0.84, 95%CI 0.62 to 1.12, P=0.23), hallucinations (RR=3.00, 95%CI 0.37 to 24.43, P=0.30), drowsiness (RR=1.49, 95%CI 0.16 to 13.99, P=0.73), itching (RR=1.05, 95%CI 0.79 to 1.41, P=0.72), hypotension (RR=0.31, 95%CI 0.04 to 2.40, P=0.26), bradycardia (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.01 to 11.24, P=0.59), and dizziness (RR=2.24, 95%CI 0.63 to 7.94, P=0.21). Compared with the control drugs, esketamine extended the operation time (MD=2.23, 95%CI 1.73 to 2.74, P<0.000 01), accelerated heart rate (MD=1.31, 95%CI 0.25 to 2.37, P=0.02), and increased the mean arterial pressure (MD=3.88, 95%CI 0.19 to 7.56, P=0.04) during surgery. Additionally, esketamine improved the Apgar score of neonates (MD=0.45, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.63, P<0.000 01) and the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale score of mothers (MD=?1.12, 95%CI ?1.87 to ?0.55, P=0.000 3), having no effects on the cord blood pH of neonates (MD=0.03, 95%CI ?0.01 to 0.07, P=0.14). Conclusion Esketamine has certain advantages when used for postoperative analgesia in cesarean section. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to further verify the above conclusion.
【摘要】 目的 觀察小劑量氯胺酮在健忘鎮痛麻醉輔助局部麻醉（局麻）剖宮產中的應用。方法 選擇1200例剖宮產的孕婦,隨機分為單純局麻組(L組)、氟芬強化局麻組(F組)和健忘鎮痛麻醉組(J組),每組400例。L組單純局麻;F組局麻術中輔以氟哌利多500 mg,芬太尼015 mg;J組在F組基礎上輔以氯胺酮,觀察各組患者麻醉誘導至胎兒娩出時間;新生兒1、5 min Apgar評分;手術中血壓相對于基礎值的波動情況;手術中及手術后出血情況及麻醉滿意度。 結果 J組與L組和F組比較,胎兒娩出時間無顯著差別;Apgar評分提高;手術中孕婦血壓波動不明顯;手術中及手術后出血量無明顯增加,麻醉滿意度明顯提高。 結論 由小劑量氯胺酮輔助實施的健忘鎮痛麻醉在局麻剖宮產中優于單純局麻和氟芬強化局麻,在剖宮產中尤其急診剖宮產中值得推廣。【Abstract】 Objective To observe the application of lowdose ketamine during the local anesthesia in cesarean section assisted by analgestic and amnestic anesthesia. Methods A total of 1200 cases who need cesarean section were randomly divided into 3 groups (400 cases in each group): simple local anesthesia group (group L), droperidolfentanyl strengthen local anesthesia group (group F) and analgestic and amnestic anesthesia group (group J). Group L was only local anesthesia. Group F was local anesthesia supplemented by droperidol 500 mg, fentanyl 015 mg. Group J was supplemented with ketamine on the basis of group F. Then the time from anesthesia to the fetus delivery, Neonatal Apgar score of one and five minutes, the blood pressure fluctuations, amount of bleeding in or after surgery and the satisfaction of anesthesia were all observed. Results Compared with group L and F, the delivery time was no significant difference, Apgar score increased, blood pressure fluctuations in pregnant women was not obviously varied, amount of bleeding in or after surgery had no significantly increase, and the satisfaction of anesthesia improved markedly all in group J. Conclusions The analgestic and amnestic anesthesia assisted by lowdose ketamine, in cesarean section, is better than local anesthesia and strengthen local anesthesia by droperidolfentanyl, which is worthy to be popularized, especially in emergency caesarean section.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effect of dexamethasone in preventing post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) associated with epidural opioids for post-cesarean section analgesia. MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases from inception to Dec. 31th 2015, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing dexamethasone with placebo/blank for the prevention of PONV associated with epidural opioids for postcesarean section analgesia. Two reviewer independently screened literature, extracted data, and assess the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 11 RCTs from 10 papers involving 1 011 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the placebo/ blank group, the dexamethasone group had lower incidence rates of post-operative nausea (RR=0.50, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.65, P < 0.000 01), postoperative vomiting (RR=0.39, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.52, P < 0.000 01), PONV (RR=0.37, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.46, P < 0.000 01), and rescue antiemetic (RR=0.34, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.62, P=0.000 5). ConclusionsCurrent evidence indicates that dexamethasone is effective for preventing PONV after epidural opioids for post-cesarean section analgesia. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusion needs to be further verified by more high quality studies.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of sufentanil versus fentanyl used in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after cesarean section.MethodsAn online search of computerized searches of the database of MEDLINE (OVID), Web of Science, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and SinoMed were conducted. Randomized controlled trials published since the inceptions of these databases until April 1st 2018, involving the comparison of sufentanil versus fentanyl for PCIA after cesarean section were included. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan 5.1 software.ResultsA total of 19 studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the fentanyl group, the sufentanil group had statistically significant lower VAS scores at 4-hour (MD=–0.99, 95%CI –1.03 to –0.95, P<0.001), 8-hour (MD=–0.30, 95%CI –0.40 to –0.21, P<0.001), 12-hour (MD=–0.54, 95%CI –0.62 to –0.46, P<0.001) and 24-hour (MD=–0.35, 95%CI –0.41 to –0.28, P<0.001); statistically significant higher Ramsay scores at 4-hour (MD=0.72, 95%CI 0.66 to 0.78, P<0.001), 8-hour (MD=0.93, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.00, P<0.001), 12-hour (MD=0.98, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.05, P<0.001), 24-hour (MD=0.07, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.11, P=0.000 5), 48-hour (MD=0.05, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.08, P<0.000 1). As for the adverse reactions, sufentanil group had lower risks of having nausea and vomiting (RR=0.25, 95%CI 0.19 to 0.31, P<0.001), pruritus (RR=0.41, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.57, P<0.001), dizziness (RR=0.27, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.44, P<0.001) and urinary retention (RR=0.35, 95%CI (0.15, 0.82), P=0.02).ConclusionsThe current evidence shows that, sufentanil has better analgesia and sedative effects, and less risks of adverse reactions for safer clinical use.
Objective To explore the value of lower abdominal aorta compression in emergent hysterectomy during cesarean section because of pernicious placenta previa. Method We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of four patients who underwent hysterectomy for pernicious placenta previa with the assistance of lower abdominal aorta compression between January 2016 and March 2017 in Sichuan Provincial Hospital for Women and Children. Result The four patients were cured successfully, and the mothers and babies were all well with no pelvic organ damage or complications related to lower abdominal aorta compression. Conclusions Lower abdominal aorta compression in hysterectomy for pernicious placenta previa during cesarean section is a feasible procedure; it can effectively reduce the amount of bleeding, less affect maternal blood circulation, make surgery area clear, and give the operators the chance to do hysterectomy calmly. Lower abdominal aorta compression presents more and more advantages to treat pernicious placenta previa and may be an effective emergency measure to reduce hemorrhage during perioperative period especially under the circumstances of no chance to carry out vascular intervention treatment.
ObjectiveTo investigate the value of uterine compression suture through laparoscopy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). MethodsA random controlled study was conducted on 85 CSP patients diagnosed between September 2013 and December 2014. The patients were randomly divided into control group (n=43) and study group (n=42). The control group received routine evacuation under laparoscopy, while the study group received routine evaluation under laparoscopy combined with uterine compression suture. The efficacy of the two treatments were compared and analyzed. ResultsThe operation time of the control group and the study group was (36.6±17.7) and (45.6±14.8) minutes, respectively. Total amount of bleeding during and after the operation was (207.9±165.8) and (96.1±29.0) mL for the two groups of patients, and the above differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in the indicators of anal exhaust time, hospitalization stay, blood β-human chorionic gonadotrophin clearance time, and menstruation recovery time between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionUterine compression suture through laparoscopy is a safe and reliable method to reduce the bleeding of CSP, which is easy to perform and worthy of promotion.
ObjectiveTo investigate the factors affecting the results of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data from 80 pregnant women of prior cesarean section with intention of vaginal delivery between October 2012 and July 2013. According to the final way of delivery, the 80 women were divided into two groups, the VBAC group (40 cases) and repeated cesarean section (RCS) group (40 cases). The clinical characteristics of the two groups were compared and further multi-variant analysis was conducted. Besides, 40 women with successful repeated vaginal delivery were included as controls. The delivery time and bleeding volume were compared between the VBAC group and the control group. ResultsThe three determinant factors associated with the present VBAC were: Arrested labor as the indication of prior cesarean section [OR=1.601, 95%CI (1.025, 2.469), P=0.04], Bishop Score [OR=3.757, 95%CI (1.437, 8.772), P=0.01] and infant weight [OR=1.391, 95%CI (1.124, 2.583), P=0.03]. The VBAC group presented a higher Episiotomy rate than the RCS group. No significant difference was found between the VBAC and the control group regarding the delivery time [(6.71±2.94) vs. (5.88±2.47) hours, P=0.176] and bleeding volume [(259.13± 75.31) vs. (230.36±67.44) mL, P=0.076]. ConclusionVBAC presents a better and faster recovery with a shorter hospital stay. But the indication of VBAC should be strictly followed to ensure the safety of both mothers and babies.