目的 介紹胸部良性疾病經單孔胸腔鏡切除術后免胸腔引流管的臨床經驗。 方法 回顧性分析 2015 年 10 月至 2016 年 10 月我院胸外科 17 例行單孔胸腔鏡手術患者的臨床資料，其中男 9 例、女 8 例，年齡 33.8（17～58）歲。行肺大皰切除術 7 例，肺楔形切除術 9 例，交感神經烙斷術 1 例。 結果 所有患者均經單孔胸腔鏡手術有效切除，期間無中轉開胸或再次開操作孔，術后不放置胸腔引流管，手術時間為（60.3±8.2）min，術中出血量為（15.2±5.1）ml，術后第 1 d、2 d、3 d 疼痛視覺模擬評分（VAS） 為 6.5±2.2，5.8±2.1，3.5±1.3，術后舒適度評分分別為 8.6±1.3，術后早期下床活動時間為（1.0±0.3）d，切口甲級愈合率 100.0%。17 例患者均無心律失常、肺部感染等并發癥，術后隨訪 6 個月氣胸均無復發。 結論 合理選擇及嚴格基線評估，胸部良性疾病經單孔胸腔鏡切除術后免胸腔引流管是安全可行的，可能有利于患者術后快速康復。
ObjectiveTo compare and evaluate the application of two types of chest drainage in patients who had undergone the lung lobe resection. MethodWe retrospective analyzed the clinical data of 240 patients who underwent left lobe resection. The patients were divided into a single conventional drainage group with single chest drainage tube (normal group) and a single conventional drainage tube combined with drainage of disposable surgical negative pressure drainage ball (NPBD) (combination group). There were 140 patients including 86 males and 54 females at mean age of 48.76± 4.92 years in the normal group. There were 100 patients including 58 males and 42 females at mean age of 48.37± 4.56 years in the combination group. We compared the outcomes between the two groups. ResultThe postoperative pathological results revealed there were 12 patients with tuberculosis (TB), 87 patients with squamous carcinoma, and 41 patients with adenocarcinoma in the normal group; 5 patients with TB, 66 patients with squamous carcinoma, and 29 patients with adenocarcinoma in the combination group. There were statistical differences in postoperative hospital stay (11.35± 2.78 d vs. 9.33± 2.46 d), chest drainage tube indwelling time (6.75± 2.10 d vs. 8.28± 2.10 d), total volume of chest drainage (1 176.07± 384.62 ml vs. 926.50± 22.35 ml) with P values less than 0.001 between the normal group and the combination group. No statistical difference was found between the two groups in complications (P>0.05). ConclusionSingle conventional drainage tube combined with drainage of disposable surgical negative pressure drainage ball (NPBD) has more advantages than single conventional chest drainage tube drainage, and is worth to be applied popularly in clinic.
ObjectiveTo compare postoperative efficacy of thoracoscopic partial pneumonectomy with or without thoracic drainage tube postoperatively.MethodsThe PubMed, Wanfang database, CNKI and Web of Science from January 2000 to August 2020 were searched by computer to collect randomized controlled studies (RCT), cohort studies and case-control studies on the efficacy of chest drainage tube placement versus no placement after thoracoscopic partial pneumonectomy. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data to evaluate the risk of literature bias. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan software.ResultsA total of 15 articles were included, including 1 RCT and 14 cohort studies. A total of 1 524 patients were enrolled, including 819 patients in the test group (no postoperative chest drainage tube group) and 705 patients in the control group (postoperative chest drainage tube group). Compared with the control group, the length of hospital stay in the test group was shorter (MD=–1.3, 95%CI –1.23 to –0.17, P<0.000 01) and the incidence of postoperative pneumothorax was higher (RD=0.06, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.10, P=0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time (MD=–2.37, 95%CI –7.04 to 2.30, P=0.32), the incidence of postoperative complications (RR=2.43, 95%CI 0.79 to 1.80, P=0.39), the reintervention rate of postoperative complications (RD=0.02, 95%CI=–0.00 to 0.04, P=0.05), postoperative subcutaneous emphysema (RD=0.02, 95%CI –0.01 to 0.06, P=0.20) and the incidence of postoperative pleural effusion (RD=0.04, 95%CI –0.00 to 0.09, P=0.10) .ConclusionCompared with the patients with chest drainage tube placement after thoracoscopic partial pneumonectomy (the control group), the test group can shorten the hospital stay. Although the incidence of postoperative pneumothorax is higher than that of the control group, the operation time, incidence of postoperative subcutaneous emphysema and in-hospital complications, and reintervention rate of in-hospital complications are not statistically significant between the two groups. Therefore no chest drainage tube may be placed after partial pneumonectomy.
ObjectiveTo explore the factors that affect the drainage time of da Vinci robot lung cancer surgery, to analyze the coping strategies, and to provide a basis for shortening the drainage time of patients after surgery and speeding up the patients' recovery.MethodsThe clinical data of 131 patients who underwent da Vinci robot lung cancer surgery at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from January 2019 to October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 68 were males and 63 were females, with an average age of 59.84±9.66 years. According to the postoperative thoracic drainage time, the patients were divided into two groups including a group A (drainage time≤ 5 days) and a group B (drainage time >5 days). Univariate analysis and logistic multivariate regression analysis were used to analyze the factors that may affect postoperative drainage time, and the correlation between different influencing factors and thoracic drainage time after da Vinci robot lung cancer surgery.ResultsLogistic multivariate analysis showed that age≥60 years (P=0.014), diabetes mellitus (P=0.035), operation time≥130 min (P=0.018), number of lymph node dissections≥15 (P=0.002), and preoperative albumin<38.45 g/L (P=0.010) were independent factors affecting the drainage time of da Vinci robot lung cancer surgery.ConclusionFor elderly patients with diabetes mellitus during the perioperative period, blood glucose should be actively controlled, reasonable surgical strategies should be formulated to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the operation, while reducing intraoperative damage and shortening the operation time. After the operation, patients should be guided to strengthen active coughing, expectoration and lung expansion. Thereby it can shorten drainage time and speed up the recovery of patients after operation.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of different drainage modes on the postoperative thoracic drainage after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for radical resection of lower lung carcinoma.MethodsA total of 183 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received biportal thoracoscopic anatomical lower lobectomy combined with mediastinal lymph node dissection in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from August 2017 to August 2019 were enrolled, including 113 males and 70 females, aged 31-77 (56.5±6.4) years. The patients were randomly divided into three groups, including an anterior axillary line group, a mid-axillary line group and a modified anterior axillary line group. Clinical efficacy of the three groups was compared.ResultsNo significant difference among these three groups in terms of gender, age, surgical site, pathological type, pathological staging, postoperative chest wall subcutaneous emphysema, postoperative pain score, and postoperative hospital stay was found (P>0.05). There were significant differences among the patients in terms of postoperative pleural effusion, re-insertion of chest tube or aspiration, total liquid quantity of thoracic drainage, drainage time and chest wall incision stitches time (P<0.05). The anterior axillary line group had higher risk of postoperative pleural effusion than the other groups (P<0.05). The occurrence of postoperative pleural effusion and rate of reposition of chest tube or aspiration were significantly reduced in the modified anterior axillary line group (P<0.05).ConclusionChest drainage tube with large diameter (24F) in the 5th intercostal space of the anterior axillary line combined with another micro-tube (8.5F) in the 7th or 8th intercostal space of the inferior scapular angle line can shorten drainage time to reduce postoperative pain, reduce the occurrence of postoperative pleural effusion, and shorten the time of surgical incision stitches.
ObjectiveTo compare the incidence of complications after removal of chest drainage tube in the early and late stages after sublobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to analyze the factors affecting postoperative pleural drainage volume (PDV), so as to explore the countermeasures and achieve rapid postoperative rehabilitation. MethodsThe patients with NSCLC who underwent minimally invasive sublobectomy in our hospital from January to October 2021 were enrolled. According to the median time of extubation, the patients were divided into an early extubation group (time with tube≤3 days) and a late extubation group (time with tube>3 days). The patients were matched via propensity score matching with a ratio of 1:1 and a caliper value of 0.02. The incidence of complications and perioperative parameters after removal of the thoracic drainage tube were analyzed and compared between the two groups, and univariate and multiple linear regression analyses were performed. ResultsA total of 157 patients were enrolled, including 79 males and 78 females, with an average age of (58.22±11.06) years. There were 76 patients in the early extubation group, 81 patients in the late extubation group, and 56 patients were in each group after propensity score matching. Compared with late extubation group, there was no significant difference in the incidence of infection after extubation (10.7% vs. 16.1%, P=0.405) or pleural effusion after extubation (5.4% vs. 3.6%, P=0.647) in early extubation group, and there was no second operation in both groups. Univariate analysis showed that smoking history (P=0.001), postoperative serum albumin reduction value (P=0.017), surgical approach (P=0.014), lesion location (P=0.027), differentiation degree (P=0.041), TNM stage (P=0.043), number of dissected lymph nodes (P=0.016), and intraoperative blood loss (P=0.016) were infuencing factors for increased postoperative PDV. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that smoking history (P=0.002), postoperative serum albumin reduction value (P=0.041), and the number of dissected lymph nodes (P=0.023) were independent risk factors for increased postoperative PDV. ConclusionThere is no significant difference in the incidence of complications after extubation between early and late extubations. Preoperative smoking history, excessive postoperative serum albumin decreases, and excessive number of dissected lymph nodes during the surgery are independent risk factors for increased postoperative PDV.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical results between single and double chest tube applications after lung cancer resection, and explore the role of single chest tube in postoperative fast track recovery. MethodNinety-three patients with lung cancer who underwent lobectomy between March and December of 2009 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were included in this study. All the patients were divided into a single-tube group including 46 patients (39 males and 7 females) with their age of 58.4±9.5 years, and a double-tube group including 47 patients (32 males and 15 females) with their age of 58.2±9.0 years. Drainage amount, duration, postoperative hospital stay, and incidences of pneumothorax and pleural effusion after removal of chest tubes were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThe percentage of patients undergoing complete video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of the double-tube group was significantly higher than that of the single-tube group, and the percentage of patients undergoing thoracotomy of the double-tube group was significantly lower than that of the single-tube group (P < 0.05). Drainage amount of the double-tube group was significantly larger than that of the single-tube group (824.4±612.5 ml vs. 510.7±406.7 ml, P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in drainage duration, postoperative hospital stay, the incidences of subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, pleural effusion or re-insertion of chest drain between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionClinical results of single chest tube is better than or equivalent to those of double chest tubes after lung cancer resection, and drainage duration of single chest tube application might be shorter.
ObjectiveTo discuss the safety and feasibility of no chest tube (NCT) after thoracoscopic pneumonectomy.MethodsThe online databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Database, VIP, China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc) were searched by computer from inception to October 2020 to collect the research on NCT after thoracoscopic pneumonectomy. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the included studies. The RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 17 studies were included. There were 12 cohort studies and 5 randomized controlled trials including 1 572 patients with 779 patients in the NCT group and 793 patients in the chest tube placement (CTP) group. Meta–analysis results showed that the length of postoperative hospital stay in the NCT group was shorter than that in the CTP group (SMD=–1.23, 95%CI –1.59 to –0.87, P<0.000 01). Patients in the NCT group experienced slighter pain than those in the CTP group at postoperative day (POD)1 (SMD=–0.97, 95%CI –1.42 to –0.53, P<0.000 1), and POD2 (SMD=–1.10, 95%CI –2.00 to –0.20, P=0.02), while no statistical difference was found between the two groups in the visual analogue scale of POD3 (SMD=–0.92, 95%CI –1.91 to 0.07, P=0.07). There was no statistical difference in the 30-day complication rate (RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.61 to 1.44, P=0.76), the rate of postoperative chest drainage (RR=1.51, 95%CI 0.68 to 3.37, P=0.31) or the rate of thoracocentesis (RR=2.81, 95%CI 0.91 to 8.64, P=0.07) between the two groups. No death occurred in the perioperative period in both groups.ConclusionIt is feasible and safe to omit the chest tube after thoracoscopic pneumonectomy for patients who meet the criteria.