【摘要】 目的 比較薤白聯合阿司匹林或單用阿司匹林防治心腦血管事件的療效。 方法 2007年1月〖CD3/5〗2009年9月就診的188例高危患者納入研究,隨機分為實驗組(89例)和對照組(99例)。兩組均予口服阿司匹林0.1 g,1次/d。實驗組同時給予口服薤白0.9 g,3次/d。觀察兩組患者血管事件的發生率和不良反應的發生情況。 結果 實驗組血管總事件發生率為6.7%,對照組為19.2%,兩組間差異有統計學意義(Plt;0.05);實驗組腦梗死發生率為1.1%,對照組為9.1%,兩組間差異有統計學意義(Plt;0.05)。兩組短暫性腦缺血、心絞痛、心肌梗死的發生率比較,差異無統計學意義(Pgt;0.05)。兩組皮下出血、血尿、黑便、惡心、腹痛等不良反應的發生率比較,差異無統計學意義(Pgt;0.05)。 結論 服用阿司匹林加薤白可顯著降低高危患者心腦血管總事件發生率和腦梗死發生率,增加療效,而不良反應沒有顯著增加。【Abstract】 Objective Compare the curative effect of cerebrovascular diseases event prevented with llium macrostemon and aspirin or only with aspirin. Methods Divide the outpatient patients into experimental group (89 patients) and control group (99 patients). Use 0.1 g aspirin for two groups with oral administration once per day. The experimental group is used with 0.9 g allium macrostemon with oral administration three times per day. Observe the generation rate and adverse reaction of vascular events in two groups of patients. Results The Total generation rate of vascular events in the experimental group is 6.7% and the control group is 19.2%,the differences were statistically significant (Plt;0.05); the cerebral infarction generation rate in the experimental group is 1.1% and in the control group is 9.1%,the differences were statistically significant (Plt;0.05). There is no significant difference (Pgt;0.05) in TIA, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction generation rate in two groups. There is no significant difference (Pgt;005) in adverse reaction generation rate of subcutaneous hemorrhage, hematuria, melena, nausea, bellyache. Conclusion Taking aspirin with llium macrostemon can significantly decrease total cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events generation rate and cerebral infarction generation rate in high risk patients, improve the curative effect and the adverse reaction has not been significantly increased.
Objective [WTBZ]To assess the impact of dual antiplatelet therapy using aspirin and clopidogrel on postoperative bleeding and blood transfusion early after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods [WTBZ]In this randomized controlled trial, 249 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups after coronary artery bypass grafting from December 2007 to December 2008. Daily clopidogrel (75 mg) and aspirin (100 mg) were initiated in 124 patients (group AC) while aspirin (100 mg) alone was administered to 125 patients (group A). Antiplatelet therapy was initiated within 48h postoperatively. Demographic, operative, and postoperative data were compared between the two groups. Chest tube drainage and quantity of blood products used in both groups were recorded. The effects of the antiplatelet regimen on chest tube drainage were compared using a linear regression model. Results [WTBZ]No statistical difference of demographic, operative, and preoperative data was observed between the two groups （Pgt;0.05）. Chest tube drainage after patients received ntiplatelet agents was not significantly different between group A and group AC（495.00±270.89 ml vs. 489.25±316.68ml，t=0.146, P=0.884）. No statistical difference of cases of transfusion(81 cases vs. 91 cases，χ2=1.937, P=0.164) or quantity of red cells (2.51±2.88 U vs. 2.25±2.87 U, t=0.690, P=0.491) and plasma (195.45±300.88 ml vs. 223.01±238.68 ml,t=0.759, P=0.449) transfused was found between group A and group AC. No perioperative mortality, reexploration or extrathoracic bleeding occurred in either group. Early postoperative use of dual antiplatelet therapy was not associated with increased bleeding after coronary artery bypass grafting on multivariable analysis（r=2.297，95%CI:-64.526,69.121，P=0.946）. Conclusionpresent study suggests that according to a predefined administration protocol, dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin and clopidogrel can safely be administered in the early postoperative period in CABG patients, without increasing the risk of bleeding complications.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of four antiplatelet regimens after coronary drug-eluting stents by network meta-analysis.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase and Web of Science databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the comparison of different antiplatelet regimens after coronary drug-eluting stenting from inception to December 31st, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk bias of included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by using Gemtc14.3 software, Stata16.0 software and RevMan5.3 software.ResultsA total of 23 RCTs involving 45 837 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that: in terms of prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) recurrence, the aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was inferior to the triple antiplatelet therapy (OR=2.13, 95%CI 1.08 to 4.03). In terms of reducing the incidence of ischemic compound events, the triple antiplatelet therapy was superior to the standard dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.53, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.72), the aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.69) and the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.73). There was no statistically significant difference among the four interventions in reducing the rate of in-stent thrombosis and all-cause mortality (P>0.05). In terms of safety, the bleeding rate of aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was lower than that of standard dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.70, 95%CI 0.55 to 0.86) and triple antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.58, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.90), and the bleeding rate of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was also lower than that of standard dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.65) and triple antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.43, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.67). The probability ranking diagram showed that: in terms of the recurrence rate of MI, the rate of in-stent thrombosis and the incidence of ischemic compound events, triple antiplatelet therapy was the lowest and aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was the highest. However, in terms of all-cause mortality and bleeding rate, aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was the lowest and triple antiplatelet therapy was the highest.ConclusionsThe available evidence suggests that when the risk of ischemia is low, we should choose aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy, and P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy may have a lower risk of ischemia and bleeding. When the risk of ischemia is high and bleeding is low, the triple or standard dual antiplatelet therapy should be selected, and the efficacy of triple antiplatelet therapy is superior, while the safety may be inferior.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of aspirin-clopidogrel combined anti-platelet therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). MethodsDatabases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2013), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP were searched electronically from their inception to September 2013 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about aspirin-clopidogrel combined anti-platelet therapy after CABG. Two reviewers selected literature independently according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After data extraction and methological quality assessment of the included studies, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of six RCTs involving 901 patients were included, of which 449 cases were in the aspirin-clopidogrel group (A+C) and 452 cases were in the aspirin with or without placebo group (A+P). The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with A+P, A+C significantly reduced occlusion rates of the saphenous vein graft (RR=0.59, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.80, P=0.000 6). But no significant difference was found between the two groups in occlusion rates of the left internal mammary artery graft (RR=0.88, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.18, P=0.78), radial artery graft (RR=0.43, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.46, P=0.18), pleural fluid drainage volume (MD=-1.68, 95%CI-48.69 to 45.32, P=0.94), incidence of major bleeding events (RR=1.20, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.65, P=0.75), major cardiovascular events (OR=0.81, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.72, P=0.58), and mortality within 30 days (RR=0.64, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.44, P=0.52). ConclusionIn reducing occlusion rates of the saphenous vein graft, the A+C group is more effective than the A+P group. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusion still needs to be verified by carrying out more high-quality RCTs.
A large amount of research evidence has shown a correlation between cerebral infarction and malignant tumors, and malignant-tumor-related embolic stroke is the main type of malignant-tumor-related cerebral infarction. Hypercoagulation is considered to be the main mechanism. However, due to the complexity of the pathogenesis, the optimal diagnosis, treatment, and prevention strategies remain unclear. This review summarizes the published literature on the concepts, mechanisms, clinical manifestations, laboratory and imaging examinations, treatment and prevention of malignant-tumor-related embolic cerebral infarction, to clearly understand this disease and provide ideas for early recognition, reasonable diagnosis and treatment, improvement of prognosis, and further research of this disease.
Substantial progresses have been made in cerebral vascular diseases in 2017. By retrospectively analyzing the clinical researches which Chinese experts participated in or were in charge of, this article briefly summarizes the update of stroke epidemiology, explorations of stroke-related risk factors, early management of acute stroke, secondary prevention and prognosis of stroke. These researches include the problems about the dose of thrombolysis medicine, new type of antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs, prognosis of intracranial hemorrhage and signs of intracranial hematoma enlargement, which have close connection with clinical work and are valuable in practice.
ObjectiveTo retrieve currently-available best evidence to select the treatment plan of antithrombotic therapy for a gerontal patient lately admitted because of atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD), and to provide references for clinical treatment. MethodsWe comprehensively searched PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid), EMbase and The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2014) up to May 2014, for relevant evidence about antithrombotic therapy for patients with AF and CAD. After analysis and assessment, we developed the plan of the patient's antithrombotic therapy. ResultsCurrent evidence showed no best treatment plan of antithrombotic therapy for patients with AF and CAD. ConclusionCorrect evaluation of the risks of thrombosis and bleeding is the key point of beneficial antithrombotic therapy for patients with AF and CAD.
ObjectiveTo analyze the correlation of thrombopoietin (TPO) and anti-TPO antibody with thrombocytopenia in patients with primary Sj?gren syndrome (PSS). MethodsWe included in our study 40 PSS patients with thrombocytopenia (group A), 22 PSS patients who once had thrombocytopenia and returned to normal (group B), 40 PSS patients with normal platelet counts (group C) and 40 healthy controls (group D) between September 2013 and October 2014. Anti-TPO antibody was detected by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and serum TPO levels were measured by ELISA. We analyzed the relationship between the assay results and the clinical manifestations and parameters. ResultsThe serum TPO levels in groups A, B, and C were (129.74±17.47) , (330.23±18.07) and (364.19±12.25) pg/mL, respectively, and they were significantly higher than that in group D [(54.04±10.71) pg/mL] (P ＜ 0.05) . The serum level of TPO was positively correlated with CRP and IgA (rs=0.224, P=0.039; rs=0.239, P=0.033) , and was negatively correlated with C4 level (rs=?0.220, P=0.041) , but it was not significantly correlated with platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, the level of antiphospholipid antibodies and the titer of antinuclear antibodies (P ＞ 0.05) . The positive rate of PSS patients was 20.59% (21/102) and the rate in groups A, B, and C was respectively 17.5% (7/40) , 22.72% (5/22) , and 22.5% (9/40) . There was no statistically significant difference between the positive and negative groups in various clinical indexes (P ＞ 0.05) . ConclusionAntiTPO antibody may not be the main mechanism of thrombocytopenia in PSS patients, and there is a certain correlation between TPO and inflammatory factors.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of different duration of dual antiplatelet therapies in patients undergoing new-generation drug-eluting stents implantation. Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2015), EMbase, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data were searched to collect studies on the different duration of dual antiplatelet therapies in patients undergoing new-generation drug-eluting stents implantation from inception to April 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Six trials were included. The results of meta-analysis showed: compared with 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy group, the incidence of bleeding in the 6 months dual antiplatelet therapy group was lower (OR=0.48, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.89, P=0.02). There were no significant differences in incidence of myocardial infarction, all cause mortality, stroke and stent thrombosis between two groups. Compared with 24 months dual antiplatelet therapy group, the incidence of stent thrombosis in the 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy group was higher (OR=2.50, 95%CI 1.13 to 5.61, P=0.02), but the incidence of bleeding in 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy group was lower (OR=0.25, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.89, P=0.03). No significant differences were found in the incidence of myocardial infarction, all cause mortality and stroke between 12 months dual antiplatelet therapy group and 24 months dual antiplatelet therapy group. Conclusions 6 months dual antiplatelet therapy following new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation is relatively more safe and efficacy. There is significant increase of incidence of bleeding in 12 or 24 months dual antiplatelet therapy. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, the above results are needed to be validated by more high quality studies.