ObjectiveTo systematically review the influence of dexmedetomidine on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and serum inflammatory factors in elderly patients.MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases from inception to April 2017, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about dexmedetomidine for early POCD in elderly patients. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 23 RCTs, including 2 026 patients were enrolled. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the incidence of POCD in the dexmedetomidine group was lower than that in the control group (the first day: RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.53, P<0.000 01; the third day: RR=0.33, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.48,P<0.000 01; the seventh day: RR=0.42, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.78,P=0.006). Meanwhile, compared with the control group, the dexmedetomidine group significantly decreased the serum levels of TNF-α (immediately after operation: MD=–5.43, 95%CI –7.44 to –3.42, P<0.000 01; 1 h after operation: MD=–4.64, 95%CI –6.92 to –2.36,P<0.000 1; 24 h after operation: MD=–3.27, 95%CI –4.92 to –1.63,P<0.000 1) and IL-6 (immediately after operation: MD=–30.69, 95%CI –41.39 to –20.00,P<0.000 01; 1h after operation: MD=–20.84, 95%CI –28.87 to –12.80,P<0.000 01; 24 h after operation: MD=–13.42, 95%CI –19.90 to –6.94,P<0.000 1).ConclusionCurrent evidence indicates that dexmedetomidine could relief early POCD in elderly patients, in which the reduction of serum inflammatory factors alleviate inflammation response may play a vital role. Due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high quality RCTs are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension in orthognathic surgery. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension in orthognathic surgery from inception to May, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by using RevMan 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 8 RCTs involving 371 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the operation time of dexmedetomidine group was not significantly different from that of hypotensive drug group, but was shorter than that of saline group (MD=?23.20, 95%CI ?44.05 to ?2.35, P=0.03). There were no statistically significant differences in the mean arterial pressure and the intraoperative blood loss between dexmedetomidine group and the control group. Compared with those in the control group, the heart rate (MD=?18.78, 95%CI ?30.80 to ?6.77, P=0.002) and the incidence of postoperative adverse events (OR=0.25, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.76, P=0.01) in dexmedetomidine group were less than those in the control group significantly. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that dexmedetomidine can be used effectively for controlled hypotension in orthognathic surgery. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine on systemic vascular resistance in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. MethodsThirty-one patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass from January to April, 2012 were randomized into experimental group (n=16) and control group (n=15). The flow rate was kept at 2.4 L/(min·m2) and moderate hypothermia was maintained. Equivalent dexmedetomidine and 0.9% sodium chloride solution were pumped for the experimental group and control group, respectively. The mean artery pressure (MAP), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), Cortisol, epinephrine and norepinephrine were determined before (T0) and at 10 and 20 minutes (T1,T2) after dexmedetomidine administration. ResultsCompared with T0, there were significant decreases in MAP and SVR at T1 and T2 (P<0.05). MAP and SVR were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group at T1 and T2, respectively (P<0.05); cortisol, epinephrine and norepinephrine were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group at T1 and T2, respectively (P<0.05). ConclusionDexmedetomidine reduces SVR and causes decrease in MAP. It can effectively inhibit the stress reaction in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.
ObjectiveTo observe the effects and security of dexmedetomidine in combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP). MethodsFrom January 2010 to January 2013, we selected 90 patients who were going to receive TEP surgery as our study subjects. The patients were divided into three groups:M1, M2 and M3 with 30 patients in each. The patients had left lateral position, and anesthesia was done between 3-4 lumbar epidural line. Injection of 0.5% bupivacaine 2 mL was carried out, and epidural catheter was 3-5 cm. Anesthesia plane was adjusted from the chest 4 or 6 vertebra to the sacral vertebra. The three groups of patients were treated with micro pump using dexmedetomidine given at a pre-charge of 0.5 μg/kg, and then group M1 was maintained by 0.3 μg/(kg·h), M2 by 0.5 μg/(kg·h), and M3 by 0.7 μg/(kg·h). The changes of mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, respiration and pulse oximetry (SpO2) were observed at each time point, and bispectral index (BIS) monitor and Ramsay sedation score test were also conducted. ResultsThe changes of MAP, heart rate and respiration in group M1 were not obvious; the Ramsay score for group M1 was 2 to 3, and BIS value after pre-charge was 65-84. For group M2, MAP, heart rate and respiration had a slight decline; Ramsay score was 3-5 points, and BIS value was 60-79. In group M3, patients had a milder decline in their MAP and respiration; the heart rate declined obviously after receiving dexmedetomidine and one patient with severe decline of the heart rate alleviated after active treatment; Ramsay score was 5 to 6 points, and BIS value was between 55 and 75. There was little change in SpO2 in all the three groups, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). ConclusionContinuous injection of dexmedetomidine at 0.3-0.5 μg/(kg·h) in CSEA is an alternative way for anesthesia, which can effectively promote sedation and reduce pain and discomfort.
Objective To explore the influence of dexmedetomidine on wake-up test during spinal orthopaedic surgery. Methods All 80 patients taking spinal orthopaedic surgery were randomly divided into the trial group and the control group, with 40 cases in each group. The endotracheal intubation anesthesia was adopted in both groups with same anesthesia induction. Additionally, dexmedetomidine 0.8 μg/ (kg·h) was infused within 10 min in the trial group before anesthesia induction, and then another 0.5 μg/ (kg·h) was also infused from the intraoperation to suture of incision. For the control group, the same amount of normal saline was infused, and all the narcotics were stopped pumping 15 min before the wake-up test, but then were continued pumping after the wake-up test. Finally, the following indexes were analyzed: wake-up time, wake-up quality, hemodynamic changes at the time of 15 min before wake-up (T1), recovery of spontaneous breathing (T2), wake-up (T3) and 15 min after wake-up (T4), dosage of narcotics, and the incidence of adverse events. Results There was no significant difference in the operation time before wake-up between the two groups (P=0.07). For the trial group, the dosage of sevoflurane (P=0.03) and sufentanil (P=0.00) used before wake-up was significantly lower, the wake-up time (P=0.04) and bleeding amount during wake-up (P=0.00) were significantly less, the wake-up quality (P=0.03) was significantly higher, the blood pressure (P=0.00) and heart rate (P=0.00) when wake-up were significantly lower, and the incidence of adverse events (P=0.04) was significantly lower, compared with the control group. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine adopted in spinal orthopaedic surgery can significantly improve patient’s wake-up quality, shorten wake-up time, reduce bleeding amount when wake-up and adverse events after wake-up, and maintain the hemodynamic stability, so it has better protective effects.
ObjectiveTo investigate the risk factors and prevention strategies of postoperative delirium in Stanford B aortic dissection. MethodsClinical data of the patients diagnosed with Stanford B aortic dissection and undergoing endovascular aortic repair from January 2020 to August 2021 in our department were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into a non-delirium group and a delirium group according to the presence of postoperative delirium. The risk factors for postoperative delirium after Stanford type B aortic dissection and the protective effect of dexmedetomidine on delirium were analyzed. ResultsA total of 659 patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection were enrolled, including 540 males and 119 females with a median age of 58.00 (41.00, 75.00) years. There were 450 patients in the non-delirium group, and 209 patients in the delirium group. There was no statistical difference in gender, body mass index, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking and drinking history, cholesterol triglyceride level, or creatinine glomerular filtration rate (P＞0.05). Age was an independent risk factor for postoperative delirium in Stanford type B aortic dissection (OR=1.392, 95%CI 1.008-1.923, P=0.044). Moreover, whether dexmedetomidine was used or not had no effect on the duration of postoperative delirium (χ2=4.662, P=0.588). Conclusion Age is an independent risk factor for postoperative delirium in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection. The incidence of postoperative delirium in young patients is lower than that in the patients with middle and elderly age, and it may be of reference value to prevent postoperative delirium. Dexmedetomidine has no significant effect on controlling the duration of postoperative delirium.
Objective To investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine combined with subanesthetic doses of ketamine on cognitive function after surgery for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. Methods A total of 78 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture who were admitted to hospital between January 2015 and June 2016 were divided into the control group (n=38) and the study group (n=40) according to the admitting time. The cases in the control group were treated with dexmedetomidine given anesthesia and the cases in the study group received dexmedetomidine combined with subanesthetic dose of ketamine. The incidences of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and the scores of Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and Ramsay scores were compaired, and serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were detected. Results There was no difference in operation time, blood loss, blood pressure and oxygen partial pressure between the two groups (P>0.05). The 1-, 3-day postoperative incidences of POCD in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, 7-day postoperative MMSE scores and Ramsay sedation scores 1 hour, 3 and 6 hours after stopping anaesthetic drugs in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The 1-, 3-day postoperative serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion For elderly patients with femoral neck fracture after surgery, taking dexmedetomidine flax composite drunk dose of ketamine anesthesia method helps to reduce the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy and safety of different sedative and analgesic methods in emergent endotracheal intubations in RICU. Methods110 cases of tracheal intubation in critically ill patients were divided into 5 groups randomly: ① control group(given no sedative or analgesic drug before intubation); ② fentanyl group(given intravenous fentanyl 2 μg/kg before intubation,followed by fentanyl 2 μg·kg-1·h-1 maintenance); ③ dexmedetomidine hydrochloride+fentanyl group(given dexmedetomidine hydrochloride 1 μg/kg+fentanyl 2 μg/kg before intubation,followed by dexmedetomidine hydrochloride 0.5 μg·kg-1·h-1+fentanyl 2 μg·kg-1·h-1 maintenance); ④ midazolam+fentanyl group(given midazolam 0.05 mg/kg+fentanyl 2 μg/kg before intubation,followed by midazolam 0.05 mg·kg-1·h-1+fentanyl 2 μg·kg-1·h-1 maintenance); ⑤ Propofol+fentanyl group(given propofol 1 mg/kg+fentanyl 2 μg/kg before intubation,followed by propofol 0.4 mg·kg-1·h-1+fentanyl 2 μg·kg-1·h-1 maintenance).The mean arterial pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR),respiratory frequency(RR),PaO2/FiO2,Riker sedation score and agitation were monitored before,during and after intubations.The one-time success rate of intubation and severe arrhythmia (sinus bradycardia,frequent ventricular premature,ventricular fibrillation,and cardiac arrest) incidence rate were recorded. ResultsThe one-time success rates of intubations of the propofol+fentanyl group (95.4%) and the midazolam+fentanyl group (90.9%) were higher than that in the dexmedetomidine hydrochloride+fentanyl group (86.4%,P<0.05),while one-time intubation success rate of three groups were higher than that of the fentanyl group (45.4%) and the control group (31.8%,P<0.05).5 minutes after intubation,the PaO2/FiO2 index of 5 groups of patients were higher than those before intubation,but the PaO2/FiO2 index of the control group and the fentanyl group were lower than those in the other three groups(P<0.05).The occurrence of serious arrhythmia rate in the dexmedetomidine hydrochloride+fentanyl group (0%),the midazolam+fentanyl group (9%) and the propofol+fentanyl group (9%) were lower than that in the control group (13.6%) and the fentanyl group (18.2%).The MAP during intubation and 2 minutes after intubation of the propofol+fentanyl group and the midazolam+fentanyl group were lower than that in the other three groups(P<0.05).The proportion of patients with Riker sedation and agitation score≤4 at intubation in the dexmedetomidine hydrochloride+fentanyl group (68.2%) was lower than that in the propofol+fentanyl group(90.9%) and the midazolam+fentanyl group (86.4%,P<0.05),but higher than those in the fentanyl group(22.7%)and the control group(18.2%,P<0.05). ConclusionPropofol,midazolam or dexmedetomidine hydrochloride with fentanyl are all effective and safe methods of sedation and analgesia in emergent endotracheal intubation in RICU.Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride with fentanyl is an ideal sedative relatively with less influence on cardiovascular system and less myocardial oxygen consumption.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effect of Dexmedetomidine (Dex) on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) of Chinese patients undergoing abdominal surgeries. MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data from inception to April 2015, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about evaluating the effect of Dex on POCD of Chinese patients undergoing abdominal surgeries. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 8 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:compared with the control group, the MMSE scores of the Dex group were higher after surgeries in the first day (MD=1.46, 95%CI 0.98 to 1.95, P<0.000 01), the second day (MD=2.46, 95%CI 2.11 to 2.81, P<0.000 01), the third day (MD=1.81, 95%CI 0.37 to 3.25, P=0.01) and the seventh day (WMD=2.03, 95%CI 1.64 to 2.43, P<0.000 01). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the usage of Dex during abdominal surgeries can reduce the incidence of POCD in Chinese patients. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.