Objective To evaluate the efficacy and the adverse reactions of intensive therapy compared with conventional therapy. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (January 1980 to June 2008), EMbase (1984 to June 2008), CBM-disc (January 1980 to June 2008) and CNKI (1994 to June 2008) to get all the randomized control trials (RCTs) about paclitaxel intensive versus conventional therapy for ovarian cancer. We used RevMan 5 to perform meta-analysis. Results Six RCTs involving 572 patients were included. Metaanalysis showed the efficacy of intensive therapy and conventional therapy was similar. There were no significant differences in response rate (RR 1.06, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.20), median survival time, survival rate, median progression free survival and median time to progression between the two groups. When taking safety into consideration, intensive therapy significantly reduced the occurrence of grade Ⅲ or higher neutropenia (RR 0.49, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.69, Plt;0.000 1) and Grade Ⅲ or higher neuropathy (RR 0.43, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.78, P=0.006). But there were no significant differences between intensive therapy and conventional therapy in flush, grade Ⅲ or higher vomiting, anemia, leucopenia, grade Ⅲ or higher thrombocytopenia and alopecia. Conclusion Paclitaxel intensive therapy has similar efficacy and adverse reactions compared with conventional therapy in ovarian cancer. Above all, intensive therapy can reduce the incidence of grade Ⅲ or higher neutropenia and neuropathy. It is a good substitution for the conventional therapy.
Objective To use a meta-analysis method to establish quantitatively the association between the HER-2/neu gene amplification/enhanced protein expression status and the 5-year post-operative survival rate or median survival time in women with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Methods We searched and screened Chinese and English literature published since 1989 to collect all retrospective cohort studies on the prognostic significance of HER-2/neu status in this population. The survival data were analyzed using Ludwig’s centered signed rank and the DerSimonian-Laird method. Results In total, 25 studies involving 3 251 patients were included. HER-2/neu was positive in 27.1% (95%CI 0 to 54.8%) of patients, which was not related to the pathological stage, type or grade of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. In HER-2/neu positive cases, the median survival time was shortened by 0.65 years, and the 5-year survival rate was lowered. The hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was 1.22 (95%C 1.09 to 1.36). By subgroup analysis, HER-2/neu protein expression was found to be most significant in prognostic assessment. Patients with a b positive value of HER-2/neu had an increased HR for the 5-year survival; and platinum-based chemotherapy was demonstrated to be less effective in HER-2/neu positive ovarian carcinoma. Conclusion In gynecological oncology, it is reasonable to measure HER-2/neu as a routine pathological marker to predict a patient’s prognosis and to determine the most appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy regimen.
Objective To evaluate the role of systematic lymphadenectomy (SL) vs. unsystematic lymphadenectomy (USL) for improving overall survival (OS) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods The databases such as PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews (EBMR), CBM, CNKI and VIP were searched between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2010, the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies on SL vs. USL in treating EOC were included. Based on Cochrane handbook, the data were extracted, the methodological quality was assessed, and then meta-analyses were conducted by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results The total 13 studies involving 22 796 patients were included, including 5 420 patients in the SL group, and the other 17 376 patients in the USL group. Two of the 13 studies were RCTs, and the other 11 were observational studies (including 2 studies retrieved from SEER data). The analyses on 2 RCTs showed that compared with USL, a) SL could not improve 5-PFS (OR=0.70, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.22, P=0.21) in early-stage EOC (FIGO I to II), but it did improve 5-PFS (OR=0.62, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.96, P=0.03) in advanced-stage EOC (FIGO III to IV); b) SL could not improve 5-OS in both early-stage EOC (OR=0.84; 95%CI 0.44 to1.58, P=0.58) and advanced-stage EOC (OR=0.93, 95%CI 0.64 to 1.37, P=0.73); and c) SL could not improve 5-OS in both early-stage (OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.44 to 1.58, P=0.58) and advanced-stage (OR=0.93, 95%CI 0.64 to 1.37, P=0.73) of EOC patients who had optimal tumor dubulking surgery. The analyses on observational studies showed that compared with USL, a) SL could not improve 5-PFS in both early-stage EOC (OR=0.38, 95%CI 0.08 to 1.74, P=0.21) and advanced-stage (OR=2.88, 95%CI 0.95 to 8.72, P=0.06) EOC; b) Whether SEER impacts were excluded or not, SL did improve 5-OS in both early-stage EOC (OR=0.54, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.63, Plt;0.000 01) and advanced-stage (OR=0.47, 95%CI 0.43 to 0.52, Plt;0.000 01) EOC; and c) For EOC patients who had optimal tumor dubulking surgery, SL could not improve 5-OS in early-stage (OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.02 to 6.19, P=0.45), but it did improve 5-OS in advanced-stage (OR=0.53, 95%CI 0.32 to 0.88, P=0.01). Conclusion These findings suggest that maybe SL can improve 5-PFS and 5-OS in EOC. However, the efficacy of SL on 5-PFS and 5-OS is still undetermined, so more relevant studies are required for further investigating the role of SL in EOC.
Objective To make an individualized therapeutic regimen for a patient with stage III relapsed ovarian cancer guided by evidence-based medicine.Methods According to the clinical problems this patient showed and the PICO (patient, intervention, comparison and outcome) principle, the best clinical evidence associated with relapsed ovarian cancer was retrieved and evaluated. Results The current evidence showed that the relapsed ovarian cancer with platinum resistance tended to be treated by pharmacotherapy. Consequently, on the basis of combining the recommended guidelines, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews or meta-analyses on RCTs, clinical experience from doctors and willingness of patient, the regimen of Irinotecan plus Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for interventional chemotherapy was recommended for this patient. After three courses of the treatment, the disease got some relieved; the medical team would like to keep conducting the same regimen for another six to eight courses, and the follow-up visit was undergoing. Conclusion For patients with relapsed ovarian cancer with platinum resistance, an individualized therapeutic regimen under the guidance of evidence-based methods can not only improve the therapeutic efficacy but also guide both doctors and patients to take the indeterminate risk of medicine.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy (IHPC) for ovarian cancer, so as to provide references for clinical practice and studies. MethodsWe electronically searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2013), Web of Science, WanFang Data, CBM, VIP and CNKI for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about IHPC vs. intravenous chemotherapy (IC) for ovarian cancer from the inception of the databases to June 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 723 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the IHPC group was superior to the IC group in clinical efficiency (OR=4.02, 95%CI 2.85 to 5.68, P < 0.000 01), clinical benefit response (OR=3.41, 95%CI 2.13 to 5.45, P < 0.000 01), recurrence and metastasis rates (OR=0.29, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.42, P < 0.000 1), and overall survival rates (OR=3.30, 95%CI 1.82 to 5.99, P < 0.000 1). In the aspect of safety, no significant difference was found in bone marrow suppression, hemoglobin reduction, nausea and vomiting between two groups. ConclusionIHPC for ovarian cancer can improve clinical efficiency, clinical benefit response and overall survival rates, and reduce recurrence and metastasis rates; and it is also safe for patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the relationship between p53 mutation in 5-8 exons and type of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) pathogenesis of Han nationality women. MethodsFrom August 2011 to December 2012, 45 patients with primary EOC (Han nationality women from Sichuan Province) diagnosed surgically and pathologically were selected. Using direct DNA sequencing, we analyzed the mutations of p53 in 5-8 exons of all cases, and the EOC patients were divided into two types according dualism and the pathogenesis results. The p53 mutation of the different types in EOC patients were analyzed. ResultsThe frequency and efficiency of p53 mutation in type-ⅡEOC patients were significantly higher than that in typeⅠ(P < 0.01). And the codon 175 might be a mutational hotspot of type-ⅡEOC. The malignant degree and oviduct involved frequency of type-ⅡEOC were obviously higher than that of type-I EOC; p53 mutation frequency in high malignant patients increased significantly. Conclusionsp53 mutation plays an important role in the development of type-ⅡEOC. The codon 175 might be a mutational hotspot of type-ⅡEOC.
目的 評價腫瘤細胞減滅術治療復發上皮性卵巢癌（EOC）的作用，分析影響生存時間的因素。 方法 按Cochrane系統評價方法，計算機檢索PubMed、EMbase、Medline、Cochrane Library、循證醫學數據庫（EBMR）、中國生物醫學文獻數據庫（CBM）、中國期刊全文數據庫（CJFD）、清華同方等數據庫，并手工檢索相關領域雜志。檢索時間從1985年1月1日－2011年11月30日，查找手術治療復發EOC患者的回顧性、非隨機前瞻性、病例對照研究，由兩位研究者按照納入排除標準篩選文獻、評價質量并提取資料后，采用SPSS軟件進行線性回歸分析。 結果 共納入48篇文獻（回顧性文獻40篇，非隨機前瞻性文獻7篇，病例對照研究1篇）共2 605例。簡單線性回歸分析結果顯示滿意切除比例與中位生存時間回歸模型成立，有統計學意義（F=7.346，P=0.009），漿液性病理類型比例與中位生存時間回歸模型成立，有統計學意義（F=5.537，P=0.025），殘留病灶大小與中位生存時間回歸模型成立，有統計學意義（F=4.249，P=0.045），多重逐步線性回歸分析顯示僅有滿意切除比率對術后中位生存時間的影響有統計學意義（P=0.009）。 結論 二次腫瘤細胞減滅術主要適用于鉑類敏感型可切除及孤立結節復發EOC患者，要獲得明確二次腫瘤細胞減滅術治療復發EOC對中位生存時間的影響，尚需進行大樣本隨機對照的研究。
ObjectiveTo analyze the reasons for misdiagnosis of gastrointestinal metastatic ovarian cancer, in order to increase the rate of correct diagnosis and treatment, and to investigate the prognostic factors. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical features, pathological features and prognostic factors of 43 cases of metastatic ovarian carcinoma from gastrointestinal tract treated between 2004 and 2014. ResultsGastrointestinal metastatic ovarian cancer was characterized by the diversity of clinical manifestations and lack of specific symptoms. The common initial symptom was pelvic mass, frequently accompanied with gastrointestinal symptoms of ascites, anemia or weight loss, abdominal pain, bloating, gastrointestinal obstruction and bleeding. Signs and symptoms of primary and secondary tumor sites often coexisted with each other, leading to misdiagnosis. Univariate analysis showed that primary site, histological type, surgical treatment, the residual tumor debulking size, lymph node metastasis, tumor invasion and standard chemotherapy had significant impacts on the prognosis (P < 0.05). ConclusionsGastrointestinal metastatic ovarian cancer occurs in premenopausal women, often with ascites, abdominal pelvic masses as the first symptom. Primary tumor site is often ignored, and the initial correct diagnosis rate is low. Metastasis from stomach cancer is the most common, followed by colorectal cancer and esophageal cancer. Prognosis is correlated with the primary site, histological type, degree of differentiation, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and other factors. Radical surgery and chemotherapy can improve survival.
Ovarian cancer is one of the common malignant tumors of female genital organs. In gynecological tumors, the incidence rate of ovarian cancer ranks the third after cervical cancer and uterine body cancer, but the death rate of ovarian cancer ranks the first, posing a serious threat to women’s life and health. In recent years, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines for ovarian cancer has become an important basis for diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. In this paper, we interpret the latest version (version 4. 2017) of NCCN clinical practice guidelines for ovarian cancer for its better clinical application.