Objective To investigate the effect of edgetoedge mitral valve plasty on left ventricular diastolic function and in order to find the validity and safety of this procedure. Methods From Feb. 2006 to Dec. 2007, thirty cases with mitral regurgitation were divided into two groups. Quadrangular resection was performed on fifteen cases with posterior proplapse in control group, and edgetoedge mitral valve plasty was performed on fifteen cases with anterior or bileaflet proplapse in experimental group, and ring annuloplasty(Medtronic ring) was used in both groups. The hemodynamics were monitored and recorded with SwanGanz catheter at the time of postoperation，2 h, 4 h, 6 h and 12 h after operation. Left ventricular diastolic function was also evaluated with echocardiography using color Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging in the patients with sinus rhythm. The ratio of the peak E velocity and A velocity(E/A), the ratio of the early diastolic peak flow velocity to the early diastolic mitral valve annular movement velocity(E/Em), and the ratio of early diastolic mitral valve annular movement velocity to late diastolic mitral valve annular movement velocity（Em/Am）were measured before operation and 1 week after operation respectively. Results Mitralvalve area were significantly reduced at 1 week after operation compared with that before operation in both groups (control group 3.63±1.06 cm2 vs. 7.18±2.41 cm2, experimental group 3.44±1.02 cm2 vs. 6.51±3.06 cm2, Plt;0.05）; and mitral regurgitant grade were significantly reduced at 1 week after operation in both groups as well(control group 0.53±0.64 cm2 vs.3.60±0.51 cm2, experimental group 0.67±0.82 cm2 vs.3.40±0.63 cm2, Plt;0.05). However, there was no significant difference for mitral valve area and mitral regurgitant grade between two groups before and after operation（Pgt;0.05）. In experimental group, there were no significant change of evaluations of E/A,E/Em and Em/Am before and after operation（E/A 1.28±0.36 vs. 1.95±1.06,E/Em 8.79±2.16 vs. 8.13±3.02, Em/Am 1.39±0.38 vs. 1.31±041，Pgt;0.05). There was no significant change of pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) before and after operation between two groups（13.60±4.37 mm Hg vs.12.20±3.53 mm Hg, Pgt;0.05）. Conclusion Edgetoedge mitral valve plasty technique is available and has no significant influence on left ventricular diastolic function, and a doubleorifice mitral valve has similar hemodynamic change compared with a physiological mitral valve.
Objective To evaluate the relationship between pattern of left ventricular dilation and functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) by echocardiography. Methods A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted on 117 patients with age of 31-77 years and left ventricular end diastolic dimension≥60 mm treated in our hospital from January 2013 through May 2016. These patients were divided into four groups by FMR degree: FMR-None/Trace (FMR-N/T group,n=33), FMR-Minor (FMR-Mi group,n=37), FMR-Moderate (FMR-Mo group,n=34) and FMR-Severe (FMR-Se group,n=13). We analyzed their basic information and echocardiographic parameters including left ventricular dimension, volume, systolic function, spherical index, regional wall motion score index, tenting height and area of mitral vavle as well as anterior/posterior angle. Results The incidences of inferior/posterior/lateral myocardial infarction and basal myocardial dyskinesia/aneurysm increased with the increase of FMR degree (FMR-N/T vs. FMR-Mi vs. FMR-Mo vs. FMR-Se: 12.1% vs. 18.9% vs. 44.1% vs. 46.2%,P=0.001 and 12.1% vs. 27.0% vs.47.1% vs. 53.8%,P=0.005, respectively). The tenting height and area of mitral valve, anterior/posterior angle, regional wall score index of the left ventricle where the papillary muscle was attached to had a positive correlation with FMR degree (P＜0.05). Conclusion There is a relationship between regional left ventricular dilation and FMR. Evaluating and improving those parameters is very important when we choose the treatment strategy of functional mitral regurgitaion.
Objective To compare long-term outcomes following mitral valvuloplasty (MVP) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) for native valve endocarditis (NVE). Methods Between November 1993 and August 2016, consecutive 101 patients with NVE underwent mitral surgery in our department, MVP for 52 patients and MVR for 49 patients. There were 69 males and 32 females at age of 38.1±14.9 years. The mean follow-up was 99.4±75.8 months. Results There was no statistical difference in cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, in-hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay or hospital stay after surgery between the two groups. Survival rate at 1, 5, 10, 20 years after surgery was 100.0%, 97.6%, 97.6%, 97.6% for MVP, and 93.5%, 84.3%, 84.3%, 66.2% for MVR with a statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.018). There was no stroke in the patients with MVP during follow-up periods. However, stroke-free survival rate at 1, 5, 10, 20 years after surgery was 100.0%, 93.9%, 89.4%, 70.2% for MVR patients with a statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.023). There was no statistical difference in recurrence of infection, perivalvular leakage and reoperation between the two groups. Composite endpoint-free survival rate at 1, 5, 10, 20 years after surgery was 100.0%, 97.6%, 92.9%, 92.9% for MVP, and 91.3%, 79.6%, 75.8%, 51.0% for MVR with a statistical difference (P=0.006). Conclusion MVP is associated with better outcomes than MVR in the patients with NVE; generalizing MVP technique in the patients with NVE is needed.
Minimally invasive cardiac surgeries are the trend in the future. Among them, robotic cardiac surgery is the latest iteration with several key-hole incision, 3-dimentional visualization, and articulated instrumentation of 7 degree of ergonomic freedom for those complex procedures in the heart. In particular, robotic mitral valve surgery, as well as coronary artery bypass grafting, has evolved over the last decade and become the preferred method at certain specialized centers worldwide because of excellent results. Other cardiac procedures are in various stages of evolution. Stepwise innovation of robotic technology will continue to make robotic operations simpler, more efficient, and less invasive, which will encourage more surgeons to take up this technology and extend the benefits of robotic surgery to a larger patient population.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive mitral valvuloplasty (MVP) in the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE) with mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of patients who underwent MVP for IE with MR in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from January 2016 to December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical incision: those with a right mini-thoracotomy were classified as a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) group, and those with a median sternotomy were classified as a median sternotomy (MS) group. All patients had isolated mitral valve involvement. Perioperative data were analyzed, and mid- to long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 86 patients were included, with 40 in the MIS group (22 males and 18 females, with a mean age of 39±15 years ranging from 8 to 71 years) and 46 in the MS group (27 males and 19 females, with a mean age of 49±16 years ranging from 14 to 71 years). The patients in the MIS group were relatively younger (P=0.004) with better preoperative cardiac function (P=0.004). There was no statistical difference in preoperative fever, gender, or comorbidities between the two groups (P>0.05). The MIS group had shorter postoperative ventilation times, less postoperative 24-hour drainage, less blood transfusion, and shorter total hospital stays compared to the MS group (P=0.001, 0.018, 0.005, 0.005). There was no statistical difference in cardiopulmonary bypass times or ICU stays between the two groups (P>0.05). The perioperative complication rates and mortality rates were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). Follow-up was conducted for 11-92 months, with a mean duration of 49±19 months and an overall follow-up rate of 91.6%. During the follow-up, 3 patients in each group required reoperation for mitral valve issues, with no statistical difference in incidence (7.5% vs. 6.5%, P=0.691). There were no warfarin-related complications, recurrences, or deaths in either group during follow-up. Multivariate regression analysis identified age, preoperative cardiac function, and surgeon experience as influencing factors for the choice of surgical approach. Conclusion Minimally invasive MVP for IE with MR is relatively safe in the perioperative period and shows significant efficacy, with clear mid- to long-term outcomes. It is recommended for younger patients with better preoperative cardiac function and when performed by surgeons with extensive experience in mitral valvuloplasty.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 47 patients underwent mitral repair in General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University between January 2010 and June 2014 year. There were 36 males and 11 females with age of 10 months to 65 years, mean age of 42.38±15.27 years. ResultsThere was no operative death within follow-up time of 18±7 months (ranged 14 to 1 586 days). Mitral valve function was normal or traces regurgitation in 33 patients (70.21%). Mild mitral regurgitation occurred in 11 patients (23.40%). Postoperative transesophageal echocardiography showed that 2 patients (4.26%) had moderate regurgitation. They underwent mitral valve repair again and cured. One patient (2.13%) underwent mitral valve replacement because of moderate to severe regurgitation. The dimensions of left atrium and left ventricle obviously decreased and heart function improved significantly compared with preoperative ones. ConclusionStrict control of surgical indications for different valve disease, the use of mitral valve repair technique, mitral surgery can get a good clinical efficacy. Preoperative diagnosis by transesophageal echocardiography, intraoperative monitoring, and immediate postoperative assessment for mitral valve repair results provide good technical support.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience in the treatment of Carpentier's type Ⅲb ischemic mitral regurgitation through the mitral valve repair versus mitral valve replacement, and to evaluate the early and midlong term effects. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 308 consecutive patients with type Ⅲb ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with mitral valve repair (a repair group, n=172) or with mitral valve replacement (a replacement group, n=136) in our hospital between January 2000 and March 2014. Among the 308 patients, 215 were males and 93 were females with mean age of 62.7±11.5 years(ranged 30-78 years). In the repair group, 170 patients underwent restrictive mitral annuloplasty (128 patients with total ring, 42 patients with C ring), and 2 patients underwent commissural constriction. In the replacement group, 11 patients underwent mechanical valve prosthesis and 125 patients underwent biological valve prosthesis. ResultsThe time of total aortic cross-clamp was 81.9±21.5 min. The time of total extracorporeal circulation was 122.0±31.3 min. Six patients died during the perioperative period. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in general information (P>0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in aortic cross-clamp time, total extracorporeal circulation time, numbers of bypass grafts and the usage rate of left internal mammary artery. The early result after the surgery showed that the incidence rates of low cardiac output and ventricular arrhythmia were significantly higher in the replacement group compared with those in the repair group. The patients were followed up for 1-85 months. No significant difference was revealed in the mid-long term survival rate between the two groups. The severity of mitral regurgitation and the rate of redo mitral valve replacement were significantly lower in the replacement group compared with those in the repair group (P<0.05). ConclusionThe early-term curative effect of valve repair is better than valve replacement for the treatment of Carpentier's type Ⅲb ischemic mitral regurgitation. In mid-long term, Chordal-sparing mitral valve replacement remains a low incidence of valve-related complications compared with mitral valve repair.
Objective To compare the mid- and long-term clinical results of mitral valve plasty (MVP) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) in the treatment of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). MethodsPatients with FMR who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from 2012 to 2021 were collected. The patients who underwent MVP were divided into a MVP group, and those who underwent MVR into a MVR group. The clinical data and mid-term follow-up efficacy of two groups were compared. Results Finally 236 patients were included. There were 100 patients in the MVP group, including 53 males and 47 females, with an average age of (61.80±8.03) years. There were 136 patients in the MVR group, including 72 males and 64 females, with an average age of (61.29±8.97) years. There was no statistical difference in baseline data between the two groups (P＞0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the extracorporeal circulation time, aortic occlusion time, postoperative hospital and ICU stay, intraoperative blood loss, or hospitalization death (P＞0.05), but the time of mechanical ventilation in the MVP group was significantly shorter than that in the MVR group (P=0.022). The total follow-up rate was 100.0%, the longest follow-up was 10 years, and the average follow-up time was (3.60±2.55) years. There were statistical differences in the left atrial diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic diameter and cardiac function between the two groups compared with those before surgery (P<0.05). The postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction in the MVP group was statistically higher than that before surgery (P=0.002), but there was no statistical difference in the MVR group before and after surgery (P=0.658). The left atrial diameter in the MVP group was reduced compared with the MVR group (P=0.026). The recurrence rate of mitral regurgitation in the MVP group was higher than that in the MVR group, and the difference was statistically significant (10.0% vs. 1.5%, P=0.003). There were 14 deaths in the MVP group and 19 in the MVR group. The cumulative survival rate (P=0.605) and cardiovascular events-free survival rate (P=0.875) were not statistically significant between the two groups by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Conclusion The safety, and mid- and long-term clinical efficacy of MVP in the treatment of FMR patients are better than MVR, and the left atrial and left ventricular diameters are statistically reduced, and cardiac function is statistically improved. However, the surgeon needs to be well aware of the indications for the MVP procedure to reduce the rate of mitral regurgitation recurrence.
Abstract： Compared with mitral valve replacement, there areseveral advantages in mitral valvuloplasty, so recently more and more sights are caught on mitral valve repair. According to different etiology, the surgeon can apply annuloplasty, triangular resection, quadrangular resection, replacement or transposition of chordae tendineae and so on to treat mitral regurgitation(MR). With the development of minimally invasive surgical technology, robotic mitral valve reconstruction evolve rapidly and percutaneous interventional therapy also commence from lab to bedside.We believe surgeons can repair MR safely and successfully in the majority of patients with proficiency in the basic techniques.
Objective To explore the safety, effectiveness, and mid-term efficacy of total thoracoscopic mitral valvuloplasty (MVP) with chordal replacement (CR) and quadrangular resection (QR) for the treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR), and to provide reference for guiding the development and selection of clinical diagnosis and treatment methods for MR patients. Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was performed to collect patients with MR who underwent MVP at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Leshan People's Hospital from January 2021 to March 2022. They were randomly divided into a CR group and a QR group by using a random number table, and were followed up for 12 months after the operation. The medical history, perioperative data and adverse cardiac endpoint events during the follow-up period were collected. The differences in surgical efficacy between the two groups were evaluated and compared, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the differences in survival rates between the two groups of patients. Results A total of 100 patients were enrolled. There were 46 patients in the CR group, including 27 males and 19 females with an average age of 49.50±9.23 years; there were 46 patients in the QR group, including 24 males and 22 females with an average age of 49.91±11.48 years. The aortic occlusion time in the CR group was longer than that in the QR group (P<0.05). Other surgical indicators, including total surgical time, extracorporeal circulation time, ventilator-assisted time, ICU hospitalization time, size of the valve ring, concomitant surgery during the same period, and the incidence of perioperative complications were not statistically different between the two groups (P>0.05). The left atrium diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular end-systolic volume, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of the two groups before discharge after the surgery were significantly improved compared to those before surgery (P<0.05). There was a statistical difference in LVEF between the two groups before discharge after the surgery (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in clinical efficacy between the two groups (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the overall incidence of exemption from mild and above mitral regurgitation 12 months after the surgery in the CR group and QR group was 84.8% and 89.1%, respectively. According to the log-rank test, there was no statistical difference in the overall survival curve between the two groups (χ2=0.356, P=0.551). Conclusion CR and QR are both safe and effective methods for the treatment of simple posterior MR.