ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcomes between laparoscopic (LAP) and open surgery for non-metastatic colon cancer of T4a stage.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data of non-metastatic colon cancer patients of T4a stage with confirmed pathological results who underwent curative resection in Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2011 and December 2017. These patients were allocated into LAP group (n=107, underwent laparoscopic radical operation) and open group (n=52, underwent open surgery).ResultsThere were no significant difference in operating time, number of lymph nodes harvested, number of positive lymph nodes, incidence of complications within 30 days, and Clavien-Dindo grading between the LAP group and open group (P>0.05), but intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, and postoperative hospital stay in the LAP group were less than (shorter than) those of the open group (P<0.05).ConclusionLaparoscopic approach for non-metastatic colon cancer of T4a stage is safe and feasible, and it has advantages including less intraoperative blood loss, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay.
ObjectiveTo summarize the diagnosis, surgical management, and outcomes of one case of complex unilateral renal artery aneurysm repaired by in situ open surgery. MethodThe clinical data of a patient with complex renal artery aneurysm admitted to the Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University in December 2021 who underwent in situ open surgery were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe patient was a middle-aged (41 years old) female with a left renal artery aneurysm detected on physical examination. The renal artery three-dimensional CT imaging showed that the aneurysm was large in size and complex in anatomical structure; the aneurysm was located at the renal hilum, demonstrating multiple outflow tracts and close proximity to renal parenchyma and the ureter. Surgical management included in situ aneurysm resection combined with renal artery branch reconstruction and great saphenous vein bypass grafting. The operation duration was 5 h and the intraoperative urine output was 250 mL, and the intraoperative blood loss was about 400 mL. Four units of erythrocyte suspension, 200 mL of autologous recycled blood, and 400 mL of plasma were transfused during the operation. The results of the 36-month postoperative follow-up showed that the reconstructed renal arterial branches and the bridging vessel had satisfactory blood flow, and renal function was unaffected. ConclusionsThe results of this case suggest that in complex renal artery aneurysms involving multiple branches, in situ resection of the aneurysm followed by revascularization and main renal artery bypass grafting to restore flow is safe and feasible, and the long-term prognosis is good. However, it should be emphasized that the anatomy of renal artery aneurysms should be evaluated in detail preoperatively to determine the method of in situ revascularization. The results of the study also need to be further validated by larger samples and multicenter studies.
Objective To investigate the impact of conversion to open in laparoscopic rectal cancer radical resection (LRR) on postoperative recovery. Methods The data from Feb. 2003 to Feb. 2007 of 176 cases who were given LRR and 32 cases receiving conversion in LRR (CRR) were analyzed retrospectively, and were compared about operation time, hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, intraoperative blood loss, recovery time of bowel movement and postoperative complications with 59 cases of open rectal cancer radical resection (ORR). Results There were no differences among LRR, CRR and ORR about operation time, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss and recovery time of bowel movement (Pgt;0.05). The hospitalization expenses of LRR and CRR were higher than that of ORR (P=0.001, P=0.001), there was no difference between CRR and LRR (P=0.843). But the postoperative complications rate of ORR was higher than those of LRR and CRR （P=0.023,P=0.004）. Conclusion Compared with ORR, LRR has relatively conversion rate, and then increases the hospitalization expenses.
Objective To investigate short-term effectiveness and clinical application advantages of orthopedic robot-assisted resection for osteoid osteoma compared with traditional open surgery. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 48 osteoid osteoma patients who met the selection criteria between July 2022 and April 2023. Among them, 23 patients underwent orthopedic robot-assisted resection (robot-assisted surgery group), and 25 patients received traditional open surgery (traditional surgery group). There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in gender, age, disease duration, lesion location and size, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) score between the two groups. The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative lesion localization time, initial localization success rate, infection, and recurrence were recorded and compared. VAS scores before surgery and at 24 hours, 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after surgery and MSTS score before surgery and at 3 months after surgery were assessed. Results All patients completed the surgery successfully, with no significant difference in surgical time between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared to the traditional surgery group, the robot-assisted surgery group had less intraoperative blood loss, shorter lesion localization time, and shorter hospitalization time, with significant differences (P<0.05). The initial localization success rate was higher in the robot-assisted surgery group than in the traditional surgery group, but the difference between the two groups was not significant (P>0.05). All patients in both groups were followed up, with the follow-up time of 3-12 months in the robot-assisted surgery group (median, 6 months) and 3-14 months in the traditional surgery group (median, 6 months). The postoperative MSTS scores of both groups improved significantly when compared to those before surgery (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the changes in MSTS scores between the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative VAS scores of both groups showed a gradually decreasing trend over time (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups after surgery (P>0.05). During follow-up, except for 1 case of postoperative infection in the traditional surgery group, there was no infections or recurrences in other cases. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative infection between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Orthopedic robot-assisted osteoid osteoma resection achieves similar short-term effectiveness when compared to traditional open surgery, with shorter lesion localization time.
Objectives To analyze risk factors associated with conversion to open surgery of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Methods From January 2009 to December 2014, 235 patients underwent laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer in the Chengdu 5th Hospital, were enrolled in this study. These patients were divided into laparoscopic repair group (n=207) and conversion to open surgery group (n=28). The characteristics, clinical outcomes, and prognosis factors were compared between these two groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the critical cutoff value for diameter and duration of perforation for predicting conversion to open surgery. Results There were no significant differences of the age, gender, body mass index, comorbidity, history of ulcer, smoking history, history of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or steroids use, history of alcohol use, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification on admission, white blood cell count on admission, C reaction protein on admission, surgeons, suture method, and location of perforation between these two groups (P>0.05). The patients in the conversion to open surgery group had a higher procalcitonin (PCT) level on admission (P=0.040), longer duration of peroration (P<0.001), larger diameter of peroration (P<0.001), longer hospital stay (P=0.002), higher proportion of patients with Clavien-Dindo classification Ⅰ and Ⅱ (P<0.001), longer gastrointestinal function recovery time (P=0.003), longer analgesics use time (P<0.001), and longer off-bed time (P=0.001) as compared with the laparoscopic repair group. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that the peroration duration on admission〔OR: 2.104, 95%CI (1.124, 3.012),P=0.020〕and peroration diameter on admission〔OR: 2.475, 95%CI (1.341, 6.396),P=0.013〕were two predictors of conversion to open surgery. For the diameter of perforation, 8.0 mm was the critical cutoff value for predicting conversion to open surgery by ROC curve analysis, the sensitivity was 76%, the specificity was 93%, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.912. For the duration of perforation, 14 h was the critical cutoff value to predict conversion to open surgery, the sensitivity was 86%, the specificity was 71%, and theAUC was 0.909. Conclusions The preliminary results in this study show that diameter of perforation of 8 mm and duration of perforation of 14 h are two reliable risk factors associated with conversion to open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. Also, PCT level would mightbe considered as a helpful risk factor for it.
ObjectiveTo review the research status of aortic arch management in type A aortic dissection (TAAD), aiming to provide a reference for surgical decision-making. MethodA comprehensive literature search was conducted on aortic arch management techniques globally. ResultsCurrent studies indicate that there are three main management strategies for TAAD: open surgery, endovascular repair, and hybrid surgery. Open surgery remains the gold standard for TAAD treatment, but it is associated with high perioperative mortality and postoperative complication rates. Although endovascular repair can reduce the incidence of complications, its technical complexity limits widespread adoption. Hybrid surgery is associated with lower complications rate. However, the lack of long-term multicenter studies and follow-up data means its long-term prognosis remains uncertain. ConclusionsAs one of the most critical emergencies in cardiovascular surgery, TAAD is characterized by rapid onset and high mortality. Therefore, it requires immediate intervention. Open surgery remains the current gold standard for treating TAAD, yet it is associated with clinical challenges such as high perioperative mortality and postoperative complication rates. Future research should focus on addressing these issues without compromising surgical success rates.
ObjectiveTo analyze the therapeutic effects of open surgery and endovascular treatment for mesenteric venous thrombosis.MethodsThe clinical data of 22 patients with mesenteric venous thrombosis from March 2005 to January 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. One patient underwent open surgery including removal of necrotic small intestine and thrombectomy of superior mesenteric vein immediately admission to the hospital. Five cases were treated with simple anticoagulation and cured. Sixteen cases received thrombolytic therapy after primary anticoagulant therapy.ResultsOne case who underwent open surgery died of multiple organ failure at 72 h after the surgery. Five cases who received simple anticoagulant reached clinical relief finally. Sixteen patients who received thrombolytic therapy achieved recanalization totally or partially. Three cases died during follow-up (3 months to 7 years, average) of which 1 died of recurrence of acute superior mesenteric venous thrombosis, 1 died of myocardial infarction, and 1 died of stroke.ConclusionsFor patients with symptomatic mesenteric venous thrombosis, if there is no intestinal necrosis, there will be encouraging results by interventional thrombolytic therapy. And the treatment effect needs further experience accumulation in more cases.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation versus traditional open surgical operation in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CBM, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation versus traditional open surgery for benign thyroid nodules from inception to June 30th, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was then performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 38 RCTs involving 4 078 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation might be more effective than traditional open surgery for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules (RR=1.09, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.19, P=0.04), and compared with traditional open surgery, ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation reduced the rate of postoperative complication (RR=0.26, 95%CI 0.21 to 0.31, P<0.000 01), shortened postoperative hospital stay (MD=–3.60, 95%CI –4.04 to –3.15, P<0.000 01) and the time consumed in operation (MD=–48.79, 95%CI –54.16 to –43.41, P<0.000 01), and reduced operative blood loss (MD=–22.02, 95%CI–23.87 to –20.17, P<0.000 01). Meanwhile, microwave ablation reduced the elevated levels of serum IL-6 content (MD=–10.34, 95%CI –10.70 to –9.97, P<0.000 01), serum CRP content (MD=–9.70, 95%CI –10.95 to –8.44, P<0.000 01) and serum TNF-α content (MD=–7.94, 95%CI –9.00 to –6.88, P<0.000 01).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation may improve clinical efficacy and can reduce postoperative complications, bleeding volume, operation time, hospitalization days and postoperative inflammatory reaction. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo compare the surgical data, safety, cosmetic outcomes, and quality of life of patients underwent single axillary incision endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with endoscopic harvesting of latissimus dorsi muscle flap (abbreviation as the “endoscopic group”) and traditional open surgery of latissimus dorsi muscle flap harvesting for breast reconstruction after mastectomy (abbreviation as the “open group”). MethodsThe patients were collected, who underwent latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University and the Fourth People’s Hospital of Sichuan Province from January 2021 to June 2024 from a prospective maintenance database, and then were assigned into an endoscopic group and open group according to the surgical method. Their basic information, information relevant operation, postoperative complications, and patient reported outcomes (BREAST-Q scale) score were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 73 patients were enrolled, including 23 patients in the endoscopic group and 50 patients in the open group. There were no statistically significant differences in the age, body mass index, breast sagging, tumor location, tumor N stage, pathological type, adjuvant therapy, etc. between the patients of two groups, except for a higher proportion of T4 stage patients in the open group as compared with the endoscopic group (P＜0.001). A longer size of latissimus dorsi muscle flap was harvested in the endoscopic group as compared with the open group (P=0.002). There were no statistically significant differences in the total surgical complications, major complications, minor complications, and implant-related complications between the patients of two groups (P>0.05). The most common complication in the patients of both groups was back seroma, 21.7% (5/23) in the endoscopic group and 22.0% (11/50) in the open group. The total length of incisions in the endoscopic group was significantly shorter than that in the open group (P<0.001), and the points of the breast satisfaction (P=0.045), back satisfaction (P<0.001), and sexual well-being (P=0.028) of the patients in the endoscopic group were significantly higher than those in the open group. The major complications did not happen in the endoscopic group, but happened in 2 cases in the open group (1 patient due to ischemic necrosis of the latissimus dorsi muscle and 1 patient due to breast infection resulting in implant removal). During the follow-up period, 3 (6.0%) patients had distant metastasis (all were lung metastasis) in the open group, and there was no local or regional recurrence, distant metastasis, and specific death of breast cancer in the endoscopic group. ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that, for patients who have skin invasion but who desire breast reconstruction or have failed by prosthetic breast reconstruction (such as skin flap necrosis), traditional open surgery of latissimusdorsi flap harvesting for breast reconstruction is worth choosing. However, for breast cancer patients who do not need additional skin breast reconstruction, endoscopic latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction has greater advantages in cosmetic effect, and it is safe and effective.
ObjectiveTo assess the outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted surgery for treatment of advanced gastric cancer.MethodsA total of 115 patients with advanced gastric cancer were included between January 2014 and December 2018 were analyzed retroprospectively, the patients were divided into two groups: open surgery group (OS group, n=63) and laparoscopy-assisted surgery group (LAS group, n=52). Baseline characteristics, intraoperative parameters and postoperative items, and long-term efficacy were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference in preoperative baseline data including gender, age and preoperative serum parameters between the two groups (P>0.05). Intraoperative blood loss in the LAS group was significantly less than that in the OS group (P<0.05). In addition, the first feeding time after operation and postoperative hospital stay in the LAS group were significantly shorter than the OS group (P<0.05). Furthermore, numbers of white blood cells and neutrophils in the LAS group were fewer than that in the OS group at postoperative 2 days (P<0.05); the level of serum albumin in the LAS group was higher than that OS group (P<0.05). The number of lymph nodes detected during operation in the LAS group was more than that in the OS group (P<0.05). Operative time and occurrence of postoperative complications were not statistically significant between the two groups (P>0.05). One hundred and ten of 115 patients were followed- up, the follow-up rate was 95.7%. The follow-up time ranged from 6 to 48 months, with a median follow-up time of 12.4 months. The disease-free survival time of the OS group was 12.2±6.5 months, while that of the LAS group was 13.5±7.4 months. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsLaparoscopic technique in treatment of advanced gastric cancer has the minimally invasive advantage, less intraoperative blood loss, less surgical trauma, and faster postoperative recovery in comparing to the traditional open surgery. Also the lymph node dissection is superior to open surgery. The curative effect is comparable to that of open surgery.