Four hundred and eighty two paients suffering from intrahepatic bile duct stone undergoing lobectomy and segmental resection (from 1975 to 1994,9) has reported. 63% of the patient in this group underwent 1-5 operations, including different types of biliary-intestinal anastomosis (21.6%). 482 cases underwent different types of hepatectomy, including left lateral-lobetomy 321 cases (66.6%),left hemihepatectomy 80 cases(16.6%), right hemihepatectomy 19 cases (3.9%), and multiple segmental resections 39 cases (8.1%, including Ⅴ+Ⅷ 11 cases, Ⅵ+Ⅶ 28 cases). Other type hepatectomy combined with guadrate lobectomy 20 cases (4.1%). Postoperative complication rate was 10.2%, including diliary fistula. hemobilia and subdiaphragmatic and resectional surface infectioin, 85% of the patients were followed up with an excellent result of 88%. The authors emphsize that hepatic lobectomy nad segmental resection is the core of treatment and selection of operative methods depends on clinical-patholigic types of the disease.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) on prevention of the complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MethodsThe clinical data of 1 079 patients underwent LC from January 2006 to June 2010 in this hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the use of MRCP or not in the different period, the patients were divided into nonMRCP group (n=523) and MRCP group (n=556). The occurrence of bile duct injuries (BDI) and retained common duct stone (RCDS) were compared between two groups. ResultsConversion to open surgery was performed in 35 cases in nonMRCP group and in 41 cases in MRCP group. The intraoperative and postoperative BDI were found in five patients and RCDS were found in 27 patients in nonMRCP group, and those were not found in patients in MRCP group. The differences of BDI and RCDS of patients were significant between two groups (P=0.026 and P=0.000). In nonMRCP group, 23 of 55 patients were found common bile duct stones by intraoperative cholangiography. Common bile duct stones were found by intraoperative cholangiography other than preoperative MRCP in three patients in MRCP group, while another three patients did not find common bile duct stones by intraoperative cholangiography although preoperative MRCP suggested. By MRCP, double gallbladders were found in one patient, Mirizzi syndrome in eight patients, variant cystic duct in 34 patients, accessory hepatic duct in 28 patients, and complicating common bile duct stones in 27 patients in MRCP group, the diagnostic accuracy of those were 100%, 87.5%, 94.1%, 89.3% and 88.9%, respectively. ConclusionPreoperative MRCP is helpful to prevent BDI and RCDS for the patients with LC.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct exploration(LCBDE) with biliary stent drainage or T tube drainage. MethodsThe clinical data of 68 cases of gallbladder and bile duct stones with the LCBDE by the same surgeon in our hospital from June 2008 to June 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-two patients were treated with LCBDE and biliary stent drainage(stent drainage group), 46 patients were treated with LCBDE and T tube drainage(T tube drainage group). ResultsThe operation were successfully completed of 2 groups. The anal exhaust time, peritoneal drainage time, postoperative hospitalization time, and hospital expenses in stent drainage group were shorter or less than thoes T tube drainage group(P < 0.05). There were no significant difference in the operative time, postoperative bilirubin level, and incidences of postoperative complications between the two groups(P > 0.05). ConclusionsThe stent drainage and T tube drainage after LCBDE has its own indications. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and biliary stent drainage is superior to the laparo-scopic common bile duct exploration and T tube drainage.
ObjectiveTo investigate clinical efficacy and advantages and disadvantages of primary closure with two endoscopes (1aparoscope+choledochoscope) or three endoscopes (laparoscope+choledochoscope+duodenoscope) through the cystic duct for treatment of gallbladder stone with secondary common bile duct (CBD) stones.MethodsThe clinical data of 83 patients with gallbladder stones with secondary CBD stones treated by two or three endoscopes combined with CBD exploration and lithotomy and primary closure through cystic duct from January 2017 to December 2018 in the Chengdu Second People’s Hospital were collected retrospectively. Among them, 41 patients were treated by two endoscopes mode (two endoscopes group), 42 cases were treated by three endoscopes mode (three endoscopes group).ResultsThere were no significant differences in the general conditions such as the gender, age, preoperative diameter of CBD, chronic diseases, etc. between the two and three endoscopes group (P>0.05). All 83 cases underwent the operations successfully and recovered well. The success rate of operation, stone clearance rate, drainage volume of abdominal drainage tube on day 1 after the operation, time of abdominal drainage tube removal after the operation, and hospitalization time had no significant differences between these two groups (P>0.05). The time of operation, intraoperative bleeding volume, and the postoperative pancreatitis rate in the three endoscopes group were significantly more (or higher) than those in the two endoscopes group (P<0.05), but the condition of liver function recovered after the operation was better than that in the two endoscopes group (P<0.05).ConclusionsWith the strict control of the operation indications, it is safe and feasible to use two or three endoscopes through the cystic duct pathway and primary closure of CBD for treatment of gallbladder stone with secondary CBD stones. However, the choice of operative methods of two or three endoscopes should be based on the general situation of the patients before and during the operation.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of preoperative jaundice on the complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative biliary stone removal in patients with common bile duct stones.MethodsA total of 104 patients with choledocholithiasis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative biliary stone removal for common bile duct stones in Baishui County Hospital and No.215 Hospital of Shaanxi Nuclear Industry between January 2014 and February 2016 were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the jaundice group (43 cases) and the jaundice-free control group (control group, 61 cases) according to the preoperative serum total bilirubin level. The differences in postoperative complication rates between the two groups were compared and risk factors affecting postoperative complications were explored.ResultsThe ALT and total bilirubin on the first day after operation in the jaundice group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). In addition, the hospital stay in the jaundice group was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of total postoperative complication rate and the incidence of complications (included biliary leakage, ballistic hemorrhage, hyperthermia, incision complications, and other complications) between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in Clavien-Dindo classification, comprehensive complication index (CCI), and ratio of CCI≥20 (P>0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that male and residual stones were independently associated with postoperative complications (P<0.05), but there was no statistical correlation between preoperative jaundice and postoperative complications (P>0.05).ConclusionPreoperative jaundice does not increase the risk of complications after acute laparoscopic surgery in patients with common bile duct stones.
Objective To explore risk factors and treatment strategies of liver resection surface infection following laparoscopic hepatolithiectomy for patient with complicated intrahepatic bile duct stones. Methods The clinical data of 45 patients with complicated intrahepatic bile duct stone underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy from January 2014 to April 2017 in this hospital were analyzed. The liver resection surface infection rate, pathogenic bacteria distribution, factors of operation, antibiotic use time, volume of drainage, and drainage tube placement time were analyzed. Results A total of 13 cases of liver resection surface infection occurred following the laparoscopic hepatolithiectomy in the 45 cases, the infection rate was 28.89%. Totally 24 strains of pathogens were isolated from the infected patients, including 9 strains of gram-positive bacteria and 15 strains of gram-negative bacteria. The mainly postoperative complications included 16 cases of the biliary leakage, 5 cases of the effusion and empyema, the average drainage volume was about 200 mL after the surgery. The double pipes were placed in the 10 patients in the operation. The drainage tubes were placed in the 23 patients under the ultrasound or CT intervention after the surgery, the average time of drainage tube placement was 8 d. The results of univariate analysis showed that the past biliary surgery history, combined with liver cirrhosis, double pipe drainage, operation time, and postoperative biliary leakage were associated with the liver section surface infection following the laparoscopic hepatolithiectomy (P<0.050). The results of multivariate analysis identified that the past biliary surgery history and postoperative biliary leakage were the risk factors (P<0.050), while the double pipe drainage was the protective factor (P<0.050) for liver resection surface infection following the laparoscopic hepatolithiectomy. Conclusions Prophylactic treatment such as perfect preoperative management and careful intraoperation should be taken for risk factors of liver section surface infection following laparoscopic hepatolithiectomy. Actively effective treatment strategies should be given if postoperative liver section surface infection existence.
Objective To evaluate safety, efficacy, and indications of laparoscopic bile duct reexploration in treatment of bile duct stones. Methods Fifty-seven patients with bile duct stones who underwent laparoscopic common bile duct reexploration (laparoscope group) and 62 patients with bile duct stones who underwent open common bile duct reexploration (laparotomy group) were included into this study from February 2013 to February 2017 in the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. The intraoperative and postoperative data of the patients were documented and analyzed. Results All the operations were performed successfully and all the patients had no extra-damage during the operation. One case was converted to the laparotomy due to the intraabdominal serious adhesion in the laparoscope group. Compared with the laparotomy group, the amount of intraoperative blood loss was less, the first time of anal exhaust was earlier, the rates of postoperative analgesia and incision infection were lower, and the length of hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscope group, there were significant differences (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the operative time, the hospitalization expense, primary suture rate of common bile duct, and the rates of postoperative complications such as the bile leakage, bile duct stricture, and residual stone between the laparoscope group and the laparotomy group (P>0.05). Conclusion With experienced skills and strict surgical indications, laparoscopic common bile duct reexploration is safe and effective in treatment of bile duct stones, and it has some advantages including less bleeding, rapid recovery, and shorter hospitalization time.
ObjectiveTo explore how to select the suitable indications of ERCP for clinical diagnosis and treatment. MethodsThe data of patients treated by ERCP between January 2005 and December 2009 in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsTotal 221 patients received ERCP, among whom 99 (45%) cases of common bile duct stones, 44 (20%) cases of malignant tumor, 9 (4%) cases of papilla narrow, 45 (20%) cases were negative, and 24 (11%) cases were failed. It had the trend that the number of the patients received ERCP reduced year by year. The postoperative complication rate was 11% (25 cases), including 15 cases of postoperative pancreatitis, 3 cases of bleeding, 5 cases of biliary duct infection, and 2 cases of basket stranded. ConclusionIn the modern medical condition, with the advancement of image and laparoscopy technology, we should select the diagnosis and treatment methods with the principles of no damage or less damage for patients, without unlimitedly broadening the clinical indications of ERCP.
Objective To evaluate effectiveness and safety of electronic choledochoscopy in treatment of intrahepatic bile duct stones. Methods From July 2013 to February 2016, 280 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones in the Department of General Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences were selected as the research objects. All the patients were randomly divided into a choledochoscopy treatment group and a conventional treatment group by envelope principle method. There were 140 patients in each group. The safety and short- and long-term effectiveness were compared in these two groups. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital. Results ① The age, gender, body mass index, course of disease, and location of stone had no significant differences in these two groups (P>0.05). ② The operations and the net stones were successfully completed in all the patients. The operative time was shorter, the blood loss was less, the incision length was smaller, the postoperative anal exhaust time was earlier, and the hospitalization time was shorter in the choledochoscopy treatment group as compared with the conventional treatment group (P<0.05). ③ The total postoperative complication rate on day 14 in the choledochoscopy treatment group was 2.9% (4/140), which was significantly lower than that in the conventional treatment group (11.4%, 16/140, P<0.05). ④ The curative excellent and good rates was 97.9% and 85.0% in the choledochoscopy treatment group and conventional treatment group respectively, which was a significant difference in these two groups (P<0.05). ⑤ The postoperative serum ALT and AST values on month 6 in the choledochoscopy treatment group were significantly lower than those in the conventional treatment group (P<0.05). Conclusion Electronic choledochoscopy in treatment of intrahepatic bile duct stones could promote rehabilitation of patient, reduce incidence of postoperative complications, and it is conducive to promoting recovery of liver function and improving follow-up effect.
摘要:目的:探討腹腔鏡膽囊切除術(laparoscopic cholecystectomy, LC)后發生嚴重并發癥的原因、治療措施和經驗教訓。方法:分析 2007 年 8 月至2009 年 4月期間華西醫院膽道外科收治的LC術后發生嚴重并發癥的7例患者的臨床資料。結果:2例繼發性膽總管結石合并化膿性膽管炎患者,采用內鏡下十二指腸乳頭切開(endoscopic sphincterotomy, EST)取出結石;3例膽道損傷患者,均進行肝門膽管成形和肝總管空腸吻合術;1例絞窄性腸梗阻患者,切除壞死空腸管后,行空腸對端吻合術;以上6例患者均順利出院,隨訪8～20個月,均生活良好。1例患者LC術后發生肺動脈栓塞,積極搶救后因呼吸衰竭而死亡。結論:術中仔細輕柔的操作以及辯清肝總管、膽總管與膽囊管的三者關系是預防LC術后發生嚴重并發癥的關鍵。合理可行的治療措施是提高發生并發癥的患者生活質量的保障。LC術時,膽道外科醫生思想上要高度重視,不可盲目追求速度,必要時及時中轉開腹。Abstract: Objective: To investigate the causes and therapeutic measures and the experience and lesson of sever complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods:Clinical data of 7 patients with severe complications after LC from August 2007 to April 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical data was got from biliary department of West China Hospital. Results: Two cases of secondary common bile duct stone with acute suppurative cholangitis got cured by endoscopic sphincterotomy. Three cases of severe bile duct injury after LC had stricture of the hilar bile duct, and all of the cases were performed RouxenY hepaticojejunostomy with the diameter of stoma 2.03.0 centimeters. One case of strangulating intestinal obstruction was cured through jejunum endtoend anastomosis after cutting off the necrotic jejunum. All of the above 6 patients recovered well. Following up for 820 months, all lived well. One patient got pulmonary embolism after LC and dead of respiratory failure after active rescue. Conclusion: Carefully making operation and distinguishing the relationship of hepatic bile duct and common bile duct and the duct of gallbladder are the key points to prevent sever complications during LC. Reasonable and feasible treatment is the ensurement of increasing the living quality of the patients with sever complications after LC. And the surgeons of biliary department must have a correct attitude toward LC and should concern think highly during LC and should not pursue speed blindly. In necessary, the operation of LC should be turned into open cholecystectomy.