Objective To systematically review the relationship between the expression of Survivin mRNA and ovarian cancer. Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2016), CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were searched to identify case-control studies concerning the association between the expression of Survivin mRNA and ovarian cancer up to November 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. Results A total of 10 studies were included. The positive of Survivin mRNA in ovarian cancer group was significantly higher than that in control group (OR=24.63, 95% CI 13.44 to 45.15,P<0.000 01). The positive of Survivin in low differentiated group was significantly higher than that in high differentiation group (OR=3.69, 95% CI 2.29 to 5.93,P<0.000 01). The positive of Survivin in clinical stage of Ⅲ-Ⅳ was significantly higher than that in clinical stage of Ⅰ-Ⅱ (OR=4.76, 95% CI 2.99 to 7.57,P<0.000 01), respectively. However, the expression of Survivin mRNA was not associated with lymph node metastasis, ascites and histological type. Conclusion The current evidence indicates that the expression of Survivin mRNA is significantly correlated with ovarian cancer and its clinicopathologic features. Due to the limited quantity and quality of includes studies, the above conclusions are needed to be verified by more high quality studies.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and the adverse reactions of intensive therapy compared with conventional therapy. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (January 1980 to June 2008), EMbase (1984 to June 2008), CBM-disc (January 1980 to June 2008) and CNKI (1994 to June 2008) to get all the randomized control trials (RCTs) about paclitaxel intensive versus conventional therapy for ovarian cancer. We used RevMan 5 to perform meta-analysis. Results Six RCTs involving 572 patients were included. Metaanalysis showed the efficacy of intensive therapy and conventional therapy was similar. There were no significant differences in response rate (RR 1.06, 95%CI 0.94 to 1.20), median survival time, survival rate, median progression free survival and median time to progression between the two groups. When taking safety into consideration, intensive therapy significantly reduced the occurrence of grade Ⅲ or higher neutropenia (RR 0.49, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.69, Plt;0.000 1) and Grade Ⅲ or higher neuropathy (RR 0.43, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.78, P=0.006). But there were no significant differences between intensive therapy and conventional therapy in flush, grade Ⅲ or higher vomiting, anemia, leucopenia, grade Ⅲ or higher thrombocytopenia and alopecia. Conclusion Paclitaxel intensive therapy has similar efficacy and adverse reactions compared with conventional therapy in ovarian cancer. Above all, intensive therapy can reduce the incidence of grade Ⅲ or higher neutropenia and neuropathy. It is a good substitution for the conventional therapy.
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) on the biological behaviour of ovarian epithelial neoplasm. METHODS Ten cases of normal ovarian tissues and eighty cases of ovarian epithelial tumor tissues were detected by immunohistochemical methods. Mias-2000 Picture Analysis System was used to study the relationship of bFGF expression intensity and microvessel count, FIGO stage, pathological grade and classification of ovarian epithelial neoplasm. RESULTS 1. Expression of bFGF was mainly in cytoplasm and nucleus in several cells of borderline and malignant tumor. 2. The expression intensity of bFGF was closely related to the malignant degree of ovarian epithelial neoplasm. The density of bFGF expression was (3.35 +/- 3.52)% in normal ovarian epithelium, (19.25 +/- 21.73)% in benign tumor, (33.78 +/- 10.86)% in borderline tumor and (48.18 +/- 12.93)% in malignant tumor. The results indicated that bFGF might play an important role in carcinogenesis of ovarian epithelial neoplasm. 3. The expression intensity of bFGF was increased with the FIGO stage of ovarian tumor. 4. The expression intensity of bFGF was increased accompanying with the decrease of differentiation degree in ovian neoplasm. 5. In borderline tumor, expression intensity of bFGF in serous cystadenoma was significantly higher than in mucinous cystadenoma, which indicated bFGF might be an important factor in canceration of ovarian epithelial neoplasm. CONCLUSION bFGF may play important roles in carcinogenesis, development, invasion and metastasis of ovarian epithelial neoplasm.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) combined with chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.MethodsCNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and PubMed databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials on the CHM combined with chemotherapy for ovarian cancer from inception to March 31st, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsThirteen studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that, CHM combined with chemotherapy group was superior to the chemotherapy alone group in effective rate of TCM syndrome (RR=1.72, 95%CI 1.46 to 2.03, P<0.00.000 1), effective rate of tumor change (RR=1.40, 95%CI 1.21 to 1.63,P<0.000 01), physical condition score (MD=9.19, 95%CI 5.89 to 12.48,P<0.000 01), tumor markers (MD=–18.00, 95%CI –20.62 to –1.538,P<0.000 01), leukocyte reduction (RR=0.67, 95%CI 0.58 to 0.77,P<0.000 01), granulocy tedepletion (RR=0.67, 95%CI 0.55 to 0.81,P<0.000 1), thrombocytopenia (RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.45 to 0.69,P<0.000 01), and digestive tract reaction (RR=0.66, 95%CI 0.50 to 0.87,P=0.004).ConclusionsThe current evidence shows that CHM combined with chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, the above conclusions are required to be verified by more high-quality studies.
Objective To construct and verify the diagnostic model of preoperative malignant risk of ovarian tumors, so as to improve the diagnostic efficiency of existing test indexes. Methods The related serological indicators and clinical data of patients with ovarian tumors confirmed by pathology who were treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University between January 2019 and September 2023 were retrospectively collected, and the patients were randomly divided into a training set and a verification set at a 7∶3 ratio. Logistic regression was used to construct a diagnostic model in the training set, and the diagnostic efficacy of the model was verified through discrimination, calibration, clinical benefit, and clinical applicability evaluation. Results A total of 929 patients with ovarian tumors were included, including 318 cases of malignant ovarian tumors and 611 cases of benign ovarian tumors. The patients were randomly divided into a training set of 658 cases and a validation set of 271 cases. A diagnostic model was constructed using logistic regression in the training set, containing 5 factors namely age, percentage of neutrophil (NEU%), fibrinogen to albumin ratio (FAR), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4): modelUAM=?3.211+0.667×age+2.966×CA125+0.792×FAR+1.637×HE4+0.533×NEU%, with a Hosmer-Lemeshow test P-value of 0.21. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve measured in the training set was 0.927 [95% confidence interval (0.903, 0.951)], the sensitivity was 0.947, and the specificity was 0.780. The area under the ROC curve of the validation set was 0.888 [95% confidence interval (0.840, 0.930)], the sensitivity was 0.744, and the specificity was 0.901. Conclusion A new quantitative tool based on age, NEU%, FAR, CA125 and HE4 can be used for the clinical diagnosis of ovarian malignant tumors, and it is helpful to improve the diagnostic efficiency and is worth popularizing.
Ovarian cancer is one of the common malignant tumors of female genital organs. In gynecological tumors, the incidence rate of ovarian cancer ranks the third after cervical cancer and uterine body cancer, but the death rate of ovarian cancer ranks the first, posing a serious threat to women’s life and health. In recent years, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines for ovarian cancer has become an important basis for diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer. In this paper, we interpret the latest version (version 4. 2017) of NCCN clinical practice guidelines for ovarian cancer for its better clinical application.
Objective To estimate the diagnostic value of mesothelin in ovarian cancer. Methods PubMed, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI and WanFang Data databases were searched from inception to October 2016 to collect relevant diagnostic accuracy studies of mesothelin in ovarian cancer. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Statistical analysis was performed using Meta-Disc 1.4, Stata 12.0 and RevMan 5.2 softwares. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated, the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was drawn and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Results Seventeen studies involving 2 052 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR were 0.63 (95%CI 0.60 to 0.67), 0.92 (95%CI 0.90 to 0.93) and 26.62 (95%CI 14.96 to 47.38), respectively. The AUC and Q index were 0.915 1 and 0.847 8, respectively. Conclusion The current evidence indicates that mesothelin has high specificity and low sensitivity, which can’t be used alone as a biomarker for the detection of ovarian cancer, but should be combined with other biomarkers.
Objective To assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of paclitaxel liposomes and carboplatin for ovarian cancer. Methods The databases such as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and CBM were searched to collect all randomized control trials (RCTs) about the clinical effectiveness and safety of paclitaxel liposomes and carboplatin for ovarian cancer. Literatures were screened according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, the data were extracted, the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed in line with Cochrane Handbook 5.0.1, and Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.0.24 software. Results Three RCTs involving 214 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that compared with the paclitaxel plus carboplatin group, the paclitaxel liposomes plus carboplatin group didn’t show significant differences in the total effective rate (P=0.62), while it was obviously superior in reducing the adverse events, such as muscle and joint pain (Plt;0.000 01), peripheral neurotoxicity (P=0.04), nausea or vomiting (P=0.000 2), facial blushing (P=0.03) and rashes (P=0.003). But there were no significant differences between the two groups in trichomadesis, dyspnea, diarrhea, bellyache and blood system abnormalities. Conclusion As current clinical evidences shows, the paclitaxel liposomes and carboplatin in treating ovarian cancer is as effective as the paclitaxel and carboplatin, and it can reduce some of the adverse reactions. Therefore, the paclitaxel liposomes and carboplatin is available for ovarian cancer as a new, safe and effective treatment. Due to small scale and low quality of the included studies, this conclusion has to be further proved with more high-quality, large-scale, and double-blind RCTs.
ObjectiveTo systematiclly review the correlation between physical activity and the risk of ovarian cancer. MethodsSuch databases as CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, The Cochrane Library (Issue 10, 2013), PubMed, EMbase were searched from database establishment to October 2013 to collect prospective cohort studies about physical activities and the risk of ovarian cancer. Relevant magazines and references of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 8 cohort studies involving 580 581 subjects, of which there were 2 444 cases of patients with ovarian cancer. The results of meta-analysis showed that, women who participated in moderate level physical activities tended to have a lower incidence of ovarian cancer, compared with those who participated in low level physical activities (age-adjusted:RR=0.87, 95%CI 0.75 to 1.01, P=0.06; multivariate-adjusted:RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.14, P=0.71) but with no significant difference; while women who participated in high level physical activities tended to have a higher incidence of ovarian cancer with a significant difference found in the multivariate-adjusted results (age-adjusted:RR=1.19, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.56, P=0.21; multivariate-adjusted:RR=1.35, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.67, P=0.008). Along with the increase of sedentariness, the incidence of ovarian cancer rose, but with no significant difference. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, compared with low level physical activities, high level ones increase the risk of ovarian caner; while the effects of moderate level ones and sedentariness on the risk of ovarian caner still remain uncertain. However, more high-quality studies are required to verify the conclusion of this study because of the limited quantity of the included studies as well as many confounding factors.
The mortality rate of ovarian cancer is the highest among female reproductive tract malignancies. Although most patients have undergone recurrent treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, the recurrence rate is still high. The exploration of scholars in this field has never stopped. In recent years, remarkable achievements have been made in the medical treatment of ovarian cancer. The research of poly adenosinediphosphate-ribose polymerase, immunotherapy (immunocheckpoint inhibitor monotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with other drugs) and anti-angiogenic drugs have provided new methods for the treatment of this disease, and throughout the whole process of ovarian cancer treatment. This paper summarizes this, and aims to provide a reference for the clinical treatment of ovarian cancer.