In November 2017, the American Heart Association updated the pediatric basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality. The new guidelines focused on the clinical value of chest compression-only CPR versus CPR using chest compressions with rescue breaths in children, rather than a comprehensive revision of the 2015 edition guidelines. The Pediatric Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation updated part content of the guidelines according to the continuous evidence review process. Guidelines recommend CPR using chest compressions with rescue breaths should be provided for infants and children with cardiac arrest. Bystanders provide chest compressions if they are unwilling or unable to deliver rescue breaths. This article mainly interprets the updated content.
ObjectiveTo adapt existing clinical practice guidelines to the management of medication adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in China, so as to provide evidence to support the development of practice guidelines that meet China's actual conditions. MethodsAccording to ADAPTE methodology and status of HAART in China, we searched, appraised, selected and adapted current clinical practice guidelines on the management of medication adherence to HAART. ResultsA total of 10 guidelines were included, and the final clinical practice guidelines for the management of medication adherence to HAART involved 3 aspects, including influential factors, assessment methods, and interventions. High quality evidence resources had been formed, and the quality of final clinical practice guidelines was higher. ConclusionIt is feasible to develop clinical practice guidelines according to the ADAPTE method, and reliable evidence support has been provided for the development of clinical practice guidelines based on guideline adaption.
The incidence of thyroid cancer has increased significantly worldwide in recent years, and it has become one of the top ten malignant tumors. The relevant guidelines for thyroid cancer have been formulated one after another. Surgery is an important method for the treatment of thyroid cancer. Standardized surgery can effectively improve the prognosis and quality of life, while inappropriate treatment will increase the risk of recurrence and reduce the survival rate. In 2022, the first domestic guideline for thyroid cancer covering all pathological types, “CACA Guidelines for Holistic Integrative Management of Thyroid Cancer” was officially released. Compared with the previous guidelines, the recommendations of the CACA guidelines are more in line with China’s national conditions, focusing on the integration of multidisciplinary resources, and minimizing the risk of complications while ensuring the treatment effect.
Objective To improve care and outcomes for all migraine suffers, the USHC created these evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache. Methods Firstly, 5 relative Technical reviews were done according to the Methods used in the AHCPR Technical Reviews. Secondly, based on the results of the 5 technical reviews, the 4 treatment guidelines were developed in direction of the USHC’S Methods used in developing clinical guidelines. Results Evidence supporting the acute treatment and preventive treatment were exclusively Class 1 studies, evidence supporting the diagnostic testing were either Class 2 or Class 3 studies , only very few expert judgment was given on some compelling issues without evidence. The recommendations they supporting were high-qualified, middle-qualified, and poor-qualified respectively. Conclusion This Evidence-Based Guidelines is one of the first and most extensive cooperative projects available for creating guidelines. The guideline was developed with systematical and scientific methods and stroven to base all of its recommendations on evidence.
ObjectiveTo compare the recommended medicines of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases guidelines, expert consensus, or diagnosis and treatment specifications with essential medicines from the 2023 World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines (WHO-EML) and the 2018 National Essential Medicine List (NEML) in differences and similarities. MethodsSix guideline websites and one association website including Guidelines International Network and National Guideline Clearinghouse, etc. were searched from inception to July 2023. The latest cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases guidelines, expert consensus, diagnosis and treatment specifications involving medicine treatment were included, and we extracted the data (year, title, target disease, authors and recommended medicines), and the statistical analysis of recommended medicines included in the WHO-EML and NEML was performed by Excel 2016. ResultsA total of 83 guidelines, expert consensus, and diagnosis and treatment specifications were included, covering cerebrovascular diseases, ischemic heart diseases, hypertensive diseases, chronic rheumatic heart diseases, diseases of arteries, arterioles and capillaries and other unspecified circulatory system disorders. They were issued from 2002 to 2023. Fifty-five (66.3%) were published in the past 5 years. For the 246 recommended medicines, they were divided into 14 categories according to the pharmacological effect. 27.2% (67/246) were included in WHO-EML and 32.9% (81/246) were included in NEML, among which 41 medicines were included both in WHO-EML and NEML, 40 in NEML only, 26 in WHO-EML only, and 139 in neither. The number of excluded medicines in antihypertensive medicines, lipid-regulating medicines and antiatherosclerotic medicines and anticoagulants exceeded 10. ConclusionThe number of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease guidelines, expert consensus, and diagnosis and treatment specifications recommended for WHO-EML and NEML is lower than 50%, and the coverage rate of NEML for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease guidelines recommended treatment medicines is higher than that of WHO-EML.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the quality of evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence, so as to provide evidence for clinical stress urinary incontinence management research.MethodsWebsite of the professional society, clinical practice guide website, Yimaitong website, PubMed, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect stress urinary incontinence management related guidelines from January 1st, 2014 to January 1st, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the quality of included guidelines using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE Ⅱ) and the characteristics of each guidelines were analyzed.ResultsWe identified totally 8 relevant evidence-based guidelines in this field. The average standardized scores in the 6 domains of AGREE II were 90.74% (scope and purpose), 78.71% (stakeholder involvement), 74.60% (rigor of development), 93.52% (clarity of presentations), 61.81% (applicability), and 91.67% (independence). The overall standardized scores of 8 guidelines were 77.70%, and the total scores were 5.31 (out of 7). For overall quality, 4 of them were grade A and 4 of them were grade B.ConclusionsThe overall quality of evidence-based guidelines for stress urinary incontinence is high, and scores in different fields are vary large. Fields of " stakeholder involvement”, " rigor of development” and " applicability” with lower scores still requires strengthening. The current guidelines for female stress urinary incontinence in China still fails to meet the standards of evidence-based guidelines, so the quality of the guidelines should be improved to improve guide clinical practice.
Secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism are common complications in patients with chronic kidney disease, especially in end stage renal disease. Surgery is an important method for the treatment of secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism. The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Guidelines for the Definitive Surgical Management of Secondary and Tertiary Renal Hyperparathyroidism is the first evidence based guideline focus on renal hyperparathyroidism surgical management. Recommendations using the best available evidence by a panel of 10 experts in secondary and tertiary renal hyperparathyroidism constructed this guideline, which provides evidence-based, individual and optimal surgical management of secondary and tertiary renal hyperparathyroidism. This paper made a guideline interpretation on the indications of surgery, imaging examination, preoperative and perioperative management, relevant evaluation and treatment during perioperative period, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring during operation, and so on.
ObjectiveTo systematically analyze the distribution of research evidence on diabetes in current clinical practice guidelines of Chinese medicine (CM). MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI, VIP databases and related guideline websites were electronically searched to collect clinical practice guidelines for CM in diabetes published before December 2023. We systematically reviewed the distribution of evidence in these guidelines. ResultsThe 27 CM guidelines on diabetes mainly covered syndrome differentiation and treatment, specific disease-specific drugs, diet, external therapies, and traditional exercises. The included guidelines used three different levels of evidence grading, with most of the evidence falling into the low-to-moderate level (67.3%). However, guidelines on diabetes-related osteoporosis, diabetic cardiomyopathy, prediabetes, and diabetic peripheral neuropathy had a relatively low proportion of high-level evidence, accounting for only 7.2%, 7.6%, 13.2%, and 13.3% respectively. Only guidelines on diabetic nephropathy provided evidence on the toxicity of Chinese herbal medicine, while other guidelines did not cover this aspect. Acupuncture, Tai Chi, Baduanjin, and other characteristics therapies had varying levels of evidence for different types of complications. Low-level evidence mainly focused on syndrome differentiation and treatment, symptom-based treatment, sign-based treatment, indicator-based treatment, Chinese patent medicine, specific disease-specific formulas, etc., for diabetes and related complications. ConclusionCurrently, topics supported by low/no evidence, new themes, inconsistent content between guidelines, evidence sources for overlapping targets, classical formulas, toxicity of Chinese herbal medicine, and characteristic CM therapies can provide directions for future research on CM in diabetes. We advocate addressing important issues related to diabetes specifically, to improve research value, eliminate unnecessary duplication of studies and resource waste, and promote the healthy development of CM research in the field of diabetes.
Objective To evaluate quality and current status of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) guidelines and consensus, and to promote the improvements in the quality of guidelines and consensus. Methods A systematic collection of TCM guidelines and consensus published in medical journals in 2022 was conducted. We used scientific, transparent, and applicable ranking tools (STAR) for evaluation, analyzed the scoring rates (%), and assessed the quality level and influencing factors of guidelines and consensus through methods such as comparison and stratification. Results A total of 130 TCM guidelines and consensus were included. Guideline areas with higher scores included recommendations (65.3%), evidence (55.9%), and guideline development groups (54.2%). In the case of consensus, higher scores were observed in recommendations (38.7%), guideline development groups (37.0%), and funding (30.0%). The total score rate of TCM guidelines exceeded that of national guidelines, while the consensus rate was lower. Stratified analysis revealed statistical differences in guideline score rates among journals and issuing institutions, as well as significant differences in consensus score rates among journals, formulation institutions, subjects, and funding categories. Conclusion The quantity and quality of TCM guidelines and consensus are on a positive trajectory, with higher quality levels in guidelines than in consensus. The overall quality of TCM guidelines surpasses that of national guidelines, particularly emphasizing the scientificity of guideline formulation. However, the overall quality of consensus remains lower than that of the national consensus. Factors such as journals, formulation institutions, subjects, and funding categories are identified as potential influences on the quality of TCM guidelines and consensus.
The publication of the 2016 version of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines is a further step to the treatment of sepsis worldwide. This version of guidelines approves new definition of Sepsis-3. Overall, the new guidelines do not change the previous principle of treatment significantly. Some detailed and specific modifications have been made. Understanding and rational use of the new guidelines based on clinical practice, are the key to managing sepsis and performing accurate and effective treatment.