Objective To design a novel stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis and test the feasibility and its function in vitro after the valve was implanted by a modified method. Methods Six stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis were divided into two groups according to different implantation, single layer suture group: new improvement stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis sutured with single layer was implanted; double layer suture group: stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis developmented by our laboratory used double layer suture was implanted. Each group contained three scales: 23 mm ,25 mm and 27 mm. Analogue ex vivo aortic valve replacement was performed , the feasibility of the new implantation was detected. Effective orifice area, transvalvular pressure gradient and regurgitation ratio were recorded at the cardiac output of 2.0 L/min, 3.5 L/min, 5.0 L/min and 7.0 L/min under the guideline of International Organization for tandardization （ISO）5840. Results The average aortic valve implantation time used for single layer suture and tradition double layer suture were 50 min and 70 min respectively. The transvalvular pressure gradient in the single layer suture group were significantly lower than those in double layer suture group under the flow of 5.0 L/min in 23 mm valve and 27 mm valve （13.51±0.51 mm Hg vs. 14.44±0.99 mm Hg, 7.36±0.19 mm Hg vs. 7.53±0.28 mm Hg；P＜0.01）;and the effective orifice area in the single layer suture group were larger than those in double layer suture group in the same case(1.87±0.06 cm2 vs. 1.76±0.08 cm2, 2.26±0.07 cm2 vs. 2.16±0.05 cm2；P＜0.01). There was no statistically difference in other parameters between both groups. Conclusion The novel design of new improvement stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis used single layer suture has good hemodynamic characteristics as the nature structure . The modified suture method decrease the implantation time.Nemerical data of the evaluation in vitro show that the difference between single layer suture group and double layer suture group in effective orifice area,transvalvular pressure gradient and regurgitation ratio haveno statistical significance. This experiment is the foundation of the animal and clinical experiment in the future.
Complex interventions are commonly used in health and social care services, public health practice, and other areas of social and economic policy that have consequences for health. Due to the multiple components of interventions, the complicated mechanisms of change, the diversity of the population involved, and the interaction between the intervention and the context in which it is implemented, the appropriate development and evaluation of complex interventions has become increasingly critical. The UK Medical Research Council published a framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. The aim of this article is to introduce and interpret the framework to provide guidance on the development and evaluation of complex interventions for domestic researchers.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the economic evaluation research of anti-novel coronavirus infection drugs at home and abroad, so as to promote clinical rational drug use. MethodsThe PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMbase, Web of Science, INAHTA, SinoMed, WanFang Data, and CNKI databases were systematically searched from January 1, 2020 to March 25, 2023, to collect economic evaluation studies related to anti-novel coronavirus infection drugs. ResultsA total of 22 articles were included, among which 11 studies were conducted from the perspective of health system, and most of the studies performed cost estimation on direct medical costs. The overall compliance rate of the included studies ranged from 42% to 70%, with deficiencies in model setting, incomplete uncertainty analysis, and lack of stakeholder participation. The results showed that immunotherapy drugs (Dexamethasone, Tocilizumab), neutralizing antibody (REGEN-COV antibody), small molecule drugs (Baricitinib, Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir, Molnupiravir, Favipiravir) and statin were cost-effective. There was some variation in the results of the economic evaluation of Remdesivir. ConclusionAt present, there are few studies on the economic evaluation of drug interventions in COVID-19. Existing studies have pointed out that most drug interventions are cost-effective. It is suggested that more standardized pharmacoeconomic evaluation studies based on the actual situation of China epidemic should be carried out in the future.
【摘要】 目的 探討高血壓危象評估和處理原則及對高血壓危象急診處理的指導意義。 方法 依據高血壓危象評估和處理原則對2008年1月-2009年12月期間收治的160例高血壓危象患者進行診斷和治療。結果 160例高血壓危象患者中,高血壓急癥134例,高血壓亞急癥26例。高血壓急癥中,以心腦血管病變為主,包括腦卒中、急性冠脈綜合征和急性左側心力衰竭。依據高血壓危象評估和處理原則進行急診處理,能夠對高血壓危象進行準確評估和有效處理,減少診治失誤,降低死亡率并改善預后。結論 有關高血壓危象的評估和處理原則能夠指導高血壓危象的急診處理,取得良好的預后。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the principles of evaluation and management of hypertensive crises in order to guide emergency clinical practice for better managements and prognosis. Methods One hundred and sixty patients with hypertensive crises admitted to our department from January 2008 to December 2009 had been diagnosed and treated. Results There were 134 patients with hypertensive emergencies (HE) and 26 patients with hypertensive urgencies(HU)in accordance with those principle. Cardiocerebralvascular diseases were the main symptom of HE including stroke, acute coronary syndrome and acute left ventricular failure. According to those principles,the emergency management was carried out, accuracy evaluation and effective management of hypertensive crises could reduce wrong diagnosis and treatment,decrease mortality and improve prognosis. Conclusion The principle of evaluation and management of hypertensive crises could guide the emergency management of hypertensive crises and obtain better prognosis．
Objective To evaluate the right usage of statistical methods in medical articles. Methods 544 theses from eight medical journalspublished during1998 and 2005 were analyzed. Results 136 theses had obvious statistical errors,accounting for 25.00%. The main types of the errors were: the wrong methods of data analyzing for 61.76%, diagram error for 14.71%, nonstatistical dealing for8.82%, the mixture of rate and ratio for 8.82%, and the other error for 5.88%. Conclusion The statistical methods should be highly valued. Despite handing themanuscript to the specialist in the same field, the statistician checking system should be built through the process of manuscript dealing.
The modernization and internationalization of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) are the key issues we must face up to. The development of TCM needs to depend on the breakthrough of methods and the innovation of ideology, and the international standardization of scientific research evaluation. The clinical evidence from randomized comtrolled trials (RCT) is valuable and reliable. It has shown that the proportion of RCT identified in TCM journals was less than 30%, and the score of RCT’s quality was less than 3 using Jadad scale. However, the number of systematic reviews on TCM is increasing rapidly after the evidence-based medicine (EBM) was introduced and practiced in China. Until 2004, 43 systematic reviews of TCM were published in China, and the quality of RCT included in those reviews was elevated. It has shown that the efficacy and safety of TCM indicated some advances in treatment of certain kind of diseases. It has been realized that RCT are important in TCM, and improving the quality of RCT is the key step for modernization and internationalization of TCM.
Objective To analyze the methodological quality of clinical practice guideline mentioned “evidence-based” in China. Methods We selected clinical guidelines developed based on evidence issued by the Chinese Medical Association in 2010-2012, and meanwhile, we conducted additional search for guidelines on clinical major diseases. Then, we selected literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and evaluated the included guidelines according to 8 items relevant to methodological rigor which were selected from the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II). If the guidelines comply with the item, we recorded 1 point, otherwise 0 point. Results a) Among twenty-two included guidelines, 13 were originated and 9 were updated once every 3 to 5 years. b) Diseases covered stroke, diabetes, chronic hepatitis B, hypertension, pediatric nutrition, etc. c) The number of guideline references were 10 to 218, of which, nine guidelines cited 24 Cochrane systematic reviews (CDSRs), accounted for 2.62% (24/916). Among them, the acute ischemic stroke guideline cited the most (7 CDSRs). d) The number of experts involved in guidelines development was 2 to 95 and guidelines pages were 4 to 150. e) The guidelines’ quality generally scored 4 to 7, most of which described the process of guidelines development. The grades of recommendation were consistent with the levels of evidence. But most of the included guidelines did not clearly described literature research methods, peer reviewer, and update procedures. Conclusion There is a growing trend that clinical guidelines are developed based on evidence in China. However, the quality of reporting and the methodological rigor of guidelines need further improvement. The citation rates of Cochrane systematic reviews in these guidelines were relatively low. We suggest that guideline recommendations should be consistent with the levels of evidence and adapt to local conditions, and relevant support policies for guideline implementation in practice. In future, attention should be paid to the aspects of guideline development methods, reporting standard, guideline accessibility, and standard training for relevant personnel.
Objective To identify the clinical evaluation methods used for undergraduate nursing students. Methods A self-made questionnaire about the clinical evaluation methods for undergraduate nursing students was used to collect information from 158 tutors of undergraduate nursing students in 4 teaching hospitals in Sichuan province. Results In terms of consulting evaluation opinion from other nurses, there was no significant difference between the ratios of tutors who really adopted and those who perceived as necessary to do so (Pgt;0.05). As for consulting the self-evaluation of nursing students and patients’ evaluation opinion, the ratio of tutors who really adopted was lower than those who perceived as necessary to do so (Plt;0.01). The majority of tutors used real, ward patients for evaluation, while a minority of tutors used demonstration room and model patients. The most effective methods viewed by the tutors were observation, holistic nursing care examination and test, and the most often used evaluation methods were clinical skill test, observation and theoretical exam. Most tutors adopted a continuous evaluation method for the clinical evaluation of undergraduate nursing students. Conclusion The methods for the clinical evaluation of undergraduate nursing students varies. This may influence the accuracy, objectivity and fairness of the evaluations. Formulating evaluation sheet of patients and self-evaluation sheet of nursing students, establishing standardized clinical skill examination station, training standardized patients and evaluation skills of clinical tutors, standardizing examination content and relevant evaluation standard and methods, and adopting comprehensive evaluation with various methods may help to improve the accuracy, objectivity and fairness of the clinical evaluation of undergraduate nursing students.
Objective To develop an evaluation tool for the screening of high risk population for oral complications in critically ill patients, which can be performed accurately and scientifically. Methods Basing on the related foreign oral assessment scale, combined with the method of brainstorming, expert consultation, method of clinical status and so on, the item pool of the assessment scale was determined. Five nursing experts and two oral experts assessed the content validity and 50 ICU nurses were tested. Then, the screening accuracy of the assessment scale was proved by application in 100 critically ill patients selected randomly. Results The Cronbach’s a coefficient of final version of the High Risk Assessment Scale for Oral Complications in Critically Ill Patients (including seven parts contents of oral health assessment and oral pH value test) was 0.815, the content validity index (Sr-CVI/Ave) was 0.932. The results of 50 nurses to the 91.2% assessment items of the assessment scale were very important and important. For screening related indicators of oral complications in high-risk patients, the sensitivity of the assessment scale was 97.53%, the specificity was 94.11%, the positive predictive value was 98.75%, the negative predictive value was 88.89%, and the crude agreement was 95%. Conclusion There are good reliability, validity and a high accuracy of screening test in the High Risk Assessment Scale for Oral Complications in Critically Ill Patients. It can be used for screening patients at high risk for oral complications in critically ill patients, and help clinical nurses to complete the oral health status of the critically ill patients quickly.
Objective To set up and to evaluate an acute closed brain injury model in rats. Methods The acute closed brain injury was produced in rats by using an impactor consisting of a stand, a guide tube, a weight and a footplate. Ninetysix SD rats were divided into a control group(n＝32, no impact), a mild injury group(n＝32, impact once at force level of 400 g·cm) and a severe injury group(n＝32, impact once at force level of 800 g·cm) to elucidate the physiological responses, the pathophysiological changes and brain edema after brain injury at different injury levels. Results In the mild injury group and the severe injury group, a sudden rise or reduction of blood pressure, deep and fast breath apnea, and pain reflects inhibition were observed. The responses were more obvious in the severe injury group than in the mild injury group. The water content of the brain increased after 6 hours of injury. The pathological contusion and edema of brain were noted or above the impact force level of 800 g·cm. When the impact force rose to or over 1200g·cm, the animals died of persistent apnea mostly. Conclusion Although the established closed brain injury model with different biomechanical mechanisms as the clinical brain injury, it is in conformity with pathological changes and pathophysiological characteristics of acute clinical brain injury, it can be utilized extensively because of its convenient and practice.