We searched The Cochrane Library（Issue 3, 2005）, MEDLINE（1996-2005） ,CMCC（1996-2005）, VIP（1996-2005） ,CNKI（1996-2005） to summarize the available evidence of topiramate for an intractable epilepsy. After scanning all these articles, we identified 11 articles including meta-analysis, randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews to evaluate. Topiramate offered an alternative in the treament for intractable epilepsy, especially for partial epilepsy, and its efficacy was proven. Patients had good tolerance. And no intercross effects with the traditional anti-epileptic drugs were found. So topiramate had broad clinical value. The primary dosage of topiramate was 200mg/d. The sustaining dosage was 400-600mg/d. And we didn＇t recommend the dosage of more than 600mg/d.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (HIPC) in treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.Methods The Meta-analysis was applied to analyze 8 randomized controlled quantitative studies published at domestic and abroad. These patients treated by HIPC after radical operation with colorectal cancer were included for the treatment group, and those treated only by radical operation with colorectal cancer for the control group. Relative risk (RR) of outcome variable of 3-year and 5-year survival rate and safety between the two groups were compared. Results There were 8 selected literatures, including 1 501 cases, in which 765 cases for treatment group, and 736 cases for control group. RR of 5-year survival rate of the total patients was 2.39 (95% CI: 1.66-3.45). RR of 3-year survival rate of the total patients was 2.13 (95% CI: 1.45-3.13). The results demonstrated that HIPC could improve 5-year and 3-year survival rate, and sensitivity analysis confirmed the conclusions more reliable. The security was described in 5 literatures, the available information showed smaller potential security issue. Conclusions HIPC after radical operation of advanced colorectal cancer can increase 5-year and 3-year survival rate of patients, improve the prognosis of patients. Whether patients with increased incidence of postoperative complications related to the HIPC is no clear-cut conclusions for lack of related research.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitor in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). MethodsThe PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in patients with axSpA from inception to December, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 7 RCTs involving 1 602 patients were included, including 852 patients in the experimental group and 750 patients in the placebo group. The results of meta-analysis showed that in terms of clinical efficacy, ASAS20 (RR=1.67, 95%CI 1.50 to 1.86, P<0.01), ASAS40 (RR=2.30, 95%CI 1.93 to 2.73, P<0.01), ΔBASFI (MD=?1.04, 95%CI ?1.21 to ?0.87, P<0.01), and ΔBASMI (MD=?0.30, 95%CI ?0.41 to ?0.19, P<0.01) of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of axSpA patients were significantly higher than those in the placebo group. In terms of safety, adverse event (RR=1.09, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.21, P=0.14) and major adverse events, such as diarrhea (RR=1.18, 95%CI 0.55 to 2.51, P=0.67), nasopharyngitis (RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.75, P=0.96), liver enzyme abnormalities (RR=1.83, 95%CI 0.84 to 3.99, P=0.13), and headache (RR=1.94, 95%CI 0.77 to 4.87, P=0.16) were statistically insignificant. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that JAK inhibitors can improve the clinical efficacy in the axSpA patients, and the safety is high. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of vaccines for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) . Methods The CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, PubMed, EMbase and Web of Science databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines from their inception to June 30th, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 12.0 software. Results A total of 13 RCTs involving 139 015 subjects were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the sero-antibody conversion rate (RR=37.883, 95%CI 8.086 to 177.491, P<0.001) and infection prevention rate (RR=1.011, 95%CI 1.006 to 1.017, P<0.001) of the vaccine group were higher than those of the placebo group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the vaccine group was higher than that in the placebo group (OR=1.839, 95%CI 1.165 to 2.903, P=0.009), which mainly included pain, redness, swelling, fever, headache and itching (P<0.05). However, the incidence of serious adverse reactions was not significantly different from that of the placebo group. Conclusion The current evidence shows that the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines is high. The most prevalent adverse reactions are mild and moderate, and severe adverse reactions are the same as those of the placebo group. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone in the treatment of viral myocarditis.MethodsThe Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Biosis Preview, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang Data, VIP, and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on dexamethasone for patients with viral myocarditis from inception to April 30th, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software.ResultsA total of 7 RCTs involving 749 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the dexamethasone treatment group exhibited an increased efficacy rate (RR=1.26, 95%CI 1.18 to 1.34, P<0.000 01), decreased levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) (MD=?11.49, 95%CI ?19.25 to ?3.72, P=0.004), cardiac troponin I (cTnI) (MD=?26.14, 95%CI ?40.82 to ?11.47, P=0.0005), and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) (MD=?20.06, 95%CI ?28.35 to ?11.77, P<0.000 01), and a decreased adverse event rate (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.65, P=0.000 3).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that dexamethasone can significantly improve the efficacy rate, reduce the levels of CRP, cTnI, and CK-MB, and reduce the incidence of adverse events in patients with viral myocarditis. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucosamine hydrochloride in the treatment of osteoarthritis. MethodsA total of 150 patients with osteoarthritis treated between April 2014 and April 2015 were randomly divided into control group and trial group with 75 in each. Patients in the trial group accepted oral glucosamine hydrochloride, while those in the control group were given diclofenac sodium. Lequesne index, total effective rate and the incidence of adverse reactions of both groups were calculated before and 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after treatment, and 2 weeks after drug withdrawal. ResultsIn both groups, Lequesne index started to decrease after 2 weeks of treatment (P<0.05), and reached the minimum value at treatment week eight (P<0.05). The Lequesne index 2 weeks after drug withdrawal was still obviously lower than that before treatment (P<0.05). There was no significant differences in the total effective rate at treatment week eight (83.1% for the control group and 80.9% for the trial group) or the total effective rate 2 weeks after drug withdrawal (80.0% for the control group and 79.4% for the trial group) between the control group and the trial group (P>0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions of the trial group (6.7%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (21.3%) (P<0.05). ConclusionGlucosamine hydrochloride is effective and safe in the treatment of osteoarthritis, which is suitable for long-term treatment.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of autologous mononuclear cells transplantation in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.MethodsPubMed, EMbase and The Cochrane Library were electronically searched to collect randomized and non-randomized controlled trials on autologous mononuclear cells transplantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head from inception to July 31th, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literatures, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software.ResultsA total of 17 studies involving 645 hips in mononuclear cells group and 557 hips in cell-free group were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with cell-free therapy, mononuclear cells therapy could improve hip function in term of Hairrs score (MD=8.11, 95%CI 4.36 to 11.87, P<0.000 1), Merle D`Aubigné Postel score (MD=2.23, 95%CI 0.97 to 3.49, P=0.000 5), WOMAC score (MD=?10.81, 95%CI ?15.80 to ?5.81, P<0.000 1), Lequesne index (MD=?2.97, 95%CI ?5.42 to ?0.52, P=0.02) and alleviate the pain (MD=?9.13, 95%CI ?12.40 to ?5.86, P<0.000 01), delay the progression of radiological staging (RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.89, P=0.01) and reduce the rate of total hip arthroplasty (RR=0.61, 95%CI 0.43 to 0.86, P=0.005). In terms of safety, mononuclear cell therapy did not increase the rate of complications (RR=0.77, 95%CI 0.33 to 1.83, P=0.56).ConclusionsThe current evidence shows that autologous mononuclear cells therapy is a safe and effective way for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of bioactive material(combest) which is combinated with bioglass and hyaluronan on burn wound healing．Methods From March to September 2006, 20 patients were treated; including 16 males and 4 females, aging 18-58 years(40 years on average)．The wounds were classified as deep degrees Ⅱ in 7 cases, granulated wounds in 9 cases and graft site wounds in 4 cases. Twenty wounds in one side were repaired with Combest as the test group and 20 wounds in the other side with blank cream as the control group. The wounds in size ranged from 2.0 cm×1.5 cm to 40.0 cm×20.0 cm. The wound healing rate was observed, and the blood test and the indices of hepatic and renal function were determined on the 1st, 3 rd,6 th, 11 th, 16 th and 21 st days of treatment．Results Wound healed within 3 weeks in 11 cases of the test group (3 cases on the 11 st day, 4 on the 16 th day, and 4 on the 21 st day) , but no wound healing was observed within 3 weeks in the control group. The healing size accounted for 2/3 of wounds in 18 cases of the test group and in 1 case of the control group. The excellent and good rates were 95%(18 cases and 1 case) in the test group and 50% (1 case and 9 cases) in the control group, showing significant difference (Plt;0.01). For all patients, no obvious changes were found in the blood test and hepatic or renal function indices. Conclusion Combest combinated with bioglass and hyaluronan is beneficial to the proliferation of the granulation and wound healing with good safety.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the long-term efficacy of biologics for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the long-term efficacy of approved biologics for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis from inception to May 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies; then, the network meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 26 RCTs were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that among 11 biologics, the most effective biologics were risankizumab, followed by bimekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, and ixekizumab, and followed by secukinumab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and etanercept was the last. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that risankizumab is likely to be the best option for long-term treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of four antiplatelet regimens after coronary drug-eluting stents by network meta-analysis.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase and Web of Science databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the comparison of different antiplatelet regimens after coronary drug-eluting stenting from inception to December 31st, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk bias of included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed by using Gemtc14.3 software, Stata16.0 software and RevMan5.3 software.ResultsA total of 23 RCTs involving 45 837 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that: in terms of prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) recurrence, the aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was inferior to the triple antiplatelet therapy (OR=2.13, 95%CI 1.08 to 4.03). In terms of reducing the incidence of ischemic compound events, the triple antiplatelet therapy was superior to the standard dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.53, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.72), the aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.69) and the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.73). There was no statistically significant difference among the four interventions in reducing the rate of in-stent thrombosis and all-cause mortality (P>0.05). In terms of safety, the bleeding rate of aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was lower than that of standard dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.70, 95%CI 0.55 to 0.86) and triple antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.58, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.90), and the bleeding rate of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was also lower than that of standard dual antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.51, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.65) and triple antiplatelet therapy (OR=0.43, 95%CI 0.26 to 0.67). The probability ranking diagram showed that: in terms of the recurrence rate of MI, the rate of in-stent thrombosis and the incidence of ischemic compound events, triple antiplatelet therapy was the lowest and aspirin monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was the highest. However, in terms of all-cause mortality and bleeding rate, aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy was the lowest and triple antiplatelet therapy was the highest.ConclusionsThe available evidence suggests that when the risk of ischemia is low, we should choose aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy, and P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy may have a lower risk of ischemia and bleeding. When the risk of ischemia is high and bleeding is low, the triple or standard dual antiplatelet therapy should be selected, and the efficacy of triple antiplatelet therapy is superior, while the safety may be inferior.