Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine in perioperative management of on-pump cardiac surgery. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through a systematic literature search of PubMed, EBSCO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang Database (up to December 2016). RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. Results Sixteen studies with 1 432 patients were included. Dexmedetomidine significantly decreased the risk of postoperative delirium (RR=0.28, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.44, P<0.000 01) and postoperative atrial fibrillation (RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.98, P=0.04) compared with the controls. The duration of intubation (RR=–1.96, 95% CI –2.07 to –1.86, P<0.000 01), length of ICU stay (RR=–0.49, 95% CI –0.74, –0.24, P=0.000 1) and hospital stay (RR=–1.24, 95% CI –2.26 to –0.22, P=0.02) in the dexmedetomidine group were significantly shorter than those of the control group. In addition, dexmedetomidine was shown to improve the score of the the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (RR=0.88, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.35, P=0.000 2) compared to the control group. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine can reduce the complications after cardiac surgery, which is safe and effective. However, more studies with good methodologic quality and large samples are still needed to make further assessment.
Objective To assess the influence of dexmedetomidine on the recovery of pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia. Methods Such databases as PubMed (1966 to March 2012), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2012), EBSCO (ASP) (1984 to March 2012), Journals@Ovid Full Text (1993 to March 2012), CBM (1978 to March 2012), CNKI (1979 to March 2012), VIP (1989 to March 2012), and WanFang Data (1998 to March 2012) were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the influence of dexmedetomidine on the recovery of pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia, and the references of the included studies were also retrieved. Two researchers extracted the data and evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies independently. Then the RevMan 5.2 software was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 16 RCTs involving 1 217 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the placebo, dexmedetomidine could reduce the occurrence of emergence agitation (OR=0.18, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.25, Plt;0.000 01) and increase the occurrence of postoperative lethargy (OR=0.14, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.68, P=0.01), but there were no differences in the occurrence of side effects including bronchospasm, bucking, breathholding, and oxygen desaturation. Dexmedetomidine could also reduce mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of pediatric patients during the recovery period after sevoflurane anesthesia, but it increased emergence time (MD=2.14, 95%CI 0.95 to 3.33, P=0.000 4), extubation time (MD=1.26, 95%CI 0.51 to 2.00, P=0.000 9) and the time of staying in PACU (MD=4.72, 95%CI 2.07 to 7.38, P=0.000 5). Conclusions For pediatric patients recovering from sevoflurane-based general anesthesia, dexmedetomidine can reduce the occurrence of emergence agitation, and is helpful to maintain the hemodynamic balance. But it prolongs emergence time, extubation time (or the time of using the laryngeal mask) and the time of staying in PACU, and increases the occurrence of postoperative lethargy.
Objective To carry out a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine in comparison with midazolam as preoperative drug. Methods All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about dexmedetomidine as preoperative drug compared with midazolam were identified. Meta analysis was performed by using the statistical software RevMan 4.2.10 on the basis of strict quality evaluation. Results Thirteen RCTs involving 806 patients were included. The results of meta analyses showed that dexmedetomidine was better than midazolam in decreasing perioperative blood pressure and heart rate, decreasing dosage of anesthetics, shortening of emergence time, and decreasing the occurrence of agitation, while the occurrence of perioperative hypotention and bradycardia of dexmedetomidine was much more than midazolam. The statistical outcomes showed that there were no differences between the two drugs in the satisfactory score, postoperative sedation score, the number of people needing analgesia, and occurrence of nausea and vomitting. Conclusion Significant advantages in favour of dexmedetomidine as preoperative drug are observed. Dexmedetomidine is safe except for more incidences of hypotension and bradycardia.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine used for intravertebral anesthesia. Methods A search in PubMed Central, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid, CNKI and WanFang Data was conducted from the date of their establishment to February 2011, so as to collect the randomized controlled trails (RCTs) on dexmedetomidine used for intravertebral anesthesia. The reference lists of identified papers were examined for further trials. After the data were extracted and the quality was assessed in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the Meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan5.0 software. Results A total of 13 RCTs involving 672 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with saline solution, dexmedetomidine tended to speed up the mean time of sensory block to reach T10 dermatome (MD= –2.39, 95%CI –4.40 to –0.39) and motor block to reach Bromage 3 (MD= –5.30, 95%CI –7.18 to –3.43). It also prolonged the time for two dermatomes regression of sensory blockade (MD=51.14, 95%CI 44.96 to 57.32) and complete resolution of motor blockade (MD=68.46, 95%CI 38.56 to 98.35). Peri-operative bradycardia significantly increased (RR=3.03, 95%CI 1.64 to 5.59) but shivering decreased (RR=0.47, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.80). In comparison with the control group, dexmedetomidine showed no difference in low blood pressure and occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Conclusion The current evidence shows that dexmedetomidine shortens the time for taking effect, prolongs the duration of intravertebral anesthesia, decreases the occurrence of shivering, and increases the occurrence of bradycardia.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the influence of dexmedetomidine on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in adult patients after receiving noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia. MethodsThe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the influence of dexmedetomidine on the early postoperative cognitive dysfunction of patients after receiving noncardiac surgery with general anesthesia was searched in PubMed, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid, The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2013), CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and Google Scholar up to November 30th, 2013. The references of included literature were also retrieved manually. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2. ResultsA total of 22 RCTs involving 1 356 patients were enrolled. The results of meta-analysis indicated that:a) dexmedetomidine reduced the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction on the first day (RR=0.38, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.49, P < 0.001), on the seventh day (RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.23 to 1.29, P=0.17); improved postoperative MMSE scores after surgery (on the first day:MD=2.38, 95%CI 1.42 to 3.34, P < 0.001; on the seventh day:MD=0.92, 95%CI 0.16 to 1.68, P=0.02), and decreased the expression of inflammatory factor IL-6 (instant:MD=-11.96, 95%CI-18.45 to-5.46, P=0.000 3; after 24 h:MD=-7.50, 95%CI-13.73 to-1.27, P=0.02); and TNF-α (instant:MD=-4.09, 95%CI-7.02 to-1.16, P=0.006)) in patients. b) No significant difference was found between two groups (MD=-0.97, 95%CI-2.37 to 0.43, P=0.17). ConclusionDexmedetomidine can effectively reduce the early-stage postoperative cognitive dysfunction, improve MMSE scores after the operation, and reduce inflammatory reaction. In addition, due to the limited quantity and quality of studies included, larger sample, high quality RCTs are needed to verify the abovementioned conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the influence of dexmedetomidine on early postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and serum inflammatory factors in elderly patients.MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases from inception to April 2017, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about dexmedetomidine for early POCD in elderly patients. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 23 RCTs, including 2 026 patients were enrolled. The results of meta-analysis showed that, the incidence of POCD in the dexmedetomidine group was lower than that in the control group (the first day: RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.53, P<0.000 01; the third day: RR=0.33, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.48,P<0.000 01; the seventh day: RR=0.42, 95%CI 0.22 to 0.78,P=0.006). Meanwhile, compared with the control group, the dexmedetomidine group significantly decreased the serum levels of TNF-α (immediately after operation: MD=–5.43, 95%CI –7.44 to –3.42, P<0.000 01; 1 h after operation: MD=–4.64, 95%CI –6.92 to –2.36,P<0.000 1; 24 h after operation: MD=–3.27, 95%CI –4.92 to –1.63,P<0.000 1) and IL-6 (immediately after operation: MD=–30.69, 95%CI –41.39 to –20.00,P<0.000 01; 1h after operation: MD=–20.84, 95%CI –28.87 to –12.80,P<0.000 01; 24 h after operation: MD=–13.42, 95%CI –19.90 to –6.94,P<0.000 1).ConclusionCurrent evidence indicates that dexmedetomidine could relief early POCD in elderly patients, in which the reduction of serum inflammatory factors alleviate inflammation response may play a vital role. Due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high quality RCTs are required to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To evaluate the sedative and analgesic efficacy and adverse effect of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on the postoperative patients in intensive care unit (ICU). Methods The relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, SCI, SpringerLinker, ScinceDirect, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and CBM from the date of their establishment to November 2011. The quality of the included studies was evaluated after the data were extracted by two reviewers independently, and then the meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.1. Results Ten RCTs involoving 793 cases were included. The qualitative analysis results showed: within a certain range of dosage as dexmedetomidine: 0.2-2.5 μg/(kg·h), and propofol: 0.8-4 mg/(kg·h), dexmedetomidine was similar to propofol in sedative effect, but dexmedetomidine group needed smaller dosage of supplemental analgesics during the period of sedative therapy. The results of meta-analysis showed: the percentage of patients needing supplemental analgesics in dexmedetomidine group was less than that in propofol group during the period of sedative therapy (OR=0.24, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.68, P=0.008). Compared with the propofol group, the duration of ICU stay was significantly shorter in the dexmedetomidine group (WMD= –1.10, 95%CI –1.88 to –0.32, P=0.006), but the mechanical ventilated time was comparable between the two groups (WMD=0.89, 95%CI –1.15 to 2.93, P=0.39); the incidence of adverse effects had no significant difference between two groups (bradycardia: OR=3.57, 95%CI 0.86 to 14.75, P=0.08; hypotension: OR=1.00, 95%CI 0.30 to 3.32, P=1.00); respiratory depression seemed to be more frequently in propofol group, which however needed further study. Mortalities were similar in both groups after the sedative therapy (OR=1.03, 95%CI 0.54 to 1.99, P=0.92). Conclusion Within an exact range of dosage, dexmedetomidine is comparable with propofol in sedative effect. Besides, it has analgesic effect, fewer adverse effects and fewer occurrences of respiratory depression, and it can save the extra dosage of analgesics and shorten ICU stay. Still, more larger-sample, multi-center RCTs are needed to provide more evidence to support this outcome.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine for postoperative sedation in cardiac patients. Methods Such databases as PubMed, EBSCO, Springer, Ovid, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched electronically from the date of their establishment to May 2012, and other relevant journals and references of the included literature were also searched manually. Two reviewers independently screened the studies in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed methodology quality. Then the meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1software. Results A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1 157 patients were included. The Jadad scores of 7 RCTs were more than 3, and only 1 RCT scored 2. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with the control group, dexmedetomidine significantly raised peripheral oxygen saturation (RR=0.90, 95%CI 0.31 to 0.49, P=0.003), decreased the incidence of average heart rate (RR=–5.86, 95%CI –7.31 to ?4.40, Plt;0.000 01), ventricular tachycardia (RR=0.27, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.88, P=0.03), delirium (RR=0.28, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.48, Plt;0.000 01) and postoperative hyperglycemia (RR=0.57, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.85, P=0.006), and reduced the number of patients who needed vasoactive agents such as epinephrine (RR=0.53, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.96, P=0.04) and β-blocker (RR=0.60, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.94, P=0.03). However, it failed to shorten the time of both ICU stay (RR=?1.24, 95%CI ?4.35 to 1.87, P=0.43) and mechanical ventilation (RR=?2.28, 95%CI ?5.13 to 0.57, P=0.12), increase mean artery pressure (RR=?2.78, 95%CI ?6.89 to 1.34, P=0.19), and well control postoperative nausea, vomiting and atrial-fibrillation. There were no significant differences between the two groups in myocardial infarction, acute cardiac failure, acute kidney failure, and mortality rate. Conclusion For postoperative sedation in cardiac patients, dexmedetomidine can effectively stabilize hemodynamic indexes, and reduce tachycardia, delirium, postoperative hyperglycemia and vasoactive agents. However, it has no marked influence on the prognosis. For the quantity and quality limitation of included studies, this conclusion needs to be proved by performing more high quality and large sample RCTs.
Objective To investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine combined with subanesthetic doses of ketamine on cognitive function after surgery for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. Methods A total of 78 elderly patients with femoral neck fracture who were admitted to hospital between January 2015 and June 2016 were divided into the control group (n=38) and the study group (n=40) according to the admitting time. The cases in the control group were treated with dexmedetomidine given anesthesia and the cases in the study group received dexmedetomidine combined with subanesthetic dose of ketamine. The incidences of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and the scores of Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and Ramsay scores were compaired, and serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were detected. Results There was no difference in operation time, blood loss, blood pressure and oxygen partial pressure between the two groups (P>0.05). The 1-, 3-day postoperative incidences of POCD in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The 1-, 3-, 7-day postoperative MMSE scores and Ramsay sedation scores 1 hour, 3 and 6 hours after stopping anaesthetic drugs in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The 1-, 3-day postoperative serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion For elderly patients with femoral neck fracture after surgery, taking dexmedetomidine flax composite drunk dose of ketamine anesthesia method helps to reduce the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
Objective To explore the influence of dexmedetomidine on wake-up test during spinal orthopaedic surgery. Methods All 80 patients taking spinal orthopaedic surgery were randomly divided into the trial group and the control group, with 40 cases in each group. The endotracheal intubation anesthesia was adopted in both groups with same anesthesia induction. Additionally, dexmedetomidine 0.8 μg/ (kg·h) was infused within 10 min in the trial group before anesthesia induction, and then another 0.5 μg/ (kg·h) was also infused from the intraoperation to suture of incision. For the control group, the same amount of normal saline was infused, and all the narcotics were stopped pumping 15 min before the wake-up test, but then were continued pumping after the wake-up test. Finally, the following indexes were analyzed: wake-up time, wake-up quality, hemodynamic changes at the time of 15 min before wake-up (T1), recovery of spontaneous breathing (T2), wake-up (T3) and 15 min after wake-up (T4), dosage of narcotics, and the incidence of adverse events. Results There was no significant difference in the operation time before wake-up between the two groups (P=0.07). For the trial group, the dosage of sevoflurane (P=0.03) and sufentanil (P=0.00) used before wake-up was significantly lower, the wake-up time (P=0.04) and bleeding amount during wake-up (P=0.00) were significantly less, the wake-up quality (P=0.03) was significantly higher, the blood pressure (P=0.00) and heart rate (P=0.00) when wake-up were significantly lower, and the incidence of adverse events (P=0.04) was significantly lower, compared with the control group. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine adopted in spinal orthopaedic surgery can significantly improve patient’s wake-up quality, shorten wake-up time, reduce bleeding amount when wake-up and adverse events after wake-up, and maintain the hemodynamic stability, so it has better protective effects.