ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of relationship between distal landing zone geometric and outcomes of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm. MethodsThe domestic and foreign literature on the accumulation of the impact of proximal and distal landing zone geometric morphology on clinical outcomes, the evaluation methods for related complications of proximal and distal landing zones, preventive measures for adverse outcomes related to the geometric morphology of the distal landing zone, and the pathophysiological mechanisms of complications related to the distal landing zone were retrieved to make an review. ResultsThe irregular geometric morphology of the proximal landing zone was closely associated with adverse events following EVAR. The morphology of the distal landing zone was actually more complex than that of the proximal zone, and the measurement methods for its parameters were also more complicated. Common methods used in the literature for studying landing zones included the centerline distance method, the minimum distance method, and the landing area method. Primary preventive measures for adverse outcomes related to the geometry of the distal landing zone included increasing radial support force and contact area, using endostaples, and extending the landing zone. In addition to anatomical factors, the distal landing zone was also influenced by various pathophysiological factors. ConclusionsThe morphology and related pathological changes of the distal landing zone significantly impact the clinical outcomes following EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm. However, current research on the distal landing zone is limited. Future studies should focus on developing new technologies and methods to improve the evaluation and management of the distal landing zone, thereby reducing the complications after EVAR, enhancing the success rate of the surgery, and improving patient survival quality.
Objective To discuss feasibility and effectivity of intraoperative ultrasound (US) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Methods A radiographic contrast nephropathy patient of abdominal aortic aneurysm and left internal iliac artery aneurysm was treated by EVAR without iodine contrast media assisted by US. Then summarized the data of this patient. Results The precise placement of the stent-graft was performed for abdominal aortic aneurysm. The left internal iliac artery aneurysm was successfully treatment with the stent-graft and coils. Intraoperative Ⅱ type endoleak from inferior mesenteric artery and Ⅰ b type endoleak from right iliac stent were identified by using US. The operative duration was 120 min and the blood loss was only 20 mL. Ⅱ type endoleak was still detected and the Ⅰ b type of endoleak was loss on postoperative a week. Conclusion Intraoperative US-assisted EVAR in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm represents a new option for intraoperative visualization of aortoiliac segments required as proximal or distal fixation zones and identification of endoleaks, especially in those patients with contraindications for usage of iodine-containing contrast agents.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the results of a hybrid procedure for treating Stanford type B1C aortic dissection.MethodsIn our center, 49 patients with Stanford type B1C aortic dissection underwent supra-arch branch vessel bypass and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) from December 2013 to December 2017. There were 33 males and 16 females with an average age of 60.4±5.5 years. Left common carotid artery to left subclavian artery bypass (n=29), right common carotid artery to left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery bypass (n=18), left common carotid artery to left subclavian artery and right common carotid artery to right subclavian artery bypass (n=2) were performed.ResultsEarly mortality rate was 2.0% (1/49). Forty-eight patients survived postoperatively. The follow-up rate was 100.0% (48/48). The patients were followed up for 6 to 47 (26.8±11.9) months postoperatively. Chest pain relapsed in one patient 8 months after the operation. The whole aorta CTA showed type A1S aortic dissection in one patient 6 months after the operation, and the re-operation was satisfactory. There was no endoleak or paraplegia.ConclusionInitial results suggest that the one-stage hybrid procedure is a suitable therapeutic option for type B1C aortic dissection.
ObjectiveTo summarize clinical experience of total aortic arch reconstruction with triple-branched stent graft placement in elderly patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection (SAAD). MethodsFrom December 2008 to December 2012, 46 elderly SAAD patients underwent total aortic arch reconstruction with triple-branched stent graft placement under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and selective cerebral perfusion (SCP)in Department of Cardiova-scular Surgery, Henan Provincial Chest Hospital. There were 37 male and 9 female patients with their age of 65-75 (68.2±5.0)years. There were 6 patients undergoing modified David procedure, 1 patient undergoing Bentall procedure, 2 patients undergoing Wheat procedure, and 37 patients undergoing ascending aortic replacement. ResultsThere was no in-hos-pital death. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 135-183 (131.1±10.5)minutes, aortic cross-clamping time was 81-100 (61.5±18.3)minutes, and SCP time was 19-28 (24.4±5.6)minutes. Postoperative complications included low cardiac output syndrome in 3 patients, acute renal failure in 2 patients, pleural effusion in 5 patients, lung infection in 2 patients, and sternal dehiscence in 1 patient, who were all cured after treatment. All the patients were followed up for 3 to 12 months without complication related to the stent graft. ConclusionTotal aortic arch reconstruction with triple-branched stent graft placement is an easy surgical procedure for SAAD with a high successful rate and low morbidity, and especially suitable for elderly patients who can't bear traditional operation.
目的：探討覆膜支架治療外傷性頸內動脈海綿竇瘺（TCCF）的臨床治療經驗。方法：11例TCCF經血管內介入治療，1例外傷性頸內動脈海綿竇瘺患者復發，壓迫頸總動脈無效，行球囊閉塞頸內動脈及瘺口。結果：術后雜音立即消失，數天后結膜水腫消退，造影見瘺口完全閉塞，10例TCCF患者頸內動脈保持通暢。1例患者頸內動脈閉塞。無操作所產生的并發癥出現。結論：覆膜支架是處理TCCF的有效手段；瘺口再通可能與支架移位、貼壁不良有關。壓迫頸總動脈對再通瘺口的治療無效。
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of using a stent graft to treat a Stanford type A aortic dissection with the ascending aorta in the cavity.MethodA retrospective review was made of the clinical data of a patient with Stanford type A aortic dissection admitted to Zhangye People’s Hospital Affiliated to Hexi University in December 2016.ResultsAfter the patient underwent general anesthesia aortic dissection and stent graft treatment, the dissection fracture completely disappeared. After 2 years of follow-up, the patient’s pseudocavity hematoma was completely absorbed. The operative time was 30 min and the blood loss was about 5 mL. There were no complications such as avulsion of dissection, internal leakage, cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction, nervous system, and other complications occurred.ConclusionFor Stanford type A aortic dissection with a tear located in the ascending aorta, intracavitary treatment with coated stent is feasible for ascending aortic dissection with good vascular conditions and tear location through accurate preoperative assessment.