ObjectivesThis study aimed to study the economic effect of five kinds of detection systems for nucleic acid, which were based on five kinds of working electrodes: gold electrode, glassy carbon electrode, carbon paste electrode, screen printing electrode, and indium-tin-oxide (ITO) glass electrode.MethodsThe cost of completing a single test was taken as the cost of economic analysis. The Youden index was used to represent the effect of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). Meanwhile, the cost-utility analysis (CUA) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were used for the economic analysis of the corresponding system.ResultsThe cost of five detection systems based on gold electrode, glass carbon electrode, carbon paste electrode, screen printing electrode, and ITO glass electrode was 3.70 yuan/unit, 4.20 yuan/unit, 5.25 yuan/unit, 33.98 yuan/unit and 5.01 yuan/unit, respectively. The Youden indexes of all five systems were 1. The cost effectiveness (C/E) were 3.70, 4.20, 5.25, 33.98, and 5.01, respectively. The cost utility (C/U) were 6.61, 6.89, 9.91, 62.93, and 9.45, respectively. The C'/E and C'/U of the gold electrode detection system were the minimum (2.96 and 5.29). Compared with the system applying the gold electrode, the system using the glassy carbon electrode had ΔC >0 and ?E0 >0; When carbon paste electrode, screen printing electrode, and ITO glass electrode system were used, ?C was >0 and ?E0 was <0.ConclusionsFrom the perspective of CEA and CUA, the system using the gold electrode has the best economic effect. The sensitivity analysis proved the reliability of CEA and CUA results. According to the ICER, gold electrode or glassy carbon electrode can be used in clinical practice with the choice depending on the user.
Objective To systematically review the health utility scores for patients with breast cancer in China. Methods PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, CBM and VIP databases were searched from inception to November, 2016 to collect studies for health utility scores for breast cancer in China. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software. Results A total of 6 studies were included. Compared with modeling studies, the range of utility scores from cross-sectional studies was narrower. The results of meta-analysis showed the utility scores for breast cancer were 0.77 (95%CI 0.67 to 0.87), 0.77 (95%CI 0.68 to 0.86) at stage 0 to Ⅰ, 0.76 (95%CI 0.66 to 0.85) at stage Ⅱ, 0.74 (95%CI 0.65 to 0.83) at stage Ⅲ and 0.73 (95%CI 0.65 to 0.81) at stage Ⅳ, respectively. Meanwhile, we descripted the median of utility scores of all studies, and the corresponding values were 0.81 (range 0.65 to 0.83), 0.82 (range 0.65 to 1.00) at stage 0, 0.82 (range 0.65 to 0.90) at stage Ⅰ, 0.77 (range 0.67 to 0.86) at stage Ⅱ, 0.70 (range 0.64 to 0.82) at stage Ⅲ and 0.70 (range 0.30 to 0.80) at stage Ⅳ, respectively. Conclusion Research on the health utility scores of breast cancer is still limited in China. Utility scores are decreasing among different clinical stages, with lowest score at late stage cancer. These findings can be used in further cost-utility evaluation on various breast cancer interventions.
Objective To assess the cost-utility study of renal transplantation compared with nemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Methods A prospective study of end-stage renal disease patients was followed up for 3 months after renal replacement therapy. The study population included 196 patients (renal transplant [RT] n=63, hemodialysis [HD] n=82 and continious ambulatory peritoneal dialysis [CAPD] n=51) from 6 hospitals of Sichuan province. Health-related quality of life was assessed by using the WHOQOL-BRIEF questionnaire. Utility scores were obtained so as to conduct CUA (cost-utility analysis). Costs were collected from financial department and by patient interview. Results The utility values were 0.539 9± 0.013 for RT, 0.450 8± 0.014 for HD, 0.512 2±0.099 for CAPD, respectively. The mean direct cost of the first three months of renal transplant was significantly higher than dialysis (RT and CAPD). Over 3 months, the average cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for patients after CAPD was lower than HD and RT. Compared to HD, incremental cost analysis showed that CAPD was more ecnomical than RT. Sensitive analysis showed that CAPD was more effective than RT when ΔQALY varied in the limit of 95% confidence interval. However, the cost-utility of RT vs HD and CAPD vs HD was varied with ΔQALY level. Conclusions Cost-utility analysis showed that CAPD was a more favorable cost-utility ratio when compared to RT at early stage RT vs HD and CAPD vs HD, but which cost-utility ratio is better, we can not draw a certain conclusion.
Objective To systematically review the health state utility values in patients with schizophrenia, and to provide references for subsequent studies on the health economics of schizophrenia. Methods The PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were searched from inception to December 1st, 2021 to collect studies on health state utility values in patients with schizophrenia. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by Stata 15.0 software. Results A total of 19 studies were included. Patients’ utility values were 0.68 (95%CI 0.59 to 0.77) for direct measures, and 0.77 (95%CI 0.75 to 0.80) and 0.66 (95%CI 0.61 to 0.70) for indirect measures with the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L as the primary scales. Utility values varied with measures, tariffs, regions, and populations. Conclusion Studies on health state utility value in schizophrenia are diversified in measurement methods, showing high inter-study heterogeneity. Therefore, it is necessary to promote the study on utility value measurement in schizophrenia in China.
Objectives To determine the health benefit of elbasvir/grazoprevir versus peginterferon combing with ribavirin (PR regimen) for Chinese chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 1b infection. Methods Markov cohort state-transition models were constructed to conduct cost utility analysis. Sensitivity analyses were performed based on base-case analysis. Results Elbasvir/grazoprevir was dominant versus PR, resulting in higher QALYs and lower costs for both noncirrhotic patients (13.867 5 QALYs, 82 090.82 RMB vs. 12.696 2 QALYs, 122 791.55 RMB) and cirrhotic patients (12.841 6 QALYs, 225 807.70 RMB vs. 8.892 4 QALYs, 326 545.01 RMB). Elbasvir/grazoprevir was economically dominant in nearly 100% among all patients within the range of threshold from 0 to 161 805 RMB/QALY. Conclusions Elbasvir/grazoprevir was dominant in treatment of genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C infection in China.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the economic efficacy of nab-paclitaxel (NAB-P) combined with gemcitabine (GEM) versus GEM alone in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer in China.MethodsA Markov model simulating the costs and health outcomes was developed to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The impact of parameter uncertainty on the model was assessed by deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis.ResultsNAB-P combined with GEM was shown superior efficacy compared to gemcitabine monotherapy, however with higher costs. The ICER between the two groups was 964 780.79￥/QALY.ConclusionsCompared with gemcitabine monotherapy, NAB-P combined with GEM is not cost-effective. The conclusion is confirmed by deterministic one-way sensitivity analysis.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the health utility scores and disability weights of liver cancer and related diseases in China.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, CBM and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect the studies of health utility scores and disability weights of liver cancer and related diseases in China from inception to November, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 12.0 software.ResultsA total of 9 studies were included which covered 10 related diseases, among which chronic hepatitis B, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis and liver cancer were the mostly reported. The overall quality was adequate, and EQ-5D was the most common tool in these studies. Results of meta-analysis showed that healthy utility scores of the four common diseases were 0.789 (0.735, 0.843), 0.734 (0.693, 0.776), 0.647 (0.627, 0.666) and 0.636 (0.508, 0.765), respectively. Measures from EQ-5D were 0.825 (0.762, 0.868), 0.761 (0.731, 0.791), 0.643 (0.620, 0.666) and 0.620 (0.473, 0.766), respectively. In addition, the corresponding median (range) utility scores of the four diseases were found to be 0.758 (0.520–0.950), 0.716 (0.570–0.900), 0.538 (0.260–0.662) and 0.541(0.310–0.720). Only one disability weight study was concluded (0.360–0.900 reported for liver cancer).ConclusionIn Chinese population, current evidences on health utility of liver cancer and related diseases are limited, particularly data on disability weights. Utility values from meta-analysis seems more optimistic and centralized than those from descriptive analysis. Different survey tools yield varying outcomes, and attentions should be addressed to their application. The decrease of heath utility scores with the severity of liver disease suggests that early prevention, early diagnosis and treatment can save more years of life with enhanced quality.
Objective To compare the long-term cost-utility of three first-generation EGFR-TKIs targeted drugs, gefitinib, icotinib, and erlotinib as first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Real-world data were collected from 1 511 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with first-generation EGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from 2009 to 2019. A three-state Markov model was established to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety and cost-utility of three first-generation EGFR-TKIs targeted drugs. The transition probability of each state was obtained by survival analysis, the direct and indirect costs were calculated by the bottom-up method, the health utility value was obtained through literature research, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated, and sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations were performed. Results There was no significant difference in clinical efficacy among the three first-generation EGFR-TKIs in the treatment of NSCLC. The incidence of skin rash and liver injury caused by gefitinib was significantly higher than that caused by icotinib and erlotinib (P<0.05). The average economic burden of patients treated with icotinib was the lowest (CNY 192 535.3) (P<0.01). The cost-utility ratio of icotinib (CNY 132 985.9/QALYs) was much lower than that of gefitinib (CNY 205 005.3/QALYs) and erlotinib (CNY 172 893.1/QALYs). Conclusion Compared with the three first-generation EGFR-TKIs drugs, icotinib is the most cost-effective.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the economics of duplizumab in combination with optimal supportive care versus optimal supportive care for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in adults from the perspective of our health system. MethodsA Markov model embedded in a decision tree was constructed to compare the long-term cost-utility of dupilumab combined with optimal supportive care versus optimal supportive care, and a sensitivity analysis was performed on the results. ResultsThe results of the basic analysis showed that compared with the optimal supportive care, dupliyuzumab in combination with optimal supportive care resulted in 3.82 more QALYs, while its cost was 125 549.42 yuan more. The ICER was 32 854.83 yuan/QALY, which was less than one times China's per capita GDP in 2022, and was economical. Univariate sensitivity analysis showed that factors such as Dupilumab-16-week post - no response utility value, Dupilumab-52-week post response rate and Dupilumab-52-week adherence had a greater impact on the cost changes. The results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a stable model structure and good robustness. ConclusionIn adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, dupliyuzumab in combination with an optimal supportive care regimen is more cost-effective compared to an optimal supportive care regimen.
The multi-attribute utility function (MAUF) is a commonly used method for measuring health utility, characterized by a solid theoretical foundation and operational feasibility. It contributes to reducing the cognitive burden on respondents, caters to the measurement of utility across multiple dimensions, and represents another most widely applied approach beyond traditional econometrics, warranting exploration and application. However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive and systematic research on this method in China, with insufficient practical application experience. Against this backdrop, this paper aims to systematically explore the methodological background of MAUF and the key points of research design for measuring health utility using this method. By drawing on the utility measurement experiences from internationally developed measurement scales such as HUI 1, HUI 2, HUI 3, 15D, AQol-8D, ASUI, HUG-5, TOOL, and ALSUI, it systematically analyzes the critical steps in the practical implementation of the method. It is hoped that this work will comprehensively and clearly elaborate on the practical approaches of MAUF, promote the further development of MAUF in China, and provide methodological references for future studies on health utility measurement based on MAUF.