ObjectivesTo overview the systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) of effectiveness and safety of spinal manipulation for low back pain or neck pain. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2015), CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP to collect SRs/MAs of spinal manipulation for low back pain or neck pain from inception to January 30th, 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and then AMSTAR tool was used to assess the methodological quality of included SRs/MAs. ResultsA total of 21 SRs/MAs were included. Twenty of them assessed the methodological quality of included original randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with different tools:2 used Jadad scale, 5 used PEDro scale, 6 used Cochrane bias risk assessment tool and 7 used other tools. The assessment results of AMSTAR tool suggested that:among 11 items, the item 1 of "Was an ‘a priori’ design provided" (18 SRs/MAs did not provide) and item 4 of "Was a list of studies (included and excluded) provided" (18 SRs/MAs did not provide) appeared to be the most problematic, followed by item 10 of "Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed" (14 SRs/MAs did not assess the publication bias) and item 11 of "Was the conflict of interest stated" (14 SRs/MAs did not provide the conflict of interest and 4 were incomplete). ConclusionThe methodological quality of included SRs/MAs is poor. The limited evidence showed that spinal manipulation is more effective for acute low back pain than chronic low back pain, and the short term effect is better than the long term one. Different spinal manipulation techniques have various effects but are all safe. Chiropractic manipulation may have the best effect. Due to the limitation of quality and quantity of included SRs/MAs, there may be potential bias in the above conclusion that needs more high quality studies to verify.
ObjectivesTo conduct an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) on Tuina from 2013 to 2017, and to explore recent research improvements on Tuina.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, SpringerLink e-book database, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data and CBM databases were searched to collect SRs including randomized controlled clinical trials on Tuina from January 1st, 2013 to December 31st, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and used AMSTAR 2 tool and PRISMA statement to assess methodology quality and reporting quality of included studies, respectively. The R 3.4.3 software was used to analyze data.ResultsA total of 8 SRs studies were included in the overview. The studied diseases involved radiculopathy cervical spondylotic, myelopathy cervical spondylotic, constipation, child anorexia, child diarrhea and external humeral epicondylitis. The results of above SRs showed that massage might be superior to other interventions in clinical efficacy, curative effects or total effective rate. However, due to the low quality of included studies of SRs, further evidence from high-quality clinical studies is required to verify above conclusions. For the results of AMSTAR 2 assessment, all 8 SRs were rated as very low quality. The quantity of items accomplished for each SR ranged from 7 to 13, 2 SRs had low methodological quality (percentage of accomplishment or partial accomplishment <50.0%) and 6 SRs with high methodological quality (percentage of accomplishment or partial accomplishment ≥50.0%). All 8 SRs did not report item 2 "Whether to declare research methods", item 10 "Whether reports have included funding sources for each study" and item 11 "Whether reports used the correct statistical method". The results of PRISMA assessment showed that all SR had good quality of reporting. The accomplished items number of each SR ranged from 22 to 26. However, there were defects in item 5(0), item 16(25.0%) and item 23(25.0%). All SRs did not report item 5 "Whether to declare research program".ConclusionsThis study finds that Tuina has supportive evidence-based medical evidence for treating anorexia, cervical spondylosis and other diseases, however, the SRs of Tuina are yet needed to be improved in terms of standardized degree. Therefore, establishing a reporting consolidated standard for evidence-based medicine on Tuina in order to improve the quality of clinical studies so as to provide clinicians with high-quality evidence is the focus of our further research.
目的 探討陽性激發點推拿聯合依托芬那酯凝膠治療對頸肩背肌筋膜炎的臨床療效。 方法 收集2011年2月－10月確診為頸肩背肌炎的患者52例，采用隨機對照試驗,其中26例采用依托芬那酯凝膠加陽性激發點推拿（治療組），另外26例采用傳統推拿進行常規推拿手法治療（對照組）。對兩組患者5次治療后的療效率、每次治療后的疼痛面譜量化評分、7個月后隨訪疼痛復發率等療效進行對照分析。 結果 治療組和對照組經連續治療5次后，總有效率分別為96.15%和80.77%，差異均有統計學意義（P＜0.05）；疼痛面譜量化評分治療組在第一次治療后就較對照組改善明顯，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）；7個月后隨訪疼痛復發人數治療組較對照組少，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。 結論 陽性激發點推拿聯合依托芬那酯凝膠治療方案對改善頸肩背肌筋膜炎引發的頸肩背部疼痛不適等癥狀優于傳統推拿組，值得臨床推廣運用。
Acute diarrhea has a high incidence in children. Pediatric tuina has been widely used in children with acute diarrhea in China. However, there is no guideline on the treatment of tuina for children with acute diarrhea. This guideline was developed following evidence-based principles and the World Health Organization handbook for guideline development. The linked systematic review was conducted following the Cochrane handbook. The quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations were evaluated using the GRADE approach. The reporting followed the RIGHT statement. Seven clinical questions (2 foreground questions and 5 background questions) were identified by literature review and expert consensus. Based on the linked systematic review and through comprehensive consideration of the balance of benefit and harm, quality of evidence, patient preferences, and other resources, we formulated the recommendations using Delphi expert consensus. We suggested combination of a weak recommendation for tuina with Western medicine usual care to treat children with acute diarrhea. This guideline can be used by clinicians and nurses in the department of traditional Chinese medicine pediatrics, and department of pediatric tuina, and can also be used as a reference for relevant clinicians of Western medicine and is also applicable to all institutions that practice tuina treatment.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the methodology quality and report quality of the published systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) of pediatric tuina domestically and abroad.MethodsCBM, VIP, CNKI, WanFang Data, PubMed, EMbase, and The Cochrane Library were electronically searched to collect published pediatric tuina SRs/MAs from inception to December 10th, 2018. The SRs/MAs which includes scale evaluation used AMSTAR2 and the PRISMA report quality evaluation tool to systematically review methodology, adopts Excel to carry out data collation and statistical analysis. ResultsA total of 18 studies (14 in Chinese and 4 in English) on the SRs/MAs of pediatric tuina were finally included. In terms of methodological quality, 6 studies were of low quality and 12 studies were of very low quality. All studies did not explain the reasons for adopting a particular research design type, and few of them explained the pre-plan, exclusion list, reasons and funding. In terms of report quality, 7 studies were relatively complete, 10 studies had certain defects and one study had serious defects. The existing problems were program and registration, comprehensive retrieval, information sources, financial support and so on. ConclusionsSRs/MAs of pediatric tuina have different degrees of issues in terms of methodological quality and report quality which still require further improvement and continuous strengthening.
Based on the existing clinical research of pediatric Tuina, this paper introduced the current types of pediatric Tuina and their applications in the aspect of growth of newborn babies, emotion problems, pain, respiratory system diseases, digestive system diseases, jaundice, brain and nerve system diseases. As for the clinical researches of pediatric Tuina, the authors found the challenges including different understandings of pediatric Tuina, poor quality of clinical researches, and lack of basic data regarding pediatric Tuina. Meanwhile, the authors suggested three corresponding strategies to improve the clinical researches, i.e. to extract valuable intervention methods based on clinical practice; to conduct high quality clinical studies; to gradually collect and accumulate basic data according to a certain plan.
目的 探討陽性激發點推拿治療對足底筋膜炎的臨床療效。 方法 對2011年3月－8月門診確診為足底筋膜炎的52例患者，采用隨機方式分為治療組和對照組各26例，治療組采用陽性激發點推拿，對照組采用電針治療。并對兩組患者治療5次后的即時療效率、日本骨科學會（JOA）足底治療療效評分、每次治療后的疼痛面譜量化評分、3個月隨訪疼痛復發率等療效進行對照分析。 結果 治療組和對照組經連續治療5次后，其JOA足底治療療效評分分別為（91.32 ± 10.61）、（82.92 ± 13.61）分，總有效率分別為96.15%、80.77%，差異均有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。疼痛面譜量化評分，治療組在第一次治療后較對照組改善明顯，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。3個月后隨訪疼痛復發情況，治療組復發人數較對照組少，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。結論 陽性激發點推拿治療法對改善足底筋膜炎引發的足底疼痛、步行不適等癥狀優于電針治療法，值得臨床推廣運用。
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of pediatric tuina in the treatment of children with acute diarrhea.MethodsCNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, CBM, PubMed and The Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of children acute diarrhea with tuina from inception to November 20th, 2020. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 15 RCTs involving 1 464 children were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with Western medicine, tuina for children with acute diarrhea could increase the cure rate (RR=1.43, 95%CI 1.26 to 1.63, P<0.001), shorten the time for the frequency of diarrhea to return to normal (MD=?0.86, 95%CI ?1.05 to ?0.66, P<0.001) and the time for stool traits to return to normal (MD=?1.07, 95%CI ?1.15 to ?0.99, P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between tuina and Western medicine (RR=0.25, 95%CI 0.03 to 2.23, P=0.22).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that tuina has a superior effect on treating children with acute diarrhea, the incidence of adverse reactions is not increased. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.
ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of massage in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea (PD).MethodsCNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, CBM, The Cochrane Library, PubMed and EMbase databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea from inception to January 6th, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 10 RCTs were included, including 758 patients with PD. Meta-analysis results showed that the total effective rate (RR=1.14, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.26, P<0.000 01; RR=1.24, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.34, P<0.000 01) and the dysmenorrhea symptom score (MD=–2.59, 95% CI –3.08 to –2.29, P<0.000 1) in massage group were superior to the control group.ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that massage for PD has certain advantages. However, due to the limited quality of the included studies, high-quality clinical trials are required to further verify the clinical efficacy of massage in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.