目的 報道臨床藥師參與抗結核藥物致結核性胸膜炎待診患者多形紅斑型藥疹的臨床藥學實踐的經驗。 方法 1例結核性胸膜炎待診患者在2011年11月3日出現皮疹后，臨床藥師根據患者的用藥情況及病情變化，提供咨詢意見，與臨床醫師共同制定不良反應的臨床處理措施。 結果 推斷為鏈霉素所致的多形紅斑型藥疹，積極處理后患者病情好轉。 結論 臨床藥師參與藥學監護，有利于處理藥物不良反應。
ObjectiveTo systematically assess the effectiveness and safety of indapamide versus calcium channel blockers (CCBs) for the treatment of hypertension. MethodsDatabases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2011), PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were electronically searched from inception to Nov. 2011, for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on indapamide versus CCBs for hypertension. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsIn total, 42 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that, the ΔDBP of indapamide was lower than that of felodipine; and the rest were similar between the two groups in the excellent rate, total effective rate, ΔSBP and ΔDBP, without significant difference (excellent rate:RR=1.01, 95%CI 0.93 to 1.09, P=0.90; total effective rate:RR=1.01, 95%CI 0.96 to 1.06, P=0.69; ΔSBP:MD=-1.21, 95%CI-3.00 to 0.59, P=0.19; ΔDBP:MD=-0.87, 95%CI-1.89 to 0.15, P=0.09). However, the incidence of indapamide was lower than those of nifedipine, nimodipine and nitrendipine, with significant differences. ConclusionBased on current clinical evidence, for hypertension, the effectiveness of indapamide is similar to CCBs, but safer than CCBs.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with STUPP regimen for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were searched to obtain randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bevacizumab combined with STUPP regimen for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients from inception to September 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 6 RCTs involving 2 835 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the bevacizumab combined with STUPP regimen group was superior to the control group on PFS (HR=0.69, 95%CI 0.62 to 0.77, P<0.000 01). But the adverse events rate at the three and above three levels was significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that bevacizumab combined with STUPP regimen for newly diagnosed glioblastoma can significantly prolong the PFS. The treatment group performs not as well as the control group on adverse event rate. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.