Objective To investigate the impact of optimized preoperative fasting scheme for gynecological day surgery with general anesthesia. Methods We retrospectively selected 639 patients undergoing gynecological day surgery with general anesthesia between June 2021 and August 2021 in the day surgery department of West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University as the control group, and 920 patients undergoing gynecological day surgery with general anesthesia in the same hospital between November 2021 and February 2022 as the observational group. The patients in the control group were treated with routine preoperative fasting scheme, and the ones in the observational group were treated with optimized preoperative fasting scheme. The differences in preoperative duration of water deprivation, intraoperative and postoperative incidences of aspiration, and postoperative first anal exhaust time between the two groups were compared. Results The preoperative duration of water deprivation in the control group was longer than that in the observational group [(12.49±2.63) vs. (6.69±2.76) h, P<0.05]. The incidences of intraoperative and postoperative aspiration were both 0. The postoperative first anal exhaust time in the control group was later than that in the observational group [(11.51±6.58) vs. (8.19±4.13) h, P<0.05]. Conclusions For patients undergoing gynecological day surgery with general anesthesia, the implementation of the optimized preoperative fasting scheme can effectively shorten the preoperative duration of water deprivation, without increasing the risk of anesthesia. It can accelerate the recovery of intestinal function for gynecological laparoscopic day surgery with general anesthesia, promote the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery, and improve the efficiency of day surgery.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) combined with general anesthesia (GA) versus GA alone on intrapulmonary shunting during one-lung ventilation (OLV). Methods We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), the specialized trials registered in the Cochrane anesthesia group, PubMed (1966 to Dec. 2009), EMbase (1966 to Dec. 2008), CBM (1978 to Dec. 2009), VIP (1989 to Dec. 2009), CNKI (1915 to Dec. 2009), and handsearched Clinical Anesthesia Journal and Chinese Anesthesia Journal. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the effectiveness of TEA combined with GA versus GA alone on intrapulmonary shunting during OLV were included, The methodological quality of included RCTs was evaluated by two reviewers independently, Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Ten RCTs involving 506 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that there were no significant differences in intrapulmonary shunting during OLV at different times-points of 5, 15, 20, 30, and 60 minutes after OLV. Conclusion Both TEA combined with GA and GA alone have the same Security during OLV. But owing to the low quality and small sample size of the included studies, further more well-designed, large sample size RCTs are needed.
Objective To systematically review the impacts of general anesthesia using sevoflurane versus propofol on the incidence of emergence agitation in pediatric patients. Methods Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2012), CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and VIP were electronically searched from inception to December 2012, for comprehensively collecting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the impacts of general anesthesia using sevoflurane versus propofol on the incidence of emergence agitation in pediatric patients. References of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 9 RCTs involving 692 children were included, of which, six were pooled in the meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) after anesthesia induction using sevoflurane, intravenous propofol maintenance was associated with a lower incidence of emergence agitation compared with sevoflurane maintenance (RR=0.57, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.84, P=0.004); and b) patients anesthetized with total intravenous propofol had a lower incidence of emergence agitation compared with total inhalation of sevoflurane (RR=0.16, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.39, Plt;0.000 1). Conclusion The incidence of emergence agitation after general anesthesia using sevoflurane is higher than that using propofol. Due to the limited quantity and quality, the application of sevoflurane should be chosen based on full consideration into patients’ conditions in clinic.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of COX inhibitor flurbiprofen axetil in relieving propofol injection pain and preemptive analgesia after general anesthesia. Methods Databases such as PubMed, CBM, Springer, Ovid, CNKI and ISI were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about flurbiprofen axetil in relieving propofol injection pain and preemptive analgesia after general anesthesia published from 2000 to 2010. The methodological quality of the included RCTs was assessed and the data were extracted according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.0.1. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results A total of 15 RCTs involving 1 425 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that: a) Relieving propofol injection pain: Compared with the placebo group, flurbiprofen axetil could prevent the propofol injection pain (RR=3.13, 95%CI 1.08 to 9.11, P=0.04), and relieve the moderate and severe pain in injecting propofol (RR=0.57, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.81, P=0.002; RR=0.14, 95%CI 0.05 to 0.34, Plt;0.000 1, respectively), but there were no significant differences in relieving mild pain between the two groups; b) Preemptive analgesia: the visual analog scale (VAS) of post-operation at 2-hour (WMD= –2.25, 95%CI –4.20 to –0.29, P=0.02), 4-hour (WMD= –1.99, 95%CI –3.19 to –0.79, P=0.001), 8-hour (WMD= –1.39, 95%CI –1.86 to –0.93, Plt;0.000 01) and 12-hour (WMD= –2.70, 95%CI –4.73 to –0.68, P=0.009) was decreased when flurbiprofen axetil was injected before the operation, but there were no significant differences in VAS of post-operation at 48-hour between the two groups. When flurbiprofen axetil was injected at the end of the operation, VAS of post-operation at 12-hour (WMD= –0.94, 95%CI –1.73 to –0.16, P=0.02) was decreased, but there were no significant differences in VAS of post-operation at 24-hour between the two groups; flurbiprofen axetil could lessen the need for opioid analgesics (RR=0.47, 95%CI 0.27 to 0.82, P=0.008); and c) Safety: there were no significant differences in postoperative nausea, vomit and somnolence between the two groups. Conclusion Flurbiprofen axetil can significantly prevent or relieve the propofol injection pain; flurbiprofen axetil injected before operation can relieve post-operative pain at 2-, 4-, 8- and 12-hour; flurbiprofen axetil injected at the end of the operation can relieve post-operative pain at 12-hour. Yet more RCTs are required to discuss its effects on nausea, vomit and somnolence.
【摘要】 目的 評價腦電雙頻指數（BIS）監測全身麻醉深度的準確性及實用性。 方法 2007年10月-2009年10月擇期行腹腔鏡膽囊切除手術的40例ASAⅠ或Ⅱ級患者隨機平均分為A、B組，兩組均采用丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼誘導和維持。A組以BIS值判斷麻醉深度并指導調整用藥，B組根據經驗調整用藥，使BIS值維持在50±5、MAP和HR維持在基礎值±20%范圍內。常規監測收縮壓（SBP）、舒張壓（DBP）、心率（HR）和BIS，計算用藥總量，記錄蘇醒時間；誘導期進行改良警覺/鎮靜（OAA/S）評分，評價BIS對全身麻醉手術期間麻醉深度的監測和指導意義。 結果 麻醉期間，B組SBP、DBP、HR和BIS波動明顯大于A組（Plt;0.05）；A組的蘇醒時間（7.5±2.5） min明顯短于B組（9.8±3.9） min（Plt;0.05）；拔管后，A組躁動、嗜睡、惡心、嘔吐患者少于B組；A組無1例發生手術中知曉，B組1例發生手術中知曉。 結論 BIS可動態反映大腦生理功能的變化，有助于臨床判斷全身麻醉深度，指導麻醉用藥。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the accuracy and practicality of bispectral index (BIS) used in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Methods Forty patients of ASA class Ⅰ or Ⅱ were randomly divided into group A and B,20 patients in each group. Anesthetic depth was judged and anesthetics was administered by BIS monitoring (being kept in 50±5) in group A or based on the experience of anesthetist in group B. After anesthesia induction, target propofol and remifentanil concentrations were adjusted to maintain the MAP, HR within the range of ±20% of preinduction values. Systolic pressure (SBP), distolic pressure (DBP), HR, SpO2 and BIS were monitored. Awake time and anesthetic consumption were recorded. Results The changes of SBP, DBP, HR and BIS were less in group A than those in group B (Plt;0.05).Awake time was shorter in group A than that in group B and restlessness drowsiness, nausea and vomitting after extubation were less in group A than those in group B. No awareness patient during operation was seen in group A, but one patient suffered from awareness in group B. Conclusion BIS monitoring can dynamicly reflect cerebral physilological function during general anesthesia and is helpful in judging anesthesia depth and directing the administration of anesthetics.
Objective To explore the effect of the feed-forward control on safety nursing of ophthalmologic day surgery patients under general anesthesia. Methods A total of 623 ophthalmologic day surgery patients under general anesthesia were retrospectively selected into the control group, who adapted the routine nursing in the Ophthalmic Day Surgery Center from January to December 2015; a total of 1 210 ophthalmologic day surgery patients under general anesthesia were retrospectively selected into the observation group, who received the feed-forward control of nursing safety management on the basis of routine nursing care from January to December 2016. The incidence rate of the adverse events and potential safety hazards and satisfaction rate were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence rate of the adverse events and potential safety hazards in the observation group (0.83%, 10/1 210) was lower than that in the control group (3.37%, 21/623), the satisfaction rate in the observation group (98.67%) was higher than that in the control group (97.11%), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of feed-forward control in the safety care of patients during the ophthalmologic day surgery under general anesthesia can effectively reduce the incidence of adverse events and potential safety hazards, and ensure the safety of medical care.
Objective To determine the efficiency and safety of dexmedetomidine in general anesthesia. Methods Trials were located through electronic searches of the PubMed, EBSCO, OVID, Springer, Foreign Journals Integration System, CNKI, CMBdisk (from the date of establishment of the databases to April 2008). Bibliographies of the retrieved articles were also checked. Result A total of 25 trials involving 1 241 patients were included. The Meta-analysis showed: dexmedetomidine reduced peri-operative heart rate and blood pressure, reduced the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomitting [RR=0.57, 95%CI (0.38, 0.84)], postoperative agitation [RR=0.29, 95%CI (0.17, 0.51)], shivering [RR=0.45, 95%CI (0.29, 0.68)], increase the occurrence of bradycardia [RR=2.16, 95%CI (1.58, 2.95)], hypotension [RR=2.97, 95%CI (1.42, 6.18)]. Dexmedetomidine reduced administration of thiopental, isoflurane and fentanyl, while there was no difference in muscle relaxant. Dexmedetomidine showed no difference in emergency time compared with the control group. As a result of low incidence of adverse reaction, dexmedetomidine showed superior in discharge time [WMD15.17, 95%CI (3.87, 26.46)]. Conclusions The limited current evidence shows that dexmedetomidine is better in maintaining the hemodynamic balance; reducing occurrence of nausea, vomiting, agitation and shivering; and reducing doses of anesthetics. In emergency time, dexmedetomidine shows no difference except discharge time.