ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of vertebral arch replantation and laminectomy in the treatment of mild to moderate isthmic spondylolisthesis.MethodsThe clinical data of 66 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis treated with vertebral arch replantation or laminectomy between March 2014 and July 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into trial group (34 cases, treated with complete replantation of vertebral arch, intervertebral fusion, and internal fixation) and control group (32 cases, treated with laminectomy with intervertebral fusion and internal fixation) according to different surgical methods. There was no significant difference in general data of gender, age, disease duration, lesion segment, Meyerding grade, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, vertebral arch fusion of trial group, and epidural scar formation of the two groups were recorded. The VAS score, JOA score, and ODI score were evaluated at preoperation, 3, 6, 12 months after operation, and at last follow-up. The effectiveness was evaluated according to HOU Shuxun’s criteria.ResultsAll the patients successfully completed the surgery, without any aggravation of nerve injury, dural tear, infection, etc. There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (t=0.583, P=0.562), but the intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the trial group than that in the control group (t=2.134, P=0.037). All the 66 patients were followed up 13-18 months (mean, 16.2 months). Postoperative clinical symptoms of all patients were significantly improved. In the control group, 7 cases were found to have symptoms of spinal canal stenosis with postoperative posture changes at 3 months after operation, and 5 cases showed mild lower limb numbness at 18 months after operation. No complication such as infection and nerve injury occurred in other patients. In the trial group, 34 cases of epidural scar tissue were completely blocked outside the replantation vertebral arch, while in the control group, 11 cases of epidural scar tissue invaded the spinal canal. At last follow-up, the fusion rate of intervertebral bone grafting and vertebral arch replantation in the trial group was 100%, and the fusion rate of intervertebral bone grafting in the control group was also 100%. The VAS score, ODI score, and JOA score were significantly improved at each time point after operation (P<0.01). The ODI score and JOA score of the trial group were significantly better than those of the control group at 3 months after operation and at last follow-up (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in scores between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05). According to HOU Shuxun’s criteria, the excellent and good rate was 91.2% in the trial group and 84.4% in the control group, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.092, P=0.573).ConclusionCompared with laminectomy, vertebral arch replantation can better improve postoperative neurological symptoms, maximize the reconstruction of the bone spinal canal, restore the stability of the intraspinal environment, and it is a better surgical method for lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Objective To analyze the therapeutic effect of the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage on lumbarspondylolisthesis. Methods From February 2003 to March 2006, 37 lumbar spondylolisthesis patients were treated with this operation, including21 males and 16 females and aging 3969 years.The affected lumbars were L3(3cases)，L4(23 cases), and L5(11 cases). According to the Meyerdingevaluating system, 12 cases were lassified as degree Ⅰ, 20 cases as degree Ⅱ,and 5 cases as degree Ⅲ. Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index were measured before operation, and 2 weeks and 3 months after operation. Results All patients were followed up 336 months. There were statistically significant differences in Taillard index, Boxall index, slipping angle, lumbar lordosis angle and intervertebral height index between before operation and 2 weeks after operation (P＜0.05),and no statistically significant differences between 2 weeks and 3 months afteroperation(P＞0.05). According to Dewei Zhou’s creterior for scoring, the results were excellent in 27 cases， good in 8 cases，and fair in 2 cases. Theexcellent and good rate was 94.6%. All of the embedded osseous were fused. Thefusing time was from 3 to 8 months (mean 3-9 months). There were no breakageof screw and rod. The position and configuration of the whole cages were good. Conclusion Applying the posterior pedicle screw system combined with interbody fusion cage may achieve synergism in the treatment of lumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis. Above procedure is served as solid internal fixationand offers a satisfactory reduction, and can improve the fusion rate of the spine. So it is an ideal procedure and worthily recommended method for treatment oflumbar vertebral spondylolisthesis.
ObjectiveTo review the researches of the role of the facet joint orientation (FJO) in degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). MethodsRelated literature concerning the FJO in patients with DS was extensively reviewed and comprehensively analyzed in 4 terms of the basic concepts, measurement methods, the controversial etiology, and the clinical significance. ResultsThe multiplanar reformation of spiral CT is expected to become a new method of studying the FJO. The causal relationship between the sagittal FJO and DS is still controversial, but further prospective studies are needed to resolve this issue. The sagittal FJO is very important in the prevention of DS and the choice of surgery plan. ConclusionThe etiologic relationship between the FJO and DS need to be further studied.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis between two different fusion surgeries combined with pedicle screw fixation system. MethodsA retrospectively analysis was made on the clinical data of 98 patients with lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis treated between February 2009 and May 2012. Of 98 cases, 53 underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) combined with internal fixation (group A), and 45 underwent posterolateral fusion (PLF) with internal fixation (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, segmental lesions, and degree of spondylolisthesis between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, reduction rate of spondylolisthesis, reduction loss rate, fusion rate, intervertebral space height, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and the recovery rate of JOA score were compared between 2 groups. ResultsThe operation time and intraoperative blood loss of group A were significantly higher than those of group B (P<0.05). Dural tear occured in 4 cases of group A and 1 case of group B during operation; 6 cases had radicular symptoms after operation in group A; incision infection was found in 1 case of 2 groups respectively. The follow-up time was 24-36 months in group A and was 26-40 months in group B. No significant difference was found in the JOA score at preoperation and 2 weeks after operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The JOA score and the recovery rate of JOA score of group A were significantly better than those of group B at 2 years after operation (P<0.05). X-ray film showed that the reduction rate of group A was significantly higher than that of group B after 2 weeks of operation (P<0.05); the reduction loss rate of group A was significantly lower than that of group B after 2 years after operation (P<0.05). The intervertebral space height of group A was significantly higher than that of group B at 2 weeks and 2 years after operation (P<0.05). The fusion rate of group A was significantly better than that of group B at 2 years after operation (P<0.05). ConclusionPLIF can achieve a greater degree of reduction, better restore disc height, and lumbar curvature than PLF. PLIF is superior to PLF in maintaining intervertebral height after operation. And PLIF has higher fusion rate, restores the stability of the spine in a greater extent, and it also can achieve a better long-term outcome.
Objective To review the research progress of the risk factors for slip progression and the pathogenesis of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis, and to discuss the value of Spinal Deformity Study Group (SDSG) classification system for lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Methods Recent articles about the risk factors for slip progression and the pathogenesis of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis were reviewed and comprehensively analyzed with SDSG classification system of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Results Pelvic incidence (PI) is the key pathogenic factor of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. The Meyerding grade of slip, PI, sacro-pelvic balance, and spino-pelvic balance not only are the fundamental risk factors of slip progression, but also are the key factors to determine how to treat and influence the prognosis. Therefore, compared with Wiltse, Marchetti-Bartolozzi, and Mac-Thiong-Labelle classification systems of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis, SDSG classification based on these factors mentioned above, has better homogeneity between the subjects of subgroup, and better reliability, moreover, could better guide operative plan and judge the prognosis. Conclusion It is suggested that the SDSG classification system should be the standard classification for lumbosacral spondylolisthesis for the clinical and research work.
ObjectiveTo observe the character of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment in patients with high-grade L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis, and to analyze the sagittal alignment alteration after operation. MethodBetween January 2009 and June 2014, 25 patients with high-grade L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis underwent posterior surgery, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed as study group. There were 14 males and 11 females with a mean age of 42.5 years (range, 20-65 years). The mean disease duration was 6 months (range, 3-12 months). According to the Meyerding evaluating system, 15 cases were rated as degree III, and 10 cases as degree IV. Eighty healthy adult volunteers were recruited simultaneously as control group. The lumbar sacral angle (LSA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured on preoperative and last follow-up standing full length lateral X-ray films. And these parameters were compared between study group (preoperative parameters) and control group. Then the patients in study group were divided into 2 subgroups according to Hresko's method:the balanced pelvis subgroup (n=14) and unbalanced pelvis subgroup (n=11) . The sagittal parameters were compared between 2 subgroups, and the alteration of sagittal parameters before surgery and at last follow-up was analyzed in each subgroup respectively. ResultsAll patients in study group were followed up 18 months on average (range, 6-48 months). After surgery, spondylolisthesis was reduced from degree III to degree 0 in 12 cases and to degree I in 3 cases, and from degree IV to degree 0 in 6 cases and to degree I in 4 cases. Bone fusion was obtained in all patients at last follow-up. The preoperative PI, SS, PT, and SVA of study group were significantly greater than those of control group (P<0.05) , while the TK was significantly smaller than that of control group (P<0.05) . In the balanced pelvis subgroup, LSA, LL, and SVA at last follow-up significantly decreased while TK significantly increased when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05) . In the unbalanced pelvis subgroup, LSA, PT, and SVA at last follow-up significantly decreased while SS, LL, and TK significantly increased when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05) . The preoperative LSA and PT in the unbalanced pelvis subgroup were significantly greater, while SS, LL, and TK were significantly smaller than those of balanced pelvis subgroup (P<0.05) ; while at last follow-up, significant differentce was found only in LSA between 2 subgroups (P<0.05) . ConclusionsThe LSA should be paid more attention in surgery to assure recovery of the sagittal balance because patients with high-grade L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis have greater PI, abnormal lumbosacral kyphosis, and sagittal imbalance.
ObjectiveTo explore a better segment of fixation and fusion for high-grade spondylolisthesis. MethodsA total of 21 patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis who had undergone reduction and posterior instrumented fusion between July 2007 and March 2012, were retrospectively reviewed. All cases underwent posterior spinal canal decompression, Schanz screws fixation and reduction, and intervertebral and posterolateral fusion. The concept of "unstable zone" and the feature of spinal deformity helped us to identify the most appropriate segment to fuse. The pre/post-operative differences on slip percentage, pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbosacral angle were compared and analyzed. The nerve function was evaluated by physical examination and neurological Frankel grade. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index were used to assess clinical and functional outcomes of lower limbs. Bone fusion was assessed using CT reconstruction. ResultsAll patients were followed up between 12 and 48 months. The clinical and radiological outcomes such as VAS scores and PI angle were all improved compared with that of preoperative, and the differences were all statistically significant (P<0.05). ConclusionFor children with severe spondylolisthesis, if not combined with structural scoliosis, the fixation and fusion level should be up to the upper vertebra which PI angle>60°, and try to protect the posterior longitudinal ligament complex in case adjacent segments become instability or even slip. For adults with severe spondylolisthesis, if not combined with other spinal disorders such as severe osteoporosis, only mono-segmental fusion is recommended after reduction. If the slipped vertebrae could not be reduced to Meyerding gradeⅠ, two or more segments would need to be fixed and fused.
Objective To evluate the clinical outcome of autograftsof ilium and interbody fusion cage or bone morphogenetic protein(BMP)／artificial bone material／ cage in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods From January 1997 to January 2004，114 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation． There were 45 males and 69 females with an average age of 43 years ranging from 32 to 61 years. Of 114patients, 85 cases were classified as degree Ⅰ, 24 cases as degree Ⅱ and 5 cases as degree Ⅲ. The patients were divided into three groups accordingto the material used for interbody fusion: autografts of ilium (group A, n=42), interbody fusion cages(group B, n=36), and BMP／artificial bone material／ cage (group C, n=36)．The clinical and radiographic results of the patients were compared among three groups． Results All patients were followed from 13 to 30 months with an average of 15 months． There were no statistically significant differences in surgical time, blood loss, and disc space height of preoperation(P＞0.05) among three groups. No severe complication occurred in the three groups(P＞0.05). The excellent and good rates in groups A，B and C were 81.0％, 80.6％, and 83.3％ respectively, showing no statisticallysignificant difference(P＞0.05)．The fusion rate of group C(97.0%) was significantly higher than those of group A(81.0%) and group B(83.3%) (P＜0.05) after 1 year of operation．And the average loss of disc space height in groups B and C was significantly lower than that in group A(P＜0.05). Conclusion Higher fusion rate and lower loss of disc space height can beobtained in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis with BMP／artificial bone materiel.It is an effective method in the treatment of spondylolisthesis.
Objective To study the relationship between sagittal facet joint and degenerative lumber spondylolisthesis (DLS) by observing the changes of the lumbar facet joint angle. Methods Fifty-seven patients with DLS who met the inclusion criteria between January 2013 and February 2016 were collected (DLS group). There were 26 males and 31 females, with the mean age of 54.0 years (range, 34-84 years). Forty patients without DLS at same stage were collected as control group. There were 23 males and 17 females with the mean age of 55.6 years (range, 29-82 years). There was no significant difference in gender and age between 2 groups (P>0.05). The lumbar facet joint angles were measured and compared by MRI scanning images in 2 groups. In DLS group, X-ray films were used to evaluated the degree of the lumbar spondylolisthesis on the basis of the Meyerding standard, and compared the facet joint angles between patients of different DLS degree. Results Facet joint angles in the DLS group [(34.18± 4.81)°] were significantly smaller than those in control group [(45.87±1.09)°] (t=15.073, P=0.000). In DLS group, the patients were rated as degree Ⅰ in 24 cases, degree Ⅱ in 19 cases, degree Ⅲ in 14 cases. As the degree of DLS increased, the lumbar joint angle decreased gradually, and showing significantly differences between patients of different DLS degree (P<0.05). Conclusion Sagittal lumbar facet joint may be one of the main risk factors of DLS.
Objective To analyze the effectiveness of combined treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis with MED, Quadrant, and Sextant-R systems. Methods Between August 2006 and June 2011, 35 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were treated, including 11 cases of isthmic spondylolisthesis and 24 cases of degenerative spondylolisthesis. There were 25 males and 10 females, with a mean age of 55 years (range, 33-71 years). The mean disease duration was 37 months (range, 8-75 months). Spondylolisthesis occurred at L4, 5 level in 21 patients and at L5, S1 level in 14 patients. According to Meyerding classification, 35 cases were rated as dergee I. The minimally invasive surgeries were performed by paraspinal muscle approach; Quadrant system was used for decompression and fusion at severe side, MED system for windowing of lamina at mild side, and Sextant-R system for fixation and reduction. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) to evaluate clinical outcomes, spondylolishesis ratio and intervertebral height to evaluate spondylolisthesis reduction. Results Lumbar continuous thin layer CT at postoperation showed that no pedicle screw invaded spinal canal and intervertebral fusion device was at good position. Incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 18-38 months (mean, 26 months). All patients got bone fusion and had no internal fixation failure by radiologic examination at 1 year after operation. Low back pain was relieved, lumbar function improved obviously, and satisfactory reduction of spondylolisthesis was obtained. At 2 weeks and 1 year after operation, the VAS score, ODI score, spondylolisthesis ratio, and intervertebral height were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P lt; 0.05). VAS score and ODI score showed significant differences (P lt; 0.05) between at 2 weeks and 1 year after operation. Spondylolisthesis ratio and intervertebral height showed no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) between at 2 weeks and at 1 year after operation. Conclusion Minimally invasive surgical management for lumbar spondylolisthesis via MED, Quadrant, and Sextant-R systems is a safe and effective surgical technique. However, its indications should be well considered.