ObjectiveTo compare the differences in preventing subcutaneous effusion, skin flap necrosis, and patient comfort between simple negative pressure drainage and negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging after radical mastectomy for breast cancer. MethodsOne hundred and ninety-six patients underwent radical mastectomy for breast cancer from January 2010 to December 2012 in this hospital were collected.The simple negative pressure drainage (SNPD group, n=84) and negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging (NPD+CB group, n=112) after radical mastectomy for breast cancer were used to prevent postoperative subcutaneous effusion.The postoperative complications, postoperative 3 d drainage volume, and patient comfort were compared in two groups. ResultsOne hundred and ninety-six patients with breast cancer were females.The differences of general clinical data were not statistically significant in two groups (P > 0.05).The differences of chest wall mean extubation time, axillary mean extubation time, postoperative 3 d mean drainage volume, and incidences of subcutaneous effusion and skin flap necrosis were not statistically significant in two groups (P > 0.05).The rate of comfort satisfactory in the SNPD group was significantly higher than that in the NPD+CB group [76.2%(16/84) versus 22.3%(25/112), P < 0.001].The chemotherapy was not affected after operation in two groups. ConclusionsComparing with negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging, simple negative pressure drainage do not increase postoperative subcutaneous effusion and skin flap necrosis, but it greatly improves the patients satisfactory rate.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of endoscopic radical mastectomy for breast cancer combined with total pectoral muscle reconstruction with breast implants. Methods The clinical data of 138 female patients with breast cancer who met the selection criteria between April 2019 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 43.8 years (range, 27-61 years). The maximum diameter of the tumors ranged from 1.00 to 7.10 cm, with an average of 2.70 cm. Pathological examination showed that 108 cases were positive for both estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor, and 40 cases were positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. All patients underwent endoscopic radical mastectomy for breast cancer combined with total pectoral muscle reconstruction with breast implants. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, prosthesis size, and occurences of nipple-areola complex (NAC) ischemia, flap ischemia, infection, and capsular contracture were recorded. The Breast-Q2.0 score was used to evaluate breast aesthetics, patient satisfaction, and quality of life (including the social mental health score, breast satisfaction score, and chest pain score). Patients were divided into two groups based on the time of operation after the technique was implemented: group A (within 1 year, 25 cases) and group B (after 1 year, 113 cases). The above outcome indicators were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, based on the postoperative follow-up duration, patients were classified into a short-term group (follow-up time was less than 1 year) and a long-term group (follow-up time was more than 1 year). The baseline data and postoperative Breast-Q2.0 scores were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe average operation time was 120.76 minutes, the average intraoperative blood loss was 23.77 mL, and the average prosthesis size was 218.37 mL. Postoperative NAC ischemia occurred in 21 cases (15.22%), flap ischemia in 30 cases (21.74%), infection in 23 cases (16.67%), capsular contracture in 33 cases (23.91%), and prosthesis removal in 2 cases (1.45%). The operation time of group A was significantly longer than that of group B (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, prosthesis size, and related complications between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 3-48 months (mean, 20 months). There were 33 cases in the short-term group and 105 cases in the long-term group. There was no significant difference in baseline data such as age, body mass index, number of menopause cases, number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cases, number of axillary lymph node dissection cases, breast cup size, degree of breast ptosis, and postoperative radiotherapy constituent ratio between the two groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the breast satisfaction score in the patients’ Breast-Q2.0 score ranged from 33 to 100, with an average of 60.9; the social mental health score ranged from 38 to 100, with an average of 71.3; the chest pain score ranged from 20 to 80, with an average of 47.3. The social mental health score of the long-term group was significantly higher than that of the short-term group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in breast satisfaction scores and chest pain scores between the two groups (P>0.05). No patient died during the follow-up, and 2 patients relapsed at 649 days and 689 days postoperatively, respectively. The recurrence-free survival rate was 98.62%. Conclusion Endoscopic radical mastectomy for breast cancer combined with total pectoral muscle reconstruction with breast implants has fewer complications and less damage, and the aesthetic effect of reconstructed breast is better.
Objective To analyze the efficacy of breast-conserving surgery with adjuvant radiation therapy (BCS+RT) vs. mastectomy (MAST) for early breast cancer among young Chinese patients. Methods Young female breast cancer patients (≤40 years old) treated at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 1st, 2008, and December 31st, 2019 were analyzed for clinical staging, molecular subtypes, surgical techniques, and prognostic assessments using follow-up data. Results Of 974 eligible patients in this study, 211 underwent BCS+RT and 763 underwent MAST. The Kaplan-Meier analyses indicated that there was no significant difference in the 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rate (99.1% vs. 99.4%, P=0.299), distant metastasis-free survival rate (97.9% vs. 96.4%, P=0.309), breast cancer-specific survival rate (100.0% vs. 97.0%, P=0.209), or overall survival rate (99.4% vs. 96.8%, P=0.342) between patients who underwent BCS+RT and those who underwent MAST. The multiple Cox proportional hazards regression analyses revealed that the treatment approach (BCS+RT or MAST) did not significantly predict locoregional recurrence-free survival (P=0.427), distant metastasis-free survival (P=0.154), breast cancer-specific survival (P=0.155), or overall survival (P=0.263). Subgroup analyses showed that there was no statistically significant difference in survival outcomes between BCS+RT and MAST in different clinical stages or molecular subtypes. Clinical stage and molecular subtype should also not be regarded as independent factors in deciding the treatment approach. Conclusions Receiving BCS+RT or MAST treatment does not affect the survival outcomes of young early-stage breast cancer patients, showing similar efficacy across various clinical stages and molecular subtypes. Choosing BCS+RT is considered safe for early-stage young female breast cancer patients eligible for breast conservation.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of breast conservation therapy (BCT) and mastectomy (Mast) on the prognosis of early luminal breast cancer (ELBC).MethodsBy retrieving the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang data, and VIP databases, the meta-analysis was performed on the documents that met the inclusion criteria. The Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0 were used for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 25 articles were included, involving 13 032 patients with ELBC, of which 8 419 underwent the BCT and 4 613 underwent the Mast. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the postoperative local regional relapse (LRR) between the BCT and the Mast in the treatment of all patients with ELBC [OR=0.84, 95% CI (0.43, 1.64), P=0.61]. For treating with BCT, the local relapse (LR), distant metastasis rate (DMR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) in the patients with luminal A ELBC were better than those in the patients with luminal B ELBC (P<0.05); Using the same method, the DMR and DFS in the patients with luminal A/B ELBC were better than those in the patients with luminal-HER2 ELBC (P<0.05). For treating with Mast, the LRR, LR, DMR, and OS in the patients with luminal A ELBC were better than those in the patients with luminal B ELBC (P<0.05); Using the same method, the LRR in the patients with luminal A/B ELBC was better than that in the patients with luminal-HER2 ELBC (P<0.05).ConclusionsFor patients with ELBC, similar LRR can be obtained by BCT and Mast treatment. Regardless of the surgical strategy, patients with luminal A ELBC are more likely to obtain relatively ideal clinical prognosis. Luminal-HER2 ELBC has the worst prognosis after BCT treatment.
ObjectiveTo investigate the prognosis after breast conserving surgery (BCS) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) in patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer, and analyze the factors related to locoregional recurrence (LRR).MethodsThe clinicopathologic and prognostic data of patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer who underwent the surgical treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2011 to December 2014 were analyzed. The clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic differences of the BCS group and MRM group were compared. The factors related to LRR of patients underwent the BCS and MRM were analyzed.ResultsA total of 1 330 patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer were included in this study, including 230 in the BCS group and 1 100 in the MRM group. Compared with the MRM group, the patients in the BCS group had higher height (P<0.001), younger age (P<0.001), smaller tumor diameter (P<0.001), and less axillary lymph node metastasis (P<0.001). Up to August 2019, 149 cases (18 cases in the BCS group and 131 cases in the MRM group) were lost, with a follow-up rate of 88.8%. The median follow-up time was 71 months (4－103 months). The LRR rate of the BCS group was higher than that of the MRM group (6.1% versus 2.5%, χ2=7.002, P<0.01). The locoregional recurrence-free survival of the MRM group was better than that of the BCS group (χ2=7.886, P<0.01). However, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of the distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival (P>0.05). In the patients underwent the BCS, the HER-2 was associated with the LRR (P<0.05), and the axillary lymph node metastasis was associated with the LRR in the patients underwent the MRM (P<0.05).ConclusionsAccording to results of this study, although there is a significant difference in locoregional recurrence-free survival between BCS group and MRM group in patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer, there are no statistical differences in distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival between the two groups. Therefore, it is safe and feasible for choosing appropriate patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer to underwent breast-conserving treatment.
Objective To introduce an surgical technique of endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) combined with immediate breast reconstruction through simple single-port access that placed in axillary incision. Methods Between January 2017 and February 2018, 15 female patients with breast cancer (stageⅠ in 5 cases and stage Ⅱ in 10 cases) were treated with endoscopic NSM combined with immediate breast reconstruction through simple single-port access that placed in axillary incision. They were 27-45 years old (mean, 37.5 years). The disease duration ranged from 1 to 24 months (mean, 8 months). The tumor located at the left breast in 8 cases and at the right breast in 7 cases. The diameter of tumor ranged from 1.5 to 3.0 cm (mean, 2.6 cm). The distance between tumor and nipple was 1.8-4.0 cm (mean, 2.3 cm). Results After operation, the nipple epidermal necrosis occurred in 1 case, and subcutaneous effusion in 1 case. No subcutaneous emphysema or skin flap necrosis occurred. Postoperative pathological examination showed that 1 case was nipple involvement and was treated with nipple resection. All patients were followed up 7-17 months (mean, 11 months). According to the Harris assessment criteria for appearance of reconstructed breast, there were 4 cases of excellent, 10 cases of good, and 1 case of poor. No tumor recurrence or metastasis occurred during follow-up. Conclusion It is a safe and feasible method of endoscopic NSM combined with immediate breast reconstruction through simple single-port access that placed in axillary incision, and can obtain good cosmetic results. It is a new option to breast reconstruction.
Eight patients treated with modified radical mastectomy and fenestration of pectoralis muscle to preserve pectoral, nerves are reported and the practical procedure is introduced. The results indicate that this method can overcome the disadvantage of mastectomy (Auchincloss) in that only dissection of fatty tissue and lymph nodes in the lateral part of axilla is carried out. With fenestration of pectoralis major muscle, not only the pectoral nerves can be perserved but also the fatty tissue and lymph nodes, including of those medial to the pectoralis minor, subclavicular and interpectoral nodes can be dissected. This method almost reached Halsted’s demand and it can be used for stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ, and even stage Ⅲ breast cancer if no infiltration to pectoralis major muscle is found.
Objective To investigate the clinical application of da Vinci surgical system in nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) and immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods Five cases of breast cancer who underwent NSM and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction were analyzed from March 2022 to April 2022. Evaluation endpoints included the key points of operation, duration of surgery, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes. Results Two patients underwent implant-based postpectoral breast reconstruction without mesh. Three patients received prepectoral reconstruction with biological mesh, 2 of which underwent bilateral breast reconstruction. Operating duration of 5 patients was 240–320 min, with an average of 291 min. The blood loss was 10–30 mL, with an average of 18 mL. No patient switched to open surgery due to the uncontrolled bleeding. The average drainage volume was 78 mL/d (60–100 mL/d) in the first 3 days and 38 mL/d (30–50 mL/d) in the 3 to 7 days after operation. The drainage tube was removed 10–18 days after operation, with an average of 13.2 days. No postoperative infections or nipple-areolar complex necrosis were observed. The inpatient stay was 1–3 days, with an average of 1.8 days. One month after operation, the BREAST-Q satisfaction score was 64–82, with an average of 76.20. The average cost for operation was 45 072 RMB (43 420–47 524 RMB). Conclusions The robotic NSM and immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction is a safe procedure with better clinical outcomes and favorable patients’ satisfaction. However, the robotic system has longer operation time and higher cost. It still needs to be personalized in the clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo compare the satisfaction and safety of patients undergoing prepectoral breast reconstruction (PBR) versus subpectoral dual-plane breast reconstruction (SBR) with implants combined with mesh after open total mastectomy for breast cancer. MethodsA prospective cohort study on clinical data of breast cancer patients who underwent open total mastectomy and received either PBR or SBR with implants and mesh for immediate breast reconstruction from June 2021 to October 2022 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were performed. The pain scores on postoperative days 1, 3, 7, and 14, the postoperative use of analgesics within 14 days, and the incidence of postoperative complications, breast satisfaction, and quality of life during follow-up periods were compared between the two groups. ResultsA total of 62 female patients were included, with 35 in the PBR group, having an average age of (39.6±6.5) years, and 27 in the SBR group, having an average age of (41.5±9.9) years. The pain scores of the SBR group on postoperative days 3 (P=0.032), 7 (P＜0.001), and 14 (P＜0.001) were significantly higher than those of the PBR group, and a higher proportion of patients in the SBR group used analgesics within postopeartive 14 days (P=0.001). The median follow-up time was 28.4 months for the PBR group and 34.9 months for the SBR group. There was no statistical difference in the overall (P=0.583), major (P=0.526), or minor (P=0.532) complication rates between the two groups during follow-up. One (2.9%) patient in the PBR group and 2 (7.4%) patients in the SBR group lost their implants (P=0.575). There were 4 patients of movement deformities and 4 patients of chest muscle pain in the SBR group, whereas no patients in the PBR group had these complications (P=0.031). Encapsular contracture occurred in 5 (14.3%) patients in the PBR group and 11 (40.7%) patients in the SBR group (P=0.023). The incidences of ripple sign (25.7% vs. 3.7%, P=0.047) and implant contour visibility (40.0% vs. 11.1%, P=0.020) were significantly higher in the PBR group than those in the SBR group. At 24 months post-surgery, breast satisfaction scores [(67.9±13.1) points vs. (52.6±16.9) points, P=0.025] and chest function satisfaction [(70.7±13.4) points vs. (58.7±14.3) points, P=0.035] were higher in the PBR group. No local recurrence, distant metastasis, or deaths occurred in the PBR group during the follow-up period, while 1 patient of local recurrence and distant metastasis occurred in the SBR group, with no deaths. ConclusionCompared to SBR, PBR is more in line with the physiological and anatomical levels of the breast, effectively avoiding postoperative movement deformities and chest muscle pain, with a lower incidence of capsular contracture, and higher postoperative breast satisfaction and chest function satisfaction. It is a safe and feasible reconstruction method. For some specific patients, especially those with higher physical activity demands, it is a better reconstruction choice.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of axillary single-site laparoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy in treatment of gynecomastia (GYN) and the assessment method of glandular mass before operation. Methods A clinical data of 65 GYN patients admitted between August 2023 and February 2024 and matched the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were (30.8±7.9) years old, with a body mass index (BMI) of 27.3 (24.9, 29.8) kg/m2. According to Simon’s grading criteria, the GYN was classified as gade Ⅰ in 8 cases, grade Ⅱa in 32 cases, grade Ⅱb in 21 cases, and grade Ⅲ in 4 cases. All patients underwent bilateral axillary single-site laparoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bilateral extubation time, total length of hospital stay, and the occurrence of related complications were recorded. The cosmetic outcome score was assessed by questionnaire at 2 months after operation. Preoperative BMI, lying/standing sternal notch to nipple (SN-N), and lying/standing nipple to nipple (N-N) were measured. The differences in SN-N between standing and lying positions (ΔSN-N) and in N-N between lying and standing positions (ΔN-N) were calculated. The intraoperative resected glandular mass was recorded. The glandular mass-related indicators (BMI, ΔSN-N, ΔN-N) were compared between Simon grades. Spearman’s correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis of glandular mass with BMI and ΔSN-N, ΔN-N and Simon grading (grades Ⅰ, Ⅱa, Ⅱb, and Ⅲ were assigned values of 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively) of the corresponding side. ResultsAll operations were successfully completed with the operation time of 75.0 (60.0, 90.0) minutes, the intraoperative blood loss of 12.0 (11.0, 13.0) mL, and the bilateral extubation time of 1.5 (1.5, 1.5) days after operation. The total length of hospital stay was 3.0 (3.0, 3.0) days. Three cases of subcutaneous hematoma in the chest wall and 1 case of nipple areola numbness and discomfort occurred after operation, while the rest of the patients had no complication, such as postoperative haemorrhage, effusion, infection, and nipple areola necrosis. The subjective cosmetic scores were all 15 at 2 months after operation, which was very satisfactory. The differences in ΔSN-N of right side between Simon grade Ⅰ and grades Ⅱa, Ⅱb, Ⅲ and in ΔSN-N of left side between Simon grade Ⅰ and grades Ⅱb, Ⅲ were significant (P<0.05), while the differences between the remaining grades were not significant (P>0.05). The differences in ΔN-N between Simon grade Ⅱa and gradeⅡb and in BMI between Simon grade Ⅱb and grade Ⅲ were not significant (P>0.05), while the differences between the remaining grades were significant (P<0.05). The glandular masses of left and right breasts in 65 patients were 69.0 (52.1, 104.0) g and 73.0 (56.0, 94.0) g, respectively; and the difference between left and right breasts was not significant (Z=?0.622, P=0.534). The data of the right breast was selected for correlation analysis. Correlation analysis showed that the right glandular mass was positive correlated with BMI and Simon grading, ΔSN-N, and ΔN-N (P<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that Simon grading had a positive predictive effect on glandular mass, and the regression equation was as follows: right glandular mass=5.541+32.115×Simon grading (R2=0.354, P<0.001). ConclusionAxillary single-site laparoscopic subcutaneous mastectomy is an ideal surgical procedure for the treatment of GYN. BMI and Simon grading are closely related to GYN glandular mass, and have certain reference value for preoperative glandular mass assessment.