Objective To evaluate the short-term effectiveness of local laminectomy and interlaminar lumbar instrumented fusion (ILIF) through a small incision for lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods Between November 2009 and January 2011, 16 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were treated by local laminectomy and ILIF through a small incision. Therewere 7 males and 9 females with an average age of 52.8 years (range, 49-67 years). Sixteen patients had lumbar degenerative stenosis with an average disease duration of 4 years and 7 months (range, 2 years-9 years and 4 months). Four cases complicated by lateral recessus stenosis, 3 by lumbar disc herniation. Involved segments included L3, 4 in 2 cases, L4, 5 in 4 cases, L5, S1 in 4 cases, L3, 4 and L4, 5 (double segments) in 2 cases, L4, 5 and L5, S1 (double segments) in 4 cases. The effectiveness was evaluated with the pre- and post-operative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disabil ity Index (ODI). The cross-sectional areas of spinal canal were measured by CT scanning and were compared between pre- and post-operation. Results The average operative time was 47 minutes (range, 35-80 minutes); the average blood loss was 145 mL (range, 120-350 mL); and the average hospital ization days were 7.8 days (range, 4-15 days). Cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 1 case, and healing of incisions by first intention was achieved in the others. The patients were followed up 12-22 months (mean, 14.8 months). CT scanning showed interspinous fusion in 14 cases and possible fusion in 2 cases after operation, with an average fusion time of 4.6 months(range, 3-10 months). The postoperative VAS score, ODI, and cross-sectional area were significantly improved when compared with preoperative values (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The ILIF can promote fusion between spinous processes, provide spine stabil ization, and protect the spinal cord. The procedure has small incision, simple method of fixation and fusion.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical and radiological effectiveness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of Cage dislodgement after lumbar surgery.MethodsThe clinical data of 40 patients who underwent revision surgery due to Cage dislodgement after lumbar surgery betweem April 2013 and March 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 18 patients underwent OLIF (OLIF group) and 22 patients underwent PLIF (PLIF group) for revision. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, body mass index, intervals between primary surgery and revision surgery, number of primary fused levels, disc spaces of Cage dislodgement, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of low back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), the segmental lordosis (SL) and disc height (DH) of the disc space of Cage dislodgement, and the lumbar lordosis (LL) before revision (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and complications of the two groups were recorded and compared. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain were evaluated at 3 days, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, and the ODI scores were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation. The SL and DH of the disc space of Cage dislodgement and LL were measured at 12 months after operation and compared with those before operation. CT examination was performed at 12 months after operation, and the fusion of the disc space implanted with new Cage was judged by Bridwell grading standard.ResultsThe intraoperative blood loss in the OLIF group was significantly less than that in the PLIF group (t=?12.425, P=0.000); there was no significant difference between the two groups in the operation time and hospital stay (P>0.05). Both groups were followed up 12-30 months, with an average of 18 months. In the OLIF group, 2 patients (11.1%) had thigh numbness and 1 patient (5.6%) had hip flexor weakness after operation; 2 patients (9.1%) in the PLIF group had intraoperative dural sac tear. The other patients’ incisions healed by first intention without early postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (χ2=0.519, P=0.642). The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain, and the ODI score of the two groups at each time point after operation were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05). At 12 months after operation, SL, LL, and DH in the two groups were significantly increased when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05); SL and DH in the OLIF group were significantly improved when compared with those in the PLIF group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in LL between the two groups (P>0.05). CT examination at 12 months after operation showed that all the operated disc spaces achieved bony fusion. According to the Bridwell grading standard, 12 cases were grade Ⅰ and 6 cases were grade Ⅱ in the OLIF group, and 13 cases were grade Ⅰ and 9 cases were grade Ⅱ in the PLIF group; there was no significant difference between the two groups (Z=–0.486, P=0.627). During follow-up, neither re-displacement or sinking of Cage, nor loosening or fracture of internal fixation occurred.ConclusionOLIF and PLIF can achieve similar effectiveness in the treatment of Cage dislodgement after lumbar surgery. OLIF can further reduce intraoperative blood loss and restore the SL and DH of the disc space of Cage dislodgement better.
ObjectiveTo explore the fusion effect of allograft Cages on transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).MethodsThe clinical data of 30 patients (38 vertebral segments) who underwent TLIF with allograft interbody fusion Cages between January 2015 and January 2017 were retrospectively analysed. There were 25 males and 5 females with an average age of 56.9 years (range, 44-72 years). The lesions included 20 cases of lumbar disc herniation, 7 cases of lumbar spondylolisthesis, and 3 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis. The operation section included 4 cases of L3, 4, 13 cases of L4, 5, 5 cases of L5, S1, 6 cases of L4, 5-L5, S1, and 2 cases of L3, 4-L4, 5. The disease duration was 6-36 months (mean, 12 months). The clinical effectiveness was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score at preoperation, 3 months and 6 months after operation, and last follow-up. The fusion rate was evaluated by anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and CT three-dimensional reconstruction at 3 and 6 months after operation. The intervertebral space height was measured on anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films at preoperation, 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months after operation.ResultsThe operation time was 2.1-4.3 hours (mean, 3.1 hours), and the intraoperative blood loss was 150-820 mL (mean, 407.5 mL). The follow-up time was 8-25 months (mean, 16.4 months). One Cage split at 6 months after operation without Cage movement and neurologic symptoms; none of the other patients had Cage prolapse, displacement, and fragmentation. No local or systemic allergy or infection signs was found in all patients. No nerve compression or symptoms was observed during the follow-up. The postoperative VAS score, ODI score, and JOA score improved significantly when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05); and the scores at 6 months and at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with those at 3 months after operation (P<0.05); but no significant difference was found between at 6 months and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The fusion rate was 55.3% (21/38), 92.1% (35/38), and 100% (38/38) at 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up postoperatively. The intervertebral space height was increased significantly at 3 days, 3 months, 6 months, and last follow-up postoperatively when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05); and the loss of intervertebral space height was significant at last follow-up when compared with postoperative at 3 days (P<0.05).ConclusionThe allograft interbody fusion Cage contributes to the spine interbody fusion by providing an earlier stability and higher fusion rate.
ObjectiveTo investigate the advantage and short- and medium-term effectivenesses of paramedian incision minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (mini-TLIF) by comparing with open TLIF. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 54 patients with single segmental lumbar degenerative disease who accorded with the inclusion criteria between January 2012 and March 2014. Open TLIF was performed in 26 patients (open group), mini-TLIF in 28 cases (minimally invasive group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, etiology, and affected segments between 2 groups (P>0.05). The indexes of surgical trauma, systemic inflammatory response, clinical outcome, and interbody fusion rate were compared between 2 groups. ResultsDural rupture occurred in 1 case of open group, L5 nerve root injury in 1 case of minimally invasive group. All patients obtained primary healing of incision. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage of minimally invasive group were significantly lower than those of open group (P<0.05). C-reactive protein, leucocyte count, and creatine kinase-MM (CK-MM) of open group were significantly higher than those of minimally invasive group at 24 hours after operation (P<0.05). At 7 days after operation, the CK-MM of minimally invasive group was significantly lower than that of open group (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found in C-reactive protein and leucocyte count between 2 groups (P>0.05). The follow-up time was 1.2-3.1 years in open group and 1.4-2.9 years in minimally invasive group. At 1 year after operation, the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were significantly improved in 2 groups (P<0.05). Minimally invasive group was better than open group in ODI and VAS score of back pain (P<0.05), but VAS score of leg pain showed no significant difference (P>0.05). According to the Suk interbody fusion standard, solid fusion was obtained in 18 cases, probable fusion in 4 cases, and nonunion in 4 cases, and the fusion rate was 84.61% in open group; solid fusion was obtained in 21 cases, probable fusion in 3 cases, and nonunion in 4 cases, and the fusion rate was 85.71% in minimally invasive group; and the interbody fusion rates showed no significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=0.072, P=0.821). ConclusionCompared with open TLIF, paramedian incision mini-TLIF has advantages of minimal surgical trauma and little blood loss for single-level lumbar degenerative disease. The short- and medium-term effectivenesses are satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical characteristics and surgical treatment strategies of delayed spinal cord injury (SCI) caused by atypical compression of old thoracolumbar fracture.MethodsBetween January 2011 and June 2018, 32 patients with delayed SCI caused by atypical compression of old thoracolumbar fracture who met the inclusion criteria were admitted and divided into group A (20 cases, underwent anterior subtotal vertebral body resection+titanium mesh reconstruction+screw rod internal fixation) and group B (12 cases, underwent posterior 270° ring decompression of vertebral canal+titanium mesh reconstruction+screw rod internal fixation) according to the different operation approaches. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, cause of injury, fracture segment, disease duration, preoperative American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification, and preoperative back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, lumbar Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, kyphosis angle, and vertebral canal occupational ratio (P>0.05). The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, and bone fusion time of reconstructed vertebrae were recorded and compared between the two groups; the kyphosis angle, back pain VAS score, and lumbar JOA score were used to evaluate the effectiveness.ResultsExcept that the incision length in group A was significantly shorter than that in group B (t=?4.865, P=0.000), there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss and operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no deaths or postoperative paraplegia cases in the two groups, and no deep infection or skin infection occurred. There was 1 case of cerebrospinal fluid leakage, 1 case of inferior vena cava injury, and 1 case of chyle leakage in group A. No serious complications occurred in group B. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P=0.274). All 32 patients were followed up 12-61 months, with an average of 20.8 months. The follow-up time for groups A and B were (19.35±5.30) months and (23.25±12.20) months respectively, and the difference was not significant (t=?1.255, P=0.219). The reconstructed vertebrae in all cases obtained bony fusion postoperatively. The fusion time of groups A and B were (8.85±2.27) months and (8.50±2.50) months respectively, and the difference was not significant (t=0.406, P=0.688). The kyphosis angle, back pain VAS score, and lumbar JOA score of the two groups at each time point after operation and last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperatively (P<0.05); the lumbar JOA score was further improved with time postoperatively (P<0.05), while the kyphosis angle and the VAS score of back pain remained similarly (P>0.05). Comparison of kyphosis angle, back pain VAS score, and lumbar JOA score between the two groups at various time points postoperatively showed no significant difference (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the JOA score improvement rate in groups A and B were 83.87%±0.20% and 84.50%±0.14%, respectively, and the difference was not significant (t=–0.109, P=0.914); the surgical treatment effects of the two groups were judged to be significant.ConclusionIn the later stage of treatment of old thoracolumbar fractures, even mild kyphosis and spinal canal occupying may induce delayed SCI. Surgical correction and decompression can significantly promote the recovery of damaged spinal cord function. Compared with anterior approach surgery, posterior approach surgery has the advantages of less trauma, convenient operation, and fewer complications, so it can be preferred.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of Wiltse approach with fulcrum reduction technique and pedicle internal fixation in the treatment of AO-A type thoracolumbar fractures. Methods The clinical data of 16 patients with AO-A type thoracolumbar fractures treated with Wiltse approach with fulcrum reduction technique and pedicle internal fixation between September 2013 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 9 males and 7 females, the age ranged from 38 to 60 years, with an average age of 50.7 years. Causes of injury included 9 cases of falling from height, 3 cases of traffic accidents, 3 cases of falling, and 1 case crushed by heavy objects. Fractured segment involved T11 in 2 cases, T12 in 5 cases, L1 in 7 cases, and L2 in 2 cases. There were 6 cases of type A1, 3 cases of type A2, 5 cases of type A3, and 2 cases of type A4 according to AO fracture classification. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and removal time of internal fixator were recorded. Before operation, immediately after operation, before and after removal of internal fixator, the local kyphotic angle (LKA), anterior vertebral height (AVH), and posterior vertebral height (PVH) of fractured vertebral body were measured; visual analogue scale (VAS) score of back pain were evaluated before operation, at 3 days after operation, before and after removal of internal fixator. Results The operation time of the patients was 50-95 minutes, with an average of 70.7 minutes; the intraoperative blood loss was 50-230 mL, with an average of 132.9 mL; the internal fixator was removed after 18-30 months, with an average of 23.6 months. All patients were followed up 20-32 months, with an average of 25.6 months. No incision infection, hematoma, and other surgery-related complications, and internal fixator rupture residual complications occurred. All 16 patients achieved satisfactory reduction results. Immediate postoperative LKA, AVH, and PVH were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05). There was a certain degree of reduction loss before internal fixator removal, and the difference in LKA was significant (P<0.05), but the difference in AVH and PVH were not significant (P>0.05). There was a certain degree of reduction loss after internal fixator removal, but only the difference in AVH was significant (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in LKA and PVH (P>0.05). The VAS score of the back pain significantly improved at 3 days after operation and before internal fixator removal when compared with preoperative score (P<0.05). The pain after internal fixator removal was significantly worse than that before internal fixator removal (P<0.05). ConclusionThe Wiltse approach with fulcrum reduction technique and pedicle internal fixation in the treatment of AO-A thoracolumbar fractures has a short operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and the posterior soft tissue and other structures are well protected during the operation. It can provide satisfactory clinical reduction results.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of dynamic neutralization system (Dynesys) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2016), CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data were searched to collect studies about Dynesys versus PLIF for lumbar degenerative disease from inception to May 31st 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 22 studies involving 1 482 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with PLIF, Dynesys could reduce operative time (MD=-29.62, 95%CI -36.67 to -22.57), operative blood loss (MD=-112.10, 95%CI -130.60 to -93.61), length of hospital stay (MD=-2.62, 95%CI -4.96 to -0.28), postoperative adjacent segment ROM (MD=-1.29, 95%CI -1.72 to -0.86) and maintain postoperative operated segment ROM (MD=3.53, 95%CI 1.99 to 5.08). There were no significant differences between two groups in postoperative ODI (MD=-1.51, 95%CI -3.58 to 0.55), postoperative back VAS (MD=-0.15, 95%CI -0.38 to 0.08), postoperative leg VAS (MD=-0.09, 95%CI -0.22 to 0.04) and postoperative complications (OR=0.69, 95%CI 0.45 to 1.06). ConclusionThe current evidence shows that compared with PLIF, Dynesys for lumbar degenerative disease has shorter operative time, less operative blood loss, shorter hospitalization days, and Dynesys can also maintain operated segment ROM and delay the degeneration of adjacent segment. Due to the limited quality of the included studies, more studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) induced proliferation of ligamentum flavum cells and ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and its effect on connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) expression.MethodsThe ligamentum flavum tissue in lumbar intervertebral disc herniation was extracted and the ligamentum flavum cells were isolated and cultured by collagenase pre-digestion method. Morphological observation, immunofluorescence staining observation, and MTT assay were used for cell identification. The 3rd generation ligamentum flavum cells were divided into 5 groups. The cells of groups A, B, C, and D were respectively sealed with 3 ng/mL TGF-β1, 50 ng/mL CTGF, 3 ng/mL TGF-β1+CTGF neutralizing antibody, and 50 ng/mL CTGF+CTGF neutralizing antibody. Serum free DMEM was added to group E as the control. MTT assay was used to detect the effects of TGF-β1 and CTGF on the proliferation of ligamentum flavum cells. Western blot was used to detect the expression of CTGF protein. Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to detect the expression of collagen type Ⅰ, collagen type Ⅲ, and CTGF genes.ResultsThe morphological diversity of cultured ligamentum flavum cells showed typical phenotype of ligamentum flavum fibroblasts; all cells expressed collagen type Ⅰ and vimentin, and some cells expressed collagen type Ⅲ; MTT identification showed that with the prolongation of culture time, the absorbance (A) value of each generation of cells increased gradually, and the A value of the same generation of cells at each time point was significantly different (P<0.05), there was no significant difference in A value between the cells of each generation at the same time point (P>0.05). After cultured for 24 hours, MTT assay showed that the A value of cells in groups A and B was significantly higher than that of group E (P<0.05). After adding CTGF neutralizing antibody, the A value of cells in groups C and D decreased, but it was still higher than that of group E (P<0.05). There were also significant differences among groups A, C and groups B, D (P<0.05). Western blot analysis showed that the relative expression of CTGF protein in groups A and B was significantly higher than that in group E (P<0.05), while the relative expression of CTGF protein in groups C and D was significantly lower than that in group E (P<0.05), and the difference between groups A, C and groups B, D was also significant (P<0.05). qRT-PCR detection showed that the mRNA relative expression of CTGF, collagen type Ⅰ, and collagen type Ⅲ in group A was significantly higher than that in group E (P<0.05). After adding neutralizing antibody, the mRNA relative expression of genes in group C was inhibited and were significantly lower than that in group A, but still significantly higher than that in group E (P<0.05). The mRNA relative expressions of collagen type Ⅰ and collagen type Ⅲ in group B was significantly higher than that in group E (P<0.05), but the mRNA relative expression of CTGF was not significantly different from that in group E (P>0.05); after neutralizing antibody was added, the mRNA relative expression of collagen type Ⅰ and collagen type Ⅲ in group D was inhibited and was significantly lower than that in group B, but still significantly higher than that in group E (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the mRNA relative expression of CTGF between group D and groups B, E (P>0.05).ConclusionTGF-β1 can promote CTGF, collagen typeⅠ, collagen type Ⅲ gene level and protein expression in ligamentum flavum cells, and TGF-β1 can synergistically promote proliferation of ligamentum flavum cells through CTGF.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of vertebral arch replantation and laminectomy in the treatment of mild to moderate isthmic spondylolisthesis.MethodsThe clinical data of 66 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis treated with vertebral arch replantation or laminectomy between March 2014 and July 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into trial group (34 cases, treated with complete replantation of vertebral arch, intervertebral fusion, and internal fixation) and control group (32 cases, treated with laminectomy with intervertebral fusion and internal fixation) according to different surgical methods. There was no significant difference in general data of gender, age, disease duration, lesion segment, Meyerding grade, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, complications, vertebral arch fusion of trial group, and epidural scar formation of the two groups were recorded. The VAS score, JOA score, and ODI score were evaluated at preoperation, 3, 6, 12 months after operation, and at last follow-up. The effectiveness was evaluated according to HOU Shuxun’s criteria.ResultsAll the patients successfully completed the surgery, without any aggravation of nerve injury, dural tear, infection, etc. There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups (t=0.583, P=0.562), but the intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the trial group than that in the control group (t=2.134, P=0.037). All the 66 patients were followed up 13-18 months (mean, 16.2 months). Postoperative clinical symptoms of all patients were significantly improved. In the control group, 7 cases were found to have symptoms of spinal canal stenosis with postoperative posture changes at 3 months after operation, and 5 cases showed mild lower limb numbness at 18 months after operation. No complication such as infection and nerve injury occurred in other patients. In the trial group, 34 cases of epidural scar tissue were completely blocked outside the replantation vertebral arch, while in the control group, 11 cases of epidural scar tissue invaded the spinal canal. At last follow-up, the fusion rate of intervertebral bone grafting and vertebral arch replantation in the trial group was 100%, and the fusion rate of intervertebral bone grafting in the control group was also 100%. The VAS score, ODI score, and JOA score were significantly improved at each time point after operation (P<0.01). The ODI score and JOA score of the trial group were significantly better than those of the control group at 3 months after operation and at last follow-up (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in scores between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05). According to HOU Shuxun’s criteria, the excellent and good rate was 91.2% in the trial group and 84.4% in the control group, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.092, P=0.573).ConclusionCompared with laminectomy, vertebral arch replantation can better improve postoperative neurological symptoms, maximize the reconstruction of the bone spinal canal, restore the stability of the intraspinal environment, and it is a better surgical method for lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Total lumbar disc replacement is an alternative to interbody fusion for the effective treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease. This paper reviewed the history of ball-on-socket type artificial lumbar disc (ALD) prosthesis, which is a typical ALD prosthesis and summarized the ALD prosthesis research progress, according to different materials such as metal-on-metal, metal-on-polymer, and polymer-on-polymer prosthesis. The structural design factors of ball-on-socket type ALD prosthesis were analyzed and its prospect of development was also presented. The purpose of this paper is to provide a theoretical reference for the design of the ball-on-socket ALD prosthesis by reviewing the current state of ball-on-socket type ALD prosthesis.