• <xmp id="1ykh9"><source id="1ykh9"><mark id="1ykh9"></mark></source></xmp>
      <b id="1ykh9"><small id="1ykh9"></small></b>
    1. <b id="1ykh9"></b>

      1. <button id="1ykh9"></button>
        <video id="1ykh9"></video>
      2. west china medical publishers
        Keyword
        • Title
        • Author
        • Keyword
        • Abstract
        Advance search
        Advance search

        Search

        find Keyword "Deep vein thrombosis" 16 results
        • Vein valve function following pharmacomechanical thrombectomy versus simple catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: A case control study

          ObjectiveTo compare vein valve function following pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) with simple catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for deep vein thrombosis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of sixty patients who suffered acute lower extremity deep vein thrombsis in our hospital between October 2016 and March 2017. All patients underwent contralateral preprocedural duplex and bilateral postprocedure duplex to access patency and valve function. The patients were divided into three groups including a group A with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) alone (36 patients with 20 males and 16 females at average age of 56 years), a group B with PMT alone (15 patients with 8 males and 7 females at average age of 55 years), and a group C with PMT combined CDT (9 patients with 4 males and 5 females at average age of 56 years). The valve function was compared among the Group A, Group B and Group C.ResultsThere were 40.0% (24/60) patients with bilateral femoral vein valve reflux, 40.0% (24/60) patients with unilateral femoral vein valve reflux (all in the treated limbs), 20% (12/60) patients had no reflux in both limbs. Of the limbs treated with CDT alone, PMT alone and PMT combined CDT, the rate of valve reflux was 38.9% (14/36), 33.3% (5/15), and 55.6% (5/9) respectively (P=0.077).ConclusionIn the patients suffering acute DVT, PMT or PMT combined CDT does not hamper valve function compared with CDT alone.

          Release date:2019-01-23 02:58 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Treatment for Deep Venous Thrombosis of Lower Extremities: Thromboectomy Versus Thrombolysis

          ObjectiveTo evaluate the treatment effective of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of low extremities. MethodsThe clinical data of 86 patients with DVT were analyzed retrospectively, which were divided into thromboectomy group (12 patients) and thrombolysis group (74 patients) according to the therapy methods. The thromboectomy group patients were treated by thromboectomy using Fogarty balloon catheter plus thrombolytie, thrombolysis group patients were treated by thrombolysis (urokinase or antithrombus enzyme of viper). ResultsThere were 8 cases healed, 4 cases relieved, 0 invalidated in the thromboectomy group and 15 cases healed, 50 cases relieved, 9 cases invalidated in the thrombolysis group at discharge. During 3-100 months of following up with an average 27 months, 10 cases and 62 cases were examined by Bultrasonic in the thromboectomy group and thrombolysis group, respectively, 6 cases were not damaged in the function of valves of the thromboectomy group, 9 cases were not damaged in the function of valves of the thrombolysis group. The rates of acute response, longtime patency, and normal valve in the thromboectomy group were higher than those in the thrombolysis group (Plt;0.05), the rate of post-thrombotic syndrome in the thromboectomy group was lower than that in the thrombolysis group (Plt;0.05). ConclusionsEarly thromboectomy is an effective way of restoring the fluency of deep vein and protecting the efficiency of the vein value organization, and reducing the sequela of DVT. Thrombolysis can only relieve the symptomation, but it can not protect the crawling and relapsing of thrombus.

          Release date:2016-09-08 10:45 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Efficacy and safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis and anticoagulation for deep vein thrombosis: a meta analysis

          ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) versus anti-coagulation (AC) for deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang Data and CNKI databases to collect randomized clinical trials (RCTs) about CDT versus AC for DVT from inception to March 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 5 RCTs and 989 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two group in incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (RR=0.73, 95%CI 0.49 to 1.09, P=0.13), iliofemoral venous patency rate (RR=2.57, 95%CI 0.59 to 11.24, P=0.21), bleeding (RR=2.03, 95%CI 0.50 to 8.28, P=0.32), severe bleeding (RR=1.77, 95%CI 0.91 to 3.42, P=0.09) and recurrence rate of venous thromboembolism (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.42 to 2.36, P=0.99). However, the incidence of moderate-severe PTS decreased in CDT group was lower than that in the control group (RR=0.70, 95%CI 0.53 to 0.92, P=0.01). ConclusionsCompared with the control group, catheter-directed thrombolysis does not reduce the incidence of PTS and VTE recurrence rate, cannot improve the long-term patency of the iliofemoral vein, yet can prevent the occurrence of moderate to severe PTS. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.

          Release date:2018-09-12 03:22 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • INFLUENCE OF BODY MASS INDEX AND AGE ON DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS AFTER TOTAL HIP ANDKNEE ARTHROPLASTY

          Objective To analyze the influence of the body mass index (BMI) and age on deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after the total hip arthroplasty(THA) or total knee arthroplasty(TKA) in Chinese patients who received prophylactic treatment for DVT. Methods We used a randomized clinical case-control study. From April 2004 to August 2004, weperformed THA and TKA for 95 patients (128 hips and knees). There were 27 men and 68 women with an average age of 60 years (range, 23-78) at surgery, and withan average BMI of 25.88 kg/m2 (range, 14.34-40.39) before surgery. All the patients were given low-molecular-weight heparin for 7-10 days pre-and postoperatively to prevent DVT. Color Doppler ultrasonography was used to detect DVT of bilateral lower extremities in all the patients before operation and 7-10 days after operation.The patients were divided into 4 groups according to their BMI:the non-obese group (BMI≤25.00 kg/m2), the overweight group (BMI, 25.01-27.00 kg/m2), the obese group (BMI, 27.01-30.00 kg/m2), and the morbidly obese group (BMIgt;30.00 kg/m2); and they were also divided into 4 groups according to their ages (≤40, 4160, 61.70, gt;70 yr) so as to analyze the influence of the BMI and age on DVT. Results The total incidence ofDVT in all the patients was 47.4% (45/95) and the incidence of proximal DVT was 3.2%. Forty-five patients had DVT and 50 patients had no DVT. The average BMI of the patients with DVT was significantly higher than that of the patients with no DVT (Plt;005). The overweight, obese, and morbidly obese patients had an odds ratio of 7.04, 4.8,and 9.6 for DVT compared with the nonobese patients (P<0.05); but the obese group had a less risk than the other 2 groups.The 41-60, 61-70, and gt;70-year-old patients had an odds ratio of 24.0, 38.2, and 24.4 for DVT compared with the ≤40year-old patients (P<0.05). Conclusion Obesity (BMIgt;25 kg/m2) and an increasing age (gt;40 yr) are identified as statistically significant risk factors for DVT after THA or TKA, and patients aged 61-70 years are more likely tohave DVT than the other patients. We should pay more attention to those obesity and aged patients when they are undergoing the total joint replacement, and we should give them enough prophylaxis and closely observe the symptoms in their bilateral lower extremities after operation, taking ultrasonography or venography to check DVT if necessary, so that we can give them prompt treatment and prevent fatal pulmonary thromboembolism. 

          Release date:2016-09-01 09:26 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • PROPHYLAXIS FOR DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS WITH LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN FOLLOWING HIP AND KNEE SURGERY

          OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin(LMWH) in prophylaxis of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) following hip and knee surgery. METHODS From April 1997 to October 1998, 46 patients undergoing hip and knee orthopedic procedures were randomized into 2 groups for studying. The following eligibility criteria were applied: age over 40 years old, no recently history of venous thromboembolism (over 3 months), normal result of preoperative hemostasis test and normal result of Doppler examination of the lower extremities. One group was control group and the other group received subcutaneously a low molecular weight heparin(Fraxiparine) with anti-factor X, activity of 41 IU/kg.day for three days, then 62 IU/kg.day from the 4th day to 10th day. All patients had venegraphy performed in the operated leg at 4 to 7 days after surgery. RESULTS eight patients(34.8%) developed DVT in the control group of 23 patients and 1 patient (4.3%) in the experimental group, also of 23 patients(P lt; 0.05). Two groups had no any bleeding complications. CONCLUSION The low molecular weight heparin is safe and effective in preventing postoperative deep vein thrombosis in patients following hip and knee surgery.

          Release date:2016-09-01 10:20 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Diagnostic Strategies of Unilateral Lower Limb Swelling (Analysis of 357 Cases)

          ObjectiveTo summarize diagnostic strategies of unilateral lower limb swelling. MethodThe clinical data of 357 patients hospitalized with unilateral lower limb swelling from March 2013 to October 2014 in our department were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThree hundred and seven (86.0%) patients were admitted to hospital within 2 weeks since the symptom onset (acute swelling), the most common cause (281 cases) was lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), other causes included infection (11 cases), hematoma (7 cases), lymphatic obstruction (4 cases), iliac vein compression syndrome (2 cases), pelvic tumor compression (1 case), arteriovenous fistula (1 case). Etiology for chronic swelling contained lower extremity DVT (33 cases), arteriovenous fistula (5 cases), lymphatic obstruction (5 cases), Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome (3 cases), pelvic tumor compression (3 cases), iliac vein compression syndrome (1 case). Up to 60.5% (26/43) lower limb swelling which were not due to DVT had histories of misdiagnosis as DVT. Nine cases of lymphatic obstruction were secondary to malignant tumor itself or the sequel of treatment. Three hundred and thirty-eight (94.6%) patients were received lower limb doppler ultrasound, while 308 patients (91.9%) were diagnosed. Fifty-nine patients needed further CT venography (CTV) or CT angiography (CTA), 10 patients were received radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy to be diagnosed. ConclusionsAlthough DVT is the main cause of unilateral lower limb swelling, the lower limb swelling which is not due to DVT is frequently misdiagnosed and belatedly treated. Considering the complexity and reciprocal overlapping for the etiology of lower limbs swelling, developing a appropriate diagnosis strategy is important. Apart from history taking and physical examination, color doppler ultrasound for the lower limb is suggested to be the preferred imaging examination mean. Pelvic cavity screening for occupancy lesions and iliac vein should be evaluated synchronously if possible. For cases which can't be diagnosed by ultrasound, CTV, CTA, or radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy could be important supplement to assist the diagnosis.

          Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Status investigation of knowledge-attitude-practice of deep vein thrombosis in medical professionals in orthopedics

          Objective To investigate the status of the knowledge, attitudes and intervention behaviors in medical professionals in the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and explore the weak links in knowledge-attitude-practice of DVT. Methods From December 2017 to February 2018, a convenient sampling method was used to extract 158 medical professionals out of 204 medical professionals from Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The questionnaire included the general information and basic situation of DVT learning, the knowledge of DVT, intervention attitude and implementation of preventive measures. The survey involved orthopedic doctors, nurses, rehabilitation therapists and nutrition managers. Results A total of 158 questionnaires were distributed and 150 valid questionnaires were completed. The effective questionnaire recovery rate was 94.9%. The mean score of basic knowledge of DVT was 6.45±1.83, the mean score of risk factors was 13.29±3.38, the mean score of intervention attitudes was 9.57±0.78, and the mean score of prevention implementation was 23.33±5.85. Conclusions The knowledge-practice of DVT intervention in orthopedic medical staff is moderate, and the attitude of DVT intervention is better among medical staff. There are various characteristics and weaknesses in knowledge-practice. It is necessary to regularly carry out knowledge about DVT among medical staff to improve the professional level of medical staff to prevent and treat DVT.

          Release date:2018-12-24 02:03 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Insertion of Inferior Vena Cave Filter in Treating Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis

          Objective To discuss and evaluate the value of insertion of inferior vena cava filter in treating lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Methods Inferior vena cava filters were placed in 46 patients with lower extremity DVT prior treatment, 20 in which were treated by therapy with anticoagulation and thrombolysis, and therapy with pressure gradient, and the other 26 patients by operation and thrombolysis therapy, and therapy with pressure gradient. Whether patients occurred pulmonary embolism was observed and the form and site of filters were monitored by periodic fluoroscopy. Results Inferior vena cava filters were placed successfully in all patients, 38 cases were implanted permanence inferior vena cava filter, 8 cases were implanted temporary inferior vena cava filter. Symptoms and signs of DVT disappeared or remitted in 44/46 patients after treatment. None of pulmonary embolism was occurred. Follow up 2-24 months (average 13 months) for 36 cases with permanence inferior vena cava filter, there was no complication of the filter and pulmonary embolism occurred. Conclusions The method of inserting inferior vena cava filter is simple and safe, which can prevent pulmonary embolism effectually to offer sufficient safeguard for the treatment of DVT.

          Release date:2016-09-08 10:56 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF LOWER LIMB DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS AFTER MAJOR ORTHOPEDIC SURGERIES

          Objective To investigate the early diagnosis of lower l imb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after major orthopedic surgeries. Methods From October 2005 to June 2009, color doppler sonography and hemorheology detection were carried out for 62 cases undergoing first total hip arthroplasty (THA), 14 cases undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and 86 cases undergoing hip fractures surgery (HFS) before operation and 1, 7, 14 days after operation. The plasma D-dimerlevels of the DVT were also examined for the THA patients before operation and 3 days after operation. Of all cases, therewere 89 males and 73 females, aged from 34 to 74 years (51.5 years on average). After operation, all the patients were treated with the regular low molecular weight heparin sodium against DVT. Results After operation, 17 cases (10.5%) developed DVT, including 8 THA cases, 1 TKA case, and 8 HFS cases. Preoperative color doppler sonography showed no abnormal echo, normal b blood flow signal, and normal periodical variation in vein blood flow without regurgitation. Postoperative examinations showed that the vascular occlusion of common femoral vein and popl iteal vein occurred in DVT patients. There were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) in whole blood viscosity between patients with DVT and without DVT after 1, 14 days and no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) before operation and 7 days after operation. There was no significant difference (P gt; 0.05) in plasma viscosity and erythrocyte aggregation index, between patients with DVT and without DVT pre- and postoperation. There was significant difference (P lt; 0.05) in erythrocyte deformation index between patients with DVT and without DVT 14 days after operation. The preoperative plasma D-dimer levels of patients with DVT and without DVT were (372.00 ± 148.62) ng/mL and (369.00 ± 141.03) ng/mL, respectively, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); the 3 days postoperatively levels were (574.00 ± 217.29) ng/mL and (391.00 ± 120.16) ng/mL, respectively, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Color doppler sonography in combination of hemorheology and plasma D-dimer examination can be beneficial for the early diagnosis of DVT in major orthopedic surgeries.

          Release date:2016-08-31 05:48 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Thrombolytic Therapy of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis of Lower Extremity(Report of 126 Cases)

          Objective To explore the results of thrombolytic therapy of acute deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity. Methods The clinical data of 126 patients with acute deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity treated conservatively from Dec.1999 to Feb.2004 were analyzed retrospectively. Results All patients were divided into three groups: 26 of central, 33 of surrounding and 67 of combined by Doppler sonography. Combined medication was adopted in all cases, in which 85 cases (67.5%) were clinically cured, 34 cases (27.0%) had good results, and 5 cases (4.0%) recovered partially. Two cases (1.6%) didn’t get better. The total effective rate was 98.4% (124/126). Conclusion Most patients with acute deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity can get satisfied results with conservative treatment including thrombolysis and anticoagulation. Early diagnosis and appropriate medication are crucial.

          Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
        2 pages Previous 1 2 Next

        Format

        Content

      3. <xmp id="1ykh9"><source id="1ykh9"><mark id="1ykh9"></mark></source></xmp>
          <b id="1ykh9"><small id="1ykh9"></small></b>
        1. <b id="1ykh9"></b>

          1. <button id="1ykh9"></button>
            <video id="1ykh9"></video>
          2. 射丝袜