ObjectiveTo compare the incidence of chondral injury using Rigidfix femoral fixation device via the anteromedial approach and the tibial tunnel approach during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. MethodsEighteen adult cadaver knees were divided randomly into 2 groups, 9 knees in each group. Femoral tunnel drilling and cross-pin guide insertions were performed using the Rigidfix femoral fixation device through the anteromedial approach (group A) and the tibial tunnel approach (group B). ACL reconstruction simulation was performed at 0, 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 70, 80, and 90°in the horizontal position. The correlation between incidence of chondral injury and slope angles was analyzed, and then the incidence was compared between the 2 groups. ResultsThe correlation analysis indicated that the chondral injury incidence increased with the increasing of the slope angle (r=0.611, P=0.000; r=0.852, P=0.000). The incidence of chondral injury was 69.1% (56/81) and 48.1% (39/81) in groups A and B respectively, showing significant difference (χ2=7.356, P=0.007). The sublevel analysis showed that the chondral injury incidence of group A (36.1%, 13/36) was significantly higher than that of group B (0) at 0-30°(χ2=15.864, P=0.000), but no significant difference was found between group A (95.6%, 43/45) and group B (86.7%, 39/45) at 45-90°(P=0.267). ConclusionIt has more risk of chondral injury to use Rigidfix femoral fixation device via the anteromedial approach than the tibial tunnel approach to reconstruct ACL.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction via transtibial (TT) and transportal (TP) techniques after 10 years follow-up. Methods A clinical data of 103 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with a single bundle of autologous hamstring tendon between March 2006 and March 2009 was retrospectively analyzed, among which 57 patients were reconstructed with TT technique (TT group) and 46 patients were reconstructed with TP technique (TP group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, cause of injury, interval between injury and operation, preoperative pivot shift test, preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and KT-2000 side-to-side difference (SSD) between the two groups (P>0.05). At 10 years after operation, Lachman test was used to evaluate the forward joint stability and pivot shift test to evaluate the rotational stability of the knee; KT-2000 SSD was used to measure tibial anterior displacement; IKDC score and Lysholm score were used to evaluate knee function; MRI examination was performed to observe graft healing and measure coronal inclination angles of the tibia and femoral tunnels. The rate of return to sports was also calculated. Results The incisions healed by first intention in the two groups, and no early complication occurred after operation. All patients were followed up 10-13 years, with an average of 11.5 years. During the follow-up period, there was no limitation of knee extension and flexion, no discomfort of donor site or graft failure in either group. MRI examination showed that the graft healed well. The IKDC score, Lysholm score, and KT-2000 SSD in the two groups were significantly improved after 10 years (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at 10 years after operation (P>0.05). There were significant differences in coronal inclination angles of femoral tunnel and tibial tunnel between the two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Lachman test and pivot shift test between the two groups (P>0.05). The rate of return to sports of patients was 61.40% (35/57) in TT group and 63.04% (29/46) in TP group, showing no significant difference between the two groups (χ2=0.29, P=0.87). Conclusion TT and TP techniques can both achieve good effectiveness in ACL reconstruction.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of different concentrations of osteoprotegerin (OPG) combined with deproteinized bone (DPB) on the bone tunnel after the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. MethodsThe femoral epiphyseal side was harvested from newborn calf, and allogenic DPB were prepared by hydrogen peroxide-chloroform/methanol method. Then, DPB were immersed in 3 concentrations levels of OPG (30, 60, 100 μg/mL) and 3 concentration ratios (30%, 60%, 100%) of the gel complex were prepared. Sixty healthy New Zealand white rabbits, male or female, weighing (2.7±0.4) kg, were divided randomly into 4 groups (n=15):control group (group A), 30% (group B), 60% (group C), and 100% (group D) OPG/DPB gel complex. The ACL reconstruction models were established by autologous Achilles tendon. Different ratios of OPG/DPB gel complex were implanted in the femoral and tibial bone tunnel of groups B, C, and D, but group A was not treated. The pathology observation (including the percentage of the femoral bone tunnel enlargement) and histological observation were performed and the biomechanical properties were measured at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after operation. ResultsOne rabbit died of infection in groups A and D, 2 rabbits in groups B and C respectively, and were added. General pathology observation showed that the internal orifices of the femoral and tibia tunnels were covered by a little of scar tissue at 4 weeks in all groups. At 8 weeks, white chondroid tissues were observed around the internal orifices of the femoral and tibia tunnels, especially in groups C and D. At 12 weeks, the internal orifices of the femoral and tibia tunnels enlarged in groups A, B, and C, but it was completely closed in group D. At each time point, the rates of the femoral bone tunnel enlargement in groups B, C, and D were significantly lower than that in group A, and group D was significantly lower than groups B and C (P<0.05); group C was significantly lower than group B at 8 weeks, but no significant difference was found at 4 and 12 weeks (P<0.05). Hisological observation showed that fresh fibrous connective tissue was observed in 4 groups at 4 weeks; there was various arrangements of Sharpey fiber in all groups at 8 weeks and the atypical 4-layer structure of bone was seen in group D; at 12 weeks, Sharpey fiber arranged regularly in all groups, with typical 4-layer structure of bone in groups B, C, and D, and an irregular "tidal line" formed, especially in group D. Biomechanics measurement showed that the maximum tensile load in group D was significantly higher than that in groups A and B at 4 weeks (P<0.05), but no significant difference was shown among groups A, B, and C, and between groups C and D (P>0.05); at 8 weeks, it was significantly higher in groups C and group D than group A, and in group D than group B (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups A, C and group B (P>0.05); at 12 weeks, it was significantly higher in groups C and D than groups A and B, and in group D than group C (P<0.05), but difference was not significant between groups A and B (P>0.05). ConclusionDifferent concentrations ratios of OPG/DPB gel complexes have different effects on the bone tunnel after ACL reconstruction. 100% OPG/DPB gel complex has significant effects to prevent the enlargement of bone tunnel and to enhance tendon bone healing.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the progress of different methods for femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and provide a clinical reference for treatment of ACL rupture.MethodsThe literature about the femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction was widely reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages and the clinical results of each method were summarized.ResultsCurrently in ACL reconstruction, methods for femoral tunnel positioning include transtibial technique (TT), anteromedial technique (AM), outside-in (OI), modified TT (mTT), and computer assisted surgery. There is no significant difference in the postoperative effectiveness between TT technique and AM technique. Compared with the TT technique, the OI technique has higher rotational stability of knee, but there is no significant difference in clinical results. The femoral tunnel located by mTT technique is closer to the anatomical placement than that of TT technique, but mTT technique is not effective for systematically anatomic femoral tunnel positioning, and further research is needed to prove its advantages.ConclusionDifferent femoral tunnel positioning methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no definite evidence that one is superior than the rest.
Objective To investigate whether the outlet of the femoral tunnel will cause iatrogenic injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) during posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) and estimate the safe angle of femoral tunnel placement. MethodsThirteen formaldehyde-soaked human knee joint specimens were used, 8 from men and 5 from women; the donors’ age ranged from 49 to 71 years, with an average of 61 years. First, the medial part of the femur was carefully dissected to clearly expose the region of the MCL course and attachment on the femoral medial aspect and to outline the anterior margin of the region with a marked line. The marked line divided the medial femoral condyle into an area with an MCL course and a bare bone area which is regarded relatively safe for no MCL course. Then, the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) was cut to identify the femoral attachment of the PCL. After the knee joint was fixed at a 120° flexion angle, the process of femoral tunnel preparation for the PCL single-bundle reconstruction was simulated. The inside-out technique was used to drill the femoral tunnel from the PCL femoral footprint inside the knee joint with an orientation to exit the medial condyle of the femur, and the combination angle of the two planes, the axial plane and the coronal plane, was adapted to the process of drilling femoral tunnels at different orientations. The following 15 angle combinations were used in the study: 0°/30°, 0°/45°, 0°/60°, 15°/30°, 15°/45°, 15°/60°, 30°/30°, 30°/45°, 30°/60°, 45°/30°, 45°/45°, 45°/60°, 60°/30°, 60°/45°, 60°/60° (axial/coronal). The positional relationship between the femoral tunnel outlet on the femoral medial condyle and the marked line was used to verify whether the tunnel drilling angle was a risk factor for MCL injury or not, and whether the shortest distance between the femoral exit center and the marked line was affected by the various angle combinations. Furthermore, the safe orientation of the femoral tunnel placement would estimated. ResultsWhen creating the femoral tunnel for PCLR, there was a risk of damage to the MCL caused by the tunnel outlet, and the incidence was from 0 to 100%; when the drilling angle of the axial plane was 0° and 15°, the incidence of MCL damage was from 69.23% to 100%. There was a significant difference in the incidence of MCL damage among femoral tunnels of 15 angle combinations (χ2=148.195, P<0.001). By comparison between groups, it was found that when drilling femoral tunnels at 5 combinations of 45°/45°, 45°/60°, 60°/30°, 60°/45°, and 60°/60° (axial/coronal), the shortest distances between the tunnel exit and the marked line were significantly different than 0°/45°, 0°/60°, 15°/45°, 15°/60°, and 30°/30° (axial/coronal) (P<0.05). Additionally, after comparing the median of the shortest distance with other groups, the outlets generated by these 5 angles were farther from the marked line and the posterior MCL. ConclusionThe creation of the femoral tunnel in PCLR can cause iatrogenic MCL injury, and the risk is affected by the tunnel angle. To reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury, angle combinations of 45°/45°, 45°/60°, 60°/30°, 60°/45°, and 60°/60° (axial/coronal) are recommended for preparing the femoral tunnel in PCLR.
ObjectiveTo introduce the method of prior-localization femoral tunnel by using a special positioning tool under the C-arm radiographic machine before surgery, and to study the effect on the knee function recovery after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.MethodsBetween January 2014 and January 2016, 32 patients with recurrent unilateral knee patellar dislocation were treated by arthroscopic patellofemoral lateral retinaculum release and MPFL reconstruction. The femoral tunnel position during MPFL reconstruction was prior-localizated under C-arm radiographic machine before operation. There were 8 males and 24 females, aged from 15 to 37 years, with an average of 23.8 years. The time from injury to admission ranged from 1 to 24 months, with an average of 9.7 months. Isometric point distance was measured on CT three-dimensional reconstruction image after operation to evaluate whether the position of femoral tunnel was isometric, and knee joint function was evaluated by Lysholm score. Spearman correlation analysis was performed between isometric point distance and Lysholm score.ResultsAll the 32 patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14.2 months). No symptoms of patellar subluxation or dislocation was found during follow-up. Patellar extrapolation test and patellar extrapolation fear test were negative. The isometric point distance was 1.5-5.9 mm (mean, 3.44 mm) at 3 days after operation. All femoral tunnels were located in equidistant tunnels. At last follow-up, the Lysholm score of the patients was 92.8±2.1, which was significantly improved when compared with preoperative score (54.4±2.8) (t=61.911, P=0.000). Isometric point distance was negatively correlated with Lysholm score (r=–0.454, P=0.009).ConclusionC-arm radiographic machine can locate the femoral tunnel position of MPFL easily and accurately before operation. The short-term and medium-term effectiveness are satisfactory, and the ionizing radiation injury caused by multiple fluoroscopy during operation is avoided.
ObjectiveTo review the research progress of location methods and the best femoral insertion position of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction of femoral tunnel, and provide reference for surgical treatment.MethodsThe literature about femoral insertion position of the MPFL reconstruction in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of MPFL, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of femoral tunnel positioning methods were summarized.ResultsThe accurate establishment of the femoral anatomical tunnel is crucial to the success of MPFL reconstruction. At present, there are mainly two kinds of methods for femoral insertion: radiographic landmark positioning method and anatomical landmark positioning method. Radiographic landmark positioning method has such advantages as small incision and simple operation, but it can not be accurately positioned for patients with severe femoral trochlear dysplasia. It is suggested to combine with the anatomical landmark positioning method. These methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no unified positioning standard. In recent years, the use of three-dimensional design software can accurately assist in the MPFL reconstruction, which has become a new trend.ConclusionFemoral tunnel positioning of the MPFL reconstruction is very important. The current positioning methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Personalized positioning is a new trend and has not been widely used in clinic, its effectiveness needs further research and clinical practice and verification.
Objective To review the research progress of Sch?ttle’s method in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR), and provide the latest knowledge and suggestions for surgical treatment. Methods The studies on Sch?ttle’s method at home and abroad in recent years were extensively collected, then summarized the problems affecting the accuracy of Sch?ttle’s method and the new ideas to improve the accuracy of localization. Results It’s vital to accurately locate the femoral tunnel during MPFLR. Malposition of the femoral tunnel is the main cause of postoperative complications and surgical failure. Sch?ttle’s method is the most well studied and most reproducible method for femoral tunnel localization, which is widely used as the “gold standard”. However, there are still problems that affect the accuracy of Sch?ttle’s method, including the impact of the internal/external rotation and varus/valgus of the knee on localization accuracy, unclear requirements for X-ray imaging and anatomical landmark reference line drawing standards, no suitable for patients with anatomical variations, and lack of further research on pediatric patients. In recent years, some new ideas are proposed to improve the Sch?ttle’s method to improve the localization accuracy. ConclusionFuture research should combine new technologies such as three-dimensional (3D) printing and intraoperative navigation to develop personalized and intelligent Sch?ttle’s method, further improving their localization accuracy.
Objective To investigate the changes of knee joint kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction assisted by personalized femoral positioner based on the apex of deep cartilage (ADC). Methods Between January 2021 and January 2022, a total of 40 patients with initial ACL rupture who met the selection criteria were randomly divided into the study group (using the personalized femoral positioner based on ADC design to assist ACL reconstruction) and the control group (not using the personalized femoral positioner to assist ACL reconstruction), with 20 patients in each group. Another 20 volunteers with normal knee were collected as a healthy group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, and affected side between groups (P>0.05). Gait analysis was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation using Opti _ Knee three-dimensional knee joint motion measurement and analysis system, and the 6 degrees of freedom (flexion and extension angle, varus and valgus angle, internal and external rotation angle, anteroposterior displacement, superior and inferior displacement, internal and external displacement) and motion cycle (maximum step length, minimum step length, and step frequency) of the knee joint were recorded. The patients’ data was compared to the data of healthy group. Results In the healthy group, the flexion and extension angle was (57.80±3.45)°, the varus and valgus angle was (10.54±1.05)°, the internal and external rotation angle was (13.02±1.66)°, and the anteroposterior displacement was (1.44±0.39) cm, the superior and inferior displacement was (0.86±0.20) cm, and the internal and external displacement was (1.38±0.39) cm. The maximum step length was (51.24±1.29) cm, the minimum step length was (45.69±2.28) cm, and the step frequency was (12.45±0.47) step/minute. Compared with the healthy group, the flexion and extension angles and internal and external rotation angles of the patients in the study group and the control group decreased at 3 months after operation, and the flexion and extension angles of the patients in the control group decreased at 6 months after operation, and the differences were significant (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in the other time points and other indicators when compared with healthy group (P>0.05). In the study group, the flexion and extension angles and internal and external rotation angles at 6 and 12 months after operation were significantly greater than those at 3 months after operation (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the other indicators at other time points (P>0.05). There was a significant difference in flexion and extension angle between the study group and the control group at 6 months after operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference of the indicators between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with conventional surgery, ACL reconstruction assisted by personalized femoral positioner based on ADC design can help patients achieve more satisfactory early postoperative kinematic results, and three-dimensional kinematic analysis can more objectively and dynamically evaluate the postoperative recovery of knee joint.
ObjectiveTo investigate the influence of lateral posterior tibial slope (LPTS) on tibial tunnel expansion after anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and the effect of tibial tunnel expansion on knee joint function.MethodsA clinical data of 52 patients with ACL rupture, who underwent arthroscopic anatomical single-bundle reconstruction between November 2018 and December 2019, was retrospectively analyzed. There were 32 males and 20 females with an average age of 34.3 years (range, 14-64 years). There were 22 cases of left knee and 30 cases of right knee. The time from injury to operation ranged from 7 to 30 days, with an average of 15.9 days. The knee function was evaluated by International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Lysholm score before operation and at 3 and 6 months after operation. At 3 and 6 months after operation, the LPTS and the width of exit, middle segment, entrance, and 2 cm from the exit of the articular surface of the tibial tunnel were measured based on MRI. The expansion of tibial tunnel was calculated and graded (degrees 0-3). According to LPTS, the patients were divided into group A (<6.0°), group B (6°-12°), and group C (>12°), and the difference in the expansion of tibial tunnel between groups was compared.ResultsAll the 52 patients were followed up 6-12 months (mean, 7.1 months). The IKDC and Lysholm scores at 3 and 6 months after operation were significantly different from those before operation (P<0.05); and the difference of knee scores between 3 and 6 months after operation was significant (P<0.05). The tibial tunnel expanded after operation, and the relative expansion at the exit and the middle segment showed significant difference between 3 months and 6 months after operation (P<0.05). The expansion degree of tibial tunnel was rated as degree 0 in 5 cases, degree 1 in 28 cases, degree 2 in 16 cases, and degree 3 in 3 cases at 3 months after operation, and degree 0 in 5 cases, degree 1 in 20 cases, degree 2 in 25 cases, and degree 3 in 2 cases at 6 months after operation. There was no significant difference in IKDC and Lysholm scores between patients with different expansion degrees of tibial tunnels (P>0.05). The LPTS of 52 patients ranged from –0.8° to 18.7° (mean, 10.6°); there were 7 cases in group A, 24 cases in group B, and 21 cases in group C. There was no significant difference in age, gender, preoperative IKDC and Lysholm scores, and initial width of tibial tunnel between groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the relative expansion of tibial tunnel at exit and middle segment between groups at 3 months after operation (P>0.05), and there was significant difference at 6 months after operation (P<0.05).ConclusionAfter anatomical single-bundle reconstruction of ACL, the tibial tunnel would expand to some extent in a short time. LPTS had a significant effect on tibial tunnel expansion, and the larger the angle was, the more obvious the expansion of the proximal tibial tunnel was. However, early knee function is not affected by tibial tunnel expansion.