ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with hypothyroidism.MethodsSixty-three patients with hypothyroidism (hypothyroidism group) and 63 euthyroid patients without history of thyroid disease (control group) who underwent primary unilateral THA between November 2009 and November 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective case control study. There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, body mass index, hip side, reason for THA, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) level, and preoperative Harris score (P>0.05). The perioperative thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroxine (T4) levels, the hypothyroidism-related and other complications during hospitalization, the decrease in Hb, perioperative total blood loss, blood transfusion rate, length of hospital stays, and 90 days readmissions rate in the two groups were recorded and evaluated. The periprosthetic joint infection, aseptic loosening of the prosthesis, and hip Harris score during follow-up were recorded.ResultsThe differences in the TSH and T4 of hypothyroidism group between pre- and 3 days post-operation were significant (P>0.05) and no hypothyroidism-related complications occurred after THA. The decrease in Hb and perioperative total blood loss in the hypothyroidism group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of transfusion rate, length of hospital stays, and 90 days readmission rates (P>0.05). No significant difference in the rate of complications (liver dysfunction, heart failure, pulmonary infection, urinary infection, and wound complication) between the two groups was found (P>0.05) except for the rate of intramuscular vein thrombosis which was significantly lower in the hypothyroidism group, and the rate of postoperative anemia which was significantly higher in the hypothyroidism group (P<0.05). The two groups were followed up 1.0-9.9 years (mean, 6.5 years). At last follow-up, Harris score in both groups were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05). An increase of 39.5±12.3 in hypothyroidism group and 41.3±9.3 in control group were recorded, but no significant difference was found between the two groups (t=0.958, P=0.340). During the follow-up, 1 case of periprosthetic joint infection occurred in the hypothyroidism group, no loosening or revision was found in the control group.ConclusionWith the serum TSH controlled within 0.5-3.0 mU/L and T4 at normal level preoperatively, as well as the application of multiple blood management, hypothyroid patients can safely go through THA perioperative period and effectively improve joint function, quality of life, and obtain good mid-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitor in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). MethodsThe PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in patients with axSpA from inception to December, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 7 RCTs involving 1 602 patients were included, including 852 patients in the experimental group and 750 patients in the placebo group. The results of meta-analysis showed that in terms of clinical efficacy, ASAS20 (RR=1.67, 95%CI 1.50 to 1.86, P<0.01), ASAS40 (RR=2.30, 95%CI 1.93 to 2.73, P<0.01), ΔBASFI (MD=?1.04, 95%CI ?1.21 to ?0.87, P<0.01), and ΔBASMI (MD=?0.30, 95%CI ?0.41 to ?0.19, P<0.01) of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of axSpA patients were significantly higher than those in the placebo group. In terms of safety, adverse event (RR=1.09, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.21, P=0.14) and major adverse events, such as diarrhea (RR=1.18, 95%CI 0.55 to 2.51, P=0.67), nasopharyngitis (RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.75, P=0.96), liver enzyme abnormalities (RR=1.83, 95%CI 0.84 to 3.99, P=0.13), and headache (RR=1.94, 95%CI 0.77 to 4.87, P=0.16) were statistically insignificant. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that JAK inhibitors can improve the clinical efficacy in the axSpA patients, and the safety is high. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of vaccines for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) . Methods The CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, PubMed, EMbase and Web of Science databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines from their inception to June 30th, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 12.0 software. Results A total of 13 RCTs involving 139 015 subjects were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the sero-antibody conversion rate (RR=37.883, 95%CI 8.086 to 177.491, P<0.001) and infection prevention rate (RR=1.011, 95%CI 1.006 to 1.017, P<0.001) of the vaccine group were higher than those of the placebo group. The incidence of adverse reactions in the vaccine group was higher than that in the placebo group (OR=1.839, 95%CI 1.165 to 2.903, P=0.009), which mainly included pain, redness, swelling, fever, headache and itching (P<0.05). However, the incidence of serious adverse reactions was not significantly different from that of the placebo group. Conclusion The current evidence shows that the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines is high. The most prevalent adverse reactions are mild and moderate, and severe adverse reactions are the same as those of the placebo group. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
Backgroud Chronic hepatitis is the major infectious disease of liver. There is no effective drug for it up to now. Clinical trials have showed that glycyrrhizin have potentional effective for chronic hepatitis. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and economics of glycyrrhizin for chronic hepatitis B and C. Search strategy The search terms include glycyrrhizin and its products’ name, chronic hepatitis and chronic carrier status. The thais registers of the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field, and the central database of The Cochrane Library as well as MEDLINE, EMBASE and Chinese Biomedical CD Database were searched from their date of inception onward. And the free Internet search was operated to find ongoing and unpublished researches. Twenty Chinese medical journals and relevant academic conference proceedings have been searched by manual method. The reference lists of identified documents were checked as the complementary search. Inclusion criteria All randomized trials that tested glycryyhizin for chronic hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infection were included in this review. Method of the review According to the principle of Cochrane systematic review, selection of thai for inclusion, assessment of methodological quality, data extraction and data syntheses were conducted by two reviewers.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone in the treatment of viral myocarditis.MethodsThe Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Biosis Preview, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang Data, VIP, and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on dexamethasone for patients with viral myocarditis from inception to April 30th, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software.ResultsA total of 7 RCTs involving 749 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the dexamethasone treatment group exhibited an increased efficacy rate (RR=1.26, 95%CI 1.18 to 1.34, P<0.000 01), decreased levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) (MD=?11.49, 95%CI ?19.25 to ?3.72, P=0.004), cardiac troponin I (cTnI) (MD=?26.14, 95%CI ?40.82 to ?11.47, P=0.0005), and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) (MD=?20.06, 95%CI ?28.35 to ?11.77, P<0.000 01), and a decreased adverse event rate (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.65, P=0.000 3).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that dexamethasone can significantly improve the efficacy rate, reduce the levels of CRP, cTnI, and CK-MB, and reduce the incidence of adverse events in patients with viral myocarditis. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo compare the safety and efficacy of powered anastomosis versus mechanical anastomosis in gastrointestinal surgery. MethodsComputerized searches were conducted in PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, and CBM databases to collect studies comparing the safety and efficacy of powered versus mechanical anastomosis in gastrointestinal surgery. The search period was from the inception of each database to March 2025. Literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, data were extracted, and the risk of bias was assessed. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis was performed using the Metan package in Stata/MP 17.0 software. ResultsA total of 15 observational studies (13 retrospective and 2 prospective) involving 21,424 patients were finally included, with 9 823 patients in the experimental group (powered anastomosis) and 11 601 patients in the control group (mechanical anastomosis). The NOS scores of all included studies were ≥5 points. Meta-analysis results showed that, compared to the mechanical anastomosis group, the powered anastomosis group had significantly lower incidence rates of anastomotic leakage [RR=0.60, 95%CI (0.37, 0.96), P=0.031], postoperative complications [RR=0.68, 95%CI (0.53, 0.86), P<0.01], intraoperative bleeding rate [RR=0.29, 95%CI (0.15, 0.56), P<0.01], and 30-day readmission rate [RR=0.62, 95%CI (0.39, 0.97), P<0.05]. No statistically significant differences were found in anastomotic stenosis [RR=0.53, 95%CI (0.18, 1.57), P=0.25], intraoperative blood loss [SMD=?0.03, 95%CI (?0.15, 0.08), P=0.57], operation time [SMD=?0.00, 95%CI (?0.08, 0.07), P=0.90], or postoperative hospital stay [SMD=?0.05, 95%CI (?0.13, 0.02), P=0.15]. ConclusionIn gastrointestinal surgery, powered anastomosis may offer potential advantages over traditional mechanical anastomosis in improving the aforementioned safety and efficacy outcomes.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of autologous mononuclear cells transplantation in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.MethodsPubMed, EMbase and The Cochrane Library were electronically searched to collect randomized and non-randomized controlled trials on autologous mononuclear cells transplantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head from inception to July 31th, 2020. Two reviewers independently screened literatures, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software.ResultsA total of 17 studies involving 645 hips in mononuclear cells group and 557 hips in cell-free group were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared with cell-free therapy, mononuclear cells therapy could improve hip function in term of Hairrs score (MD=8.11, 95%CI 4.36 to 11.87, P<0.000 1), Merle D`Aubigné Postel score (MD=2.23, 95%CI 0.97 to 3.49, P=0.000 5), WOMAC score (MD=?10.81, 95%CI ?15.80 to ?5.81, P<0.000 1), Lequesne index (MD=?2.97, 95%CI ?5.42 to ?0.52, P=0.02) and alleviate the pain (MD=?9.13, 95%CI ?12.40 to ?5.86, P<0.000 01), delay the progression of radiological staging (RR=0.55, 95%CI 0.34 to 0.89, P=0.01) and reduce the rate of total hip arthroplasty (RR=0.61, 95%CI 0.43 to 0.86, P=0.005). In terms of safety, mononuclear cell therapy did not increase the rate of complications (RR=0.77, 95%CI 0.33 to 1.83, P=0.56).ConclusionsThe current evidence shows that autologous mononuclear cells therapy is a safe and effective way for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
【摘要】 目的 采用循證醫學的方法評價硫唑嘌呤（aiathioprine，AZA）治療潰瘍性結腸炎（ulcerative colitis，UC）的有效性和安全性。 方法 計算機檢索PubMed、Cochrane library、Embase、CNKI、維普和CBM數據庫收集國內外關于AZA診療UC的隨機對照試驗（ramdomized controllel trial，RCT）。按Cochrane系統評價的方法評價納入研究質量，并進行Meta分析。 結果 共納入5個RCT，共262例UC患者。Meta分析結果顯示，AZA治療UC在緩解率方面與安慰劑比較，差異無統計學意義[P=1.19，95%CI（0.94，1.49），P=0.14]；在復發率方面，兩者比較差異有統計學意義[P=0.72，95%CI（0.54，0.95），P=0.02]；全部不良反應方面和嚴重不良反應方面，兩者比較差異無統計學意義，Meta分析結果分別為[P=2.52，95%CI（0.82，7.74），P=0.11]和[P=4.03，95%CI（0.88，18.53），P=0.07]。 結論 系統評價結果為AZA在療效方面優于安慰劑，在不良反應發生率方面差異無統計學意義。但由于納入的5個研究中沒有高質量的RCT，且有1個可能產生高度偏倚，使得這一結論受到影響，有必要開展更多設計嚴謹，大樣本、多中心的RCT。【Abstract】 Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of azathio-prine in the treatment of ulcerative colitis through an evidence-based method. Methods We searched the literature from databases like PubMed, Cochrane library, CNKI, VIP, and CBM, and evaluated the quality of studies according to Cochrane systematic review. Finally, Meta-analysis was performed. Results Five randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included in this study with a total of 262 patients. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the rate of remission between azathio-prine and placebo in treating ulcerative colitis [P=1.19, 95%CI (0.94, 1.49),P=0.14]. There was significant difference in the relapse rate between the two treating methods [P=0.72, 95%CI (0.54, 0.95),P=0.02]. In addition, there was no statistical difference in all adverse effects [P=2.52, 95%CI (0.82, 7.74),P=0.11] and serious adverse effects [P=4.03, 95%CI (0.88, 18.53),P=0.07] between the two treating methods. Conclusion In the treatment of ulcerative colitis, azathio-prine has a significant advantage in efficacy than placebo, but there is no significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the two groups. However, none of the 5 RCT included in this review has a high quality and one of them even probably has a high bias, which has a big influence on our conclusion. Consequently, multi-center large-scale randomized controlled trials of higher quality are needed to make confirmation.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the long-term efficacy of biologics for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the long-term efficacy of approved biologics for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis from inception to May 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies; then, the network meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 26 RCTs were included. The results of network meta-analysis showed that among 11 biologics, the most effective biologics were risankizumab, followed by bimekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, and ixekizumab, and followed by secukinumab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and etanercept was the last. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that risankizumab is likely to be the best option for long-term treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.