【摘要】 目的 探討絕經期促性腺激素及氯米芬在促排卵治療中適宜的治療方法。 方法 2004年8月〖CD3/5〗2008年5月對80例不孕患者實施促排卵治療。測定血雌激素、黃體生成素水平、陰道B型超聲、子宮頸黏液評分及基礎體溫測定監測排卵,并觀察不良反應的發生情況。 結果 使用氯米芬及絕經期促性腺激素排卵率分別為773%和856%；卵巢過度刺激綜合癥發生率為150%,大多由使用絕經期促性腺激素方案引起,且起始劑量150 U；未破裂卵泡黃素化綜合征的發生率為90%。 結論 絕經期促性腺激素和氯米芬治療排卵障礙性不孕有較好的療效,絕經期促性腺激素和氯米芬促排卵治療效果與卵巢的狀態及激素水平有關。促性腺激素的使用應強調個體化,以達到較好的治療效果并降低卵巢過度刺激綜合癥的發生。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the proper method with human menopausal gonadotropin and clomiphene in facilitating ovulation treatment. Methods Eighty infertility patients with the facilitating ovulation treatment were included from August 2004 to May 2008. Ovulation monitoring was based on the level of estrogen and luteinizing hormone, transvaginal B ultrasound, the cervical Inlser score and assay of basal body temperature. Besides, adverse reactions were observed. Results The rates of ovulation of clomiphene and human menopausal gonadotropin were 77.3% and 85.6%. The rate of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), which was mostly caused by human menopausal gonadotropin with 150 IU, was 150%. The rate of luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome (LUFS) was 90%. Conclusion Individual therapy with human menopausal gonadotropin and clomiphene is essential to infertility patients with ovulation barrier. The efficacy of human menopausal gonadotropin and clomiphene is relevant to the ovarian condition and the hormone levels. Individual using of hormone is important in the facilitating ovulation treatment, which is helpful to increase the effective efficacy and prevent the OHSS.
目的 探討3種不同助孕方案在≥40歲婦女體外受精-胚胎移植（IVF-ET）周期中的臨床效果。 方法 回顧性分析2010年8月－2012年2月期間，于四川大學華西第二醫院生殖中心行IVF-ET助孕、年齡≥40歲婦女共245個周期的臨床資料，排除一側卵巢缺如患者3例，余242個周期根據助孕方案不同分為3組：拮抗劑組（GnRH-A方案組）44個周期、長方案組109個周期及短方案組89個周期，比較3種方式助孕的臨床效果。 結果 3組均無早發黃體生成素峰；長方案組應用促性腺激素（Gn）的時間最長，應用Gn數量最多，獲得最高的獲卵數及獲胚數（P＜0.05）；3組的受精率、優胚率、冷凍胚胎數、周期取消率、卵巢過度刺激綜合征發生率、早期流產率均無統計學意義（P＞0.05），短方案組的種植率及臨床妊娠率最低（P＜0.05）。 結論 GnRH-a長方案在≥40歲婦女的IVF-ET周期中具有較好的臨床結局，在≥40歲婦女IVF-ET周期中具有與長方案相似的結局，并且可以減少Gn使用量，提高卵泡及胚胎質量，短方案組對≥40歲婦女臨床效果較差。
ObjectivesTo evaluate and compare the clinical impact of different methods of trigger in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) with high ovarian response undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles.MethodsA total of 323 PCOS patients with high ovarian response in an gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in our reproductive medical center from January 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2017 were included. Then they were divided into two groups based on the different trigger modes: Group A: gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) with low dose human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG); Group B: HCG as trigger. Analysis and comparison of the general data of the two groups of patients, ovulation induction cycle treatment, embryo laboratory indicators and resuscitation cycle treatment outcome were performed retrospectively.ResultsThere were no significant differences in baseline such as ages, BMI, startup dose of Gn, the total dosage of drugs, promote ovulation days and so on (P>0.05). The serum E2 level on trigger day in group A was significantly higher than those in group B (7 256.94±2 031.92 vs. 6 200.26±1 001.44, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the retrieved oocytes (23.90±7.99 vs. 23.81±7.15), binuclear fertilization rate (58.19% vs. 56.30%), and the number of frozen embryos (12.81±5.45 vs. 11.07±5.36) between two groups (P>0.05). There were also no significant differences between two groups in the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS (5.98% vs. 7.87%), clinical pregnancy rate (59.28% vs. 57.53%), implantation rate (41.05% vs. 38.24%), miscarriage rate (9.28% vs. 8.22%) and live birth rate (47.42% vs. 41.10%) during the frozen-thawed cycles (P>0.05).ConclusionsFor high responders of PCOS patients with GnRH antagonist protocol, using GnRH-a with low dose HCG as trigger maybe could decrease the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS. Embryo resuscitation and transfer cycle can also obtain ideal outcome.
Objective To summarize the progress of effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on protecting ovarian function of young breast cancer patients who received chemotherapy, and to provide reference for clinical work. Methods Through searching of PubMed, CNKI, WanFang database, and other databases, we mainly collected relevant literatures in nearly five years, which concerning the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on protecting the ovarian function of young breast cancer patients who received chemotherapy. Results Young breast cancer patients faced with problems about long-term survival, quality of life, social psychological pressure, and other related problems. Chemotherapy caused irreversible damage to the ovarian function. Chemotherapy combind with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist could prevent premature ovarian failure and improve patients’ quality of life. Conclusions Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combines with chemotherapy can protect the ovarian function of young breast cancer patients, and reduce premature ovarian failure and retain reproductive function with no serious adverse effect. In addition, it shall not affect the curative effect of chemotherapy itself, but this conclusion still needs further randomized controlled clinical trial to confirm.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of different pituitary down regulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment. MethodsThe clinical data of 358 IVF cycles in women at 40 years old or younger from November 2012 to January 2013 in the West China Second University Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. All the 358 cycles were divided into two groups, according to whether the leading follicle diameter was <14 mm (group A, 158 cycles) or ≥14 mm (group B, 200 cycles) after discontinuing the GnRH-a. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. ResultsCompared with group B, the amount of gonadotropins used was significantly more, and the time of gonadotropin use was also significantly longer in group A (P<0.05). However, the serum level of estradiol (E2), progesterone (P) and Luteinizing hormone (LH), incidence of premature P rise, retrieved ovum number, the rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth did not significantly differ between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionDiscontinuing the use of GnRH-a in early stage of controlled ovarian stimulation can keep effective pituitary down regulation and it has the same optimal clinical outcomes in patients undergoing IVF-ET.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of 3-month sustained releasing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) (GnRHa 3M) and 1-month sustained releasing GnRHa (GnRHa 1M) in the treatment of pre-menopausal females with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Methods Databases including CNKI, WanFang Data, PubMed, EMbase and Web of Science were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials(RCTs) of GnRHa in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer from inception to May 18th, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The gemtc software package in R 3.6.1 software and Stata 15.0 software were used for network meta-analysis. Results A total of 11 RCTs including 7 484 patients were included. The network meta-analysis results showed that there was no significant difference between GnRHa 3M and GnRHa 1M in E2 level (MD=?1.3, 95%CI ?13 to 9.6), DFS (HR=1.2, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.7) and OS (HR=2.0, 95%CI 0.75 to 4.9). For safety, there was no significant difference between the two groups (RR=1.0, 95%CI 0.25 to 4.2). Conclusion Current evidence shows that the efficacy and safety of GnRHa 3M is similar to that of GnRHa 1M. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo research on the clinical efficacy of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) pump in the treatment of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) by using micropulse pump subcutaneous pump Gonadorelin to treat patients with HH. MethodsThrough the report of one case of GnRH pump treatment patient and related literature review, we studied the effect of GnRH pump therapy and the traditional treatment on HH patients' sex hormone level, secondary sexual characteristics, spermatogenesis and pregnancy rate. ResultsThrough treatment, GnRH pump effectively improved the patient's sex hormone level, secondary sexual characteristics development and sperm production ability, and eventually the patient attained the goal of fertility. The patient had a change in his voice tone; Beard and armpit hair grew out; The patient had a good mood with sexual drive; luteotropic hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone became normal. The patient's sperm density was 20×109/L, and the average sperm motility was higher than 30%. ConclusionPulse pump GnRH conforms to the physiological rhythm of GnRH secretion with a good clinical efficacy and tolerance. So we recommend GnRH pump as the preferential choice for treatment of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.