Objective Exploring the correlation between intravesical pressure (IP) and diaphragm excursion (DE) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and evaluating its predictive value for weaning outcomes. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 144 SAP patients with ARDS admitted between 2020 and 2023. By collecting the outcome of weaning, collect data on gender, age, acute physiology and chronic health score II (APACHE II), oxygenation index, and IP and DE before weaning and extubation for all patients. Based on weaning outcomes, divide patients into successful and failed groups, and compare the differences in various indicators between the two groups; Use binary logistic regression to analyze whether IP and DE are risk factors affecting weaning in SAP patients with ARDS, and use Pearson correlation analysis to examine the correlation between IP and DE; Use receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) to analyze the predictive value of IP and DE on weaning outcomes in SAP patients with ARDS. ResultsA total of 144 SAP patients with ARDS were included, of which 108 were successfully weaned and 36 were unsuccessful. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, and APACHE II scores between the successful and failed groups (males: 62.96% (68/108) compared to 69.44% (25/36), age (years): 41.91 ± 8.14 compared to 42.42 ± 6.22, APACHE II score (points): 18.28 ± 2.22 compared to 18.97 ± 1.83, P>0.05). The IP of the successful group was significantly lower than that of the failed group, and the DE was significantly higher than that of the failed group [IP (mmHg): 18.45 ± 3.76 compared to 23.92 ± 5.65, DE (mm): 16.18 ± 4.23 compared to 12.28 ± 4.44, all P<0.05]. All patients showed a significant negative correlation between IP and DE (r=–0.457, P<0.001). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of IP predicting the withdrawal outcome of SAP patients with ARDS was 0.805, with a 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of 0.724-0.885 and P<0.001. When the cutoff value was 19.5 mmHg, the sensitivity was 91.57% and the specificity was 47.54%; The AUC for predicting the withdrawal outcome of SAP patients with ARDS by DE was 0.738, with a 95%CI of 0.641-0.834 and P<0.001. When the cutoff value was 11.5 points, the sensitivity was 84.82% and the specificity was 59.38%. Conclusions There is a significant negative correlation between IP and DE in SAP combined with ARDS patients, and both have certain predictive value for weaning outcomes.
To evaluate the development prevention and treatment of pneumonic injury after operation on aged patients with abdominal infection. We analyzed 77 aged patients (＞60 y) admitted from Jan. 1991 to Dec. 1992: 38 cases of which with abdominal infection (infection group), 39 cases without abdominal infection (non-infection group). All patients were given oxygen therapy and continuous SaO2 monitoring. Results: There were 28 patients with hypoxemia (SaO2＜95%) in infection group, with an occurrence rate of 73.7%. In non-infection group (12 patients), the rate of hyoxemia was 30.8%, which has significant difference between two groups (Ｐ＜0.001). All patients with hypoxemia were given oxygen therapy and 31 patients′ SaO2 was elevated. The efficient rate was 77.5%. Other 9 patients developed ARDS, the rate was 2.5% (9/40). In the infection group 8 patients developed ARDS with an occurrence rate of 21.1%. There was one patient with ARDS in the non-infection group, the rate was 2.6%. There was significant difference between two group (Ｐ＜0.05). Conclusions: The results suggest that hypoxemia is liable to occur in aged patients with abdominal infection after operation and these patients were liable to develop ARDS. Oxygen therapy and SaO2 monitoring is the important managements to these patients in prevention of pneumonic injury.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) induced by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods Sixty-eight patients with ARDS induced by COVID-19 in Wuhan Concorde Red Cross Hospital form January 25, 2020 to March 10, 2020 were included in the study. They were divided into an HFNC group (n=36) and an NIV group (n=36) according to the treatment. All patients received basic routine treatment, antiviral treatment and prevention therapy of secondary infection. The HFNC group received high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy, and the NIV group received NIV therapy. Then respiration and circulation parameters, comfort and tolerance, complications were compared between the two groups. Results After treatment for 3 days, 1 week, and 2 weeks in all patients with COVID-19 induced ARDS, respiratory rate (RR) was lower than that before therapy, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), PaO2/FiO2 were higher than those before therapy (P<0.05), and therapeutic effect was time-dependent. But there was no significant difference of RR, PaO2, SpO2, PaO2/FiO2 between the HFNC group and the NIV group at different time points (P>0.05). After treatment for 2 weeks, the HFNC group patients' comfort, difficulty breathing, tolerance score were lower than the NIV group (P<0.05, P<0.01), the incidence rate of gastric distension and dry mouth etc. was lower than that in the NIV group (11.11% vs. 37.50%, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in rate of invasive mechanical ventilation or mortality between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions HFNC and NIV can improve respiratory and circulatory parameters of patients with COVID-19 induced ARDS. HFNC has better comfort and tolerance, and can reduce related complications.
With the growth of offshore activities, the incidence rates of seawater drowning (SWD) induced acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) increase significantly higher than before. Pulmonary interstitial edema, alveolar septum fracture, red blood cells, and inflammatory cells infiltration can be seen under light microscope in the pathologic changes of lungs. The major clinical manifestations are continual hyoxemia and acidosis, which lead to a severe condition, a high death rate, and a poor treatment effect. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells are capable of self-renewal, multilineage differentiation and injured lung-homing, which are induced to differentiate into alveolar epithelial cells and pulmonary vascular endothelial cells for tissues repairing. This may be a new way to treat SWD-ALI and SW-ARDS.
Objective To Assess the efficacy of using lung ultrasound to guide alveolar recruitment maneuver in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods Sixty patients with ARDS were randomly divided into two groups, ie, maximal oxygenation group (n=30) and lung ultrasound group (n=30). All the patients had artificial airway and needed mechanical ventilation. The patients in the two groups accepted recruitment maneuver guided by maximal oxygenation or lung ultrasound respectively. During the course of recruitment maneuver, the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), central venous pressure (CVP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), and extravascular lung water index (EVLWI) were recorded and compared between both groups. Results The PaO2 in lung ultrasound group was higher than that in maximal oxygenation group (P=0.04). The PEEP was higher in lung ultrasound group but without significant difference (P=0.910). There was no significant difference of the other outcomes (CVP, MAP, CO, EVLWI) between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion Lung ultrasound is an effective means that has good repeatability and security for guiding recruitment maneuver in patients with ARDS.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a serious threat to human life and health disease, with acute onset and high mortality. The current diagnosis of the disease depends on blood gas analysis results, while calculating the oxygenation index. However, blood gas analysis is an invasive operation, and can’t continuously monitor the development of the disease. In response to the above problems, in this study, we proposed a new algorithm for identifying the severity of ARDS disease. Based on a variety of non-invasive physiological parameters of patients, combined with feature selection techniques, this paper sorts the importance of various physiological parameters. The cross-validation technique was used to evaluate the identification performance. The classification results of four supervised learning algorithms using neural network, logistic regression, AdaBoost and Bagging were compared under different feature subsets. The optimal feature subset and classification algorithm are comprehensively selected by the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under curve (AUC) of different algorithms under different feature subsets. We use four supervised learning algorithms to distinguish the severity of ARDS (P/F ≤ 300). The performance of the algorithm is evaluated according to AUC. When AdaBoost uses 20 features, AUC = 0.832 1, the accuracy is 74.82%, and the optimal AUC is obtained. The performance of the algorithm is evaluated according to the number of features. When using 2 features, Bagging has AUC = 0.819 4 and the accuracy is 73.01%. Compared with traditional methods, this method has the advantage of continuously monitoring the development of patients with ARDS and providing medical staff with auxiliary diagnosis suggestions.
Objective To evaluate the efficiency and associated factors of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation( NPPV) in the treatment of acute lung injury( ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome( ARDS) .Methods Twenty-eight patients who fulfilled the criteria for ALI/ARDS were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized to receive either noninvasive positive pressure ventilation( NPPV group) or oxygen therapy through a Venturi mask( control group) . All patients were closely observed and evaluated during observation period in order to determine if the patients meet the preset intubation criteria and the associated risk factors. Results The success rate in avoiding intubation in the NPPV group was 66. 7%( 10/15) , which was significantly lower than that in the control group ( 33. 3% vs. 86. 4% , P = 0. 009) . However, there was no significant difference in the mortality between two groups( 7. 7% vs.27. 3% , P =0. 300) . The incidence rates of pulmonary bacteria infection and multiple organ damage were significantly lower in the NPPV success subgroup as compared with the NPPV failure group( 2 /10 vs. 4/5, P =0. 01;1 /10 vs. 3/5, P = 0. 03) . Correlation analysis showed that failure of NPPV was significantly associated with pulmonary bacterial infection and multiple organ damage( r=0. 58, P lt;0. 05; r =0. 53, P lt;0. 05) . Logistic stepwise regression analysis showed that pulmonary bacterial infection was an independent risk factor associated with failure of NPPV( r2 =0. 33, P =0. 024) . In the success subgroup, respiratory rate significantly decreased( 29 ±4 breaths /min vs. 33 ±5 breaths /min, P lt; 0. 05) and PaO2 /FiO2 significantly increased ( 191 ±63 mmHg vs. 147 ±55 mmHg, P lt;0. 05) at the time of 24 hours after NPPV treatment as compared with baseline. There were no significant change after NPPV treatment in heart rate, APACHEⅡ score, pH and PaCO2 ( all P gt;0. 05) . On the other hand in the failure subgroup, after 24 hours NPPV treatment, respiratory rate significantly increased( 40 ±3 breaths /min vs. 33 ±3 breaths /min, P lt;0. 05) and PaO2 /FiO2 showed a tendency to decline( 98 ±16 mmHg vs. 123 ±34 mmHg, P gt; 0. 05) . Conclusions In selected patients, NPPV is an effective and safe intervention for ALI/ARDS with improvement of pulmonary oxygenation and decrease of intubation rate. The results of current study support the use of NPPV in ALI/ARDS as the firstline choice of early intervention with mechanical ventilation.