ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of post mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) on breast reconstruction after mastectomy in breast cancer patients, in order to provide evidence support for clinical treatment decision.MethodsFive databases searched in the current study include the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CNKI, VIP and WanFang database. A systematic search for control trials was performed in each database from the starting date of each database to March 1, 2021. After the two evaluators independently selected literatures, extracted data and conducted quality evaluation according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the meta analysis was carried out by Revman 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 9 cohort studies (3 447 cases) were included, including 699 cases in PMRT group and2 748 cases in non-radiotherapy group. The results of meta-analysis showed that: PMRT was associated with significant increase in capsular contracture. The incidence of capsular contracture increased from 4.34% in the non-radiotherapy group to 34.10% in patients receiving PMRT [OR=9.25, 95%CI (3.76, 22.78), P<0.000 01]. In addition, PMRT was associated with a significant increase in incidences of reconstructive failure [OR=2.55, 95%CI (1.74, 3.74), P<0.000 01] and revisional surgery [OR=2.24, 95%CI (1.58, 3.18), P<0.000 01]. Moreover it was associated with a significant reduction in patient satisfaction [OR=0.29, 95%CI (0.15, 0.57), P=0.000 30] and cosmetic outcome [OR=0.26, 95%CI (0.15, 0.43), P<0.000 01].ConclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrates that breast cancer patients who received PMRT after breast reconstruction, the rate of adverse events is increased and patients’ satisfaction and cosmetic outcome are decreased.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of immediate breast reconstruction with silicone prosthesis for breast tumor. Methods The clinical data of the 42 patients with breast tumor who had undergone breast reconstruction with silicone prosthesis from January 2012 to June 2017 were collected retrospectively. The postoperative complications and cosmetic results were analyzed. Results All patients underwent operation successfully. The surgical time was 230–435 min (mean of 325 min), the intraoperative blood loss was 100–160 mL (mean of 130 mL), and the hospitalization time was 18–33 d (mean of 24 d). The cosmetic results was excellent in 26 patients, good in 8 patients, bad in 8 patients, and fine rate was 81.0% (34/42). Rate of patients’ overall satisfaction with breast reconstruction was 73.8% (31/42) and rate of aesthetic satisfaction was 78.6% (33/42). After operation, seroma occurred in 2 patients, and the ischemic necrosis in nipple and areola occurred in 3 patients. All the patients were followed-up for 4–70 months, and the median follow-up time was 37 months. During the follow-up period, no patient had metastasis or recurrence. Six patients received radiotherapy, among them 2 patients appeared Ⅱ-grade capsular contracture. Conclusion The breast reconstruction with silicone prosthesis is a simple, easy, and effective surgical procedure.
Objective To summarize types of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction and present situation. Method The relevant literatures about post-mastectomy breast reconstruction in recent years were reviewed. Results With the increasing incidence of the breast cancer and the progressing of the treatment methods, it has become a trend for the post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. If the patient’s condition is allowed, the post-mastectomy breast reconstruction can be performed. At present, the post-mastectomy breast reconstruction mainly include the implant based reconstruction, autologous tissue reconstruction, autologous fat transplantation, etc.. There are different options for the breast reconstruction according the indicators and it had the corresponding complications. So the selection of reconstruction technique depend on the individual requirements, determining by the patient choice, advice of the reconstructive surgeon, and anticipated post-mastectomy therapy, particularly the needs for the radiotherapy and chemotherapy, etc.. Conclusions Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is common abroad, corresponding research has been carried out in our country, experiences in learning are shairing. With deepening of domestic and foreign exchanges and progressing of technology, it is believed that post-mastectomy breast reconstruction might become one of conventional reconstruction options in future.
Objective To explore the interaction of postmastectomy radiotherapy （PMRT） and breast reconstruction， and elucidate how to choose the type and timing of breast reconstruction. Method Literatures about PMRT and breast reconstruction were reviewed. Results PMRT might increase the incidence of complications and impair the cosmetic satisfaction of breast reconstruction. Breast reconstruction might also compromise the effect of PMRT. Conclusions In patients who will receive or have already received PMRT， the optimal approach is delayed autologous tissue reconstruction after PMRT. If PMRT appears likely but may not be required at the time of mastectomy，delayed-immediate reconstruction may be considered， or immediate autologous tissue reconstruction may be considered in case of patients awareness of the increased complications and impaired cosmetic outcomes from PMRT.
ObjectiveTo understand the application of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant-based breast reconstruction. MethodLiteratures on application of ADM in the implant-based breast reconstruction were reviewed. ResultsADM was widely used in the implant-based breast reconstruction and revisionary breast surgery. ADM could help to achieve a better reconstruction outcome by precisely locating the inferior mammary fold and strengthening the local control of the implant. However, whether ADM might increase the postoperative complications was controversial. ConclusionADM assisted implant-based breast reconstruction could achieve a better cosmetic outcome, but the large sample randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate the application effect and risk of ADM.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility, oncological safety, and aesthetic result of skin-spring mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-spring mastectomy (NSM) in breast reconstruction of implant (permanent gel or expander) for breast cancer patients who were not fit for the breast conserving surgery (BCS). Methods Between October 2005 and July 2011, 89 women with breast caner underwent SSM or NSM, with an average age of 42.4 years (range, 19-55 years) and an average disease duration of 5.7 months (range, 1-24 months). The pathological examination revealed invasive ductal carcinoma in 55 cases, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 15 cases, invasive ductal carcinoma + DCIS in 8 cases, DCIS with infiltration in 10 cases, and occult breast cancer in 1 case. According to tumor staging criterion of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), 15 cases were rated as stage 0, 51 cases as stage I, 22 cases as stage II, and 1 case as unclear. Finally, 33 patients underwent SSM and 56 patients underwent NSM according to the location and diameter of tumor and the infiltration of tumor to nipple. Secondary breast reconstruction was performed with permanent gel replacement after axillary lymph node dissection in 9 patients with positive sentinel lymph node and 1 patient with occult breast cancer; immediate breast reconstruction was performed with permanent gel in the other patients. All the patients received the chemotherapy or/and radiotherapy according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline. Results Complications occurred in 5 patients undergoing breast reconstruction of permanent gel after NSM, including 1 case of haemorrhage, 2 cases of infection, and 2 cases of local skin necrosis. Primary healing of incision was obtained in the others. No nipple necrosis was observed in patients undergoing NSM. All the patients were followed up 14-88 months (median, 40 months). At 10 months after operation, the aesthetic results were excellent in 40 cases, good in 33 cases, fair in 14 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 82%. No recurrence or metastasis was found during follow-up. Conclusion The SSM or NSM is feasible and oncological safe for patients who are not fit for BCS, with satisfactory aesthetic result.
ObjectiveTo explore the method of preventing heat steam induced skin damage in robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (R-NSM-IBR) using Da Vinci Robots. Methods A clinical data of 128 female patients with breast cancer, who were treated with R-NSM-IBR between September 2022 and December 2023 and met the selection criteria, was retrospectively analyzed. During robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy, the breasts were covered with gauze cooled by ice water to reduce skin temperature in 99 cases (group A) and were not treated in 29 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in the age, affected side, body mass index, pathological type of breast cancer, and constituent ratios of adjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy between the two groups (P>0.05). Intraoperative breast skin temperature, unilateral robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy time, and the incidence of complications of breast heat steam induced skin damage were recorded. Results The time for unilateral robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy was (77.18±9.23) minutes in group A and (76.38±12.88) minutes in group B, with significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). The intraoperative breast skin temperature was significantly lower in group A than in group B [(25.61±0.91)℃ vs (33.38±1.14)℃; P<0.05]. Seven cases of heat steam skin damage occurred during operation, including 2 cases (2.0%) in group A and 5 cases (17.2%) in group B, with a significant difference in incidence between the two groups (P<0.05). Among them, 1 patient in group B had a vesication rupture and infection, which eventually led to the removal of the implant; the rest of the patients were treated with postoperative interventions for skin recovery. Conclusion The use of breast covered with gauze cooled by ice water during R-NSM-IBR can effectively reduce the risk of heat steam induced skin damage.