In order to protect the integrity and function of the digestive system, duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection is becoming the surgical method which was chosen by more and more doctors for benign lesions or low-grade malignant tumors of the pancreatic head. With the development of minimally invasive concepts and techniques, laparoscopic technology has brought unique advantages to this surgery. In this paper, a series of problems such as the development process and indications of laparoscopic duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection were discussed, and the core techniques of surgery and how to reduce the occurrence of complications were emphasized. The aim is to improve the therapeutic effect and quality of life of patients through reasonable surgical methods and treatment strategies.
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an effective and lasting method for treating obesity, type 2 diabetes and other obesity related metabolic diseases. The symmetrical three-port LSG has been proven to be a simple, safe, and effective surgical procedure. However, China still lacks standardized surgical operation guidelines for this method. This guideline provides a detailed description of the various steps and key details of the symmetrical three-port LSG, aiming to standardize and normalize the symmetrical three-port LSG in the bariatric and metabolic field in China, and to provide standardized surgical procedures for clinical surgeons in this field.
ObjectiveTo explore the diagnostic value of “Four-Step Procedure” of laparoscopic exploration in patients with peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the data of 409 gastric adenocarcinoma patients from July 2016 to August 2020 who underwent “Four-Step Procedure” of laparoscopic exploration in West China Hospital. The descriptive case series study was conducted to analyze the outcome of laparoscopic exploration combined with CY (cytology test), stepwise treatment plans, and the rates of CY1 and P1 (peritoneal metastasis) among cT3–4 patients during different periods. SPSS 22.0 software was used to conduct the univariate and multivariate logistic regression to analyze the high risk factors associated with P1 and (or) CY1.ResultsA total of 409 gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent laparoscopic exploration were enrolled in our study. Among them, 65 patients were confirmed to be P1 and (or) CY1. Stratified analysis by cT and cN staging showed that there were 7 (7.4%) and 55 (27.9%) patients with peritoneal metastasis in cT3 staging and cT4 staging, respectively. After laparoscopic exploration, 168 patients received laparoscopic gastrectomy, 35 patients received laparotomy, 143 patients received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and 63 patients received conversion therapy. The bar chart showed an ascending tendency in the diagnosis rate of P1 over time among cT3–4 patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ascites was an independent risk factor of CY1 and (or) P1 (P<0.001). Additionally, the postoperative complication rate was 2.9% in the patients who merely underwent laparoscopic exploration, including 4 patients with pulmonary infection and 2 patients with urinary retention.Conclusions“Four-Step Procedure” of laparoscopic exploration is reliable and feasible for gastric cancer. “Four-Step Procedure” of laparoscopic exploration has high diagnostic value for peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer. Our study shows that most of peritoneal metastasis distribute in cT3 and cT4 patients. For these patients, laparoscopic exploration should be recommended to identify if peritoneal metastasis exists and avoid unnecessary laparotomy.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RAS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in hiatus hernia repair. MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Web of Science, VIP, and Wanfang databases were searched to collect literature comparing the efficacy and safety of RAS and CLS for hiatus hernia repair published from their inception to November 7, 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies, and RevMan 5.4.1 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 15 retrospective cohort studies with 18239 patients were finally included. The NOS scores of the included literature were all≥7 points. Meta-analysis results showed that RAS was superior to CLS in terms of postoperative complications as the primary outcome [OR=0.56, 95%CI (0.42, 0.77), P<0.01]. There was no statistical difference between the two methods in terms of average operation time [MD=?0.74, 95%CI (?12.99, 11.51), P=0.91], average intraoperative blood loss [MD=?24.47, 95%CI (?54.80, 5.87), P=0.11], intraoperative complications [OR=0.76, 95%CI (0.29, 2.01), P=0.58], average postoperative hospital stay [MD=?0.24, 95%CI (?0.75, 0.27), P=0.36], postoperative GERD score [MD=?0.04, 95%CI (?0.41, 0.33), P=0.81], and 30-day readmission rate [OR=0.60, 95%CI (0.30, 1.20), P=0.15]. The cost of CLS surgery was less than that of RAS [SMD=1.59, 95%CI (1.16, 2.01), P<0.01]. ConclusionRAS has comparable efficacy and safety to CLS in hiatus hernia repair.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcomes between laparoscopic (LAP) and open surgery for non-metastatic colon cancer of T4a stage.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical data of non-metastatic colon cancer patients of T4a stage with confirmed pathological results who underwent curative resection in Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2011 and December 2017. These patients were allocated into LAP group (n=107, underwent laparoscopic radical operation) and open group (n=52, underwent open surgery).ResultsThere were no significant difference in operating time, number of lymph nodes harvested, number of positive lymph nodes, incidence of complications within 30 days, and Clavien-Dindo grading between the LAP group and open group (P>0.05), but intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, and postoperative hospital stay in the LAP group were less than (shorter than) those of the open group (P<0.05).ConclusionLaparoscopic approach for non-metastatic colon cancer of T4a stage is safe and feasible, and it has advantages including less intraoperative blood loss, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). Methods We electronically searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2013), CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SILC versus CMLC from inception to January 1st, 2013. According to the Cochrane methods, the reviewers screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. Results Finally, 17 RCTs involving 1 233 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with CMLC, SILC was lower in 24 h postoperative pain score (visual analogue scale, VAS) (SMD= –0.40, 95%CI –0.76 to –0.04, P=0.03), higher in cosmetic results score (SMD=1.56, 95%CI 0.70 to 2.43, P=0.000 4), and longer in operative time (MD=13.11, 95%CI 7.06 to 19.16, Plt;0.000 1). However, no significant difference was found in 6 h postoperative pain scores (VAS), postoperative complications, port-site hernia and hospital stay between the two groups. Conclusion SILC is a safe and effective technique for the treatment of uncomplicated benign gallbladder diseases, and it has certain advantages compared with CMLC, which is recommended in clinical application.
ObjectiveTo study the predictability of dynamic prediction model of clinical pancreatic fistula in patients with or without pancreatic duct stent in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).MethodsA total of 66 patients who underwent LPD in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from November 2019 to October 2020 were enrolled in the randomized controlled trial (registration number: ChiCTR1900026653). The perioperative data of the patients were collected in real time. The patients were divided into groups according to whether the pancreatic duct support tube was retained during the operation, and the probability prediction value was output according to the model formula. The specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, discrimination, and stability of the prediction results were analyzed.ResultsFor the group with pancreatic stent tubes, the specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of the model at the model cut-off points on the postoperative day 2, 3 and 5 were 92.0%, 76.7% and 57.1%, 50.0%, 100% and 66.7%, and 88.8%, 78.8% and 61.3%, respectively. The areas under the ROC curve were 0.870, 0.956 and 0.702, respectively. The kappa values of the prediction result based on model cut-off point and cut-off point of ROC curve were 0.308, 0.582 and 0.744, respectively. Whereas for those who without the stent tube, the specificity, sensitivity, and prediction accuracy of the model on the postoperative day 5 were 66.7%, 100% and 72%, respectively. The area under curve at different time points were 0.304, 0.821, and 0.958, respectively. The kappa values at the last two time points were 0.465 and 0.449, respectively.ConclusionsFor patients with pancreatic duct support during LPD operation, the dynamic model of clinical pancreatic fistula can more accurately screen high-risk groups of clinical pancreatic fistula, and has better stability of prediction results. For patients without supporting tube, in the case of flexible adjustment of the boundary point, the model can also be more accurate screening on the 3rd and 5th days after operation.
ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors of perioperative severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ and above) after laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC). MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of CRC patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria treated in the Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were used to explore the risk factors of perioperative severe complications after the laparoscopic radical resection of CRC. ResultsAtotal of 170 eligible patients were included in this study, and the postoperative complications occurred in 45 patients, 24 of whom were severe complications. The univariate analysis results showed that the age (P<0.001), body mass index (BMI, P=0.047), age adjusted Charlson complication index (aCCI) score (P=0.002), American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (P<0.001), prognostic nutritional index (PNI, P=0.011), preoperative anemia (P=0.011), operation numbers of surgeon (P=0.003), and operation time (P=0.026) were related to the perioperative severe complications in the patients underwent the laparoscopic radical resection of CRC. The statistic indexes of univariate analysis (P<0.05) combined with indexes of clinical significance were included in the multivariate analysis, the results showed that the ASA classification Ⅲ– Ⅳ (OR=3.536, P=0.027), BMI ≥25 kg/m2 (OR=3.228, P=0.031), preoperative anemia (OR=2.876, P=0.049), operation numbers of surgeon <300 (OR=0.324, P=0.046), and the operation time ≥300 min (OR=3.480, P=0.020) increased the probability of perioperative severe complications in the patients underwent the laparoscopic radical resection of CRC. ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that clinicians should pay attention to the perioperative management of patients with CRC, such as adequately evaluating the preoperative status of patients by ASA classification, PNI, and aCCI to adjust the malnutrition of patients; after operation, the patients with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 and operation time more than 300 min should be paid more attention. At the same time, the surgeon should continuously accumulate the operation numbers and improve the operation proficiency so as to reduce the occurrence of perioperative severe complications after laparoscopic radical resection of CRC.
ObjectiveTo study the efficacy and safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) in the treatment of elderly patients with high risk moderate acute cholecystitis.MethodsThe clinical data of 218 elderly patients with high risk moderate acute cholecystitis admitted to Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery in Dazhou Central Hospital from January 2015 to October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 112 cases in the PTGBD combined with early LC sequential treatment group (sequential treatment group) and 106 cases in the emergency LC group. In the sequential treatment group, PTGBD was performed first, and LC was performed 3–5 days later. The emergency LC group was treated with anti infection, antispasmodic, analgesia, and basic disease control immediately after admission, and LC was performed within 24 hours. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion to laparotomy rate, postoperative catheter retention time, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative hospitalization time, hospitalization cost, incidence of incision infection, and incidence of complications above Dindo-Clavien level 2 were compared between the two groups to evaluate their clinical efficacy and safety.ResultsAll patients in the sequential treatment group were successfully treated with PTGBD, and the symptoms were significantly relieved within 72 hours. There were significant differences in the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, conversion to laparotomy rate, postoperative tube retention time, postoperative anal exhaust time, postoperative hospitalization time, incidence of incision infection, and the incidence of complications above Dindo-Clavien level 2 between the two groups (P<0.05), which were all better in the sequential treatment group, but the hospitalization cost of the sequential treatment group was higher than that of the emergency LC group (P<0.05). There were no cases of secondary operation and death in the 2 groups. After symptomatic treatment, the symptoms of all patients were relieved, without severe complications such as biliary injury and obstructive jaundice. All the 218 patients were followed up for 4–61 months, with an average of 35 months. During follow-up period, 7 patients in the sequential treatment group had postoperative complications, and complications were occurred in 13 patients in the emergency LC group.ConclusionPTGBD is the first choice for elderly high risk moderate acute cholecystitis patients with poor systemic condition and high risk of emergency surgery, but it has the disadvantage of relatively high medical cost.