ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical experiences and treatment effectiveness of chronic venous insufficiency with venous ulcer in lower limb. MethodsSeventy-eight patients (88 limbs) suffering lower limb chronic venous insufficiency with venous ulcer from May 2004 to April 2011 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients had undergone high ligation for great saphenous vein plus endovenous laser treatment plus subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS). ResultsPostoperative complications included 3 cases of subfascial haematoma; 2 cases of pneumohypoderma; 3 cases of numbness in anterior tibial and ankle areas. All the ulcers healed between 4 to 6 weeks. Follow up period was between 6 months to 5 years. There was only one recurrence due to residual varicose from ankle area. The mean operation time was 20 min (15－30 min) in SEPS, the average blood loss was 2 ml (1－5 ml), and the mean duration of postoperative hospitalization was 5 d (2－8 d). ConclusionsSEPS is a first treatment choice for CVI with venous ulcer. It has less invasiveness, lower chances for bleeding, shorter operation time, quicker recovery, and fewer complications.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the therapeutic effect of subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS) in treatment of varicose of the lower limb. METHODS: From 1999. 11 to 2000. 12, 108 patients with varicose of the lower limb underwent venous surgery and 34 of them were treated by SEPS. There were 16 males and 18 females aged 20-79(averaged 51.4 years). Thirty limbs (26 cases) had open ulcers and the diameter of ulcer was 1.5-12.0 cm. Eleven limbs (8 cases) had severe pigmentation and the skin changes had been presented for 1 month to 15 years. According to the severity of illness, flush saphenofemoral ligation, great saphenous vein stripping, percutaneous continuous venous circum suture, external femoral vein valve repair and SEPS were performed separately or simultaneously. RESULTS: Active ulcers healed in 19 limbs after 1 month, in 7 limbs after 3 months, and in the other 4 ulcers after skin transplantation. There was no ulcer recurrence during follow-up (ranged 9-22 months). CONCLUSION: SEPS can accelerate the healing of venous ulcers, and it is one of important methods in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency.
Endoscopic and robotic surgeries feature small incision and reducing surgical trauma, and minimized incision scars. However, the oncological safety of their application in breast-conserving surgery and breast reconstruction for breast cancer has always been a focal clinical concern. The breast-conserving surgery and breast reconstruction using the suspension, insufflation, and lipolysis methods could achieve precise tumor resection in the selected patients and under the specific surgical conditions, with the support of appropriate instruments. Meanwhile, the innovative application of the reverse-sequence method and auxiliary port technique has further enhanced surgical efficiency and the precision of tumor resection. Current studies suggest that endoscopic and robotic-assited breast-conserving surgery and breast reconstruction yield in terms of oncological outcomes comparable to those of conventional open breast-conserving surgery, including positive margins, local recurrence, regional recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival. These approaches offered advantages in minimally invasive techniques and aesthetic outcomes. However, existing research was limited by short follow-up period and small sample sizes. Future large-scale, long-term prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate their oncological safety and long-term efficacy. These studies could help establish novel techniques as standard surgical approaches for breast cancer, particularly the efficient and streamlined reverse-sequence endoscopic and auxiliary port-assisted techniques.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of surgical intervention combined with endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN). MethodsA retrospective, historical control study was conducted. A total of 98 patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) complicated with IPN who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were admitted to the Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu from June 2016 to January 2023 were selected as the research objects. The endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage was carried out in our hospital in June 2020. In this study, patients treated before May 2020 were divided into the non-EUS group (52 cases), and patients treated after June 2020 were divided into the EUS group (46 cases). The baseline data, surgical intervention, length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, infection time, incidence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), survival situation, short-term and long-term complications, and other indicators were compared between the two groups. ResultsThe number of percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD, 1.0 vs. 1.0), the number of PCD drainage tube (1.0 vs. 2.0), the number of retroperitoneal debridement drainage (1.0 vs. 2.0), the total length of hospital stay (42.0 d vs. 45.5 d), the length of ICU stay (11.0 d vs. 14.0 d), the length of infection time (10.5 d vs. 18.5 d), the incidences of MODS [43.5% (20/46) vs. 67.3% (35/52)] and residual infection [28.3% (13/46) vs.48.1% (25/52)] in the EUS group were shorter (or lower) than those in the non-EUS group (P<0.05); but there were no significant differences in the number of endoscopic pancreatic stent implantation, the number of laparotomy, the number of laparoscopic surgery, and the incidences of abdominal bleeding, gastrointestinal fistula, gastrointestinal obstruction, chronic pancreatic fistula, chronic pancreatitis and incisional hernia between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor patients with AP complicated with IPN, surgical intervention combined with endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage can reduce the number of PCD and drainage tube, shorten the total length of hospital stay, the length of ICU stay and infection, as well as reduce the incidences of MODS and residual infection.
Endoscopic bariatric treatment (EBT) is an effective method for the treatment of obesity. The principle of weight loss is similar to metabolic bariatric surgery. It can be classified as a food restriction (stomach-targeted) and malabsorption (small intestine-targeted). At present, a lot of EBT devices had been cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat obesity, while the EBT in China lagged behind Western countries. Hence, we reviewed the current stomach-targeted EBT, aiming to provide a reference for the supplement of obesity treatment methods and the development of EBT in China.
ObjectiveTo systematically review efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) on patients with malignant obstructive jaundice.MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data, and CNKI were searched online to collect the randomized controlled trials or cohort studies of EUS-BD versus PTBD on the patients with malignant obstructive jaundice from inception to November 30, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened the literatures, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of included the studies, then the meta-analysis was performed by using the RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsThree randomized controlled trials and 6 cohort studies involving 496 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with the PTBD, the EUS-BD had the lower occurrence of complications [OR=0.30, 95% CI (0.20, 0.47), P<0.000 01], lower rate of reintervention [OR=0.11, 95% CI (0.06, 0.22), P<0.000 01], shorter hospital stay [MD=–3.42, 95% CI (–6.72, –0.13), P=0.04], and less hospital costs [SMD=–0.83, 95% CI (–1.16, –0.49), P<0.000 01]. There were no significant differences in the technical success rate [OR=0.88, 95% CI (0.20, 3.85), P=0.86] and clinical effective rate [OR=1.73, 95% CI (0.97, 3.11), P=0.06] between the two groups.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that EUS-BD has some advantages of lower occurrence of complications, lower rate of reintervention, shorter hospital stay, and less hospital costs in treatment of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice as compared with PTBD. There are no significant differences between two groups in technical success rate and clinical effective rate. Due to limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high quality studies required to be verified above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of life (QOL) in patients with primary palmar hyperhidrosis (PPH) after endoscopic thoracic sympathicotomy (ETS) and analyze the influencing factors. MethodsA total of 243 patients (118 males and 125 females, with an average age of 21.99±6.31 years) with PPH who were successfully treated with ETS (only T3 level thoracic sympathicotomy) in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2018 were enrolled, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) was used to assess the QOL scores before and after ETS. By establishing a linear regression model of gender, age, body mass index, compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) and palm dryness, and the relationship between the changes of the QOL scores and various factors was studied. ResultsThe total QOL score after surgery was higher than that before surgery (63.01±4.58 vs. 48.11±1.95, P<0.05). Compared with the negative group of CH, the QOL score decreased by 4.662 in the postoperative CH patients. For every grade of CH severity increasing, the QOL score decreased by 3.449. Compared with the negative group, the QOL scores decreased by 1.804 and 2.400 respectively for every grade of CH severity increasing in the patients with postoperative chest and back CH. ConclusionETS can not only improve the symptoms of abnormal palmar hyperhidrosis, but also significantly improve the QOL. Severe chest and back CH is an important factor affecting the QOL of patients.
ObjectiveTo understand advances in the timing and surgical mode selection of gastrointestinal endoscopy and surgical intervention for acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP).MethodThe recent literatures on the timing and choice of gastrointestinal endoscopy and surgical treatments aimed at ABP were reviewed.ResultsFor ABP patients with early cholangitis or biliary obstruction, no matter how serious, endoscopic treatment should be used to relieve obstruction and relieve symptoms. For patients only with ABP, if non-surgical treatment was not effective and patients showed symptoms such as biliary obstruction or biliary tract infection, endoscopic intervention should be considered. Most ABP patients had milder symptoms and could undergo cholecystectomy during the same hospitalization to prevent ABP recurrence after symptoms relief. Patients with severe ABP could be treated with cholecystectomy along with pancreatic necrotic tissue removal, and surgery should be performed after the disease was controlled. If the preoperative imaging examination highly suspected that there were stones in the biliary tract, biliary exploration should be performed at the same time. Laparoscopic surgery should be selected as far as possible to facilitate the postoperative recovery of the patient.ConclusionsFor patients with ABP, whether endoscopic or surgical treatment, the timing and surgical mode selection should follow the specific clinical situation with the “individualization” principle of the treatment. We should make the reasonable and effective policy at diagnosis and treatment according to different conditions.
ObjectiveTo explain the advantage of laparoscopic endoscopic rendezvous procedures used to treat rectal carcinoma, and predict the future direction of the surgery methods for rectal carcinoma. MethodsA review and summary based on the clinical experience of our hospital and the published researches about the laparoscopic endoscopic rendezvous procedures over the past years in home and abroad were performed. ResultsLaparoscopy can monitor the situation of the abdominal cavity.Endoscopy can detect the location of rectal carcinoma.Laparoscopic endoscopic rendezvous procedures used to treat rectal carcinoma can combine the advantage of each other.And the purpose of "less invasion, less pain, and faster recovery" will be achieved.The effect of "1+1 > 2" will be realized. ConclusionLaparoscopy and transanal endoscopic microsurgery hybrid could be a naive form of nature orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery to treat rectal carcinoma.
ObjectiveThe aim of this paper is to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of non-surgical treatments of the enterocutaneous fistula, in order to give some advice.MethodsPubmed, EMBASE, Medline, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were retrieved for the published article addressing the non-surgical treatments of enterocutaneous fistula between 2004 to 2018. The keywords were " enterocutaneous fistula” in English and Chinese, respectively. The non-surgical treatments of enterocutaneous fistula were reviewed.ResultsThe results of this search suggested that non-surgical treatments of the enterocutaneous fistula mainly include fibrin glue, endoscopic treatment, laser ablation, and somatostatin. Fibrin glue was widely used at domestic and abroad, but it needed repeated operations. Endoscopic treatment of enterocutaneous fistula required a certain professional foundation; laser ablation technology was still immature and required theoretical data support. Now, the use of somatostatin was controversial.ConclusionEach of measures have its advantages and disadvantages, we should determine according to the patient’s condition and economic situation.