SUMSearch and TRIP database are meta search engines for searching clinical evidence. This article introduces major contents and search methods of the SUMSearch and TRIP database, so as to provide quick search resources and technical help for evidence-based practice.
ObjectiveTo describe the characteristics of colorectal cancer surgical procedures in the West China Colorectal Cancer Database (Database from Colorectal Cancer, DACCA).MethodWe used the form of text description.ResultsThe related content modules of DACCA operation in West China, included operative type, radical resection level, anus preservation, stoma type, the date of closure, surgical approach, expansive resection, intersphincteric resection (ISR), etc. were elaborated. The data label related method corresponding to each item in the database and the structured method required in the corresponding big data application stage were elaborated, and the error correction precautions of all classified items were described.ConclusionsIn the DACCA database, there are more detailed classification for the radical treatment of colorectal cancer. The application of expanded surgery is of great significance for both colon cancer and rectal cancer; stoma-related data has diversified data characteristics, which will provides standards and basis for clinical application of DACCA, and also provides experience reference for other colleagues who want to build colorectal cancer database.
ObjectiveTo analyze the tumor characteristics of colorectal cancer in the current version of Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA).MethodsThe DACCA version was the updated version on April 16, 2020. The data items including: procedure of anastomosis, shape of anastomosis, enhanced suture for anastomosis, stuffing, drainage, coverage of major omentum, anti-adhesion material, reconstruction of pelvic peritoneum, contaminate, and drug implants were analyzed for the characteristics of each selected data item.ResultsA total of 6 338 analyzable data rows were obtained by screening the DACCA database. Among the 6 338 pieces of data, the most common one was the double staple technique (58.1%), end-to-end anastomosis (69.4%), one-total-circle of enhancement (33.2%), and without stuffing (54.1%) in the items of procedure of anastomosis, shape of anastomosis, enhanced suture for anastomosis, stuffing, respectively; the ratio with drainage was higher (79.2%) in the term of drainage, the drainage time was (3.74±2.89) d and median drainage time was 3.00 d; the ratio with covering part of major omentum, without anti-adhesion material, with unilateral partial closure, without contaminate, and without drug implants were more higher, which was 41.1%, 79.8%, 58.7%, 73.9%, and 53.9% in the items of coverage of major omentum, anti-adhesion material, reconstruction of pelvic peritoneum, contaminate, and drug implants, respectively.ConclusionIt might better explain the outcome of surgery associated with intraoperative operation by studying the features of surgery of DACCA and guide the operation in the future for better outcomes.
ObjectiveTo understand the impact of preoperative nutritional status on the postoperative complications for patients with low/ultra-low rectal cancer undergoing extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy. MethodsThe patients with low/ultra-low rectal cancer who underwent extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy from January 2009 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected using the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA), and then who were assigned into a nutritional risk group (the score was low than 3 by the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002) and non-nutritional risk group (the score was 3 or more by the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002). The postoperative complications and survival were analyzed for the patients with or without nutritional risk. The postoperative complications were defined as early-term (complications occurring within 30 d after surgery), middle-term (complications occurring during 30–180 d after surgery), and long-term (complications occurring at 180 d and more after surgery). The survival indicators included overall survival and disease-specific survival. ResultsA total of 680 patients who met the inclusion criteria for this study were retrieved from the DACCA database. Among them, there were 500 (73.5%) patients without nutritional risk and 180 (26.5%) patients with nutritional risk. The postoperative follow-up time was 0–152 months (with average 48.9 months). Five hundreds and forty-three survived, including 471 (86.7%) patients with free-tumors survival and 72 (13.3%) patients with tumors survival. There were 137 deaths, including 122 (89.1%) patients with cancer related deaths and 15 (10.9%) patients with non-cancer related deaths. There were 48 (7.1%) cases of early-term postoperative complications, 51 (7.5%) cases of middle-term complications, and 17 (2.5%) cases of long-term complications. There were no statistical differences in the incidence of overall complications between the patients with and without nutritional risk (χ2=3.749, P=0.053; χ2=2.205, P=0.138; χ2=310, P=0.578). The specific complications at different stages after surgery (excluding the anastomotic leakage complications in the patients with nutritional risk was higher in patients without nutritional risk, P=0.034) had no statistical differences between the two groups (P>0.05). The survival curves (overall survival and disease-specific survival) using the Kaplan-Meier method had no statistical differences between the patients with and without nutritional risk (χ2=3.316, P=0.069; χ2=3.712, P=0.054). ConclusionsFrom the analysis results of this study, for the rectal cancer patients who underwent extreme sphincter-preserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy, the patients with preoperative nutritional risk are more prone to anastomotic leakage within 30 d after surgery. Although other postoperative complications and long-term survival outcomes have no statistical differences between patients with and without nutritional risk, preoperative nutritional management for them cannot be ignored.
Evidence and its quality are of the key issues in evidence-based medicine. The Cochrane Library is an electronic publication, updated quarterly every year in CD-Rom and internet format, designed to provide high quality evidence to inform people receiving care, and those responsible for treating, teaching, research and administration at all levels. This paper aims to help readers how to access its information as well.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical therapeutic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and external beam radiation (XRT) in the treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsThe early HCC patients were collected in the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database, from 2010 to 2015, according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients were assigned into an XRT group and a RFA group according to according treatment plans. The propensity score matching (PSM) was performed at a ratio of 1∶4 based on age, gender, race, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), cirrhosis, and tumor diameter. The overall survival of the patients of the two groups was compared, and the risk factors affecting the long-term prognosis for the early HCC patients were analyzed. ResultsA total of 2 861 early HCC patients were collected, including 2 513 in the RFA group and 348 in the XRT group. After PSM, a total of 1 582 patients were enrolled, including 343 in the XRT group and 1 239 in the RFA group. After PSM, the proportion of tumor with larger diameter (>5 cm) in the XRT group was still higher than that in the RFA group (P<0.001), but there were no statistically significant differences in the other clinical pathological characteristics between them (P>0.05). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the RFA group was better than that of the XRT group (HR=1.65, P<0.001); The stratified analysis based on the tumor diameter revealed that the survival curves of the RFA group were superior to those of the XRT group in the HCC patients with tumor diameters <3 cm, 3–5 cm, and >5 cm (<3 cm: HR=1.79, P<0.001; 3–5 cm: HR=1.50, P<0.001; >5 cm: HR=1.67, P=0.003). The results of the multivariate Cox regression model analysis showed that the older age (≥65 years), higher AFP level (≥400 μg/L), larger tumor diameter (≥3 cm), and later AJCC stage (stage Ⅱ) were the risk factors for overall survival in the early HCC patients (HR>1, P<0.05), while the XRT treatment was a risk factor for shortening overall survival in the HCC patients [HR(95%CI)=1.62(1.41, 1.86), P<0.001]. ConclusionThe data analysis results from the SEER database suggest that the long-term overall survival of RFA treatment is superior to XRT treatment for patients with AJCC stage Ⅰ or Ⅱ.
ObjectivesTo summarize and compare the operative mechanisms of the most representative comprehensive clinical practice guideline (CPG) databases worldwide, so as to provide references for establishing and managing Chinese CPG database.MethodsCPG databases were collected worldwide by discussing with experts in the guideline and database fields. Studies on guideline databases were searched in PubMed and CNKI to further collect CPG databases mentioned in these studies. Representative comprehensive guideline databases were finally selected by consulting relevant guideline experts. The institutions’ names of establishing and managing CPG databases, funding sources, human resources, aims, quality control measures (including CPG inclusion and updating criteria) were extracted and summarized. Databases were divided into government-led, society-led, and enterprise-led models. A descriptive analysis was conducted.ResultsThere were four government-led databases, four society-led databases and merely one enterprise-led database. The institutions of establishing CPG databases were same as the institutions of managing databases in the seven databases. All CPG databases had set up offices, seven of which were located in the capital. Most databases’ funds came from the government. Four databases implemented board management. According to the division of functions, members involved in establishing and managing CPG databases mainly included leaders, expert teams, managerial personnel, secretaries, web developers, and patient representatives. Criteria for inclusion of CPG were relevant to the purpose of establishing databases. Most databases required guidelines that had be updated within three to five years.ConclusionsThis study provides comprehensive information on operative mechanism of different CPG databases which can assist guideline database builders to optimize their operative mechanism.
ObjectiveBased on recently update Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA), we aimed to analyze the characteristics of in-hospital process management from reginal medical center’s colorectal cancer patients.MethodsWe used Version January 29th, 2019 of DACAA being the analyzing source. The items were included date of first out-patient meeting, admitted date, operative date, discharged date, waiting-time, preoperative staying days, postoperative staying days, hospital staying days, and manage protocol, whose characteristics would be analyzed.ResultsWe left 8 913 lines to be analyzed by filtering DACCA. Useful data lines of first out-patient meeting had 3 915, admitted date had 8 144, operative date had 8 049, and discharged date had 7 958. The average of waiting-time were (9.41±0.43) days, and based on timeline trend for line prediction analyzing, which showed R2=0.101 257, P<0.001. The average of preoperative staying days were (5.41±0.04) days, and based on timeline trend for line prediction analyzing, which showed R2=0.023 671, P<0.001. The average of postoperative staying days were (8.99±0.07) days, and based on timeline trend for line prediction analyzing, which showed R2=0.086 177, P<0.001. The average of hospital staying days were (14.43±0.08) days, and based one timeline trend of line prediction analyzing, which showed R2=0.098 44, P<0.001. Analyzable ERAS data were 2 368 lines in DACCA. Total EARS data in 2 368 lines, there were 108 lines (5%) completed and 2 260 lines (95%) incomplete. Pre/post ERAS data in 2 260 lines, there were 150 lines (7%) completed and 2 110 lines (93%) incomplete. Post ERAS data in 2 110 lines, there were 170 lines (8%) completed and 1 940 lines (92%) incomplete.ConclusionsIn recent 20 years, the regional medical center served in-hospital colorectal cancer patients with decreased preoperative staying days, postoperative staying days, and in-hospital staying days from DACCA analyzing, which could prove the service ability had been in improved. Utilization rate of EARS was increased, and also being the main in-hospital process management.
ObjectiveTo analyze the characteristics of adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer in the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA).MethodsThe informations in the DACCA database were screened, including adjuvant therapy (adjuvant strategy, compliance), adjuvant chemotherapy (indication selection, acceptance, actual cycles of chemotherapy, effect, and standardized application), adjuvant radiotherapy (indication selection, acceptance, and effect), and targeted therapy (uses of oral and intravenous targeted drugs). The data that at least one of items must not be “empty” were selected.ResultsA total of 3 955 data items were analyzed for colorectal cancer adjuvant therapy. ① The highest data composition ratio of “planned strategy of adjuvant therapy” and “compliance of adjuvant therapy” was “adjuvant therapy” (35.6%, 929/2 611) and “coordination” (28.1%, 664/2362), respectively. ② The highest data composition ratios of “indication of chemotherapy”, “acceptance of chemotherapy”, “cycles of chemotherapy”, “effect of chemotherapy”, and “chemotherapy based guidelines” were “must” (38.6%, 1 140/2 963), “rejection” (53.1%, 1 373/2 586), “6-cycle adjuvant chemotherapy” (12.4%, 338/2 722), “stability” (59.9%, 618/1031), and “standardization” (78.6%, 903/1 149). There was an obvious relationship between the planned strategy of adjuvant chemotherapy and the final acceptance of chemotherapy (χ2=505.262, P<0.001), that was, when the planned strategy of adjuvant chemotherapy was “optional”, the proportion of final rejection was very high (89.0%, 137/154). ③ The highest data composition ratios of “indication of radiation”, “acceptance of radiation”, and “effect of radiation” were “unnecessary” (49.1%, 1 423/2 915), “rejection” (93.8%, 2 629/2 803), and “stability” (38.1%, 45/118). There was a correlation between the planned strategy of adjuvant radiotherapy and the final acceptance of radiotherapy (χ2=139.593, P<0.001), that was, when the patients who should receive radiotherapy had not high acceptance (10.6%, 127/1 194), and the patients who should select optional radiotherapy all refused radiotherapy (100%).④ The data composition ratios of “none” of oral and intravenous targeted therapy drugs in targeted therapy were the highest, at 84.2% (2 121/2 520) and 73.3% (206/281), respectively. ConclusionBy expounding the characteristics of the current adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer in DACCA, it provides a reference for the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer.
ObjectiveTo elaborate the contents and concrete concepts of preoperative specialized examination and evaluation of colorectal cancer of the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA) in the West China Hospital. MethodThe article was described in the words.ResultsThe components, stage, accuracy, preoperative comprehensive evaluation, clinical factors of initial diagnosis, misdiagnosis and mistreatment of colorectal cancer in the DACCA were defined and elaborated in the detail. The data label corresponding to each item in the database and the required structured way in the application stage of large data were also described in detail, and the corrective precautions for all classified items were described.ConclusionsThrough the detailed description of the preoperative specialized examination and evaluation of colorectal cancer of DACCA in West China Hospital, it might provide the standard and basis for the clinical application of database in the future, and provide reference for other peers who wish to build a colorectal cancer database.