Objective The objective of this study is to find individualized, evidence-based treatment for a patientwith extensive small cell lung cancer, malignant pleural effusion, and liver metastasis.Methods According to the PICO (patient intervention comparison outcome) principle, evidence was collected and critically assessed. The patient’s preference was also taken into consideration in the decision making process. Results We included 10 randomized controlled trials, 13 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and three clinical guidelines. The evidence indicated that chemotherapeutic treatment prolongs survival in patients with extensive small cell lung cancer and AiDi injections could relieve adverse effects caused by chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Cisplatin and etoposide are considered major standard cytotoxic drugs for small cell lung cancer. We drained the pleural cavity and infused Bleomycin into the pleural cavity. We also used an EP regimen of chemotherapy after the patient’s condition had improved. This patient survived longer than the average survival time for small cell lung cancer patients and has enjoyed a higher quality of life. Conclusion Chemotherapy is the main medical treatment for patients with extensive small cell lung cancer, backed up by symptomatic treatment and supportive care. Prophylactic cranial irradiation decreases brain metastases incidence and improves survival in complete response small cell lung cancer patients.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of doxepin in the treatment of primary insomnia. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), PubMed (1966 to December 2009), EMbase (1974 to December 2009), ISI (1961 to December 2009), CNKI (1979 to December 2009), VIP (1989 to December 2008), CBM (1978 to December 2009), and WANFANG Data (1998 to December 2009). We also searched the correlated grey literature and conference literature for complement. Data were extracted, methodologically evaluated, and cross-checked by two reviewers independently. RevMan 5.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results One randomized controlled trial and three cross trials involving 171 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that total sleep time (TST), wake time during sleep (WTDS), wake time after sleep (WTAS), and sleep efficiency (SE) were improved by low and medium dosage of doxepin (1-25 mg) with statistically significant difference compared with placebo. On the contrary, most indicators of sleep quality had no statistically significant difference between high dose doxepin (50 mg) and placebo. While the sleeping structural indicators of rapid eye movement sleep (REM), rapid-eyemovement latency (REM-L), and sleep stage II (St.II) were changed by high and medium dosage of doxepin (25-50 mg) with statistically significant difference. Conclusions Low and medium dosage of doxepin (1-25 mg) is effective in improvement of the sleep quality in patients with primary insomnia, but it is necessary to concern the side effects and the effects on sleep structure when treating primary insomnia with medium dosage of doxepin (25 mg). High dosage of doxepin (50 mg) is not recommended to treat primary insomnia. However, this conclusion still needs clinical trials to be further validated.
Objectives To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of coronary artery drug injection for slow flow/no-reflow phenomenon after coronary stent implantation. Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2009), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang databases from their inception to April 2009. Two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. Meta-analyses were performed by RevMan 5.0 software. Results Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 593 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that urokinase, adenosine, and anisodamine could significantly improve the thrombolysis in myocardial infartion (TIMI) flow. In addition, anisodamine could improve the coronary blood pressure. Urokinase significantly reduced the incidence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and non-fatal of heart failure during hospitalization, but it could not change the mortality and the incidence of unstable angina, recurrence of myocardial infarction, and ischemic target revascularization. Conclusion Evidence shows that anisodamine, urokinase, urapidil and adenosine can improve TIMI flow and improve myocardial perfusion on the no-reflow patients post coronary stent implantation and urokinase can significantly reduce the incidence of main adverse cardiovascular events. Their clinical application is worthy to be advocated.
Objectives To evaluate the effect of metrinidazole treatment after conventional hemorrhoidectomy pain in patients with third and fourth degree hemorrhoids. Methods We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 1 2009), PubMed (1966 to March 2009), EMbase (1974 to March 2009), SCI (1974 to March 2009), CBM (1978 to March 2009), CNKI (1994 to March 2009), and VIP (1989 to March 2009) to identify randomized controlled trials or quasi- randomize controlled trials of metronidazole versus placebo for treating post hemorrhoidectomy pain. We evaluated the quality of the included studies by using the Handbook 4.2.6 recommend standards and analyzed data using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.10. Results We included seven randomized controlled trials or quais-randomized controlled trials (n=553). Meta-analyses showed that there were statistical differences between metronidazole and placebo in pain after hemorrhoidectomy and the use of an additional dose of analgesia. Conclusions The current evidence shows that metronidazole relieves the pain after conventional hemorrhoidectomy and reduces the additional used of analgesics. Further high quality, large sample randomized controlled trials should be carried out.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy of ambroxol for lung protection in perioperative period. Methods We followed the Cochrane Collaboration methodology to conduct systematic reviews. We searched relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CBM, CNKI and VIP. We assessed the methodological quality for each outcome by grading the quality, and used RevMan5.0.0 to perform meta-analysis. Results Eight RCTs were eligible and included 669 patients. All of these trials used randomization but the quality scales were B. Compared to the control group, the ambroxol group had a statistically significant benefit in atelectasis, pulmonary complications, cough and expectoration degree. The RR (95%CI) were 0.44 (0.25, 0.78), 0.51 (0.34, 0.75), 0.39 (0.16, 0.94) and 0.22 (0.09, 0.53), respectively. The ambroxol group was also better than the control group in sputum volume, sputum characteristics, rales and pulmonary surfactant. Conclusion Ambroxol can improve respiratory system symptoms post-operatively, reduce pulmonary complications, and prevent pulmonary surfactant from decreasing during operation. Ambroxol has a satisfactory lung protective effect in the preoperative period, but we can’t define a proper dose and usage time.
Objective To provide a reference for the best evidence-based medicine (EBM) education modelby retrospective analysis and summary the EBM education model of the EBM center of Lanzhou University for medicalpostgraduates. Methods To utilize students’ spare time we changed the traditional teaching method, and instead used problem based learning and academic discussions to teach postgraduates how to design and apply research. Results Sixtytwo postgraduates were trained and completed 73 research papers and registered 33 Cochrane systematic reviews. Twentythree papers were published in foreign journals (SCI) as first authors, 34 papers were published in domestic journals. Five students received awards in the academic conference of Lanzhou University. Conclusion Medical students will benefit from taking part in EBM research. This education model will help them not only understand the methods of clinical research and EBM and improve the quality of their research and their cooperative skills, but also master related clinical knowledge.
Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of metformin plus rosiglitazone in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods Based on the principles and methods of Cochrane systematic reviews, we searched the CochraneLibrary (2008, 4 issue), PubMed (1966 to October 19, 2008), Embase (1974 to October 19, 2008), China BiomedicalLiterature Database (1978 to October 12, 2008), China Journal Fulltext Database (1994 to October 12, 2008), ChineseScientific Journals Full text Database (1989 to October 12, 2008). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Metforminplus roziglitazone versus metformin for type 2 diabetes were included. We assessed the quality of the included RCTsaccording to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 5.0 was used for meta-analysis. Results Twelve RCTs totaling 3020 patients were included. Metaanalysis showed that Glycosylated hemoglobin levels [WMD= – 0.48%, 95%CI (– 0.74, – 0.22), P=0.000 3], fasting plasma glucose levels [WMD= – 1.03mmol/L, 95%CI (– 1.85, – 0.75), Plt;0.000 01], insulin sensitivity, and β-cell function improved significantly with metformin plus rosiglitazone therapy. Compared with the metformin monotherapy group, patients treated with metformin plus rosiglitazone had more edema events [RR= 3.27, 95%CI (1.80, 5.91), Plt;0.000 1] and lower gastro-intestinal events [RR= 0.82, 95%CI (0.71, 0.94), P=0.004]. We found no statistically significant effect on body weight, the percentage of patients with at least one adverse event, and hypoglycemia events. Conclusions Current evidence demonstrates that combination treatment with metformin plus rosiglitazone improves glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and cells function more effectively than with metformin monotherapy. Side effects of two types of therapy have differences in performance.
Objective To assess the affect of problem-based learning (PBL) versus literature based learning(LBL) in clinical medicine students. Methods Computer retrieval was conducted to search for controlled studies comparing PBL with LBL. The quality of included studies was critically evaluated and data was analyzed by using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0 software. Results Finally 11 articles were included in the review, but most of them were of low quality.There are clinical heterogeneity between different studis which cause descriptive results. The PBL tended to be superior to LBL in the analysis-skill, self-directed learning skill, data-searching skill, and original skill.Conclusion PBL tends to be associated with better learning results among clinical medicine students compared withLBL methods. We need large-scale, randomized controlled trials of higher quality to confirm this.
Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of capecitabine plus docetaxel in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer where anthracycline has failed as a treatment. Methods We electronically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (2008, issue 4), and CBM to Sept. 2008. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs about capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer were identified. Study selection and analyses were undertaken according to the Cochrane Handbook, and RevMan 5.0 was applied for statistical analyses. The following was studied: total survival time, the development time of disease, reaction rate, the mid-survival time, adverse events and quality of life. Results Three RCTs involving 672 patients with metastatic breast cancer were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that the overall survival (MD=3.00, 95%CI 1.64 to 4.36), disease time to progression (MD=1.85, 95%CI 1.15 to 2.55), and the response rate (RR=1.29, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.52) were superior in the combination arm to the docetaxel alone arm. Conclusion The current evidence available shows that the combination of capecitabine and docetaxel may significantly improve the short-term efficacy comparing with docetaxel alone. However, adverse events and long-term efficacy are not clear; more high-quality RCTs should be conducted.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of glucose-insul in-potassium (GIK) in patients with acute myocardialinfarction (AMI). Methods Both foreign language databases including The Cochrane Library (issue 4, 2007), PubMed, EMBASE and Chinese databases involving CBM, VIP and CJFD were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the effect of GIK on the heart function (left ventricular ejection fraction LVEF, ST changes, left ventricular remodel ing) of patients with AMI. Two reviewers assessed the qual ity of each trial and extracted data independently. The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.10 software was used for statistical analysis. Results Five RCTs were included, all of which came from abroad. The methodological qual ity of the included studies was good. The basel ine data of each trial were comparable. Meta-analyses showed that no significant difference was observed in the improvement of LVEF between the GIK group and the control group (WMD=1.87, 95%CI -0.32 to 4.06, P =0.09), whereas GIK was more beneficial in decreasing ST (OR=1.92, 95%CI 1.25 to 2.96,P =0.003) and preventing left ventricular remodel ing (OR=0.08, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.68, P=0.02). Conclusion Based on the above evidence, although GIK may, to some extent, be beneficial for both ST decreasing and long-term prognoses in patients with AMI, it can not yet be concluded that GIK can improve the heart function of those patients. Therefore, it is imperative to design and implement further stricter, large-scale RCTs, so as to accurately identify the therapeutic effect of GIK solution in patients with myocardial infarction.