ObjectiveTo explore the model of sharing appointments between medical inspection resources in medical alliance hospitals in the medical profession, in order to improve the utilization efficiency of medical inspection resources and patient satisfaction, and to promote the effective implementation of intelligent services in medical alliance hospitals. MethodsBy analyzing the medical process of medical inspection appointments, and organizing the inspection appointment resources of each hospital according to the actual business characteristics of each hospital of the medical alliance by the unified medical inspection appointment platform. Through the unified big data platform, the business collaboration between the medical alliance hospitals and the sharing and scheduling of medical inspection resources among the hospitals of the medical alliance are realized. ResultsThe construction and use of the medical alliance unified inspection platform has realized the sharing and utilization of inspection resources between hospitals in the medical alliance, which is convenient for patients to choose their own inspection resources across hospitals when making an appointment for inspection, and further improves patient satisfaction. ConclusionThe unified medical appointment platform unifies the management of the medical alliance's appointment examination resources, which can not only effectively improve the utilization efficiency of medical inspection appointment resources, but also expand the effective scope of patients' choice of medical inspection appointments, and at the same time improve patient satisfaction and promote the construction of hospital intelligent services.
The pharmacy management of medical institutions is the basic condition for the pharmacy management of medical alliances. There are many common factors in the pharmacy management of each medical institution, and these common factors are the basic conditions for the pharmacy management of medical alliances. The pharmacy management of a medical alliance is composed of both shared aspects and aspects that meet the individual needs of different medical institutions. There are many problems in the primary medical institutions of the medical alliances, such as obsolete concepts of pharmacy management and weak pharmaceutical service capabilities. Pharmaceutical information collection is an important part in the pharmacy management of medical institutions, which can connect all aspects and better reflect the advantages of the special organization of the medical alliances. This paper explores pharmacy management in medical consortia for the specific organisational form of medical alliances, examines the basic situation of pharmacy management in different medical institutions in medical consortia, analyzes the basic conditions and basic characteristics of pharmacy management in medical consortia, so as to find a breakthrough in pharmacy management in medical consortia.
ObjectivesTo analyze the theoretical and practical research and effect evaluation of integrated care at home and abroad, so as to provide evidence for the development of integrated care in China.MethodsPubMed, CNKI and WanFang Data databases and government documents, research reports were searched to collect studies on integrated care, and then literature review was then performed.ResultsForeign integrated care was dominated at government level. The integration involved numerous departments such as hospital and insurance institutions. The degree of integration was high and funds were sufficient. The theoretical framework was studied from the macro, meso and micro perspectives, and people-centered, value-based integration was proposed. However, in China the integrated care was primarily guided by the government nationally. Local government was responsible for specific integration practices. The degree of integration was low and funds were insufficient. The theoretical research mostly focused on cooperation, interest mechanisms and so on. At home and abroad, researchers focused on the evaluation of health service and quality. Foreign countries paid more attention to medical costs, while in China, due to the imbalance of interest mechanisms, researchers paid more attention to medical expenses and performance evaluation.ConclusionThere is no unified theoretical framework and method for integrated medical care. Researchers and policy makers should combine the successful experience and characteristics at home and abroad, consider the complex health policy context of the country to implement integrated care.
The implementation of the medical alliance has promoted the effective integration of medical resources in China. However, with the increase in the demand for rehabilitation medical care, the construction of rehabilitation medical alliance will provide a new strategy for the development of rehabilitation medicine. The rehabilitation medical alliance will promote the subsidence of high-quality rehabilitation resources, enhance the service capacity of grass-roots rehabilitation, and achieve the hierarchical rehabilitation diagnosis and treatment. The rehabilitation medical alliance combines four alliance models to construct a three-tier system, forming a three-level alliance of administration and classification. Regarding rehabilitation clinical pathway, rehabilitation evaluation system, rehabilitation treatment system and the homogenization guarantee of rehabilitation nursing as its main content, intelligent rehabilitation medicine alliance could be established by means of technical means such as artificial intelligence and big data cloud platform.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of a healthcare consortium combined with an internet-based medical model in the management of epilepsy centers in ethnic minority regions, and to provide guidance for the standardized management of epilepsy in these areas. Methods This was a prospective cohort study. A total of 300 epilepsy patients admitted to the Epilepsy Center of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture from January to December 2025 were selected and divided into an observation group (150 patients) and a control group (150 patients) based on whether they were included in the medical consortium plus internet-based healthcare management model. The observation group was managed using the integrated medical consortium and internet-based healthcare model, while the control group received traditional management. We compared baseline data comparability, clinical efficiency indicators (waiting time for consultation, length of hospital stay, follow-up compliance rate), efficacy indicators (seizure frequency, overall response rate), safety indicators (complication incidence rate), cognitive function (MMSE score), and quality of life (QOLIE-31 score) between the two groups. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, ethnic composition, disease duration, seizure type, baseline seizure frequency, or baseline MMSE scores (P>0.05), indicating comparability. After 6 months of intervention, the monthly seizure frequency in the observation group decreased from the baseline (6.51±1.02) to (2.34±0.89), while that in the control group decreased from (6.48±0.98) to (4.12±1.15); the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P<0.05); The overall response rate was 92.00% (138/150) in the observation group and 76.00% (114/150) in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (χ2=14.286, P=0.001). The mean waiting time for outpatient visits in the observation group was (3.12±1.05) days, which was shorter than that of the control group (7.24±2.15) days (t=11.365, P<0.001); The average length of hospital stay was (7.24±2.18) days, shorter than that of the control group (10.56±3.24) days (t=5.892, P<0.001). The outpatient follow-up compliance rate in the observation group was 90.00% (135/150), higher than the 68.00% (102/150) in the control group (χ2=8.362, P=0.004). The improvement in MMSE scores in the observation group was (9.74±3.45) points, which was superior to that of the control group (5.74±2.89) points (t=7.234, P<0.001); The improvement in QOLIE-31 total scores was (18.45±6.23) points and (11.24±5.67) points, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (t=6.891, P<0.001). Patient satisfaction in the observation group was 94.00% (141/150), higher than the 80.00% (120/150) in the control group (χ2=4.332, P=0.037). Conclusion The integrated medical consortium and internet-based healthcare model can optimize the diagnosis and treatment process for epilepsy patients in ethnic minority regions, reduce seizure frequency, improve cognitive function and quality of life, and enhance the level of regional medical services.