Objective To investigate the stability and the stress distributions of L3-5 fused with three different approaches (interbody, posterolateral and circumferential fusions) and to investigate degeneration of thesegment adjacent to the fused functional spinal unit. Methods A detailed L3-5 three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model of a normal man aged 32 was established and validated. Based on the model, the destabilized model, the interbody, posterolateral and circumferential fusions models of L4-5 were established. After the loadings were placed on all the models, we recorded the angular motions of the fused segment and the Von Mises stress of the adjacent intervertebral disc. Results The circumferential fusion was most stable than the others, and the interbody fusion was more stable than the posterolateral fusion. The maximal Von Mises stress of the adjacent L3,4 intervertebral disc in all the models was ranked descendingly as flexion,lateral bending,torsion and extension. For the three kinds of fusions, the stress increment of the L3,4 intervertebral disc was ranked ascendingly as interbody fusion,posterolateral fusion and circumferential fusion. Conclusion After destabilization of the L4,5 segment, the stability of the circumferential fusionis better than that of the others, particularly under the flexional or extensional loading. The stability of the interbody fusion is better than that of the posterolateral fusion, except for under the flexional loading. The feasibility of adjacent segment degeneration can be ranked descendingly as: circumferential fusion,posterolateral fusion and interbody fusion.
Objective To evaluate the short-term effectiveness of local laminectomy and interlaminar lumbar instrumented fusion (ILIF) through a small incision for lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods Between November 2009 and January 2011, 16 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were treated by local laminectomy and ILIF through a small incision. Therewere 7 males and 9 females with an average age of 52.8 years (range, 49-67 years). Sixteen patients had lumbar degenerative stenosis with an average disease duration of 4 years and 7 months (range, 2 years-9 years and 4 months). Four cases complicated by lateral recessus stenosis, 3 by lumbar disc herniation. Involved segments included L3, 4 in 2 cases, L4, 5 in 4 cases, L5, S1 in 4 cases, L3, 4 and L4, 5 (double segments) in 2 cases, L4, 5 and L5, S1 (double segments) in 4 cases. The effectiveness was evaluated with the pre- and post-operative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disabil ity Index (ODI). The cross-sectional areas of spinal canal were measured by CT scanning and were compared between pre- and post-operation. Results The average operative time was 47 minutes (range, 35-80 minutes); the average blood loss was 145 mL (range, 120-350 mL); and the average hospital ization days were 7.8 days (range, 4-15 days). Cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in 1 case, and healing of incisions by first intention was achieved in the others. The patients were followed up 12-22 months (mean, 14.8 months). CT scanning showed interspinous fusion in 14 cases and possible fusion in 2 cases after operation, with an average fusion time of 4.6 months(range, 3-10 months). The postoperative VAS score, ODI, and cross-sectional area were significantly improved when compared with preoperative values (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The ILIF can promote fusion between spinous processes, provide spine stabil ization, and protect the spinal cord. The procedure has small incision, simple method of fixation and fusion.
OBJECTIVE To investigate the therapeutic effect of percutaneous lumbar discectomy (PLD) combined with sodium hyaluronate (SH) injection in the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. METHODS Forty-eight patients suffered from lumbar disc herniation were divided into two groups and treated by PLD combined with SH injection into epidural cavity (treatment group) or single PLD (control group) respectively. All patients were followed up for 24 months. The therapeutic effects in both groups were assessed and compared according to Macnab’s criterion. RESULTS The patients in the treatment group got much more significant improvement than those in the control group, with shorter therapeutic course and more safety. CONCLUSION PLD combined with SH injection into epidural cavity is more effective and safety in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation than of pure PLD.
【摘要】 目的 探討腰部放置襯墊物對經皮冠狀動脈介入手術后臥床患者的作用。 方法 選取2008年7〖CD3/5〗12月于我科行經皮冠狀動脈介入手術后50例患者,隨機分為試驗組25例和對照組 25 例。試驗組在常規護理基礎上予腰部放置襯墊物,對照組25例予常規護理,手術次日對患者進行視覺模擬量表測試方法(VAS)評分。 結果 試驗組VAS評分秩和檢驗低于對照組,差異有統計學意義(Plt;0001);兩組除煩躁外其他并發癥無顯著差異。 結論 冠狀動脈介入手術后患者在平臥位制動時予腰椎彎曲處放置襯墊物可降低患者腰部疼痛程度。【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the effects of lumbar pad on bed patients who uhderwent percutaneous coronary intervention operation. Methods The 50 patients who uhderwent percutaneous coronary intervention operation in our deparment from July to December 2008，then randomly divided into experimental group(25 patients)and control group(25 patients). Control group were received conventional care，the experimental group were received lumbar pad based on the conventional care. The second day after operation，the patients were scored by visual analog scale test method (VAS). Results The VAS scores of experimental group was lower than control group，the difference was statistically significant (Plt;0001). The differences of other complications between two groups except fidgety were not statistically significant. Conclusions Coronary intervention after surgery，the patients in peripharyngeal braking to bend lumbar pad material can reduce the waist ache degree.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical and radiological effectiveness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of Cage dislodgement after lumbar surgery.MethodsThe clinical data of 40 patients who underwent revision surgery due to Cage dislodgement after lumbar surgery betweem April 2013 and March 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 18 patients underwent OLIF (OLIF group) and 22 patients underwent PLIF (PLIF group) for revision. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, body mass index, intervals between primary surgery and revision surgery, number of primary fused levels, disc spaces of Cage dislodgement, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of low back pain and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), the segmental lordosis (SL) and disc height (DH) of the disc space of Cage dislodgement, and the lumbar lordosis (LL) before revision (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and complications of the two groups were recorded and compared. The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain were evaluated at 3 days, 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, and the ODI scores were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation. The SL and DH of the disc space of Cage dislodgement and LL were measured at 12 months after operation and compared with those before operation. CT examination was performed at 12 months after operation, and the fusion of the disc space implanted with new Cage was judged by Bridwell grading standard.ResultsThe intraoperative blood loss in the OLIF group was significantly less than that in the PLIF group (t=?12.425, P=0.000); there was no significant difference between the two groups in the operation time and hospital stay (P>0.05). Both groups were followed up 12-30 months, with an average of 18 months. In the OLIF group, 2 patients (11.1%) had thigh numbness and 1 patient (5.6%) had hip flexor weakness after operation; 2 patients (9.1%) in the PLIF group had intraoperative dural sac tear. The other patients’ incisions healed by first intention without early postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (χ2=0.519, P=0.642). The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain, and the ODI score of the two groups at each time point after operation were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05). At 12 months after operation, SL, LL, and DH in the two groups were significantly increased when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05); SL and DH in the OLIF group were significantly improved when compared with those in the PLIF group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in LL between the two groups (P>0.05). CT examination at 12 months after operation showed that all the operated disc spaces achieved bony fusion. According to the Bridwell grading standard, 12 cases were grade Ⅰ and 6 cases were grade Ⅱ in the OLIF group, and 13 cases were grade Ⅰ and 9 cases were grade Ⅱ in the PLIF group; there was no significant difference between the two groups (Z=–0.486, P=0.627). During follow-up, neither re-displacement or sinking of Cage, nor loosening or fracture of internal fixation occurred.ConclusionOLIF and PLIF can achieve similar effectiveness in the treatment of Cage dislodgement after lumbar surgery. OLIF can further reduce intraoperative blood loss and restore the SL and DH of the disc space of Cage dislodgement better.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of nerve root compression on dorsal root ganglia. METHODS: Following the method of Kawakami, 4/0 ribbon gut were applied around left L4-6 spinal nerve roots in 50 SD rats. Just 3 mm cranial to the dorsal root ganglia, the nerve roots were secured by two ligation node. The nerve roots of right side were as control. The L4-6 spinal cord was taken out 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 weeks after surgery, respectively. The activity of fluoride resistant acid phosphatase (FRAP) was determined by the enzyme histochemistry (Gomori method) and the image analysis technique. RESULTS: In the test side, the FRAP content of spinal dorsal horn reduced 4 weeks after operation. And there were gradually more and more decreases from 4 to 12 weeks. There was significant difference between the test side and control side (P lt; 0.01). CONCLUSION: Chronic nerve root compression causes damage to dorsal root ganglia.
ObjectiveTo investigate the advantage and short- and medium-term effectivenesses of paramedian incision minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (mini-TLIF) by comparing with open TLIF. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 54 patients with single segmental lumbar degenerative disease who accorded with the inclusion criteria between January 2012 and March 2014. Open TLIF was performed in 26 patients (open group), mini-TLIF in 28 cases (minimally invasive group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, etiology, and affected segments between 2 groups (P>0.05). The indexes of surgical trauma, systemic inflammatory response, clinical outcome, and interbody fusion rate were compared between 2 groups. ResultsDural rupture occurred in 1 case of open group, L5 nerve root injury in 1 case of minimally invasive group. All patients obtained primary healing of incision. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative drainage of minimally invasive group were significantly lower than those of open group (P<0.05). C-reactive protein, leucocyte count, and creatine kinase-MM (CK-MM) of open group were significantly higher than those of minimally invasive group at 24 hours after operation (P<0.05). At 7 days after operation, the CK-MM of minimally invasive group was significantly lower than that of open group (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found in C-reactive protein and leucocyte count between 2 groups (P>0.05). The follow-up time was 1.2-3.1 years in open group and 1.4-2.9 years in minimally invasive group. At 1 year after operation, the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were significantly improved in 2 groups (P<0.05). Minimally invasive group was better than open group in ODI and VAS score of back pain (P<0.05), but VAS score of leg pain showed no significant difference (P>0.05). According to the Suk interbody fusion standard, solid fusion was obtained in 18 cases, probable fusion in 4 cases, and nonunion in 4 cases, and the fusion rate was 84.61% in open group; solid fusion was obtained in 21 cases, probable fusion in 3 cases, and nonunion in 4 cases, and the fusion rate was 85.71% in minimally invasive group; and the interbody fusion rates showed no significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=0.072, P=0.821). ConclusionCompared with open TLIF, paramedian incision mini-TLIF has advantages of minimal surgical trauma and little blood loss for single-level lumbar degenerative disease. The short- and medium-term effectivenesses are satisfactory.
Objective To evaluate the cl inical effect of local autogenous bone chips extended with allogeneic bone grafts in the posterolateral lumbar fusion. Methods From March 2005 to April 2007, 22 cases which underwent posterolaterallumbar fusion with allograft bone mixed with local autograft bone were analyzed retrospectively. The postoperative temperature, drainage flow and heal ing time of the incision were analyzed; postoperative lumbar pain was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) and JOA score; the postoperative efficacy was assessed by MacNab criteria and Oswestry disabil ity index (ODI); the fusion rate was defined by Jorgenson fusion criteria. Results All cases were followed up for 17-35 months with an average of 21 months, the wound all healed by first intention; no red swell ing, exudation and infection occurred. The excellent and good rate was 81.8% for JOA score (excellent in 4 cases, good in 14 cases, fair in 4 cases), 77.3% for MacNab criteria (excellent in 4 cases, good in 13 cases, fair in 5 cases) and 90.9% for ODI index (excellent in 3 cases, good in 17 cases, fair in 2 cases). The postoperative X-ray fusion rate within 1 year was 90.9%. Conclusion Allograft bone mixed with local autograft bone can achieve good efficacy and fusion rate in posterolateral lumbar fusion.
Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes ofa surgical approach for decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis, which was featured with reconstruction of posterior spinal structures and epidural space by spinous process-splitting, less osteotomy, laminar flap and keeping spinal process, lamina, outer ligmentum flavum intact. Methods From October 2001 to April 2003, 39 patients (19 males and 20 females, aging 36 to 77 years with a mean age of 49.6 years with lumbar stenosis underwent the surgical decompression procedure with reconstruction of posterior canal structures and epidural space. The involved locations were L3,4 to L5S1(5 cases),L4,5 to L5S1(18 cases), L4,5(11 cases) and L5S1(5 cases). The course of disease was 3 months to 16 years (40.4 months on average). The clinical outcomes after 1 year of operation Results All patients were followed up from 18 to 36 months. No intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed and all patients were satisfactory with the surgery. Computerized tomography showed that spinal and nerve root canal were satisfactorily enlarged 1 week postoperatively in all cases. Fusion of lamina and spinous process were detected on CT in 87.2% patients (34/39) 3 months after operation. No patients presented re-stenosis of lumbar spine and all patients presented bony fusion 1 year after surgery. Conclusion The approach of the current study was a reliable and effective method in the management of lumbar stenosis, it preserved thecontinuity of spinal process, interspinous ligaments, lamina and ligmentumn flavum and integrality of posterior spinal structures and epidural space. The integrity of the psoterior spinal structures can prevent the scar formation and improve the stability of lmbar spine postoperatively.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of dynamic neutralization system (Dynesys) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease. MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 5, 2016), CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data were searched to collect studies about Dynesys versus PLIF for lumbar degenerative disease from inception to May 31st 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 22 studies involving 1 482 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with PLIF, Dynesys could reduce operative time (MD=-29.62, 95%CI -36.67 to -22.57), operative blood loss (MD=-112.10, 95%CI -130.60 to -93.61), length of hospital stay (MD=-2.62, 95%CI -4.96 to -0.28), postoperative adjacent segment ROM (MD=-1.29, 95%CI -1.72 to -0.86) and maintain postoperative operated segment ROM (MD=3.53, 95%CI 1.99 to 5.08). There were no significant differences between two groups in postoperative ODI (MD=-1.51, 95%CI -3.58 to 0.55), postoperative back VAS (MD=-0.15, 95%CI -0.38 to 0.08), postoperative leg VAS (MD=-0.09, 95%CI -0.22 to 0.04) and postoperative complications (OR=0.69, 95%CI 0.45 to 1.06). ConclusionThe current evidence shows that compared with PLIF, Dynesys for lumbar degenerative disease has shorter operative time, less operative blood loss, shorter hospitalization days, and Dynesys can also maintain operated segment ROM and delay the degeneration of adjacent segment. Due to the limited quality of the included studies, more studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.