Objective To compare the efficacy of plating versus intramedullary nailing in the treatment of adult humeral shaft fracture. Methods We identified eligible studies in PubMed (1950 to September 2007), MEDLINE (1950 to September 2007), OVID CINAHL (1950 to September 2007), OVID EBM (3rd Quarter 2007), CBMdisk (1978 to June 2007) and CNKI (1981 to June 2007). We also handsearched several Chinese orthopedic journals. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing plating versus intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fracture in adults were included and the quality of these trials was critically assessed. Data analyses were conducted with Stata 10.0. Results Six RCTs involving 425 patients were included, among which the statistical heterogeneity was not significant (Pgt;0.1). Cumulative meta-analyses showed that intramedullary nailing might increase the re-operation rate in studies conducted before the year of 2000 (OR=0.39, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.90, P=0.03), but the difference was not significant in studies conducted after 2000 (OR=0.54, 95%CI 0.27 to 1.08, P=0.08). Intramedullary nailing might increase the incidence of shoulder impingement compared with plating (OR=0.13, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.65, P=0.01). The rates of non-union, deep infection, iatrogenic radial nerve injury and internal fixation failure were similar between plating and intramedullary nailing. Meta-analyses were not conducted for union time, operation time and bleeding (transfusion) volume, because the relevant data were not available from the included trials. Conclusion Intramedullary nailing may increase the incidence of shoulder impingement. The rates of re-operation, non-union, deep infection, iatrogenic radial nerve injury and internal fixation failure are similar between plating and intramedullary nailing. Further well-designed and large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to determine the effects of plating and intramedullary nailing on these outcomes.
Because of the complexity of proximal humeral fractures, the treatment of proximal humeral fractures has always been a challenge for clinicians. The MultiLoc intramedullary nail is a new type of internal fixation device which has been gradually used in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in recent years. At present, it is mainly used in the Neer two- and three-part fractures, especially surgical neck fractures. Its flexible design can provide personalized and multi-plane fixation for fracture patients, “screw-in-screw” and medial supporting screw can effectively reduce the axial displacement and varus angle of humeral head, and minimally invasive surgical incision can reduce the injury of rotator cuff. This review focuses on the research status and related evidence of the design, operation, prognosis, and postoperative complications of MultiLoc intramedullary nail, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the application of MultiLoc intramedullary nail in fracture treatment, and enhance clinicians’ understanding of MultiLoc intramedullary nail as a new type of internal fixation device.
ObjectiveTo review the research progress of intramedullary lengthening nail technology.MethodsThe foreign literature on the development history, types, advantages and disadvantages, indications and contraindications, complications, and effectiveness of intramedullary lengthening nail were reviewed and analyzed.ResultsThe intramedullary lengthening nail system mainly includes mechanical type, electric motor drive type, and magnetic drive type. Compared with traditional external fixation and lengthening technology, the intramedullary lengthening nail technology has certain advantages in incidence of complications, bone healing, postoperative functional rehabilitation, incision aesthetics, convenience, and patient satisfaction. However, there are also shortcomings, such as pain, uncontrollable distraction rate, device failure, etc. In the clinical application of intramedullary lengthening nails for limb lengthening, the indications should be grasped reasonably, and the related complications should be prevented and treated.ConclusionIntramedullary lengthening nails provide a new option for limb lengthening, and the initial effectiveness is good. It is one of the development direction of limb lengthening technology.
Objective To compare the outcomes between intramedullary nail change and augmentation plating with a retained intramedullary nail for aseptic nonunion of femoral shaft fractures after femoral nailing, and to analyze the cause so as to guide the clinical application. Methods Between June 2001 and June 2011, 28 patients with aseptic nonunion of femoral shaft fractures after femoral nailing were treated with intramedullary nail change (11 patients, group A) and augmentation plating with a retained intramedullary nail (17 patients, group B), and the clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. There was no significant difference in age, gender, smoking, location of fracture, Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF) classification, type of injury, associated injury, type of nonunion, and time of nonunion between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The patients were followed up by imaging and the clinical function at regular intervals to observe the callus growth and the recovery condition of the affected limb function, and clinical curative effectiveness was evaluated by Tohner-Wrnch standard. Results The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and intraoperative erythrocyte-transported volume in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative drainage volume and hospitalization days between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). All the incisions healed by first intention, and no nerve and blood vessel injury occurred. All patients were followed up 18.6 months on average (range, 12-36 months). All cases obtained bone union, and time of clinical and radiological bone healing in group B was significantly shorter than those in group A (P lt; 0.05). During follow-up, no following complication occurred: deep incision infection, injuries of blood vessels and nerves, loosening and breakage of internal fixation, loss of reduction, angulated and rotational malunion. According to Tohner-Wrnch standard at last follow-up, the results were excellent in 6 cases, good in 3 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 81.8% in group A; the results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 5 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 100% in group B; and difference was significant between 2 groups (Z= — 2.623, P=0.021). Conclusion Augmentation plating with a retained intramedullary nail is an ideal treatment for aseptic nonunion of femoral shaft fractures after femoral nailing and can achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes because it has simpler operation, shorter operation time, less blood loss, and less trauma than intramedullary nail change.
Objective To compare the clinical effect of reamed and nonreamed intramedullary interlocking nails on treating open tibial fractures. Methods From February 2002 to February 2004, 92 cases of open tibial fractures (86 patients) were treated with intramedullary interlocking nails. Of the 86 patients, 65 were male and 21 were female. Their age ranged from 18 to 68 years (36.5 on average). Of the 92 cases, 54 were in the reamed group and 38 in the nonreamed group. Patients moved with the support of crutch after their wounds were healed. Results All patients were followed up regularly for 6 to 24months. Infection rate in the reamed group and nonreamed group was 20.3% and 5.3% respectively, and there was significant difference between them (Ｐlt;0.05). The averagehealing time of the fractures was 22.5 weeks in reamed group and 19 weeks in nonreamed group, and there was no significant difference between them (Ｐ＞0.05). Delayed unions occurred in 8 cases and 3 cases in reamed group and nonreamed group respectively. Conclusion Compared with reamed group, nonreamed intramedullary interlocking nails have lowerinfection rate and fewer delayed unions and ununions.
ObjectiveTo review the cause, treatment, and prevention of complications of retrograde intramedullary nail fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis and enhance the recognition on the complications of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. MethodsThe recent literature concerning intramedullary nail fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis was consulted and reviewed. ResultsThere are intraoperative and postoperative complications of intramedullary nail fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis, and the causes, treatment, and prevention of complications are various. ConclusionProgress of retrograde intramedullary nail fixation increases the successful rate of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. However, there is still a high complication rate, so strict preoperative assessment and skilled surgical technique are necessary to prevent complications.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical results of locking-plate with an intramedullary fibular allograft for type C2 proximal humeral fracture fixation. MethodsBetween January 2011 and August 2012, 16 patients with proximal humeral fractures (AO type C2) were treated by locking-plate with an intramedullary fibular allograft. The clinical data were retrospectively analysed. There were 5 males and 11 females with an average age of 64 years (range, 55-70 years). The injury causes were falling injury in 12 cases, traffic accident injury in 3 cases, and sports injury in 1 case. The duration between injury and operation ranged from 2 to 6 days (mean, 4.5 days). The imaging data were used to judge the fracture healing, and to measure the neck-shaft angle and the height of humeral head; the disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36), and Neer score were used to evaluate the function of the shoulder after surgery. ResultsPrimary healing of incision was obtained in all patients; no complication of vascular and nerve injury occurred. Sixteen cases were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18 months). All fractures healed at 18-24 weeks (mean, 20 weeks). No complication occurred as follows:re-displacement, necrosis, rejection reaction, and loosening or extraction of screws. At last follow-up, the neck-shaft angle was 126.6-136.9° (mean, 132.5°), showing a little lost when compared with intraoperative angle (130.5-138.0°, 134.0° on average). At 12 months after surgery, the height loss of humeral head was 1.8-4.6 mm (mean, 2.0 mm); the passive anteflexion of the shoulder was 130-160° (mean, 148°); the active anteflexion was 120-145° (mean, 136°); the external rotation was 30-65° (mean, 56°); the internal rotation was 15-25° (mean, 19°). And the DASH score was 2-53 (mean, 12); the SF-36 score was 50-95 (mean, 89). According to Neer score for shoulder function, the results were excellent in 10 cases, good in 4 cases, fair in 1 case, and poor in 1 case, with an excellent and good rate of 87.5%. ConclusionLocking-plate with an intramedullary fibular allograft for type C2 proximal humeral fracture fixation has satisfactory clinical results because of stable fixation, high clinical outcome scores, and low internal fixation failure.
Objective To describe the design and application of a new intramedullary controlled dynamic nailing(ICDN).〓〖WTHZ〗Methods The new ICDN was made of a stainlesssteel alloy, consists of a nail shaft, innerrod, tensile screw, end cape and two interlocked screws. From December 2005 toFebruary 2007, 48 cases of femoral shaft fractures were treated with ICDN. There were 16 females and 32 males with a mean age of 36.6 years (range, 16-48years). Injury was caused by traffic accident in 26 cases, falling from a height in14, sportsrelated in 7 and crush injury in 1 case. According to Winquist classification, Thirtyseven cases were classified as typeⅠ(13 cases of typeⅠ-1,23 cases of Ⅰ-2 and 1 case of Ⅰ-3), eleven as type Ⅱ fracture ( 2 cases oftype Ⅱ-1, 8 cases of Ⅱ-2 and 1 case of Ⅱ-3). The time from injury to admission was an hour to a week. Emergency operation was performed in 19 cases and the other 29 patients were given operation within 3 days. Results All cases were followed up for an average of 5 months (3-12 months). Among them, the average healing period was 21 weeks (826 weeks) and no nonunion, delayed union and breakage of nailings occurred. The complications included 2 infections, 5 pains, and 4 deformities. Based on Johner and Ｗrubs standard, the results were excellent in 39 cases, good in 7 cases and fair in 2 cases, The excellent and good rate was 95.8%. Conclusions ICDN has excellent biomechanical characteristics which can provide a flexible fixation in treating femoral shaft fractures. The operation is simple and is one of the good techniquesin treating femoral shaft fractures.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of reamed versus nonreamed intramedullary nailing for femoral fractures. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) were identified from MEDLINE (1966-2004.5), EMBASE (1966-2004.5), Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2004), Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group Database (2004.5), and CBM disc (1979-2004.5). We handsearched Chinese Journal of Orthopaedy (from establishment to May 2004) and Orthopaedic Journal of China (from establishment to May 2004) . RCTs and CCTs were included. Data were extracted by two reviewers with designed extraction form. RevMan 4.2.3 software was used for data analysis. Results Five RCTs and two CCTs were included. The combined results of meta-analysis showed that reamed intramedullary nailing for femoral fractures can reduce the rate of nonunion (RR=0.38, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.83, P=0.01) and the rate of implant failure (RR=0.42, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.89, P=0.02). Conclusions Compared with nonreamed intramedullary nailing for femoral fractures, reamed intramedullary nailing can reduce the rates of nonunion and implant failure. However, the relation between reaming or pulmonary complications, the time of union, infection, malunion, operative time, and blood loss needs further study.
Objective To discuss the effectiveness of antibiotic-impregnated cement temporary spacer for osteomyel itis and nonunion of bone caused by intramedullary fixation. Methods Between June 2002 and May 2006, 12 patients with chronic osteomyel itis and nonunion of bone caused by intramedullary nail ing were treated, including 8 males and 4 females with an average age of 40.2 years (range, 26-53 years). The fracture locations included tibia in 7 cases and femur in 5cases. Infection occurred within 2 weeks after intramedullary fixation in 7 cases and within 3 months in 5 cases. The mean time from infection to admission was 5 months (range, 1-24 months). The results of bacteria culture were positive in 10 cases and negative in 2 cases. White blood cell (WBC) count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were higher than normal values. An antibiotic-impregnated cement temporary spacer was inserted after removal of biomembrane and internal fixator, thorough debridement and irrigation. After osteomyel itis was controlled by antibiotic therapy postoperatively, two-stage bone transplantation and internal fixation were performed after 3 to 6 months. Results All wounds healed by first intention without early compl ication. All cases were followed up 24 to 48 months (mean, 34 months). WBC count, ESR, and CRP were normal at 3 months postoperatively. The X-ray films showed the fracture heal ing at 10-14 weeks after operation (mean, 12 weeks). Expect one patient had knee range of motion of 90°, the lower l imb function of the others returned to normal. No infection recurred during follow-up. Conclusion Antibiotic-impregnated cement temporary spacer could control osteomyelitis and nonunion of bone caused by intramedullary nail ing, and two-stage bone transplantation and internal fixation after osteomyelitis is an effictive and ideal way to treat osteomyelitis and nonunion of bone caused by intramedullary nail ing.