Objective To investigate differential points of clinical symptoms and pathology of solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (SPTP) and islet cell tumor (ICT). Methods Fifteen cases of SPTP and twelve cases of ICT were studied in this retrospective research. Clinical symptom, pathologic feature and computed tomography (CT) image of patients with both tumors were analyzed, and the imaging features were compared with pathological results. Results The mean age of SPTP patients was 22.4 year-old. Twelve patients with SPTP presented a palpable abdominal mass as the initial symptom. It was observed that the tumor cells were located in a pseudopapillary pattern with a fibro-vascular core histologically. On the CT images, a mixture of solid and cystic structures could be seen in all the tumors. After taking enhanced CT scan, the solid portion was slightly enhanced in the arterial phase and the contrast intensity increased in the portal venous phase. On the other hand, the mean age of ICT patients was 39.3 year-old. The major symptom was due to the function of islet cell tumor, which was typical in 8 patients, presenting as Whipple triad. Histologically, cells demonstrated in trabecular, massive, acinar or solid patterns, and the blood supply of the tumor was abundant. On the CT images, most small tumors were difficulty to be detected. ICT could be markedly enhanced in the arterial phase and slightly enhanced in the portal venous phase on post-contrast CT scan. Conclusion Clinical symptom, pathologic feature and CT scanning are helpful to differentiate SPTP from ICT.
【Abstract】ObjectiveBy using multidetector row spiral CT (MDCT) to investigate the CT imaging findings of gallbladder abnormalities caused by hepatic parenchymal diseases and those of inflammatory cholecystitis. MethodsCT and clinical data of 80 patients with gallbladder abnormalities were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty patients were in hepatic disease group, including 20 chronic hepatitis, 25 liver cirrhosis, and 5 cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma. Thirty patients were in inflammatory group, including 19 chronic cholecystitis, 6 acute cholecystitis, 3 cholecystitis with acute pancreatitis, 1 gangrenous cholecystitis, and 1 xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. All patients underwent MDCT plain scan and contrastenhanced dualphase scanning of upper abdomen. ResultsIn hepatic disease group, 48 cases had evenly thickened gallbladder wall (96%) with mean thickness of (3.67±0.49) mm; 38 cases had clear gallbladder outlines (76%); 38 cases had gallbladder wall enhancement of various degree (76%); 14 cases had gallbladder bed edema and localized nondependant pericholecystic fluid collection (28%). In inflammatory cholecystitis group, 28 cases had obscuring gallbladder outlines (93%) ; 26 cases had gallbladder wall evenly thickened (87%), 4 cases showed unevenly thicked wall (13%), the mean thickness being (4.54±1.14) mm; 30 cases had inhomogenous enhancement of the gallbladder wall (100%); 9 cases had highattenuation bile (30%); 4 cases had dependant pericholecystic fluid collection (13%); 5 cases had transient enhancement of adjacent hepatic bed in arterial phase (17%); microabscess and gas in the gallbladder wall was observed in 1 case respectively. ConclusionMDCT can offer imaging findings useful for differentiating abnormal gallbladder changes caused by hepatic parenchymal diseases from those due to inflammatory cholecystitis.
ObjectiveTo explore the differential diagnosis value of airspace consolidation in thoracic CT between organizing pneumonia (OP) and acquired community pneumonia (CAP).MethodsA retrospective study was taken by retrieving the patients CT database from October 2010 to August 2016. Fifty-six consecutive patients with OP and 99 consecutive patients with CAP whose CT showed airspace consolidation were enrolled and their clinical characteristics and radiological characteristics were analyzed.ResultsThe percentage of patients whose CT image showed various amount of air bronchogram (ABG) with different shapes is higher in OP group than that in CAP group (87.5% and 72.7% respectively, χ2=4.558, P=0.033). The median and interquartile range amount of ABG in the OP patients were significantly higher than those in CAP group [4 (ranged from 2 to 8) and 2 (ranged from 0 to 4) respectively, z=3.640, P=0.000]. Morphologically, 58.9% of the OP patients showed entire air bronchogram (EABG) on the thoracic CT, significantly higher than that in CAP group (21.2%) (χ2=22.413, P=0.000). Interrupted ABG was found in 26.3% of CAP patients, while 16.1% of OP patients shared same features and the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=2.125, P=0.148). Traction bronchiectasis and ground glass opacity (GGO) were more likely to be found in the OP patients rather than CAP patients with 26.8% and 39.3% respectively, while they were found in 1.0% and 11.1% in the CAP patients (P<0.05). Reversed halo sign was found only 1.0% of the CAP patients, significantly lower than that in OP group, 26.8% (χ2=25.671, P=0.000). Pleural effusion and bronchial wall thickening were more commonly found in the CAP group with 56.6% and 35.4% respectively. By multivariate logistic analysis, EABG (OR=5.526, P=0.000), traction bronchiectasis (OR=21.564, P=0.010), GGO (OR=4.657, P=0.007) and reversed halo sign (OR=13.304, P=0.023) were significantly associated with OP, while pleural effusion (OR=0.380, P=0.049) and bronchial wall thickening (OR=0.073, P=0.008) were significantly associated with CAP. Other features in thoracic CT coexisting with ABG all reach significance statistically between the OP and CAP group (all P<0.05).ConclusionsAirspace consolidation in thoracic CT may be valuable for the differential diagnosis between OP and CAP. EABG is more commonly found in OP patients than in CAP patients. When EABG exists or ABG coexists with traction bronchiectasis, GGO and reversed halo sign, a diagnose of OP should be considered.
Objective To investigate the clinicopathologic features, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of pulmonary selerosing pneumocytoma (PSP). Methods A total of 13 cases of PSP were enrolled, and the clinical and imaging findings, pathologic features, and immunophenotype were collected and analyzed, with review of the literatures. Results Thirteen patients were all female, aged from 27 to 69 years old by first discovered, the average age was 53 years old. The maximum diameter ranged from 0.8 - 6 cm. It was mainly discovered accidentally by physical examination. According to the CT findings of 13 cases, all lesions were round or round-like, with a well-circumscribed mass. The “welt vessel sign” was suggestive to the diagnosis of PSP. Microscopically, the tumor was composed of two types of cells (surface epithelial cells and round mesenchymal cells), and four histological patterns (papillary, solid, hemorrhagic and sclerotic zone). Immuophenotype: thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and epithelial membrane antigen were expressed on both epithelial cells and mesenchymal cells. Pan cytokeratin (PCK) and cytokeratin 7 were only expressed on epithelial cells, and vimentin on mesenchymal cells. Conclusion PSP is a rare lung benign tumor, preoperative and intraoperative freezing diagnosis are difficult, the diagnosis depends on the morphologic characteristics of paraffin-embedded tissue sections and immunohistochemical staining. The identification of mesenchymal cells with TTF-1 positive and PCK negative is the key to PSP diagnosis.
Abstract： Sarcoidosis is a common systemic disease with noncaseating granulomatous epithelioid nodule and coexisting granulomatous inflammation. Although sarcoidosis can affect any organ of the body， more than 90% of the patients demonstrate thoracic involvement， which is often confusing with lung cancer and other diseases. Therefore, thoracic surgeons must have a clear understanding of sarcoidosis. Moreover， due to the special role of surgery in obtaining pathological specimens， thoracic surgeon plays an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of sarcoidosis. It is not difficult to make diagnosis for patients with typical clinical features of sarcoidosis. However， the majority of patients do not have specific manifestations of sarcoidosis. The cause of sarcoidosis remains unknown， and there is also no specific treatment strategy for it. But recent research has shown that annexin A11 gene may be involved in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis， and tumor necrosis factor （TNF） inhibitor is effective in the treatwent of sarcoidosis.
【Abstract】ObjectiveBy using multidetector row spiral CT (MDCT) to investigate the CT imaging findings of gallbladder abnormalities caused by hepatic parenchymal diseases and those of inflammatory cholecystitis. MethodsCT and clinical data of 80 patients with gallbladder abnormalities were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty patients were in hepatic disease group, including 20 chronic hepatitis, 25 liver cirrhosis, and 5 cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma. Thirty patients were in inflammatory group, including 19 chronic cholecystitis, 6 acute cholecystitis, 3 cholecystitis with acute pancreatitis, 1 gangrenous cholecystitis, and 1 xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. All patients underwent MDCT plain scan and contrastenhanced dualphase scanning of upper abdomen. ResultsIn hepatic disease group, 48 cases had evenly thickened gallbladder wall (96%) with mean thickness of (3.67±0.49) mm; 38 cases had clear gallbladder outlines (76%); 38 cases had gallbladder wall enhancement of various degree (76%); 14 cases had gallbladder bed edema and localized nondependant pericholecystic fluid collection (28%). In inflammatory cholecystitis group, 28 cases had obscuring gallbladder outlines (93%) ; 26 cases had gallbladder wall evenly thickened (87%), 4 cases showed unevenly thicked wall (13%), the mean thickness being (4.54±1.14) mm; 30 cases had inhomogenous enhancement of the gallbladder wall (100%); 9 cases had highattenuation bile (30%); 4 cases had dependant pericholecystic fluid collection (13%); 5 cases had transient enhancement of adjacent hepatic bed in arterial phase (17%); microabscess and gas in the gallbladder wall was observed in 1 case respectively. ConclusionMDCT can offer imaging findings useful for differentiating abnormal gallbladder changes caused by hepatic parenchymal diseases from those due to inflammatory cholecystitis.
ObjectiveTo investigate the value of contrastenhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast mass. MethodsTotally 65 patients with 70 breast masses were evaluated by general ultrasonography and contrastenhanced ultrasonography with contrast agent SonoVue. The related indexes, such as the degree and mode of contrast enhancement, the lesion boundaries and dissipation mode, were used to describe the difference between benign and malignant mass, which was also compared with pathological results. ResultsHistopathological examination revealed that benign mass was in 37 cases and malignant in 28 cases. The sensitivity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of contrastenhanced ultrasonography with contrast agent SonoVue were significantly higher than that of general ultrasonography (Plt;0.05), while no significant difference in diagnostic specificity and misdiagnosis rate was observed between them (Pgt;0.05). All tumors showed contrast enhancement in various degrees. Of 28 patients with enhanced mass, hyperenhancement in 22 cases and nodular inhomogeneous enhancement in 21 cases were observed and the boundaries of malignant tumor were irregular with ill-defined and radial enhancement. Most of benign tumors were represented by weak, homogeneous enhancement, and the shape was regular with smooth and tidy boundary and intact capsule except seven cases with unclear boundary. These imaging characteristics of benign and malignant tumors were obviously different (P=0.000). In the resolution phase, both benign and malignant mass showed heterogeneous or homogeneous dissipation, which was not significantly different (P=0.791). ConclusionCompared with general ultrasonography, contrast enhanced ultrasonography may be more helpful for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors.
Objective To establish the overall diagnostic accuracy of the measurements of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for malignant ascites. Methods After a systematic review of current studies, sensitivity, specificity, and other measures of the value of ascites concentrations of VEGF in the diagnosis of malignant ascites were pooled by using random effects models. Qualified studies on evaluation of VEGF in diagnosis of malignant ascites in English and Chinese published from January 1990 to December 2009 were retrieved from The Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMbase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, WanFang Data, and VIP Information. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study with the tool of QUADAS. Statistical analyses were performed by employing Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Meta-analyses of the reported sensitivity and specificity of each study and Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve were performed. Results Seven studies met the inclusion criteria for the analysis. After testing the heterogeneity of the included studies, a random effect model was selected to calculate the pool weighted sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence interval: the sensitivity was 0.81 (95%CI 0.75 to 0.85), the specificity was 0.90 (95%CI 0.86 to 0.94), the DOR was 50.45 (95%CI 28.37 to 89.73), and the AUC of SROC was 0.9507 (SE=0.013 0). The subgroups were analyzed to identify the sources of heterogeneity according to race and agent sources. There was homogeneity among the three studies with agents from Ramp;D company (χ2=0.05, P=0.9750; I2=0.0%), and the AUC of SROC were 0.9675 (SE=0.016 7). Conclusion VEGF has a highly accurate sensitivity and specificity with a b ROC curve, which makes it a new marker to differentiate malignant ascites from the benign.
ObjectiveTo assess the values of MRI, ultrasound (US), and X-ray in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. MethodsThe image data of 50 breast lesions confirmed with histopathology were analyzed retrospectively and the values of MRI, US and X-ray mammography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions based on the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) were assessed. The diagnostic efficiency of MRI, US, and X-ray in 50 benign and malignant breast lesions were compared using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. The areas of ROC curves of MRI, US, and X-ray were calculated with Z test using SPSS 16.0. ResultsThere were 44 patients with 50 breast lesions, 26 malignant lesions, 24 benign lesions. Based on the BI-RADS, according to X-ray imaging features, 26 malignant breast lesions were classified as 5 lesions of category 5, 7 lesions of category 4, 6 lesions of category 3, 3 lesions of category 2, 1 lesion of category 1, 4 lesions of category zero. Twenty-four benign breast lesions were classified as 1 lesion of category 4, 3 lesions of category 3, 4 lesions of category 2, 13 lesions of category 1, 3 lesions of category zero. According to the characteristics of US findings, 26 malignant breast lesions were classified as 17 lesions of category 5, 4 lesions of category 4, 1 lesion of category 3, 1 lesion of category 2, 3 lesions of category 1. Twenty-four benign breast lesions were classified as 1 lesion of category 5, 2 lesions of category 4, 4 lesions of category 3, 14 lesions of category 2, 2 lesions of category 1, 1 lesion of category 0. According to MRI imaging findings, 26 malignant breast lesions were classified as 6 lesions of category 5, 18 lesions of category 4, 1 lesion of category 3, 1 lesion of category 1. Twenty-four benign breast lesions were classified as 20 lesions of category 1, 3 lesions of category 2, 1 lesion of category 3. The area under the ROC curve of the MRI, US, and X-ray was 0.977, 0.835, and 0.764, respectively. The differences of MRI with US (Z=2.05, P < 0.05) and MRI with X-ray mammography (Z=2.81, P < 0.05) were statistically significant. While the difference of US with X-ray mammography (Z=0.73, P > 0.05) was't statistically significant. ConclusionsDynamic contrast-enhanced MRI is an accurate examination in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. The differential diagnostic efficiency of MRI is significantly better than those with US and X-ray.
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of analyzing the pattern of gallbladder wall enhancement on MDCT to identify the different causes of acute cholecystitis. Methods In January 2009 to December 2012， 169 patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis caused by various pathologic conditions were performed MDCT scans， the images of portal venous phase and clinical data were retrospectively reviewed by two blinded radiologists. There were 146 cases in non-hepatopathy cholecystitis group and 23 cases in hepatopathy cholecystitis group. The other 5 normal gallbladder cases diagnosed by MDCT scans were retrospectively reviewed as contrast group. Using five patterns according to the enhancement pattern of flat gallbladder wall thickening on MDCT. The study cases were then divided into five patterns and the thickness of the mucous membrane were measured. The occurrence rate of each pattern and the thickness of the mucous membrane between the groups were compared respectively. Results In the non-hepatopathy cholecystitis group， there were typeⅡin 102 cases （69.9%）， typeⅢin 5 cases （3.4%）， typeⅣ in 30 cases （20.5%）， and typeⅤ in 9 cases （6.2%）. In the hepatopathy cholecystitis group， there were typeⅡin 2 cases （8.7%）， typeⅢ in 11 cases （47.9%）， typeⅣin 5 cases （21.7%）， and typeⅤin 5 cases （21.7%）. The occurrence rate of typeⅡin the non-hepatopathy cholecystitis group was significialtly higher than that in the hepatopathy cholecystitis group （P＜0.005）. The occurrence rate of typeⅢ and typeⅤ in the hepatopathy cholecystitis group were significialtly higher than those in the non-hepatopathy cholecystitis group（P＜0.005， P＜0.05）. The occurrence rate of type Ⅳ between the two groups had no significant difference （P＞0.05）. TypeⅠonly present in the contrast group. The non-hepatopathy group’s mean mucous membrane thickness was （2.61±1.30） mm ， which was thicker than the hepatopathy group’s （2.02±0.52） mm（t=2.22， P＜0.05）. Conclusion Analyzing the enhancement pattern of a thickened gallbladder wall on MDCT is helpful in identifying the causes of acute cholecystitis， and the gallbladder perforation or not.