ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of convalescent plasma (CP) in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of CP in the treatment of COVID-19 from inception to September 15th, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies; then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. ResultsA total of 16 RCTs involving 15 301 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that CP treatment did not reduce mortality compared with no-placebo (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.93 to 1.05, P=0.63) or normal saline (RR=1.06, 95%CI 0.60 to 1.86, P=0.84). However, compared with standard plasma, the mortality of CP group was lower (RR=0.59, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.95, P=0.03). In addition, compared with no-placebo or normal saline, CP treatment could not improve the clinical condition at 28-30 days, reduce mortality at early treatment and in patients without invasive mechanical ventilation when randomized. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that compared with no-placebo or normal saline, CP does not reduce mortality in patients with COVID-19. However, when the disease progresses to the point where standard plasma is required, CP may reduce mortality. In addition, use of CP in patients with early or non-critical COVID-19 failed to reduce mortality. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
Medical institutions, the last defense line for the medical treatment of coronavirus disease 2019, are crucial to avoid cross-infection in hospitals. And how to reasonably arrange patient visits and achieve early detection, early reporting, early isolation, and early treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and suspected cases at the same time is an important proposition. After the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019, West China Hospital of Sichuan University continued to supplement and improve implementation details based on the three-level pre-examination and triage of infectious diseases, and established a three-level pre-inspection and triage management mechanism more suitable for coronavirus disease 2019, and successfully applied it. This article introduces the process and results of this outpatient three-level pre-examination and triage management optimization practice, aiming to provide an experience reference for the outpatient three-level pre-examination and triage in medical institutions.
This article discusses the concret implementation of day surgery in Ophthalmology Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University during the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic and under the regular prevention and control, so as to provide a basis for ensuring the safety and effectiveness of clinical work in the special period. According to the requirements of health administration departments and the hospital for the prevention and control of epidemic, combining with the characteristics of concret work, the Ophthalmology Center carried out and accurately implemented a series of prevention and control management measures, and obtained good results in the clinical work on the basis of comprehensive security protection. From February to October, 2020, there were a total of 16 507 cases who underwent the day surgery in the Ophthalmology Center, with no surgical infection or suspected case of coronavirus disease 2019. The safety and quality management of epidemic prevention and control has played an active and effective role in the active development of day surgery in this center. The safe and optimized diagnosis and treatment process has reassured the patients and their families, and the strict implementation of protective measures by medical staff has ensured the safety of surgery and the work being proceed with smooth progress and high efficacy.
The prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 is severe. In order to reduce the exposure of high-risk population and help home protection for at-risk population, West China Hospital of Sichuan University actively explored the construction and practice of online monitoring and home control systems, established a follow-up work team for at-risk population, formulated standardized work models and procedures, set up an online standardized follow-up information registration form to collect follow-up data, and controlled the process quality through repeated supervision. During the epidemic period of coronavirus disease 2019, West China Hospital of Sichuan University online follow-up mode can play a positive supporting role in the epidemic prevention and control and promoting this model has certain reference value for various medical institutions.
ObjectiveTo investigate the psychological status and its influencing factors of hospital staff during the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and provide a reference for psychological intervention strategies for hospital staff in public health emergencies.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, we investigated the staff of Mianzhu People’s Hospital through an anonymous questionnaire survey sent through WeChat group from February 13th to 18th, 2020, to analyze the psychological situation and influencing factors of the on-the-job staff. SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical analysis.ResultsAmong the 1 115 staff members who met the inclusion criteria, 951 completed the questionnaire, with a response rate of 85.3%. There were 945 valid questionnaires, with an effective response rate of 84.8%. A total of 224 staff members (23.7%) had mental health problems. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the total scores of social support [odds ratio (OR)=0.869, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.805, 0.938), P<0.001] and the total scores of stress coping strategies [OR=0.685, 95%CI (0.607, 0.772), P<0.001] were protective factors of psychological status, while having kids [OR=1.607, 95%CI (1.084, 2.382), P=0.018] and the position being logistic worker [OR=2.229, 95%CI (1.326, 3.746), P=0.002] were risk factors of psychological status.ConclusionsDuring the outbreak of COVID-19, mental health problems emerged among the staff of designated medical treatment hospital. When a public health emergency occurs, hospitals and relevant departments should take psychological intervention measures as soon as possible to ensure the work of epidemic prevention and control.
With the change of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prevention and control strategy in China, the number of COVID-19 cases has increased significantly recently, which has also brought new challenges to the perioperative risk control of thoracic surgery. This paper puts forward several suggestions, aiming to standardize the preoperative screening and evaluation during the COVID-19 period, strictly grasp the indications and timing of surgery, optimize the medical management process, individualize surgical decision-making, and minimize the risk of COVID-19 infection to surgery.
In December 2019, an outbreak of pneumonia associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan, China. The lung imaging finding is like that of the lung cancer immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) associated pneumonia. Therefore, we speculated that they may have similar pathogenesis and treatment strategies, which is reviewed in this article in order to provide some reference to timely and effectively reduce the fatality rate of COVID-19.
Objective To understand the impact of an infection risk control measures implemented in the non-clinical areas of a hospital on the visitors during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic period, in an attempt to provide scientific evidence for the improvement and optimization of subsequent prevention and control measures. Methods The convenience sampling method was used to investigate and analyze all the personnel who came to the hospital for treatment or work on February 22, 2020. Collect the influence of the personnel coming to the hospital on the sense of security, medical behavior (work) and the acceptance of the measures arising from the implementation of infection control measures such as sub-regional management of people and vehicles, body temperature screening during admission, and sub-channel management of hospital visitors in the non-clinical areas of the hospital. ResultsA total of 1 098 patients/family members were included. 70.13% (770/1 098) of the patients/family members thought that visiting the hospital during the COVID-19 epidemic would make them feel uneasy; 90.26% (991/1 098) of the patients/family members could accept the body temperature screening during admission, 96.99% (1 065 / 1 098) of the patients/family members could accept the sub-regional management of people and vehicles, and 100.00% (1 098/1 098) of the patients/family members could accept the sub-channel management of hospital visitors in the non-clinical areas of the hospital; 71.22% (782/1 098) of the patients/family members thought that the peripheral prevention and control measures had increased the sense of security in medical treatment, and they would continue to choose this hospital for the next time if necessary. A total of 2 543 employees were included. 37.55% (955/2543) of the employees felt uneasy because they were afraid of being infected in the hospital; 93.12% (2 368/2 543) of the employees could accept the establishment of a dedicated channel for staff admission, 99.25% (2 524/2 543) of the employees could accept the temperature screening at the entrance of the dedicated channel, and 97.48% (2 479/2 543) of the employees could accept the subregional management measures. 82.54% (2 099/2 543) of the employees thought that the peripheral prevention and control measures would not affect their work. Conclusions Implementing a series of prevention and control measures in the non-clinical areas during the emergency response state can improve the sense of security of the patients, family members of the patients and employees who come to the hospital to some extent. In the future, measures such as strengthening publicity and education, improving facilities, perfecting the planning and design, providing the complete information, and strengthening supervision, can be taken to further optimize the risk control of infection in non-clinical areas and improve the acceptance of personnel coming to the hospital.
ObjectiveTo study the clinical characteristics of overseas imported and related local COVID-19 patients in Chengdu.MethodsFifty overseas imported patients who were Chinese and 14 related local patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to Public Health Clinical Center of Chengdu from November to December 2020 were selected. The epidemiological characteristics, clinical manifestations, auxiliary examination, treatment and prognosis were summarized and analyzed.ResultsThe local group were older, and they were mostly elderly and females (P≤0.05). Compared with the imported group, the proportion of the local group was higher in heart disease and tumor. More patients had cough, fever and expectoration symptoms (P≤0.05). C-reactive protein, fasting blood glucose and fibrinogen were higher, and the lymphocyte count, blood platelet count, CD3+ T lymphocyte count, CD4+ T lymphocyte count, CD8+ T lymphocyte count were lower. The positive rate of novel coronavirus total antibody, IgG antibody and IgM antibody in the imported group were higher than those in the local group (P≤0.05). The negative conversion time of the median nucleic acid was shorter than that of local patients (P≤0.05).ConclusionThere are differences in sex ratio, age, complications, clinical manifestations, lymphocyte measurement value, T lymphocyte count and negative conversion time of nucleic acid between overseas imported and local COVID-19 patients in Chengdu. The local patients are mostly elderly and have more complicated conditions, but all of them have good prognosis.
Objective To investigate the causal effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Methods Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data were sourced from the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative and published research. We employed: ① linkage disequilibrium score regression to estimate heritability of individual traits and genetic correlations between COVID-19 and IPF; ② multi-trait analysis of GWAS to identify genetic loci associated with COVID-19 and IPF; ③ Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess causal effect of COVID-19 on IPF; ④ colocalization analysis to identify shared causal variants. Results ① Three COVID-19 phenotypes showed significant positive genetic correlations with IPF (P<0.05); ② Multi-trait analysis of GWAS identified loci jointly associated with COVID-19 and IPF; ③ MR indicated that COVID-19 hospitalization may increase IPF risk (P=0.006); ④ Two causal variants were identified: rs12585036 (posterior probability>0.8, mapped to ATP11A) and rs12610495 (posterior probability>0.8, mapped to DPP9). Conclusions COVID-19 hospitalization may increase IPF risk through inflammatory pathways, providing new insights for managing COVID-19-related pulmonary diseases.