ObjectivesTo investigate the status quo of follow-up services for patients with cervical spondylosis, to explore its influencing factors, and to provide reference for the follow-up management model after postoperative discharge of patients with cervical spondylosis.MethodsA total of 220 patients with cervical spondylosis were selected by using convenient sampling from October 2018 to May 2019, and the general information questionnaire and the follow-up service needs questionnaire were used for the investigation.ResultsThe score of follow-up service content requirement for patients with cervical spondylosis was 54.87±7.56, and the rehabilitation training instruction was the highest. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the follow-up service content score was influenced by education level [non-standardized partial regression coefficient (b)=3.186, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.490, 3.882), P<0.001], length of hospital stay [b=5.140, 95%CI (3.914, 6.365), P<0.001], Neck Disability Index [b=1.326, 95%CI (0.189, 2.463), P=0.022], and age [≥75 years as the reference, 45-59 years: b=3.766, 95%CI (0.671, 6.860), P=0.017; 60-74 years: b=4.081, 95%CI(0.849, 7.314), P=0.014]. The method of obtaining follow-up services was mainly based on outpatient follow-up (85.5%), telephone follow-up (50.5%), and established a follow-up service center (40.5%) for discharged patients. The executives were multidisciplinary teams (60.5%) and hospital-community integration teams (48.2%). There were 19.1% of discharged patients who were willing to pay for relevant follow-up services.ConclusionsPatients with postoperative cervical spondylosis have strong demand for post-discharge follow-up services, which are affected by many factors. Medical staff should pay attention to this and develop a personalized follow-up service plan according to patient characteristics to meet different discharged patients and improve the quality of medical services.
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the early effectiveness of the Discover cervical artificial disc replacement in treating cervical spondylosis. Methods Qualified for the selective standard, 24 patients with cervical spondylosis were treated between March 2010 and March 2011. Of 24 patients, 13 patients underwent anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) (ACDF group, between March 2010 and September 2010) and 11 patients underwent Discover cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR group, between September 2010 and March 2011). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, lesions typing, and affected segments between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The operative time, blood loss, and complications were recorded. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, and Odom’s scores were used to evaluate the postoperative effectiveness. In CADR group, the cervical range of motion (ROM) in all directions, and prosthesis eccentricity were measured before and after operation. Results Symptoms disappeared and no complication occurred after operation in the patients of 2 groups. The patients were followed up 12 to 18 months (mean, 15.3 months) in ACDF group and 6 to 12 months (mean, 9.6 months) in CADR group. The NDI scores in CADR group were significantly higher than those in ACDF group at 1, 3, and 6 months (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was observed in JOA score improvement rate between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). According to Odom’s score at last follow-up, the results were excellent in 6 cases, good in 4 cases, and fair in 3 cases with an excellent and good rate of 76.92% in ACDF group, and were excellent in 9 cases, good in 1 case, and poor in 1 case with an excellent and good rate of 90.91% in CADR group, showing no significant difference (χ2=3.000, P=0.223). The patients in CADR group had significant limit of cervical joint ROM in flexion and extension and right bending at 1 month (P lt; 0.05), but cervical joint ROM restored after 3 months. The ROMs of left bending at 3 months and 6 months were bigger than preoperative value (P lt; 0.05). Meanwhile, ROM in left bending were bigger than that in right bending in replaced segment and upper segment (P lt; 0.05), and the ROM difference between left bending and right bending in upper segment was 2 times higher than that in the replaced segment; a marked linear correlation (P lt; 0.05) existed between the ROM difference and prosthesis eccentricity, and prosthesis bias had bigger ROM in lateral bending. Conclusion Discover cervical artificial disc replacement for treatment of cervical spondylosis can provide a good effectiveness and cervical postoperative movement function. As a new prosthesis, it has some merits such as simple operative steps and less complications.
The incidence of perioperative sleep disorders in patients with cervical spondylosis is high, which affects the physiological and psychological rehabilitation effect of patients after surgery. The expert consensus (preliminary draft) was prepared by summarizing expert experience and recommendations. After expert review and revision, the consensus was formed. The consensus was developed based on existing evidence-based medical evidence and expert clinical experience, which is scientific and practical and can provide a basis for clinical medical personnel to prevent and treat perioperative sleep disorders in patients with cervical spondylosis.
In order to adapt to the development of the new medical care model, West China Hospital of Sichuan University established a multidisciplinary follow-up team, established follow-up health files, implemented follow-up health management, assessed the risk of abnormal indicators, guided rehabilitation, established green medical treatment channels, managed follow-up data, prevented health management risks, and continuously improved quality. Through these measures, West China Hospital of Sichuan University has established a standardized and systematic follow-up management model for patients with cervical spondylosis after discharge, in order to promote the functional rehabilitation of patients during the perioperative period, and improve patient satisfaction. This article introduces this contract-based follow-up management model, which aims to provide a reference for other medical institutions to establish a good follow-up management system for patients with cervical spondylosis.
Objective To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by using zero-profile anchored cage (ZAC) in treatment of consecutive three-level cervical spondylosis, by comparing with plate-cage construct (PCC). Methods A clinical data of 65 patients with cervical spondylosis admitted between January 2020 and December 2022 and met the selection criteria was retrospectively analyzed. During consecutive three-level ACDF, 35 patients were fixed with ZAC (ZAC group) and 30 patients with PCC (PCC group). There was no significant difference in baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05), including gender, age, body mass index, surgical segment, preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) score, prevertebral soft tissue thickness (PSTT), cervical lordosis, and surgical segmental angle. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, clinical indicators (JOA score, NDI, VAS score), and radiological indicators (cervical lordosis, surgical segmental angle, implant subsidence, surgical segment fusion, and adjacent segment degeneration), and the postoperative complications [swelling of the neck (PSTT), dysphagia] were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results Patients in both groups were followed up 24-39 months. There was no significant difference in follow-up duration between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were lower in ZAC group than in PCC group, and the length of hospital stay was longer, but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). At each time point after operation, both groups showed significant improvements in JOA score, VAS score, and NDI compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups at each time point after operation (P>0.05). Both groups showed an increase in PSTT at 3 days and 3, 6 months after operation compared to preoperative levels (P<0.05), but returned to preoperative levels at last follow-up (P>0.05). The PSTT at 3 days and 3 months after operation were significantly lower in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at 6 months and at last follow-up (P>0.05). The incidences of dysphagia at 3 days and 3 months were significantly lower in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05), while no significant difference was observed at 6 months and last follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no postoperative complication in both groups including hoarseness, esophageal injury, cough, or hematoma. Both groups showed improvement in cervical lordosis and surgical segmental angle compared to preoperative levels, with a trend of loss during follow-up. The cervical lordosis loss and surgical segmental angle loss were significantly more in the ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05). The incidence of implante subsidence was significantly higher in ZAC group than in PCC group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the ZAC group and PCC group in the incidences of surgical segment fusion and adjacent segment degeneration (P>0.05). ConclusionIn consecutive three-level ACDF, both ZAC and PCC can achieve satisfactory effectiveness. The former can reduce the incidence of postoperative dysphagia, while the latter can better maintain cervical curvature and reduce the incidence of implant subsidence.
Objective To explore the neck axial symptom (AS) after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and to make contrastive analysis. Methods From October 2004 to April 2006, 22 patients, 13 males and 9 females, aged 33-54 years old (43.3 on average), underwent Bryan cervical disc placement (groupA). Among them, there were 16 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 6 of nerve root cervical syndrome, with 20of single segment replacement and 2 of two segments replacement. The courses of disease were 1-21 months (6 months on average). Meanwhile, 30 patients, 17 males and 13 females, aged 35-64 years old (50.3 on average) underwent traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (group B). Among them, there were 19 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and 11 of nerve root cervical syndrome, with 26 of single segments replacement and 4 of two segments replacement. The course of disease was 1-23 months (7 months on average). In both groups, the neurologic recovery rate, the change of cervical curvature of the operated segments and total range of motion (ROM), and incidence of neck axial symptoms were recorded and compared. Results All the patients were followed up for 24-42 months (30.6 months on average). There was no graveness compl ication happening during and after operation in both groups. There were no compl ications of prosthesis bit shifting and amotio in group A, and group B exhibited a bony fusion on X-ray films 6 months after operation, without plate and bolt loose or broken. The patients’ cl inical symptoms of radiculopathy were obviously rel ieved and the curative effect was satisfactory in two groups of nerve root cervical syndrome. In both groups of cervical spondylotic myelopathy, the patients’ JOA scores at the postoperative follow-up increased obviously than preoperative (Plt; 0.01), and there was no significant difference between the two groups before the operation and at the end of the follow-up (P gt; 0.05). The rate of sagittal al ignment of the operated segment with kyphosis increased obviously in group B, higher than in group A (P lt; 0.05).The total ROM of group B was obviously lower than preoperative (Plt; 0.01), and the pre- and postoperative difference of group A was not statistically significant (P gt; 0.05). The rate of postoperative neck AS was 18.18% in group A and 46.67% in group B, and the difference was statistically significant(Plt; 0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, the use of Byran disc arthroplasty for cervical syndrome is associated with good outcomes. At the same time, it can maintain the cervical motion and curvature of operated segments, avoid the decrease of total ROM and lower the incidence of the postoperative neck AS.
To compare and evaluate the whole effect of anterior decompression approach to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy by using cervical retractor systems and the traditional surgical approach. Methods From April 2001 to August 2004, group A included 30 males and 23 females aging from 31 to 69 years, and the involved time was from 7 months to 15 years. Involved segments included 22 one-segments, 24 two-segments and 7 three-segments. In all 53 cases, anterior windowing decompression and fusion with autograft and titanium plate internal fixation by using traditionalcircular saw were performed. Group B included 48 males and 20 females aging from 33 to 74 years, and the involved time was from 5 months to 18 years. Involved segments included 23 one-segments, 34 two-segments and 11 three-segments. In all 68 cases, anterior undermined far-reaching decompression and fusion with autograft and titanium plate internal fixation by using removing disc merely in the single-level or separately in the multilevels employing self-retractor and Caspar cervical retractor systems via interspinal approach were performed. X-rays and MRI showed cervical disc degeneration, herniation and spinal cord compression. The surgery time, loss of blood, vertebral body fusion time, difference in height of involved segments preor postoperatively and compl ications were counted up and compared between the two groups. Improvement rate of spinal function pre- or postoperatively were valued by using JOA score. Results A total of 92 cases including 42 of group A and 50 of group B were followed up for 3 to 5 years, mean 3.5 years. In group A, surgery time, loss of blood, time of vertebral body fusion, difference in height of involved segments pre- or postoperatively, and improvement ratio of spinal function were(76.80 ± 28.41) min,(564.00 ± 181.96) mL,(12.10 ± 3.58) weeks, (1.30 ± 0.67) mm and 0.49% ± 0.14%, respectively. In group B, they were(57.90 ± 15.01) min,(317.50 ± 136.92) mL,(9.75 ± 1.36) weeks, (3.00 ± 0.56) mm and 0.71% ± 0.17% , respectively. The differences between the two groups were significant in all measured values(P lt; 0.05). Compl ications occurred in 7 cases ofgroup A including 1 spinal cord injury, 1 plate displacement, 1 bonegraft displacement and 4 disfunctions of il iac region. No compl ication happened in group B. Conclusion Anterior decompression approach using cervical retractor systems is significantly superior to the traditional approach as to the whole effect to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy, and furtherperfects the traditional anterior decompression approach. The modified approach is scientific, safe and easily spread.
Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) treatment for cervical spondylosis has been more than half a century, and achieved good clinical results. However, with the continuous extension of follow-up time, the fusion segment-associated postoperative complications emerged gradually. Reserved cervical stability and activity, the concept of non-fusion was born. As a non-fusion technique, cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR) developed rapidly. With the continuous development of artificial prosthesis materials and design concepts, and specification and proficiency of surgical procedures, CADR has achieved better short- and mid-term clinical efficacy than ACDF. Compared with ACDF, the main advantages of CADR are that the postoperative recovery is quick, the activity and stability of cervical vertebra are maintained, the height of cervical intervertebral space is restored, and the stress of adjacent segments and the rate of surgical renovation are reduced. In clinical work, as an emerging technology, CADR requires spine surgeons to control the surgical indications, contraindications, and patients’ conditions strictly. This article reviews the research progress of CADR in order to provide new ideas for clinical treatment of cervical spondylosis.
Objective To evaluate the long-term effect of excessive length of bone graft via anterior cervical approach and over distraction of intervertebral space on cervical curvature and postoperative neck axial symptom (AS). Methods FromJune 2001 to June 2004, 30 patients with nerve root cervical spondylosis at the C5,6 level underwent anterior cervicaldecompression, autogenous il iac bone graft and internal fixation with titanium plate. There were 14 males and 16 females aged 32-73 years old (average 54.7 years old), and the course of disease was 1-31 months (average 7 months). No instabil ity of cervical vertebrae was noted on the cervical dynamic position x-ray films. Intervertebral height was measured immediately after operation, and accordingly the patients were divided into two groups: the over distraction group (n=11), in which the length of bone graft was excessive, the intervertebral space was over distracted, and the intervertebral height was increased by more than 3 mm compared with the preoperative value; the proper distraction group (n=19), in which the length of bone graft was proper, no over distraction of the intervertebral space occured, and the intervertebral height was increased by less than 3 mm compared with the preoperative value. Regular X-ray exams were performed 1 week and 3, 24, and 48 months after operation to analyze bone fusion condition of the grafted bone, changes of the intervertebral height of the fused segments, and variation of physiological curvature of the cervical vertebra. The postoperative neck AS was evaluated according to the the neck AS evaluation criteria set by ZENG Yan and co-workers. Results All patients were followed up for 48-66 months (average 54.5 months). Cl inical symptoms were el iminated in all cases. No compl ications occurred in the proper distraction group; 1 patient of the over distraction group had ostoperative nerve root paralysis at C5 level, and recovered 3 months after proactive treatment. Bone fusion was achieved in all patients 3-6 months after operation, except for 1 case in the proper distraction group suffering from non-fusion 12 months after operation. There was no occurrence of loosening or breakage of steel plate and screw, and no displacement of the grafted bone. At 48 months after operation, the intervertebral height of the proper distraction group and the over distraction group was increased by (1.9 ± 1.8) mm and (3.5 ± 2.7) mm, respectively, when compared with the preoperativevalue (P gt; 0.05). The physiological curvature of the operated cervical segment was well maintained. The curvature of the proper distraction group and the over distraction group at the final follow-up visit was increased by (2.17 ± 1.83)° and (3.32 ± 2.71)°, respectively, when compared with the preoperative value (P gt; 0.05). The physiological curvature of the whole cervical vertebra at the final follow-up visit was increased by (4.57 ± 3.71)° in the proper distraction group and decreased by (2.43 ± 2.13)° in the over distraction group, when compared with the preoperative value (P lt; 0.05). The incidence rate of postoperative neck S at 48 months after operation was 15.79% in the proper distraction group (11 cases excellent, 5 cases good, 3 cases fair) and 54.55% in the over distraction group (3 cases excellent, 2 cases good, 5 cases fair, 1 case poor), showing a significant difference between two groups (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Excessive length of bone graft via anterior cervical approach and over distraction of intervertebral space are bad for maintaining the physiological curvature of the whole cervical vertebra, and increase the incidence of postoperative neck AS. Selection of bone graft at the proper height is essential in anterior cervical operation.
Objective To investigate the effect difference between the Solis fixation fusion and the titanium plate fixation by the cervical anterior approach after decompression and bone graft implantation. Methods Of the 104 patients with cervical disease from September 2001 to March 2004, 36 were treated with the Solis implantation after decompression by the cervical anterior approach, and 68 were treated with the titanium plate fixation after decompression and bone graft implantation. The recovery of the neurological function in all the patients were assessed with the JOA Scoring at 6 weeks,3,6,12,24 and 36 months. The fragment fusion and its stability as well as the changes in the intervertebral height were assessed with X-ray examination. Results According to the JOA Scoring, the excellent and good outcomes accounted for 94.4% in the Solis group and 94.1% in the titanium plate group. In allthe patients, the fragment fusion was achieved in 3 months. The change in the Cobb angle of the fused fragment was less than 5° at the flexionextension posture, 3.6±0.8° in the Solis group, 2.4±0.7° in the titanium plate group. There was significant differences between the two groups(P＜0.05). The intervertebral height of the operation fragment in the Solis group increased 1.6±0.7mm, which was higher than that in the titanium plate group(P＜0.05). Conclusion Clinical effects of the two internalfixation operations are good; however, the Solis fixation has more advantages because of its simpler performance,less trauma, and fewer complications.