ObjectiveTo summarize the effectiveness and experience of Wanger grade 3-5 diabetic foot treated with vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) combined with transverse tibial bone transport.MethodsBetween March 2015 and January 2018, 21 patients with refractory diabetic foot who failed conservative treatment were treated with VSD combined with transverse tibial bone transport. There were 15 males and 6 females, aged 55-88 years (mean, 65 years). The diabetes history was 8-15 years (mean, 12.2 years). The duration of diabetic foot ranged from 7 to 84 days (mean, 35.3 days). The size of diabetic foot ulcer before operation ranged from 2 cm×2 cm to 8 cm×5 cm. According to Wanger classification, 8 cases were rated as grade 3, 11 cases as grade 4, and 2 cases as grade 5. Among the 21 cases, angiography of lower extremity before operation was performed in 5 cases, CT angiography of lower extremity in 16 cases, all of which indicated that the arteries below the knee were narrowed to varying degrees and not completely blocked. Preoperative foot skin temperature was (29.28±0.77)℃, C-reactive protein was (38.03±31.23) mg/L, leukocyte count was (9.44±2.21)×109/L, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 6.8±1.5, and ability of daily living (Barthel index) was 54.3±10.3.ResultsAfter operation, 2 patients with Wanger grade 4 and smoking history failed treatment and had an major amputation (amputation above ankle joint) at 30 days and 45 days after operation, respectively. One patient with Wanger grade 5 and chronic heart failure died of cardiac arrest at 60 days after operation. The remaining 18 patients were followed up 6-24 months (mean, 9.2 months). The external fixator was removed at 40-62 days after operation, with an average of 46 days. All the wounds healed, with a healing time of 50-120 days (mean, 62.5 days). The pain of 18 patients’ feet was relieved obviously, and there was no recurrence of ulcer in situ or other parts. There was no complication such as tibial fracture and ischemic necrosis of lower leg skin after operation. After ulcer healing, the foot skin temperature was (30.86±0.80)℃, C-reactive protein was (22.90±18.42) mg/L, VAS score was 2.4±1.2, and Barthel index was 77.3±4.6, all showing significant differences when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05); the leukocyte count was (8.91±1.72)×109/L, showing no significant difference (t=1.090, P=0.291).ConclusionVSD combined with transverse tibial bone transport can effectively promote the healing of Wanger grade 3-5 diabetic foot wounds, but smokers, unstable blood glucose control, and chronic heart failure patients have the risk of failure.
Objective To review the progress in amputation technique of diabetic foot. Methods Recent l iterature concerning the amputation technique of diabetic foot was reviewed and analyzed. Results According to the different levels of the amputation, the diabetic foot’s amputation can be classified as major amputation and minor amputation, and differentkinds of methods can derive from these styles. Different factors should be considered when the style and method of amputation are chosen. Conclusion To the diabetic foot amputation, the general rule is to l imit the amputation level on the premise of the good cl inical effect. The health state, the region of the diabetic foot, the tissue perfusion, the susceptibil ity to infection in local tissue, and the abil ity of wound healing are important factors in selecting the styles and methods of diabetes-related amputations. Importance should be attached to the synthesis treatments of diabetes to prevent the higher level amputation.
ObjectiveTo review the research progress of adrenergic β-antagonists on wounds and diabetic chronic cutaneous ulcers healing in recent years, and to investigate its application prospect in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).MethodsThe latest literature about the role of adrenergic β-antagonists in wounds and diabetic chronic cutaneous ulcers healing was extensively reviewed, and the mechanisms of adrenergic β-antagonists for wounds and its potential benefit for DFU were analyzed thoroughly.ResultsThe adrenergic β-antagonists can accelerate the wound healing. The possible mechanisms include accelerating re-epithelialization, promoting angiogenesis, improving neuropathy, and regulating inflammation and growth factors, etc. At present clinical research data showed that the adrenergic β-antagonists may be an adjuvant treatment for diabetic chronic cutaneous ulcers.ConclusionAdrenergic β-antagonists maybe promote the healing of wounds and diabetic chronic cutaneous ulcers. However, more long-term follow-up and high-quality randomized control studies are needed to further verify their efficacy and safety for DFU.
Objective To introduce the basic research and cl inical appl ication of stem cells transplantation for treating diabetic foot. Methods The recent original articles about the stem cells transplantation for treating diabetic foot were extensively reviewed. Results Transplanted different stem cells in diabetic foot could enhanced ulceration heal ing in certain conditions, increase neovascularization and avoid amputation. Conclusion Stem cells transplantation for treating diabeticfoot may be a future approach．
Tibial transverse transport (TTT) was firstly applied to treat thromboangiitis obliterans successfully by Professor QU Long in China in 2000. Based on this, the team of Professor HUA Qikai in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University applied this technique to treat diabetic foot since 2013, and until now, more than 500 patients underwent this treatment with excellent effectiveness including a salvage rate as high as 96.1%. Our team also improved this technique in many aspects, and developed a TTT-based classification system and treatment for diabetic foot. We also explored the underlying mechanism of TTT treatment using imaging, histology, and other basic research methods. To further promote the application of this technique in clinic, we reported the findings from our cases and reviewed our previous findings in this study.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of tibial transverse transport (TTT) combined with nose ring drain (NRD) in the treatment of severe diabetic foot ulcer.MethodsThe clinical data of 60 patients with severe diabetic foot (Wagner grade 3 or 4) ulcer who were admitted between April 2017 and August 2020 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 30 cases were treated with TTT combined with NRD (TTT+NRD group), and 30 cases were treated with TTT (TTT group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, diabetes duration, preoperative glycated hemoglobin, comorbidities, wound area, and duration, side, and grade of diabetic foot (P>0.05). The wound healing time, wound healing rate, amputation rate, recurrence rate, duration of antibiotic therapy, hospital stay, number of hospitalizations, and number of operations were recoreded and compared between the two groups.ResultsNo obvious surgical complications occurred in the two groups. Patients in both groups were followed up 3-13 months, with an average of 5.7 months. The duration of antibiotic therapy and hospital stay in the TTT+NRD group were significantly shorter than those in the TTT group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in wound healing time, wound healing rate, number of hospitalizations, and number of operations between the two groups (P>0.05). During follow-up, there was no recurrence of ulcer in the TTT+NRD group while 2 recurrent cases (6.7%) in the TTT group. The difference in recurrence rate was not significant (P=0.492). One case (3.3%) in the TTT+NRD group underwent amputation due to acute lower extremity vascular embolism, and 1 case (3.3%) in the TTT group underwent amputation due to secondary necrosis. The difference in amputation rate was not significant between the two groups (P=1.000).ConclusionTTT combined with NRD is an effective method for the treatment of severe diabetic foot ulcers with deep infections or relatively closed cavities or sinuses. It can shorten the time of antibiotic use and the length of hospitalization; and the NRD has a good drainage effect without obvious comorbidities, procedure and the postoperative care are simple and easy to obtain materials.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of local injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in treatment of diabetic foot ulcer.MethodsBetween October 2017 and October 2018, 90 diabetic foot ulcer patients who met the selection criteria were randomly divided into 3 groups: PRP injection group (group A, PRP was injected and hydrogel dressing covered the wounds), PRP covered group (group B, PRP gel and hydrogel dressing covered the wounds), and the control group (group C, hydrogel dressing covered the wounds), 30 cases in each group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, injured side, disease duration, preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin, wound size, and Wagner grading between groups (P>0.05). The frequency of treatments and hospitalization day in all groups and the total amount of PRP application in groups A and B were recorded. The wound healing condition was recorded during the treatment, and the wound healing rate was calculated at 3 months after the first debridement.ResultsThe frequency of treatments in groups A, B, and C were (10.2±0.8), (11.4±0.6), (12.5±0.5) times, respectively. The total amount of PRP application of groups A and B were (306±24) and (342±18) mL, respectively. There was no significant difference in the frequency of treatments and the total amount of PRP application between groups (P>0.05). The hospitalization days of groups A, B, and C were (40.5±1.8), (62.1±2.3), and (88.6±1.4) days, respectively, showing significant differences between groups (P<0.05). In the course of treatment, the necrosis and exudation of the wounds gradually reduced, the areas of wounds gradually reduced; and the above conditions of group A were significantly better than groups B and C, and group B was better than group C. At 3 months after the first debridement, the wound healing rates of groups A, B, and C were 93.2%±0.8%, 52.1%±1.1%, and 21.3%±1.3%, respectively, with significant differences between groups (P<0.05).ConclusionPRP can effectively promote the repair of diabetic foot ulcer. The effectiveness of local injection of PRP is superior to the local coverage.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the potential effectiveness of JinHuang powder in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). MethodsDatabases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, WanFang data, VIP and CNKI were electronically searched from their inception to December 2013, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about JinHuang powder for DFUs. Two reviewers screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsA total of 3 RCTs involving 198 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:the JinHuang powder group were superior to the control group in total effective rate (RR=1.25, 95%CI 1.10 to 1.41, P=0.00) and the wound healing time (SMD=-3.32, 95%CI -5.69 to -0.96, P=0.00). ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that the JinHuang powder is an effective therapeutic method for DFUs. Because of the limitations of quantity and quality of the eligible studies, large sample size studies are needed to validate the conclusion.
Objective To analyze the methods of treating diabetic feet and to evaluate the optimal method. Methods The clinical data of 115 patients (137 legs) with diabetic feet were retrospectively analyzed. Results Seventy-one affected legs were treated with balloon dilation or stenting (11 with additional debridement of local ulcer), 12 legs were treated by femoral-popliteal arterial bypass (5 with additional debridement of local ulcer), and 31 legs were treated by debridement of local ulcer or amputation merely, and another 23 legs were treated by medical therapy. All diabetic feet treated by surgical treatment were improved obviously without death and severe complications, while 2 cases with medicine therapy died. Conclusion Because of the complexion of the diabetic foot, it should be treated individually, and the key point is to deal with the vascular lesions.
Diabetic foot is one of the most common complications of diabetes. The incidence of diabetic foot is high and its treatment is difficult. The cost of treating this disease is huge, which brings a huge burden to patients, families, and society. According to the development process of diabetic foot, this article reviews the rehabilitation nursing of diabetic foot from the perspective of rehabilitation nursing problems, intervention measures, and intervention modes. The rehabilitation nursing problems are summarized as body functions, body structures, activities, and participation; the intervention measures involve rehabilitation education, skin nursing, exercise therapy, mental nursing, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, platelet-rich plasma therapy, and rehabilitation aids; the intervention modes include preventive rehabilitation nursing, in-hospital rehabilitation nursing, community and family rehabilitation nursing, and palliative nursing.