目的評價痔上黏膜環切術（PPH)加芍倍注射術治療中重度（排糞造影檢查提示突出深度大于16 mm）直腸前突的療效。方法回顧性分析我院2006年12月至2010年9月期間應用PPH加芍倍注射術治療的45例中重度直腸前突患者的臨床資料，分析其手術時間、住院時間及復發和并發癥發生情況。結果本組患者手術時間為(18.8±2.2) min （15～25 min），住院時間為(7.2±0.6) d (6～8 d)。術后隨訪(12.3±6.6)個月(6～30個月)。34例(75.6%)排便費力、肛門堵塞、下墜等不適癥狀完全緩解; 10例(22.2%)癥狀明顯緩解，有輕度肛門下墜感，可忍受; 1例(2.2%)術后排便困難癥狀緩解，但肛門下墜感明顯，6個月后緩解。1例(2.2%)于術后25個月再次出現排便費力癥狀，排糞造影檢查提示直腸前突深度為17 mm(術前34 mm)。45例患者術中及術后均未發生大出血、直腸狹窄、直腸陰道瘺等并發癥。結論PPH加芍倍注射術治療中重度直腸前突具有創傷小、術后恢復快、療效顯著、并發癥少等優點，但是患者術后養成良好的排便習慣很重要。
Objective To explore the value of fecal calprotectin （FCP） in the activity evaluation for ulcerative colitis （UC）. Methods Sixty three patients with UC （UC group） and 30 patients with gastrointestinal symptoms but without abnormal results of colonoscopy （control group）， who were treated in The Forth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University between Sep. 2007 to Dec. 2009 were enrolled to examine the FCP， C-creative protein （CRP）， and erythrocyte sedimentation rate （ESR）. Then comparison between UC group and control group was performed. Results Levels of FCP and CRP in active gradeⅠ，Ⅱ， and Ⅲ group were all significantly higher than those of control group and inactive UC group （P＜0.05）， with the increase of active grade of UC， the level of FCP gradually increased （P＜0.05）. The levels of CRP in active grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ group were all significantly higher than those of gradeⅠgroup （P＜0.05）， but didn’t differed between active grade Ⅱ and Ⅲ group （P＞0.05）. There were no significant difference among 5 groups on ESR （P＞0.05）. Levels of FCP （rs=0.807， P＜0.01）， CRP（rs=0.651， P＜0.01）， and ESR （rs=0.371， P＜0.05） in active grade group were significantly related to histological grade under colonoscopy. Conclusion FCP examination is simple， inexpensive， repeatable， and noninvasive， and FCP can be used as an marker of activity evaluation in UC.
Objective To summarize the methods of diagnosis and treatment for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Methods The processes of diagnosis and treatment for 84 patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were analyzed retrospectively. The incision and primary suture with mattress-suture and exterminated dead space was performed in 36 patients （without recurrence and the length of fistulous tract was less than 5 cm）. The sinus resection and incision open surgery with excision of fully pathology tissue and regional treatment with Kangfuxin liquid was performed in 48 patients （with recurrence and the length of fistulous tract was more than 5cm）. Results Two cases were recurrent after half a year and cured with sinus resection and incision open surgery and regional treatment with Kangfuxin liquid in the incision and primary suture group. The others were disposable healing. The healing time in the incision and primary suture group was from 14 to 35d， the mean time was 26d， which in the other group was from 30 to 45d， the mean time was 37d. Follow-up for more than one year， none of recurrence happened. Conclusion Perfecting inspection before surgery， clarifying a diagnosis， choosing a suitable surgical treatment， and perioperative care could cure the disease and extremelyreduce recurrence.
ObjectiveTo summarize the significance of laboratory examinations in diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC). MethodsLiteratures at home and abroad were searched to review the clinical significance of laboratory examinations indexes in diagnosis of UC. ResultsAnti-neutrophilcytoplasmicantibodies (ANCA) had some value in diagnosis of UC, but it was limited in evaluation of UC in active patients. The positive rate of anti-intestinal goblet cell antibody (GAB) in patients with UC was higher than that of patients with Crohn's disease (CD), so it could be used as identification indexes of the two diseases, but it could not reflect the severity of the disease. Anti-saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA) and anti-pancreatic antibody (PAB) were mainly used in the differential diagnosis of UC and CD, but they had no significant advantages in diagnosis of UC. Fecal calprotectin (FCP) played a positive role in evaluation of recurrence and activity in UC. Although lactoferrin, M2-pyruvate kinase (M2-PK), and S100A12 were not as effective as FCP, but if combined with related indicators, they were also important. ConclusionsOf the relevant indexes of laboratory examination in the diagnosis of UC, FCP plays an importent role in the evaluation of recurrence and activity of UC.
目的 觀察吻合器痔上黏膜環形切除釘合術（PPH）治療直腸前突所致便秘的臨床療效。方法 回顧性分析我科2008年1月至2012年1月期間經PPH治療的104例女性直腸前突致便秘患者的手術經過及術后療效。結果 本組104例均手術順利，手術時間13～35min，平均21min；住院時間3～7d，平均4.5d；無直腸陰道瘺、肛周膿腫、肛門狹窄等并發癥發生。術后2周均常規行肛門指檢，3例局部輕度炎癥，給予抗炎對癥治療后癥狀消失。5例吻合口局部吻合釘未完全脫落，給予取出后不適癥狀消失。術后隨訪1～5年（平均3年），隨訪率為97.12%（101/104），臨床癥狀完全消失99例，治愈率為95.19%；癥狀好轉5例，該5例行排糞造影檢查，直腸前突均明顯減輕，且便秘癥狀明顯緩解。結論 PPH治療女性直腸前突所致便秘安全、有效，便秘癥狀緩解明顯，是一種適合臨床應用的手術方式。
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids （PPH） and Block repair procedure for rectocele．Methods A retrospective study of 62 patients with surgical treatment for rectocele was analyzed．The patients were divided into PPH group （n=32） and Block group （n=30） according to the different operation procedure．The symptoms score of improvement of the patients after surgery was compared between the two groups， including operation time，intraoperative blood loss， postoperative pain score， required analgesic times， postoperative complications，hospitalization time，and hospitalization expenses．Results The symptoms of constipation of patients in two groups was significantly improved afer operation．Comparing one month with three months of Longo’s obstructed defecation syndrome （ODS） score after the operation，there was no significant difference in the PPH group（P＞0.05）， but significant difference in the Block group（P＜0.01）．Although the expenses of the PPH group was much higher than that of the Block group （P＜0.01）， the outcomes of the PPH group were much better than those of the Block group （P＜0.01）， including the postoperative Longo’s ODS score of one month and three months，operation time，intraoperative blood loss， postoperative pain score，required analgesic times，and hospitalization time．Two cases of lightly postoperative incontinence occurred in the PPH group，but completely recovered after three months in the clinical follow-up．Conclusions The PPH is as safe and effective as Block repair procedure for rectocele. The short time effect and lower recurrence rate of the PPH are better than those of the Block repair procedure．
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids （PPH） combined with Shaobei injection in treatment for obstructed defecation syndrome （ODS） caused by rectocele. Methods Seventy-two female patients with rectocele from December 2009 to January 2011 in this hospital were divided into PPH combined with Shaobei injection group （36 cases） and only PPH group （36 cases）. The Longo ODS score was performed on week one，month one，month three，and month six after operation，respectively；pain was evaluated， complications such as urine retention，postoperative bleeding，and anal function were observed；hospital stay and recovery work time were recorded in two groups. Results All patients were followed up for 6 months，there were no significant differences in complications，hospital stay，and the Longo ODS score on week one and month one after operation between two groups （P＞0.05）. But the Longo ODS score of the PPH combined with Shaobei injection group on month three and month six after operation were significantly lower than those of the only PPH group （P＜0.05）. Conclusion PPH combined with Shaobei injection has a better efficacy as compared with only PPH，and at least as safe as only PPH.
Objective To compare the curative effect of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) with MilliganMorgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) for acute incarcerated hemorrhoids. Methods A retrospective study of 103 patients with acute incarcerated hemorrhoids treated by surgery was performed. The patients were divided into PPH group (n=58) and MMH group (n=45) according to the different operation program who underwent. Operative time, pain score of VAS, time required for anodyne, postoperative complications, hospital stay, and hospital charges were compared. Results The symptoms were both relieved in two groups patients. Although the hospital charges of patients in MMH group were fewer, the patients in PPH group had advantages of shorter operative time, less postoperative pain, lower requirement for anodyne, fewer complications (edema of anal edge), and shorter hospital stay (Plt;0.01). Conclusion PPH is as safe and effective as MMH, and furthermore its short-term therapeutic effect is better than MMH.