Objective To explore the feasibility of arch-preserved jejunum in total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction （AEG） and upper-middle gastric cancer. Methods Clinical data of 13 patients who underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy with usage of arch-preserved jejunum to resolve the anastomosis tension problem in our hospital from Dec. 2012 to Apr. 2013 were analyzedretrospectively， and surgical experience was summarized. Results The maximal and actual extended lengths were （7.75±1.75） cm （4-10 cm） and （5.95±1.82） cm （3-9 cm） respectively， with the utilization percentage of （77.91±16.60）% （50.0%-100.0%）. These patients hadn’t suffered postoperative mortality and severe complications， such as anastomosis leakage， stenosis， hemorrhage， and so on. Besides， there were 1 case complicated with postoperative acute urinary retention and another 1 case complicated with infra-hepatic space abscess and peritoneal infection. Conclusion Arch-preserved jejunum is a practical surgical technique to handle with the anastomosis tension of esophagojejunostomy in total gastrectomy for AEG and upper-middle gastric cancer.
Objective To summarize the research progress of digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer. Methods The domestic and international published literatures about digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer were retrieved and reviewed. Results More and more attention had been paid to the postoperative quality of life after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer， and the most related factor for postoperative quality of life was the type of digestive tract reconstruction. The pouch reconstruction and preservation of enteric myoneural continuity showed beneficial effects on clinical outcomes. Current opinion considered the pouch reconstruction might be safe and effective， and was able to improve the postoperative quality of life of patients with gastric cancer. However， the preservation of duodenal pathway didn’t show significant benefits. Conclusion The optimal digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy is still debating， in order to resolve the controversies， needs more in-depth fundamental researches and more high-quality randomized controlled trials.
Objective To evaluate the effect of total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) for the treatment of advanced esophagogastric junction cancer. Methods Clinical data of 273 cases of advanced esophagogastric junction cancer who underwent TG and PG in our hospital from Jan. 2004 to Dec. 2010 were reviewed for retrospective analysis. Operation related indexes, 3-year cumulative survival rate, and 5-year cumulative survival rate were compared and evaluated. Results There was no significant difference between TG group and PG group in intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and hospital stay(P > 0.05), but the number of dissected lymph nodes in TG group was obviously more than those of PG group, and the difference was statistically significant(P=0.000). The postoperative complication rates were 10.3%(12/117)in TG group and 21.8%(34/156) in PG group respectively, which was lower in TG group(χ2=6.353, P < 0.05). The 3-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates of TG group were 58.9% and 34.2%, of PG group were 43.4% and 23.6% respectively, and the 3-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates were all lower in PG group(χ2=5.894, P < 0.05;χ2=5.582, P < 0.05). For patients in stage pT4, pN2, and TNMⅢ, whose tumor size were bigger than 3.0 cm, and patients who had accept chemotherapy, the 3-and 5-year cumulative survival rates of TG group were significantly higher than those of PG group(P < 0.05). However, for patients in stage pT2, pT3, pN0, pN1, pN3, TNMⅠ, TNMⅡ, TNMⅣ, whose tumor size were smaller than 3.0 cm, who had not accept chemotherapy, and patients of any pathological type, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in 3-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates(P > 0.05). Conclusion For the patients who suffered from advanced esophagogastric junction cancer, TG can improve long-term survival rate, and it can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and improve postoperative quality of life.
Objective To find out some ideal reconstructions after total gastrectomy in experimental study of rat. Methods Sixty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly and averagely divided into 6 groups: Roux-en-Y group (RY group), proximate jejunal pouch group (PJP group), distal jejunal pouch group (DJP group), two jejunal pouchs group (TJP group), duodenumjejunal pouch interposition group (DJPI group) and laparotomy group (L group). Body weight of rats, intestinal transit distance, adaptive changes in esophagojejunostomic mucosa and morphology changes of intestine after operation were observed and compared. Results At 2 weeks after operation, body weight in each group were significantly lower than that before operation （P＜0.05）. At 4 weeks postoperatively, body weight in PJP group, TJP group and DJPI group were significantly higher than that in RY group respectively （P＜0.05）, as well as at 8 weeks. Intestinal transit distance in PJP group was shorter than that in RY group （P＜0.05）. With regard to intestinal mucosa, TJP group and DJPI group were significantly different with RY group （P＜0.05）. Interestingly, there was no difference in each group as to refluxing esophagitis （P＞0.05）. Conclusion Proximate and two jejunal pouchs Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy seem to be ideal procedures for digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy. The jejunal pouch interposition procedure seems to be same effective to PJP and TJP, but there is no preponderance over the former.
Objective To investigate for a reasonable reconstruction method in patients undergoing total gastrectomy. Methods Data of 63 cases receiving total gastrectomy from January 2000 to October 2005 in Ganzhou District Hospital of Zhangye City were analyzed retrospectively, and the patients were divided into double pouch jejunum interposition （DPJI） group (n=30) and Roux-en-Y ρ pouch （RYρ） group (n=33) according to the operation methods, then operation time， morbidity of complications, amount and frequency of meat and drink, complications of digestive tract, amount of total protein and albumin were compared between two groups. Results There were no significant differences in operation time，morbidity of complications, the amount or frequency of meat and drink between two groups (Pgt;0.05); but the incidence of digestive tract complications of DPJI group was lower than that of RYρ group （P＜0.05). GradeⅠ/Ⅱof Vervaeck index and the amount of total protein and albumin in DPJI group were statistical significantly higher than those of RYρ group （P＜0.05）. Conclusion Functional DPJI is a reasonable digestive tract reconstruction method.
Objective To investigate the influence on the postoperative recovery for giving either total parenteral nutrition （TPN） or early enteral nutrition (EEN) to patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy. Methods Eighty-six patients with gastric cancer undergone total gastrectomy were divided into TPN group (n=31) and EEN group (n=55). Patients in TPN group received TPN support via vena cava (internal jugular vein or subclavian vein), while patients in EEN group received early feeding through the naso-intestinal tube, which was placed during operation, and volume of enteral nutrition (fresubin) was increased daily, full enteral nutrition was expected on day 3-5. Nutrition status after operation, postoperative plasma albumin (Alb), the time of passing gas or stool, the time of oral intake, hospital stay and any postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results There were no significant differences between two groups (Pgt;0.05) in postoperative plasma Alb level, the time of passing gas or stool, postoperative complications rate or hospital stay. However, in the TPN group, the time of oral intake was shorter than that in EEN group (P=0.004). Conclusions Both TPN and EEN are the suitable nutritional methods for patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy, and with no detectable difference. For patients with high risk, such as severe malnutrition, naso-intestinal tube should be placed for EEN.