摘要:目的: 探討早期腸內營養支持在胃腸道惡性腫瘤術后患者中應用的臨床效果。 方法 :54 例胃腸道惡性腫瘤行根治手術的患者,隨機分為對照組和研究組,分別接受腸外營養支持(PN)和腸內營養支持(EN)。比較兩組治療前后的血清白蛋白、前白蛋白和轉鐵蛋白水平,肝腎功能指標,胃腸功能恢復時間以及并發癥的發生率。 結果 :經過術后7 d 的營養支持治療,EN組術后血清前白蛋白、轉鐵蛋白水平升高程度明顯大于PN組,胃腸功能較PN組更快恢復。在術后并發癥的發生率和肝腎功能指標方面兩組沒有顯著性差異。 結論 :早期腸內營養支持能夠安全有效地促進胃腸道腫瘤術后患者的恢復。Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of early enteral nutrition (EN) support on postoperative patients with gastrointestinal malignancy. Methods : A total of 54 postoperative patients with gastrointestinal malignancy were randomly divided into EN group and parenteral (PN) group. Both groups received isocaloric and isonitrogen nutrition support. The serum albumin, transferrin, prealbumin and liver and renal function were measured using standard techniques. The gastrointestinal function and postoperative complications were evaluated. Results : After nutrition support, serum albumin was not significantly different between two groups. Compared with PN group, serum transferrin and prealbumin level significantly increased in EN group (P＜005). The gastrointestinal function in EN group resumed earlier than that in PN group. There was also no difference in liver and renal function and postoperative complications between two groups. Conclusion : The application of early enteral nutrition support is beneficial to the recovery of the gastrointestinal cancer patients after surgery.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between total enteral nutrition and enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods A total of 70 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from July 2012 to July 2015 were collected prospectively, and all patients were divided into 2 groups randomly: enteral nutrition group and combined nutrition group. Patients in enteral nutrition group received total enteral nutrition, and patients in combined nutrition group received enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition. Compared the nutritional indicators, other related indexes, and morbidity between the 2 groups. Results ① The nutritional indexes. Compared with before treatment, the body mass index (BMI), white blood cell count, serum albumin level, serum albumin level, and total lymphocyte count at 1 week and 2 weeks after treatment improved (P<0.05). At the same time point (before treatment, 1 week after treatment, and 2 weeks after treatment), there was no significant in the BMI, white blood cell count, serum albumin level, serum albumin level, and total lymphocyte count between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ② Other related indexes. The anal exhaust time, defecation time, and hospital stay of the patients in the combined nutrition group were shorter than those of enteral nutrition group, and the cost of treatment in combined nutrition group was less than that of the enteral nutrition group (P<0.05). ③ Morbidity. There was no significant difference in the total morbidity between the combined nutrition group〔11.4% (4/35)〕 and enteral nutrition group 〔20.0% (7/35)〕,P>0.05. Conclusion Total enteral nutrition and enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy both can obtain well curative effect, but enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition can make the patients recover faster with lower cost, which is suitable for promotion.
Objective To investigate the influence on the postoperative recovery for giving either total parenteral nutrition （TPN） or early enteral nutrition (EEN) to patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy. Methods Eighty-six patients with gastric cancer undergone total gastrectomy were divided into TPN group (n=31) and EEN group (n=55). Patients in TPN group received TPN support via vena cava (internal jugular vein or subclavian vein), while patients in EEN group received early feeding through the naso-intestinal tube, which was placed during operation, and volume of enteral nutrition (fresubin) was increased daily, full enteral nutrition was expected on day 3-5. Nutrition status after operation, postoperative plasma albumin (Alb), the time of passing gas or stool, the time of oral intake, hospital stay and any postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results There were no significant differences between two groups (Pgt;0.05) in postoperative plasma Alb level, the time of passing gas or stool, postoperative complications rate or hospital stay. However, in the TPN group, the time of oral intake was shorter than that in EEN group (P=0.004). Conclusions Both TPN and EEN are the suitable nutritional methods for patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy, and with no detectable difference. For patients with high risk, such as severe malnutrition, naso-intestinal tube should be placed for EEN.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early enteral nutrition (EN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, CNKI were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about EN versus TPN after PD published from 2000 to March 2010. The quality of the included trials was assessed according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, and the data were extracted and analyzed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 322 PD patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that the EN (the treatment group) was superior to the TPN (the control group) in the average postoperative hospital stay (MD= –2.34, 95%CI –3.91 to –0.77, Plt;0.05), the total incidence rate of complication (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.99, P=0.04), the recovery time of enterocinesia (MD= –29.87, 95%CI –33.01 to –26.73, Plt;0.05) and the nutrition costs (MD= –30.51, 95%CI –35.78 to –25.24, Plt;0.05); there were no differences in mortality (RR=0.23, 95%CI 0.03 to 2.03, P=0.19), pancreatic leakage (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.45 to 1.35, P=0.38), infectious complications (RR=0.71, 95%CI 0.43 to 1.18, P=0.19), non-infectious complications (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.5 1 to 1.20, P=0.26) and postoperative serum albumin level (MD= –0.79, 95%CI –2.84 to 1.27, P=0.45). Conclusion Compared with total parenteral nutrition, the enteral nutrition used earlier after pancreatoduodenectomy shows significant advantages. But more reasonably-designed and double blind RCTs with large scale are expected to provide high quality proof.
Thirty two surgical patients with liver disease (hepatocelluar carcinoma 16, liver cirrhosis 8, obstructive jaundice 8) were studied. All of them were randomly divided into three groups for administration of different kinds of TPN during the postoperative period [group Ⅰ (TPN without fat emulsion), group Ⅱ (TPN with fat emulsion, 1g/kg body weight/day of fat), group Ⅲ (TPN with fat emulsion 2g/kg body weight/day of fat )]. Their liver function test, glucose, lipid metabolism were examined and compared during the period of TPN. Result: ①TB, ALT and AST decreased in group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ (Plt;0.05), but increased in group Ⅰ (Plt;0.05). ②The blood glucose and insulin levels were normal in group Ⅱ and groupⅢ, but showed hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in group Ⅰ (Plt;0.05). ③The serum lipid, lipoprotein, apoliprotein level and LCAT activity returned to normal 6 days after operation in group Ⅱ (Plt;0.05), but not in group Ⅰ and groupⅢ (Plt;0.05). Conclusion: ①TPN with fat emulsion for surgical patients with liver disease can make more improvement on hepatic functions than TPN without fat emulsion. ②1g/kg body weight/day of fat dosage may be suitable for the patients during the period of postoperative TPN.
Objective To research the effects of recombinant growth hormone (rhGH) with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) on nitrogen balance and nutritional state of the patients following major abdominal surgery. Methods We randomly selected 45 patients receiving TPN after major abdominal surgery and distributed them to study group (rhGH+TPN, n＝30) and control group (TPN only, n＝15). For 7 days after operation, every one was given rhGH 4u or replaced by hypodermic injection of normal saline (control group). Results TPN+rhGH promoted the rehabilitant of nitrogen balance, heightened the level of plasma albumin and transferrin and increased the weight and creatinin/height index (CHI), but the thickness of triceps skin fold (TSF) had no significant change in patients following major abdominal surgery. Conclusion The rhGH can improve the effects of TPN.
To study the effects of arginine supplementation in total parenteral nutrition (TPN) on lymphocytic immune function in postoperative patients with gastric cancer. Thirty six patients with gastric cancer receiving TPN were eligible for entry into randomized and prospective clinical trial of the study. T cell subsets, NK cell activity, plasma IL-2 content and peripheral blood CD25 were measured in before and after parenteral nutrition of the patients. Results: usual TPN could not improve lymphocytic immunosuppression of postoperative patients with gastric cancer. The patients receiving arginine supplementation in TPN might enhance lymphocytic immune function by increasing CD4 level, IL-2 production and NK cell activity, but there was no significant effect of arginine on CD25 expression. Conclusion: there are some effects of supplement with arginine on releasing of the cellular immunosuppression and restoring of lymphocytic immune function.
Objective To promote the clinical application of parenteral and enteral nutrition preparations in hospitalized patients. Methods Domestic and foreign articles about parenteral and enteral nutrition support were enrolled to make a review. Results Nowadays, parenteral and enteral nutrition played an important role in the medical treatment of perioperative and critically ill patients. Rational nutrition support could improve the condition of patients with nutritional risk and result in better clinical outcomes. Different enteral nutrition formulations should be used according to the diseases. Supplementally parenteral nutrition may also be useful in combination with enteral nutrition to reach the required intake targets. We should pay attention to the application of glucose, lipid emulsion, amino acids, vitamins, and so on, when performed parenteral nutrition support. Conclusion It is necessary to standardize parenteral and enteral nutrition support in the work of clinical practice, including the application of nutrition support and selection of nutrition preparations.
Methods Sixty-six postoperative patients with gastric cancer combined diabetes were divided into 3 groups according to the balanced principle. In the frist group (FD group), FD was the nutrition preparation for 21 patients. In the second group (fresubin group), fresubin and the ordinary insulin injection were the nutrition preparation for 21 patients. In the third group (TPN group), the nutrition preparation came from TPN and the ordinary insulin injection for 24 patients. FD, fresubin or TPN were given at 24 h after operation, the levels of blood glucose for empty stomach, after meal (enteral nutrition or TPN) and the common complications compared among 3 groups of postoperative patients. Results ① In FD group, the levels of blood glucose of postoperative empty stomach and after enteral nutrition were stable with little fluctuation and no insulin was needed with 1 case of hyperglycemia (4.8%). In fresubin group and TPN group, the levels of blood glucose of postoperative empty stomach and after enteral nutrition or TPN were unstable with big fluctuation, with 6 cases (28.6%) and 8 cases (33.3%) of hyperglycemia, 5 cases (23.8%) and 6 cases (25.0%) of hypoglycemia in fresubin group and TPN group, respectively. Compared with fresubin group and TPN group, the rate of pathoglycemia was lower in FD group, the difference had statistical significance separately (Plt;0.05); There was no significant difference between fresubin group and TPN group (Pgt;0.05). ② The rates of infection of incisional wound in FD group (4.8%) and fresubin group (23.8%) were lower than that of TPN group (33.3%), there was significant difference among 3 groups (Plt;0.05); The time of passage of gas by anus in FD group and fresubin group were shorter than that in TPN group (Plt;0.05); There was no significant difference between FD group and fresubin group (Pgt;0.05). There were no significant differences of the rates of abdominal distension or diarrhea among 3 groups (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion Regarding postoperative patients with gastric cancer combined diabetes, in the early time field test group of the nutrition preparation, FD is better than fresubin or TPN, which does not increase the risk of the blood glucose change and have few complications.
ObjectiveTo explore influence of different nutritional approaches on liver function in patients after esophagectomy. MethodsA total of 160 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent surgical treatment were divided into a enteral nutrition (EN) group and a total parenteral nutrition (TPN) group according to different medical staff. There were 80 patients in each group. Two and 7 days postoperatively, albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and total bilirubin (TB) of the 2 groups were examined to evaluate liver function. ResultsAbnormities in liver function (ALB, PA, ALT, TB) was common phenomenon in esophageal cancer patients, but there was no statistical difference in ALB, PA, ALT, TB on the 2nd postoperative day between the EN group and the TPN group (P > 0.05). On the 7th postoperative day, liver functions were improved than those on the 2nd postoperative day in the two groups. And frequencies of liver function abnormity in the EN group were significantly lower than those in the TNP group (P < 0.05). ConclusionCompared with TPN, EN has advantages in facilitating hepatic protein synthesis and recovery of liver function after esophagectomy.