Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of early enteral nutrition (EN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, CNKI were electronically searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about EN versus TPN after PD published from 2000 to March 2010. The quality of the included trials was assessed according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, and the data were extracted and analyzed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 4 RCTs involving 322 PD patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that the EN (the treatment group) was superior to the TPN (the control group) in the average postoperative hospital stay (MD= –2.34, 95%CI –3.91 to –0.77, Plt;0.05), the total incidence rate of complication (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.99, P=0.04), the recovery time of enterocinesia (MD= –29.87, 95%CI –33.01 to –26.73, Plt;0.05) and the nutrition costs (MD= –30.51, 95%CI –35.78 to –25.24, Plt;0.05); there were no differences in mortality (RR=0.23, 95%CI 0.03 to 2.03, P=0.19), pancreatic leakage (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.45 to 1.35, P=0.38), infectious complications (RR=0.71, 95%CI 0.43 to 1.18, P=0.19), non-infectious complications (RR=0.78, 95%CI 0.5 1 to 1.20, P=0.26) and postoperative serum albumin level (MD= –0.79, 95%CI –2.84 to 1.27, P=0.45). Conclusion Compared with total parenteral nutrition, the enteral nutrition used earlier after pancreatoduodenectomy shows significant advantages. But more reasonably-designed and double blind RCTs with large scale are expected to provide high quality proof.
Malnutrition is directly related to the outcomes of critically ill children. Providing ideal nutritional treatment can reduce the high catabolic state caused by the critically ill, reduce oxidative damage and regulate immune response, then improving clinical prognosis. Optimized nutritional supply for critically ill children has been transformed from auxiliary support to one of the important treatment methods. Enteral nutrition is the preferred way to provide nutrition, but parenteral nutrition is the only method of supplement and replacement when the supply of enteral nutrition is insufficient or deficient. This article reviews the timing of parenteral nutrition initiation, protein and amino acids in parenteral nutrition, the mechanism of possible adverse effects in early parenteral nutrition, and issues related to parenteral nutrition in premature infants, in order to help clinicians in pediatric intensive care unit improve the evaluation and management of parenteral nutrition use.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of total enteral nutrition (TEN) versus total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Methods The databases such as Pubmed (1996 to June 2011), EMbase (1984 to June 2011), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials of The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2011) and CBM (1978 to June 2011) were electronically searched, and the relevant references of the included papers were also manually searched. Two reviewers independently screened the trials according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodology quality. Meta-analyses were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.1 software. Results Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 379 patients with SAP were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with TPN, TEN could significantly reduce the risk of mortality (RR=0.33, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.55, Plt;0.000 1), pancreatitis-related infections (RR=0.35, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.50, Plt;0.000 01), required rate of surgical intervention (RR=0.43, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.82, P=0.01), and incidence of multiple organ failure (MOF) (RR=0.28, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.46, Plt;0.000 01). There was no significant difference in the nutrition strategies associated complications between TPN and TEN (RR=1.16, 95%CI 0.42 to 3.22, P=0.78). Conclusion Meta-analyses show that compared with TPN, TEN can reduce the risk of mortality, pancreatitis-related infections, required rate of surgical intervention, and incidence of MOF; and it will not increase the nutrition strategies associated complications. Consequently, TEN should be considered a better choice for SAP patients as early as possible.
Objective To research the effects of recombinant growth hormone (rhGH) with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) on nitrogen balance and nutritional state of the patients following major abdominal surgery. Methods We randomly selected 45 patients receiving TPN after major abdominal surgery and distributed them to study group (rhGH+TPN, n＝30) and control group (TPN only, n＝15). For 7 days after operation, every one was given rhGH 4u or replaced by hypodermic injection of normal saline (control group). Results TPN+rhGH promoted the rehabilitant of nitrogen balance, heightened the level of plasma albumin and transferrin and increased the weight and creatinin/height index (CHI), but the thickness of triceps skin fold (TSF) had no significant change in patients following major abdominal surgery. Conclusion The rhGH can improve the effects of TPN.
Objective To investigate the influence on the postoperative recovery for giving either total parenteral nutrition （TPN） or early enteral nutrition (EEN) to patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy. Methods Eighty-six patients with gastric cancer undergone total gastrectomy were divided into TPN group (n=31) and EEN group (n=55). Patients in TPN group received TPN support via vena cava (internal jugular vein or subclavian vein), while patients in EEN group received early feeding through the naso-intestinal tube, which was placed during operation, and volume of enteral nutrition (fresubin) was increased daily, full enteral nutrition was expected on day 3-5. Nutrition status after operation, postoperative plasma albumin (Alb), the time of passing gas or stool, the time of oral intake, hospital stay and any postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results There were no significant differences between two groups (Pgt;0.05) in postoperative plasma Alb level, the time of passing gas or stool, postoperative complications rate or hospital stay. However, in the TPN group, the time of oral intake was shorter than that in EEN group (P=0.004). Conclusions Both TPN and EEN are the suitable nutritional methods for patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy, and with no detectable difference. For patients with high risk, such as severe malnutrition, naso-intestinal tube should be placed for EEN.
Objective To promote the clinical application of parenteral and enteral nutrition preparations in hospitalized patients. Methods Domestic and foreign articles about parenteral and enteral nutrition support were enrolled to make a review. Results Nowadays, parenteral and enteral nutrition played an important role in the medical treatment of perioperative and critically ill patients. Rational nutrition support could improve the condition of patients with nutritional risk and result in better clinical outcomes. Different enteral nutrition formulations should be used according to the diseases. Supplementally parenteral nutrition may also be useful in combination with enteral nutrition to reach the required intake targets. We should pay attention to the application of glucose, lipid emulsion, amino acids, vitamins, and so on, when performed parenteral nutrition support. Conclusion It is necessary to standardize parenteral and enteral nutrition support in the work of clinical practice, including the application of nutrition support and selection of nutrition preparations.
ObjectiveTo study the protective effect of hepatocyte growth factor(HGF) on grafted mucous membrane of transplanted small bowel.MethodsTotal small bowel transplantation was made in inbred Wistar (RT1k) rats heterotopically,either total parenteral nutrition (control group,n=10) or hepatocyte growth factor supplemented TPN (HGF group,n=10) was given to the recipients from the 2nd day to the 10th day postoperatively. Morphological parameters of the transplanted intestinal mucosa, such as mucosal villous height, villous width, crypt depth, mucosal thickness and villous surface area were observed. Variation of ultrastructure of transplanted epithelial cells was observed. Composition of mucosal protein and DNA content were tested. ResultsComparison between HGF group and the control group were as follows. Mucosal villous height (298.79±22.31） μm vs （176.45±14.62） μm, P=0.001, villous width (107.46±12.34） μm vs （74.20±16.85） μm, P=0.004, crypt depth (104.56±11.17） μm vs （74.45±8.34） μm, P=0.000 5, mucosal thickness (409.53±35.83） μm vs （259.38±24.65） μm, P=0.003, and villous surface area (0.101±0.011) mm2 vs (0.041±0.005) mm2, P=0.001 were found significantly increased in HGF group compared with control group, there were no obvious difference decrease as compared to pretransplant parameters.Mucosal protein composition was higher in HGF group than that in control group （89.65±9.28) mg/g wet wt vs (53.73±11.45) mg/g wet wt, P=0.012, baseline (92.64±10.52) mg/g wet wt, nearly equal to baseline; DNA composition was also high in HGF group （0.89±0.09) mg/g wet wt vs (0.51±0.06) mg/g wet wt, P=0.008, baseline (0.91±0.09) mg/g wet wt. Nearly normal ultrastructure of the graft was maintained in HGF group, atrophied microvilli and broken mitochondrial crista were observed in control group.ConclusionHepatocyte growth factor can improve mucosal structure, preserve enterocyte ultrastructure of isograft after small bowel transplantation in rat.
ObjectiveTo explore influence of different nutritional approaches on liver function in patients after esophagectomy. MethodsA total of 160 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent surgical treatment were divided into a enteral nutrition (EN) group and a total parenteral nutrition (TPN) group according to different medical staff. There were 80 patients in each group. Two and 7 days postoperatively, albumin (ALB), prealbumin (PA), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and total bilirubin (TB) of the 2 groups were examined to evaluate liver function. ResultsAbnormities in liver function (ALB, PA, ALT, TB) was common phenomenon in esophageal cancer patients, but there was no statistical difference in ALB, PA, ALT, TB on the 2nd postoperative day between the EN group and the TPN group (P > 0.05). On the 7th postoperative day, liver functions were improved than those on the 2nd postoperative day in the two groups. And frequencies of liver function abnormity in the EN group were significantly lower than those in the TNP group (P < 0.05). ConclusionCompared with TPN, EN has advantages in facilitating hepatic protein synthesis and recovery of liver function after esophagectomy.
Thirty two surgical patients with liver disease (hepatocelluar carcinoma 16, liver cirrhosis 8, obstructive jaundice 8) were studied. All of them were randomly divided into three groups for administration of different kinds of TPN during the postoperative period [group Ⅰ (TPN without fat emulsion), group Ⅱ (TPN with fat emulsion, 1g/kg body weight/day of fat), group Ⅲ (TPN with fat emulsion 2g/kg body weight/day of fat )]. Their liver function test, glucose, lipid metabolism were examined and compared during the period of TPN. Result: ①TB, ALT and AST decreased in group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ (Plt;0.05), but increased in group Ⅰ (Plt;0.05). ②The blood glucose and insulin levels were normal in group Ⅱ and groupⅢ, but showed hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in group Ⅰ (Plt;0.05). ③The serum lipid, lipoprotein, apoliprotein level and LCAT activity returned to normal 6 days after operation in group Ⅱ (Plt;0.05), but not in group Ⅰ and groupⅢ (Plt;0.05). Conclusion: ①TPN with fat emulsion for surgical patients with liver disease can make more improvement on hepatic functions than TPN without fat emulsion. ②1g/kg body weight/day of fat dosage may be suitable for the patients during the period of postoperative TPN.
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between total enteral nutrition and enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods A total of 70 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from July 2012 to July 2015 were collected prospectively, and all patients were divided into 2 groups randomly: enteral nutrition group and combined nutrition group. Patients in enteral nutrition group received total enteral nutrition, and patients in combined nutrition group received enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition. Compared the nutritional indicators, other related indexes, and morbidity between the 2 groups. Results ① The nutritional indexes. Compared with before treatment, the body mass index (BMI), white blood cell count, serum albumin level, serum albumin level, and total lymphocyte count at 1 week and 2 weeks after treatment improved (P<0.05). At the same time point (before treatment, 1 week after treatment, and 2 weeks after treatment), there was no significant in the BMI, white blood cell count, serum albumin level, serum albumin level, and total lymphocyte count between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ② Other related indexes. The anal exhaust time, defecation time, and hospital stay of the patients in the combined nutrition group were shorter than those of enteral nutrition group, and the cost of treatment in combined nutrition group was less than that of the enteral nutrition group (P<0.05). ③ Morbidity. There was no significant difference in the total morbidity between the combined nutrition group〔11.4% (4/35)〕 and enteral nutrition group 〔20.0% (7/35)〕,P>0.05. Conclusion Total enteral nutrition and enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy both can obtain well curative effect, but enteral nutrition combined with parenteral nutrition can make the patients recover faster with lower cost, which is suitable for promotion.